Attachment 4.doc

DOC document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Material Handling Equipment Maintenance Service
Solicitation number
N68335-11-R-0030
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions-Answers-3.doc DOC document
Questions-Answers-2.doc DOC document
Questions-Answers.doc DOC document
MHE.xls XLS spreadsheet
FORKLIFT BATTERY CHARGERS.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 3.doc DOC document
SOW-MHE.doc DOC document
CDRL A001 -MHE.doc DOC document
CDRL A002 -MHE.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4

Present/Past Performance Evaluation Form

1.Contractor:

2.Customer:

3.Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

4.Contract Type: Negotiated______________

Sealed Bid_________________

Fixed Price_______________ Cost Reimbursement________________

IDIQ____________________

Other____________________________

5.Complexity of Work: Difficult_____________ Routine:____________________

Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate performance risk rating for each category.

Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Highly Satisfactory, Outstanding (Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, Quality Awards)

Comments:

Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed)

Comments:

Business Professionalism: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, response to customer inquiries, problem resolution time and efficiency.)

Comments:

Customer Satisfaction: Rating:

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, satisfaction of customers with the Contractor’s service)

Comments:

Would you select this firm again? Please explain.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .