Attachment 4.doc
DOC document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Material Handling Equipment Maintenance Service
- Solicitation number
- N68335-11-R-0030
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions-Answers-3.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions-Answers-2.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions-Answers.doc | DOC document | |
| MHE.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| FORKLIFT BATTERY CHARGERS.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3.doc | DOC document | |
| SOW-MHE.doc | DOC document | |
| CDRL A001 -MHE.doc | DOC document | |
| CDRL A002 -MHE.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4
Present/Past Performance Evaluation Form
1.Contractor:
2.Customer:
3.Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
4.Contract Type: Negotiated______________
Sealed Bid_________________
Fixed Price_______________ Cost Reimbursement________________
IDIQ____________________
Other____________________________
5.Complexity of Work: Difficult_____________ Routine:____________________
Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate performance risk rating for each category.
Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Highly Satisfactory, Outstanding (Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, Quality Awards)
Comments:
Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed)
Comments:
Business Professionalism: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, response to customer inquiries, problem resolution time and efficiency.)
Comments:
Customer Satisfaction: Rating:
Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, satisfaction of customers with the Contractor’s service)
Comments:
Would you select this firm again? Please explain.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .