FOUO_C04.0_N4523A19R1302.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 10:00 AM local time 21 Oct 2019

X

A X B X C X D

EX

X

G F 87 - 91

92 - 102 X H 103 - 104 dylan.ford@navy.mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

DX 1 104

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N4523A 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 0 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and

N/A conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

DYLAN FORD 360-476-4452

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

2 - 12

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

13 - 26

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

29 - 31

X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 32 - 35 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 36 - 39 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

40 - 85

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD CODE 400

1400 FARRAGUT

CONTRACTING CODE 440

BREMERTON WA 98314

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

19 Sep 2019

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N4523A19R1302

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN

Number

1 Job

Encoder Preliminary Design

FFP

Curtiss-Wright EMD will perform the Design of Encoder in accordance to the Performance Work Statement 6.2. Design approval required at PDR (180 days after award date). Encoder design shall meet all PWS requirements including PWS 5.

Design, Technical and Performance Requirements.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: AC33

NET AMT

Exhibit A CDRL A001

FFP

0Complete CDRL A001 as required in Exhibit A.

OPTION Encoder Critical Design

FFP

Critical Design Review IAW PWS 6.3; Encoder design shall meet all PWS requirements including PWS 5. Design, Technical and Performance Requirements.

Government Acceptance of Final Rotary Position Sensor Encoders Design 310 days from date of contract award.

OPTION Exhibit B CDRL A002

FFP

Complete CDRL A002 as required in Exhibit B.

OPTION Encoder First Article Testing

FFP

Curtiss-Wright EMD shall conduct Encoder First Article Testing in accordance with Performance Work Statement 6.4. First Article shall be redesigned as necessary based upon First Article Test results to conform to PWS paragraph 5 requirements. Final delivery of accepted First Article 470 days from date of contract award.

OPTION Exhibit C CDRL A003

FFP

Complete CDRL A003 as required in Exhibit C.

Total Price Base Without Options (CLIN’s 0001 & 0002)

Total Price For Base and All Options

(CLIN’s 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, & 0006)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

252.215-7009 PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST (JAN 2014)

The offeror shall complete the following checklist, providing location of requested information, or an explanation of why the requested information is not provided. In preparation of the offeror's checklist, offerors may elect to have their prospective subcontractors use the same or similar checklist as appropriate.

PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST

REFERENCES

SUBMISSION

ITEM

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided EXPLAIN (may use continuation pages)

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section I Paragraph A

Is there a properly completed first page of the proposal per FAR 15.408 Table 15-2 I.A or as specified in the solicitation?

2. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph A(7)

Does the proposal identify the need for Government-furnished material/tooling/test equipment? Include the accountable contract number and contracting officer contact information if known.

N/A

No GFP/GFM provided for in

Solicitation

3. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section I Paragraph A(8)

Does the proposal identify and explain notifications of noncompliance with Cost Accounting Standards Board or Cost Accounting Standards (CAS); any proposal inconsistencies with your disclosed practices or applicable CAS; and inconsistencies with your established estimating and accounting principles and procedures?

4. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section I, Paragraph C(1)

Does the proposal disclose any other known activity that could materially impact the costs?

This may include, but is not limited to, such

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided EXPLAIN (may use continuation pages)

FAR 2.101, “Cost or pricing data” factors as—

(1) Vendor quotations;

(2) Nonrecurring costs;

(3) Information on changes in production methods and in production or purchasing volume;

(4) Data supporting projections of business prospects and objectives and related operations costs;

(5) Unit-cost trends such as those associated with labor efficiency;

(6) Make-or-buy decisions;

(7) Estimated resources to attain business goals; and

(8) Information on management decisions that could have a significant bearing on costs.

5. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph B

Is an Index of all certified cost or pricing data and information accompanying or identified in the proposal provided and appropriately referenced?

6. FAR 15.403-1(b) Are there any exceptions to submission of certified cost or pricing data pursuant to FAR 15.403-1(b)? If so, is supporting documentation included in the proposal?

(Note questions 18-20.)

7. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph C(2)(i)

Does the proposal disclose the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the estimate, including those used in projecting from known data?

8. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph C(2)(ii)

Does the proposal disclose the nature and amount of any contingencies included in the proposed price?

9. FAR 15.408 Table 15- 2, Section II, Paragraph A or B

Does the proposal explain the basis of all cost estimating relationships (labor hours or material) proposed on other than a discrete basis?

10. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraphs D and E

Is there a summary of total cost by element of cost and are the elements of cost cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data? (Breakdowns for each cost element

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided EXPLAIN (may use continuation pages) must be consistent with your cost accounting system, including breakdown by year.)

11. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section I Paragraphs D and E

If more than one Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) or sub Contract Line Item Number (sub-CLIN) is proposed as required by the RFP, are there summary total amounts covering all line items for each element of cost and is it cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data?

12. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph F

Does the proposal identify any incurred costs for work performed before the submission of the proposal?

13. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph G

Is there a Government forward pricing rate agreement (FPRA)? If so, the offeror shall identify the official submittal of such rate and factor data. If not, does the proposal include all rates and factors by year that are utilized in the development of the proposal and the basis for those rates and factors?

Provide most recent FPRA or FPRP information in Proposal.

COST ELEMENTS

MATERIALS AND SERVICES

14. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph A

Does the proposal include a consolidated summary of individual material and services, frequently referred to as a Consolidated Bill of Material (CBOM), to include the basis for pricing? The offeror’s consolidated summary shall include raw materials, parts, components, assemblies, subcontracts and services to be produced or performed by others, identifying as a minimum the item, source, quantity, and price.

SUBCONTRACTS (Purchased materials or services)

15. DFARS 215.404-3 Has the offeror identified in the proposal those subcontractor proposals, for which the contracting officer has initiated or may need to request field pricing analysis?

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided EXPLAIN (may use continuation pages)

16. FAR 15.404-3(c)

FAR 52.244-2

Per the thresholds of FAR 15.404-3(c), Subcontract Pricing Considerations, does the proposal include a copy of the applicable subcontractor’s certified cost or pricing data?

17. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Note 1;

Section II Paragraph A

Is there a price/cost analysis establishing the reasonableness of each of the proposed subcontracts included with the proposal?

If the offeror’s price/cost analyses are not provided with the proposal, does the proposal include a matrix identifying dates for receipt of subcontractor proposal, completion of fact finding for purposes of price/cost analysis, and submission of the price/cost analysis?

EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA

18. FAR 52.215-20

FAR 2.101,

“commercial item”

Has the offeror submitted an exception to the submission of certified cost or pricing data for commercial items proposed either at the prime or subcontractor level, in accordance with provision 52.215-20?

a. Has the offeror specifically identified the type of commercial item claim (FAR

2.101 commercial item definition, paragraphs (1) through (8)), and the basis on which the item meets the definition?

b. For modified commercial items (FAR

2.101 commercial item definition paragraph (3)); did the offeror classify the modification(s) as either—

i. A modification of a type customarily available in the commercial marketplace (paragraph (3)(i)); or

ii. A minor modification (paragraph (3)(ii)) of a type not customarily available in the commercial marketplace made to meet Federal Government requirements not exceeding the thresholds in FAR 15.403- 1(c)(3)(iii)(B)?

c. For proposed commercial items “of a type”, or “evolved” or modified (FAR 2.101 commercial item definition paragraphs (1) through (3)), did the contractor provide a technical description of the differences between the proposed item and the comparison item(s)?

This is a noncommercial Item.

This solicitation is for a Development item as defined by

FAR 35.001.

19. [Reserved]

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided EXPLAIN (may use continuation pages)

20. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph A(1)

Does the proposal support the degree of competition and the basis for establishing the source and reasonableness of price for each subcontract or purchase order priced on a competitive basis exceeding the threshold for certified cost or pricing data?

INTERORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFERS

21. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph A.(2)

For inter-organizational transfers proposed at cost, does the proposal include a complete cost proposal in compliance with Table 15- 2?

22. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph A(1)

For inter-organizational transfers proposed at price in accordance with FAR 31.205- 26(e), does the proposal provide an analysis by the prime that supports the exception from certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1?

DIRECT LABOR

23. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph B

Does the proposal include a time phased (i.e.; monthly, quarterly) breakdown of labor hours, rates and costs by category or skill level? If labor is the allocation base for indirect costs, the labor cost must be summarized in order that the applicable overhead rate can be applied.

24. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph B

For labor Basis of Estimates (BOEs), does the proposal include labor categories, labor hours, and task descriptions, (e.g.; Statement of Work reference, applicable CLIN, Work Breakdown Structure, rationale for estimate, applicable history, and time-phasing)?

25. FAR subpart 22.10 If covered by the Service Contract Labor Standards statute (41 U.S.C. chapter 67), are the rates in the proposal in compliance with the minimum rates specified in the statute?

INDIRECT COSTS

26. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph C

Does the proposal indicate the basis of estimate for proposed indirect costs and how they are applied? (Support for the indirect rates could consist of cost breakdowns, trends, and budgetary data.)

OTHER COSTS

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided EXPLAIN (may use continuation pages)

27. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph D

Does the proposal include other direct costs and the basis for pricing? If travel is included does the proposal include number of trips, number of people, number of days per trip, locations, and rates (e.g. airfare, per diem, hotel, car rental, etc)?

There is no requirement to include travel.

28. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph E

If royalties exceed $1,500 does the proposal provide the information/data identified by Table 15-2?

Contractor owns required data rights.

29.

FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph F

When facilities capital cost of money is proposed, does the proposal include submission of Form CASB-CMF or reference to an FPRA/FPRP and show the calculation of the proposed amount?

Clause 52.215-17

Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of

Money (Oct 1997) is included in this solicitation.

FORMATS FOR SUBMISSION OF LINE ITEM SUMMARIES

30. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section III

Are all cost element breakdowns provided using the applicable format prescribed in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 III? (or alternative format if specified in the request for proposal)

31. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section III Paragraph B

If the proposal is for a modification or change order, have cost of work deleted (credits) and cost of work added (debits) been provided in the format described in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.B?

This is not a modification or a change order.

32. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section III Paragraph C

For price revisions/redeterminations, does the proposal follow the format in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.C?

This is not a price revision or redetermination.

OTHER

33. FAR 16.4 If an incentive contract type, does the proposal include offeror proposed target cost, target profit or fee, share ratio, and, when applicable, minimum/maximum fee, ceiling price?

The anticipated contract type is a Firm Fixed Price

Development Contract with Options. See

Provision 52.216-1.

34. FAR 16.203-4 and

FAR

15.408 Table 15-2, If Economic Price Adjustments are being proposed, does the proposal show the rationale and application for the economic

Economic Price Adjustments are not being utilized

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided EXPLAIN (may use continuation pages)

Section II, Paragraphs A, B, C, and D price adjustment? within this Solicitation.

35.

FAR 52.232-28 If the offeror is proposing Performance- Based Payments did the offeror comply with

FAR 52.232-28?

Performance Based Payments are not being utilized.

36. FAR 15.408(n)

FAR 52.215-22

FAR 52.215-23

Excessive Pass-through Charges– Identification of Subcontract Effort: If the offeror intends to subcontract more than 70% of the total cost of work to be performed, does the proposal identify: (i) the amount of the offeror’s indirect costs and profit applicable to the work to be performed by the proposed subcontractor(s); and (ii) a description of the added value provided by the offeror as related to the work to be performed by the proposed subcontractor(s)?

(End of provision)

SUBMISSION CHECKLIST

Please use this submission checklist in conjunction with Provision 252.215-7009 Proposal Adequacy Checklist to ensure the offeror has submitted all required information.

Responsive Offer Submission Checklist Offeror's Initials of Items Included in

Submission

1. Completed SF 33 (Blocks 12 through 18; Block 12 must 1. ________________ be for a minimum of 120 days).

2. Signed Amendment(s) (if necessary) 2. ________________

3. Pricing for Base Item and Optional Items. (Completed CLINs) 3. ________________

4. Completed Provision 252.215-7009 Proposal Adequacy Checklist. 4. ________________

5. Certified Cost Data; See Attachment J-2 Instructions for Submitting 5. ________________ Cost/Price Proposals When Certified Cost or Pricing Data Are Required.

(Supporting documentation and information IAW Provision 252.215-7009).

6. Completed Attachment J-3 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data 6. ________________

(Include as cover to proposal) .

7. Submission of Attachment J-4 Encoder Cost Breakdown. 7. ________________

8. Submission of Performance Schedule for all three phases 8. ________________ IAW PWS paragraphs 6.2.2.10 & 6.2.4.4.3 and Section L Submission Requirements.

9. Representation and Certifications per FAR Clause 52.204-7. 9._________________

If your information is already in the System for Award Management at SAM – https://www.sam.gov, it may be submitted instead of completing this section.

10. Authority to Bind the Company 10.________________

Refer to FAR 4.102 (Contractors Signature) for required information.

11. Small Business Subcontracting Plan IAW C11.0 Letter 440-256 11.________________ Notice to Large Business Firms

12. Submission of Quality Management Plan to maintain 12.________________ quality within proposed Technical approach and proposed schedule.

Offeror shall submit offer to Contract Specialist via Email IAW Section L Submission Requirements. Offeror shall confirm receipt of offer with the Contract Specialist.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Ship/Activity: USS JIMMY CARTER SSN-23 Title: Design and First Article Testing of Rotary Encoders Place of Performance: Vendor Facility

1. PURPOSE:

1.1. To replace the existing Linear Variable Differential Transducer (LVDT) and mechanical linkage assembly with a Rotary Encoder with improved accuracy and position indication.

2. BACKGROUND:

2.1. In 2014, Curtiss-Wright Electrical Mechanical Division CW-EMD provided LVDT calibration technical assistance to PSNS in an attempt to improve the consistency and repeatability of the LVDT readouts of the Advance Secondary Propulsion System Rotary Deployment Mechanism (ASPS RDM).

This effort was successful, with a complete calibration of Rotary Deployment Mechanism (RDM) units #1 and #2 and greatly improved results of RDM unit #3. Upon completion of the on-site technical assistance, a tolerance stack-up analysis was done to determine the impact on the accuracy of the LVDT by clearances within the mechanical linkage and other RDM components. A report (PPDT-14-

012) was generated to quantify and summarize the findings of the analysis. It was found that the potential play in the mechanical linkage was a maximum angular error of 2.61 degrees at training angle +/- 205 degrees and 1.75 degrees at training angle of 0 degrees.

2.2. Based on PPDT-14-012, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS), Bremerton, WA tasked CW-EMD with a Rotary Encoder Feasibility Study under Contract N00406-15-D-5021. This study, PPDT-16-015, Rev. 0 dated 30 September 2016, determined it was feasible to replace the LVDT with custom rotary encoders that will meet or exceed the necessary technical requirements identified in the Study.

3. SCOPE:

3.1. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) requires the design, development, and first article testing of a Rotary Encoder to replace the currently installed LVDTs on the ASPS RDM. The LVDTs and associated mechanical linkage are part of the ASPS on the USS JIMMY CARTER (SSN 23). PSNS requests the vendor to provide services for design, development, and testing of a first article unit for a Rotary Encoder retrofit kit for the existing LVDT and mechanical linkage.

4. REFERENCES:

4.1. Feasibility Study PPDT-16-015, Rev. 0, dated 30 September 2016

4.2. MIL-DTL-901, Shock Tests, High-Impact

4.3. MIL-STD-461, Electromagnetic Emissions

4.4. ASME Y14.100, Engineering Drawing Practices

4.5. MIL-STD-31000, Detail Specification, Technical Data Packages

4.6. MIL-DTL-917, Detail Specification, Electric Power Equipment

4.7. MIL-HDBK-520, Systems Requirements Document Guidance

5. DESIGN, TECHNICAL, AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS:

5.1. Design, Technical, and Performance requirements for Rotatory Encoders are detailed below:

5.1.1. Angular range = 69 revolutions

5.1.1.1. The angle of the worm gear ranges from +205 degrees to – 205 degrees. There is a gear reduction between the worm gear and the work shaft of approximately 60:1, yielding 68.33 revolutions that the worm shaft rotates through. The Rotary Position Sensor Encoder shall interface with the worm shaft;

therefore, it must be capable of the same Maximum Angular Speed.

5.1.2. Maximum Angular Speed = 50 RPM

5.1.3. Have a tolerance of less than ±0.5 degrees over the full range of motion of the RDM training shaft.

5.1.4. Water Exposed Component Material = QQ-N-281 or QQ-N-286.

5.1.5. Material for all other components shall not degrade in performance over the entire temperature range (see 5.1.15) and meet pressure requirements (see 5.1.16) through minimizing the number of mechanical interfaces that are sealed. Aluminum and stainless steel materials are to be used. Control dissimilar material corrosion by application of a coating between the surfaces.

5.1.6. Capability to recall correct position following a power on/off cycle.

5.1.7. Unit Life = Minimum of 11.75 Years in above seawater environment (Desired Unit Life of 17 to 18 Years)

5.1.8. Not to Exceed the Rough Volume Envelope of the Removed LVD T.

5.1.9. Mount to the existing hole-pattern to provide a watertight seal against the gear cover

5.1.10. Utilize the same power supply as the removed LVDT (+15VDC at ~ 100ma and -15VDC at ~5mA)

5.1.11. Mate to the existing 4 wire connector (Part No. M24231/2-002) and utilize shipboard cabling to communicate with the encoder communication card.

5.1.12. The Rotary Position Sensor Encoders communication card shall be a form and fit replacement with the current DCM-1000. A test box will interface to the Rotary Position Sensor Encoder both directly at the Rotary Position Sensor Encoder and remotely from a port on the card to perform functional test and calibration procedures.

5.1.13. Pass shock testing per the requirements of 2.2, Grade A, Type A, Class II.

5.1.14. Contained within a single housing, manufactured from a single piece of painted Monel material, utilizing seals to prevent seawater and grease intrusion. Only the electrical connector and the Rotary Position Sensor Encoder housing shall be permitted to be exposed to seawater.

5.1.15. Shall operate in seawater at temperatures between 28° F and 85° F which contains salt, sand, and other foreign materials.

5.1.16. The housing shall be capable of withstanding ambient pressures of up to 1000 psi.

5.1.17. Contain EMI filters to meet requirements of 4.3, Part 6, regarding electromagnetic emission and susceptibility requirements for Class A5 equipment and subsystems.

5.1.18. Maintenance free over the lifetime of the unit. Removal of the unit would only require replacement of the main seals to prevent seawater and grease intrusion.

5.1.19. Provide a calibration procedure to verify correct signal outputs and provide the procedure to the Government as a deliverable to observe during calibration of installed operational testing.

5.1.20. Qualification testing shall include as a minimum of the following to verify compliance with the design requirements of this specification:

5.1.20.1. Visual Examination for conformance with this specification and Paragraph 4.5.1 of MIL-DTL-917.

5.1.20.2. Insulation Resistance testing in accordance with Paragraph 4.5.3 of MIL-DTL-917.

5.1.20.3. Hydrostatic Test at 1.5-time max pressure for one hour for any implodable Volumes.

5.1.20.4. Electromagnetic Interference per MIL-STD-461, Electromagnetic Emissions.

5.1.20.5. High Impact Shock per the requirements of MIL-DTL-901, Grade A, Type A, Class II.

5.1.20.6. Calibration procedure to verify accuracy over the complete range

5.1.20.7. Operating Test to verify operation of the rotary encoder from 205 to -205 degrees rotation of the RDM for 24 hours at max pressure.

5.1.21. The Government will retain limited data rights from the design and development of the Rotary Encoder kits.

5.2. Project Contracting Management Report

5.2.1. Contractor shall prepare and maintain a Contract Schedule in the form of a Microsoft project-planning chart/schedule. The schedule shall define all distinct work Items, duration (start/finish), and percent of work complete. Contractor shall maintain and submit to the Government a schedule for each individual Item issued during the term of this contract. These events shall include all phases of material procurement, sub-contracting, fabrication, shipping and inspection reports. The schedule shall be prepared by the 10th of each month following the exercising of any Item and continue until Item is completed. The Contract Schedule will also list any payment invoices processed in the reporting period. Additionally, the Schedule will address performance progress and assign risk management tracking identifiers for each Item in execution.

Performance Requirements Summary

Requirement Performance Standards Allowable Deviation

Phase 1 - Preliminary Design Review (PDR) (Para 6.2)

The Contractor shall provide all required PDR Deliverables (Para 6.2.3.1) following the delivery instructions, and include all required submittals with each delivery.

The contractor shall comply with all PWS (see Section 5) and PDR requirements (see Para 6.2) and communicate to the government if any of the required performance characteristics cannot be met by system at PDR. The government will determine on a case-by-case basis as to the acceptability of non-conforming supplies.

Phase 2 - Critical Design Review (CDR) (Para 6.3)

The Contractor shall provide all required CDR Deliverables (Para 6.3.3.1) following the delivery instructions, and include all required submittals with each delivery.

The contractor shall comply with all PWS (see Section 5) and CDR requirements (see Para 6.3) and communicate to the government if any of the required performance characteristics cannot be met by system at CDR. The government will determine on a case-by-case basis as to the acceptability of non-conforming supplies.

Phase 3 – First Article Development, Testing and final technical data package (Para 6.4)

The Contractor shall provide all required updates to any First article Deliverables prior to testing, this includes documents that are required to get updated due to testing.

The contractor shall comply with all PWS (see Section 5) and First Article requirements (see Para 6.4) and communicate to the government if any of the required performance characteristics cannot be met by system for first article testing. The government will determine on a case-by-case basis as to the acceptability of non-conforming supplies.

The Contractor shall provide all required test results from Visual Examination.

The Contractor shall provide all required test results from Insulation Resistance testing.

The Contractor shall provide all required test results from Hydrostatic Test.

The Contractor shall provide all required test results from Electromagnetic Interference testing.

The Contractor shall provide all required test results from High Impact Shock test

The Contractor shall provide all required results from Calibration procedure

The Contractor shall provide all required test results from Operating Test

6. CONTRACT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS:

6.1. Provide services to design and develop a first article Rotary Encoder and perform first article testing according to the recommendations of the encoder study as referenced in 2.1 and the design, technical, and performance requirements of Section 5. The required outcome will be the replacement of existing LVDTs and mechanical linkage with a Rotary Encoder with a tolerance of less than ±0.5 degrees over the full range from +205 degrees to – 205 degrees’ rotation of the RDM and minimal impact to existing equipment.

6.1.1. The services will be provided in three distinct phases and will follow the initial schedule listed in below table, based on a standard 5-day work schedule.

Phase Milestones & Deliverables Working Days After Award

Duration (days)

Preliminary Design

Contract award 0 0

PDR Documents 160 160

PDR 180 20

Post PDR Documents 190 10

Critical Design

(Option 1)

CDR Documents 280 90

CDR 300 20

Post CDR Documents 310 10 First

Article Testing

(Option 2)

First Article Documents 430 120

First Article Test 450 20

Post First Article Test Documents 470 20

6.2. Phase 1 - Preliminary Design Review (PDR) (CDRL A0001 – Preliminary Design Technical Data Package)

6.2.1. The PDR is a technical assessment establishing the physically allocated baseline to ensure that the system under review has a reasonable expectation of being judged operationally effective and suitable as to meeting the requirements in Section 5. This review assesses the allocated design documented in subsystem product specifications for each configuration item in the system and ensures that each function, in the functional baseline, has been allocated to one or more system configuration items. The PDR establishes the allocated baseline design and underlying architectures to ensure that the system under review has a reasonable expectation of satisfying the Technical, Requirements for the Rotary Encoders. (See Section 5).

6.2.2. PDR presentation and PDR documents prepared for assessment by Government shall be prepared IAW MIL-STD-31000 and ASME Y14.100 and at a minimum include all items listed below:

6.2.2.1. Systems Requirements Document (SRD) – Per MIL-HDBK-520

6.2.2.2. Requirements Verification Test Matrix (RVTM)

6.2.2.3. Hardware Design Document (HDD)

6.2.2.4. Test and Evaluation Plans for Qualification, Quality Conformance, Shock, EMI, and Vibration.

6.2.2.5. Preliminary Arrangement, Electrical, Printed Wire Assemblies, and Mechanical Drawings or models.

6.2.2.6. Preliminary Engineering Drawing Tree.

6.2.2.7. Preliminary Material list

6.2.2.8. All Hardware Configuration Items (HWCI)

6.2.2.9. Preliminary Calculations for shook, EMI, thermal, etc.

6.2.2.10. Preliminary Detailed Contract Schedule (with Milestones)

6.2.2.11. Preliminary Test and Evaluation procedures

6.2.2.12. Identification of outstanding issues with risk mitigation plan to resolve issues

6.2.2.13. Preliminary ILS Life Cycle plan for rotary encoder which will include Life Cycle Maintenance Requirements, PMS, Calibration and Maintenance instructions, and rough order of magnitude cost and hour estimate to Government for procurement of a Rotary Encoder Kit and repair of a Rotary Encoder Kit.

6.2.2.14. PDR Presentation

6.2.3. PDR Entrance Criteria

6.2.3.1. The following document listed in Table below shall in the below state to support approval of this phase prior to the presentation and delivered to PSNS.

PDR Deliverables

Performance Objective

Standard Performance Threshold

Method of Surveillance

Systems Requirements Document (SRD)

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Requirements Verification Test Matrix (RVTM)

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Hardware Design Document (HDD)

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Qualification Conformance Test Plans

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Quality Conformance Test Plan

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Shock Test Plan Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

EMI Test Plan Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Vibration Test Plan Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Preliminary Test and Evaluation procedures

75% Complete and submitted for review

60% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Preliminary 75% Complete and 60% Complete and 100 Percent

PDR Deliverables

Objective

Standard Performance Threshold

Method of Surveillance

Arrangement, Electrical, Printed Wire Assemblies, and Piping Drawings and models submitted for review submitted for review Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Preliminary Engineering Drawing Tree

75% Complete and submitted for review

60% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Preliminary Material Lists Identified

75% Complete and submitted for review

60% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

All Hardware Configuration Items

(HWCI)

Identified and submitted for review

90% Identified and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Preliminary Calculations

75% Complete and submitted for review

60% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Detailed Contract Schedule (with Milestones)

Established submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

Preliminary ILS Life Cycle plan for rotary encoder which will include Life Cycle Maintenance Requirements, PMS, Calibration and Maintenance instructions, and rough order of magnitude cost and hour estimate to Government for procurement of a Rotary Encoder Kit and repair of a Rotary Encoder Kit.

75% Complete and submitted for review

60% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

PDR Presentation Package complete & provided for review

Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Preliminary Design Package

6.2.4. PDR presentation Exit Criteria

6.2.4.1. Detailed Contract Schedule (with Milestones) Approved

6.2.4.2. Preliminary Design meets all Program requirements

6.2.4.3. Project Risks are known and are manageable

6.2.4.3.1. Identification of outstanding issues with risk mitigation plan to resolve issues

6.2.4.4. Deliverable format and schedule

6.2.4.4.1. Formatting, drawing standards, specification standards, cost estimates, quality control, and the content and format of the documents shall be in conformance with industry standards and work previously performed for the Government on projects of similar size, scope, and complexity.

6.2.4.4.2. The reports and tests shall be provided in an electronic medium (Microsoft Word, Microsoft Access, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat).

6.2.4.4.3. Schedule shall be provided in an electronic medium (Microsoft Project)

6.2.4.4.4. Drawing package models shall be provided in an electronic medium (i.e. Solid Edge or equivalent 3D CAD Software that can be imported into Solid Edge).

6.2.4.4.5. Drawing package drawings shall be provided in an electronic medium (i.e. AutoCAD or Adobe Acrobat).

Deliverable schedule

Deliverable Frequency # of Copies Medium / Format Submit To

PDR Documents 20 days prior to

PDR

presentation

1 original and 1 electronic copy

The Contractor shall use the following format for deliverables and provide on a DVD, CD, or through a secure share point site.

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Nial Moe, Code 126 1400 Farragut Bremerton WA 98314 360-627-5246

PDR read ahead presentation

10 days prior to

PDR

presentation

PDR presentation As scheduled In person at presentation

Final PDR presentation and Identification of outstanding issues with risk mitigation plan to resolve issues

10 days after

PDR

presentation

1 original and 1 electronic copy

The Contractor shall use the following format for deliverables and provide on a DVD, C h h

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Nial Moe, Code 126 1400 Farragut

6.2.4.4.6. All deliverables defined above shall be submitted for review and approval by the Government. The Government shall review and provide feedback on each document within two weeks of receipt of each deliverable. Government expectation is that all feedback shall be incorporated into the next iteration, if conflict between Government expectation and Contractor submittals both sides will hold a teleconference and resolve issues or establish common understanding of expectations in conformance with this performance work statement, the contract, and referenced documents. Acceptance of all deliverables shall be based on Government approval, and any rejected deliverables shall be revised and resubmitted for approval.

6.3. Phase 2 - Critical Design Review (CDR) (CDRL A0002 –Critical Design Technical Data Package)

6.3.1. The CDR is a multi-disciplined technical review verifying the product baseline to ensure that the system under review has a reasonable expectation of satisfying the requirements identified in Design, Technical, And Performance Requirements for the Rotary Encoders. (See Section 5). This review assesses the final design as captured in product specifications for each Configuration Item in the system and ensures that each product specification has been captured in detailed design documentation.

Product specifications for hardware enable the fabrication of configuration items, and include production drawings. The CDR evaluates the proposed Baseline documentation to determine if the system design documentation (Product Baseline, including Item Detail Specs, Material Specs, Process Specs) is satisfactory to start first article production. In addition, shall include Manufacture Timeframe to develop a Rotary Encoder Kit, Repair Timeframe for repair of a Rotary Encoder Kit, Rough order of magnitude Cost and Hour estimate to Government for procurement of a Rotary Encoder Kit.

6.3.2. CDR presentation and CDR documents prepared for assessment by Government shall be prepared IAW MIL-STD-31000 and ASME Y14.100 and at a minimum include all items listed below:

6.3.2.1. Any revision to Systems Requirements Document (SRD) since PDR

6.3.2.2. Any revision to Requirements Verification Test Matrix (RVTM) since PDR

6.3.2.3. Any revision to Hardware Design Document (HDD) since PDR

6.3.2.4. Any revision to Test and Evaluation Plans for Qualification, Quality Conformance, Shock, EMI, and Vibration. since PDR

6.3.2.5. Arrangement, Electrical, Printed Wire Assemblies, and Mechanical Drawings or models.

6.3.2.6. Engineering Drawing Tree.

6.3.2.7. Material list

6.3.2.8. All Hardware Configuration Items (HWCI)

6.3.2.9. Calculations for shock, EMI, thermal, etc.

6.3.2.10. Detailed Contract Schedule (with Milestones) revision

6.3.2.11. Test and Evaluation procedures

6.3.2.12. Identification of outstanding issues with risk mitigation plan to resolve issues

6.3.2.13. ILS Life Cycle plan for rotary encoder which will include Life Cycle Maintenance Requirements, PMS, Calibration and Maintenance instructions, and rough order of magnitude cost and hour estimate to Government for procurement of a Rotary Encoder Kit and repair of a Rotary Encoder Kit.

6.3.2.14. CDR Presentation

6.3.3. CDR Entrance Criteria

6.3.3.5. The following document listed in Table below shall in the below state to support approval of this phase prior to the presentation and delivered to PSNS.

CDR Deliverables

Objective

Standard Performance Threshold

Method of Surveillance

Systems Requirements Document (SRD) Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Requirements Verification Test Matrix (RVTM) Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Hardware Design Document (HDD) Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Qualification Conformance Test Plans Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Quality Conformance Test Plan Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

CDR Deliverables

Objective

Standard Performance Threshold

Method of Surveillance

Shock Test Plan Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

EMI Test Plan Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Vibration Test Plan Revision

Complete and submitted for approval

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Test and Evaluation procedures

Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Final Arrangement, Electrical, Printed Wire Assemblies, and Piping Drawings and models

Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Final Engineering Drawing Tree

Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Material Lists Identified

Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Calculations Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

Detailed contract Schedule (with Milestones) Revision

Established submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

ILS Life Cycle plan for rotary encoder which will include Life Cycle Maintenance Requirements, PMS, Calibration and Maintenance instructions, and rough order of magnitude cost and hour estimate to Government for procurement of a Rotary Encoder Kit and repair of a Rotary Encoder Kit.

Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

CDR Presentation Package complete & provided for review

Complete and submitted for review

90% Complete and submitted for review

100 Percent Inspection of Critical Design Package

6.3.4. CDR presentation Exit Criteria

6.3.4.5. Detailed Design is expected to meet all requirements of Design, Technical, And Performance Requirements for the Rotary Encoders. (See Section 5).

6.3.4.6. Test Plan addresses all elements of the RVTM

6.3.4.7. ILS products necessary for lifecycle support of the project have been identified and their scheduled completion is deemed acceptable

6.3.4.8. Project Risks characterize the significant technical and schedule risks at a suitable level for tracking

6.3.4.9. Schedule is in place and meets key milestones

6.3.5. Deliverable format and schedule

6.3.5.5. Formatting, drawing standards, specification standards, cost estimates, quality control, and the content and format of the documents shall be in conformance with industry standards and work previously performed for the Government on projects of similar size, scope, and complexity.

6.3.5.6. The reports and tests shall be provided in an electronic medium (Microsoft Word, Microsoft Access, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat).

6.3.5.7. Schedule shall be provided in an electronic medium (Microsoft Project)

6.3.5.8. Drawing package models shall be provided in an electronic medium (i.e. Solid Edge or equivalent 3D CAD Software that can be imported into Solid Edge).

6.3.5.9. Drawing package drawings shall be provided in an electronic medium (i.e. AutoCAD or Adobe

CDR Documents 20 days prior to

CDR

presentation

1 original and 1 electronic copy

The Contractor shall use the following format for deliverables and provide on a DVD, CD, or through a secure share point site.

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Nial Moe. Code 126 1400 Farragut

CDR read ahead presentation

10 days prior to

CDR

presentation

CDR presentation As scheduled In person at presentation

Final CDR presentation and Identification of outstanding issues with risk mitigation plan to resolve issues

10 days after

CDR

presentation

The Contractor shall use the following format for deliverables and provide on a DVD, CD, or through a secure share point site.

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Nial Moe. Code 126 1400 Farragut

6.3.5.10. All deliverables defined above shall be submitted for review and approval by the Government. The Government shall review and provide feedback on each document within two weeks of receipt of each deliverable. Government expectation is that all feedback shall be incorporated into the next iteration, if conflict between Government expectation and Contractor submittals both sides will hold a teleconference and resolve issues or establish common understanding of expectations in conformance with this performance work statement, the contract, and referenced documents. Acceptance of all deliverables shall be based on Government approval, and any rejected deliverables shall be revised and

6.4. Phase 3 – First Article Development, Testing and Final Technical Data Package (CDRL A0003 –Test Performance Report)

6.4.2. The Contractor shall build, perform testing, and calibration on a First Article Rotary Encoder in accordance with the Government Approved Test Procedures, as identified and accepted during the CDR. The Government reserves the right to witness all Qualification Tests and shall be notified 30 days prior to initiation of testing in order to schedule Government representatives’ arrival on-site. The Contractor shall conduct sufficient tests on the First Article of equipment to ensure that the design conforms in all respects to this specification.

6.4.3. Test reports and other documents for the final technical data package prepared for assessment by the Government shall be prepared IAW MIL-STD-31000 and ASME Y14.100 and at a minimum include all items listed below:

6.4.3.5. Any revision to Systems Requirements Document (SRD) since CDR

6.4.3.6. Any revision to Requirements Verification Test Matrix (RVTM) since CDR

6.4.3.7. Any revision to Hardware Design Document (HDD) since CDR

6.4.3.8. Any revision to Test and Evaluation Plans for Qualification, Quality Conformance, Shock, EMI, and Vibration. since CDR

6.4.3.9. Any revision to Detailed Schedule (with Milestones) Established since CDR

6.4.3.10. Any revision to Arrangement, Electrical, Printed Wire Assemblies, and Mechanical Drawings or models. since CDR

6.4.3.11. Any revision to Engineering Drawing Tree since CDR

6.4.3.12. Any revision to Material list since CDR

6.4.3.13. Any revision to Calculations since CDR

6.4.3.14. Any revision to Test and Evaluation procedures since CDR

6.4.3.15. Any revision to Identification of outstanding issues with risk mitigation plan to resolve issues since

CDR

6.4.3.16. Any revision to Preliminary ILS Life Cycle plan for rotary encoder which will include Life Cycle Maintenance Requirements, PMS, Calibration and Maintenance instructions, and rough order of magnitude cost and hour estimate to Government for procurement of a Rotary Encoder Kit and repair of a Rotary Encoder Kit since CDR

6.4.4. First article testing Entrance Criteria

6.4.4.5. The following document and material listed in Table below shall in the below state to support approval of this phase prior to testing and delivered of results to PSNS.

First article Deliverables prior to testing

Objective

Standard Performance Threshold

Method of Surveillance

Updates to any CDR Deliverables prior to testing

Complete and approved

Complete and submitted for approval

100 Percent Inspection of First Article Package

Detailed Schedule (with Milestones) Revision

Complete and approved

Complete and submitted for approval

100 Percent Inspection of First Article Package

6.4.5. First article testing Exit Criteria

6.4.5.5. The following document and material listed in the table below shall in the below state to support approval of this phase after completion of testing and delivered of results to PSNS.

6.4.5.6. Contractor shall identify all outstanding issues with risk mitigation plan to resolve issues.

6.4.5.7. Provide additional manufacturing, production and engineering services to resolve failures as a result of test sequences.

6.4.5.8. Provide integrated logistics support package for the rotary encoder to include drawings, design notes, material list with part numbers, and photographs of internal and…