Section_L_Attachment_1_and_2.docx

SECTION L ATTACHMENT 1

CPARS UPDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

The information in this questionnaire is being requested as part of a proposal response to Solicitation Number: N68335-19-R-0226. Please include this form(s) with proposal submission.

If the last CPAR on the contract identified in 2.0 was completed more than 6 months prior to the receipt of this questionnaire, please complete the questionnaire below.

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

*If possible, this questionnaire should be completed by the Program Manager.

3. SCOPE OF WORK CHANGE

Has the scope of work significantly changed since the past CPAR? (YES or NO)

YES_____ Please explain; (For Example; during the last CPAR period, the contractor was primarily doing design work, but now the program has entered into the testing phase).

NO______ Current work is similar to last CPARS efforts.

4. PAST PERFORMANCE UPDATE

Have there been any significant changes in contact performance between your last CPAR and now?

Yes_____ Please explain; 1) for any previous Yellow or Red rating, has the contractor exhibited demonstrated systemic improvements that perhaps would be reflected in a different rating on your next CPAR. Or 2) contractor schedule performance has declined significantly from last CPAR report period, e.g., was a Green and might become Yellow or Red on next CPAR.

NO______

SECTION L ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The information in this questionnaire is being requested as part of a proposal response to Solicitation Number: N6833519R0226. If applicable, please include with proposal submission.

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

b. Please check those activities which are applicable to your program.

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets and exceeds many contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets and exceeds some contractual. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4.2 QUESTIONS

4.2.1: TECHNICAL DESIGN, TEST AND LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of technical design, test or logistics performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these problems or strengths?

c. Have corrective actions been taken and have they been effective?

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.2: SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

c. Have corrective actions been taken and have they been effective?

d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated _________________.

4.2.3: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT

a. To what extent does the contractor identify and apply resources to meet program requirements and communicate appropriate information in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor’s risk management practices (identify and mitigate risks)?

c. If applicable, identify and provide information on the contractor’s ability to transition from design to test phases of an effort, and/or from test to manufacturing.

d. Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated____________________.

4.2.4. OTHER. Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain.

4.3 SUMMARY: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one), 1) definitely would not, 2) probably would not, 3) might, 4) might not, 5) probably would, 6) definitely would award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Please explain.