N4523A-17-R-0016_(Final)_Air_Flask.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

N4523A-17-R-0016 17-Nov-2016

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

360-476-4001

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

12:00 PM 19 Dec 2016

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

N4523A9. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

DAVID MIRANO

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

N4523A17RQ00012

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESSX

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD CODE 400

1400 FARRAGUT

CONTRACTING CODE 440

BREMERTON WA 98314-5001

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

FAX:

TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

1,250

NAICS:

336611

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF62

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

N4523A-17-R-0016

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN

Number

SERVICES FOR CHEMICAL CLEAN

AND COAT

FFP

1 Job

JML: 6275-9530 HP AIR FLASK CLEAN AND COAT

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: 4523A70H572P

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: N4523A17RQ00012

PROJECT: 6T3

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

PERFORMANCE WORK STATMENT

SERVICE CONTRACT

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) WORKSHEET

REV 11/16/16

JML #: 6275-9530

Ship/Activity: U.S. NAVAL VESSEL

Title: 70 CUFT Air Flasks Cleaning

Place of Performance: Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, WA

Period of Performance: 06 March 2017 to 28 April 2017

1. BACKGROUND: Four (4) ea. 70 cubic foot (CF) high pressure (HP) air flasks, that support the catapult hydraulic systems, require cleaning and phosphate coating. All four (4) air flasks are in operating condition.

2. REFERENCES:

CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE NAVAIR LAKEHURST APPROVED CLEANING PROCEDURE

IAW. NAVAIR 51-15ABD-2 PARAGRAPH 5, PRIOR TO SUBMITTING PROPOSAL.

2.1. NAVAIR 51-15 ABD-2 Section 4-7 Spherical Air Flask Inspection

2.2. DWG 509040 (K) Air Flask Assembly 70 CF 3,000 PSI

2.3. DWG 509041 (H) Air Flask Spherical, Ring Mounting 70 CF 3,000 PSI

2.4. TT-C-490F, FEDERAL SPECIFICATION, Chemical Conversion Coatings and Pretreatments for Metallic

Substrates (Base for Organic Coatings).

2.5. NAVSEA Standard Item 009-110, Non-Nuclear Work on Nuclear Vessels

2.6. Local Standard Items 099-01 NW, General Occupational Safety

2.7. Local Standard Item 099-02 NW, General Contractor Environmental Protection Requirements for the

Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC)

2.8. Local Standard Item 099-04NW, Hazardous Material Requirements for the Bremerton Naval Complex

(BNC)

2.9. Local Standard Item 099-06NW, Waste Management Requirements for the Bremerton Naval Complex

(BNC)

2.10. Local Standard Item 099-07NW, Solid Waste Management Requirements for the Bremerton Naval

Complex (BNC)

2.11. Local Standard Item 099-10NW, Maintaining Protection and Cleanliness from Non-Radioactive

Operations; accomplish Requirements for the Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC)

2.12. COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3 – Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual, Volume IV Chapter 10, Work

Authorization and Control

2.13. NAVSEA S0400-AD-URM-010/TUM – Tag-out User’s Manual

2.14. S0570-AC-CCM-8010 Industrial Ship Safety Manual for Fire Prevention and Response

2.15. NAVSEA 389-0288 Radiological Controls

3. WORK REQUIREMENTS/SCOPE: The Contractor shall:

3.1. Obtain NAVAIR Lakehurst approval of cleaning and phosphate coating procedure prior to award as required per 2.1 paragraph 5 (abrasion method not permitted). Provide evidentiary confirmation of approved cleaning procedure from NAVAIR LAKEHURST no later than three (3) weeks after contract award.

3.2. Comply with the requirements of 2.1 through 2.5.

3.3. Accomplish requirements of 2.6 through 2.15.

3.4. Provide and submit a Contractor Hazardous Material Inventory (CHMI) in accordance with 2.7 to the

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) three (3) weeks prior to start of work. Include all hazardous materials that will be requested to bring into the shipyard. The COR will forward the CHMI along with submitted MSDS/SDS sheets to the project ESH manager (para. 9.4) to verify materials are listed and authorized on the shipyard’s

Authorized Use List (AUL). Contractor will report usage of all HAZMAT during execution monthly and no later than the 10 th day on the Government Hazardous Material and Monthly Usage form.

Note: Materials and Chemicals not listed on the AUL may require approval through the ESH manager or be substituted by an alternate chemical that has been approved by the Project ESH Manager.

3.5. Provide electronic copy of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) in accordance with 2.8 to the COR three (3) weeks prior to start of work.

3.6. Provide one legible copy, in electronic media, a production schedule for the execution of all work on the four (4) HP air flasks. Production schedule to include timelines and durations to accomplish the cleaning and phosphate coating of the flasks. Submit to the COR and topside APS at least 3 weeks prior to start of contract.

3.7. Provide one legible copy, in electronic media, a site visit report containing the following information:

Contract Number, Ship Hull Number and Name, Date, Date of Performance and Services accomplished. Provide media to the COR within 5 business days of completion of services.

3.8. Submit an Electronic Waste Information Sheet (E-WIS) in accordance with 2.8 for all hazardous waste.

3.9. Provide documentation that all pressure containing hoses have been hydrostatically tested prior to use

(hoses used for hazardous materials must be marked with "HAZMAT" along with the MSDS number, hydrostatic test date: month and year).

3.10. Provide one supervisor for each 5 cleaning technicians and ensure all contractors are qualified to operate equipment and handle cleaning agents and effluent. Overtime is authorized.

3.11. Provide double walled poly tank(s) for the storage of cleaning agents and effluent during the process. Note: If unable to provide a double walled poly tank (s), a single walled tank(s) may be used, with an impermeable secondary containment capable of containing 100 percent of the largest container in the containment or

10 percent of the total volume of all containers, whichever is greater. If secondary containment is not protected from the rain, provide additional capacity for 4 inches of rain per paragraph 3.11 of 2.9.

3.12. Provide all pumps, hoses, fittings, containments required to connect to and pump from air flasks and storage tanks to accomplish all cleaning operations.

3.13. Provide storage facility to store hazardous material.

3.14. Provide the following system preparations for flushing each air flask.

3.14.1. Install vents in all high points (1/4” are sufficient).

3.14.2. Install drains in all low points.

3.14.3. Install isolation valves in all loops to allow individual loop flushing.

3.15. Provide Government notifications as follows:

3.15.1. Accomplish (Government notification) as follows: (G) is a symbol inserted in a Work

Item to establish a point in the sequence of accomplishment of work at which time the Subject Matter Expert (SME), via the COR, shall be notified by the prime contractor in all cases to permit Government observation of a specific contractor test or inspection (I)(V).

3.15.2. Notify SME, via the COR, during normal day shift working hours, at least 4 hours, but not more than one working day, prior to commencing specific requirements in the paragraph annotated with the symbol (I)(G).

3.15.3. Notify the SME, via the COR, not later than 4 hours before the end of the last preceding day shift when tests or inspections following a (G) Point are scheduled after normal day shift working hours, on a weekend, or on a federal holiday.

3.15.4. For (G)-Points scheduled after normal day shift working hours, on a weekend, or a

Federal holiday, notify the SME, via the COR, to cancel a scheduled test or inspection as soon as known, but no later than 2 hours prior to the scheduled event.

(I)(G) CLEANLINESS INSPECTION

3.16. Provide chemical cleaning services to remove internal corrosion on four (4) ea. 70 CUFT HP air flasks located in separate compartments as per 2.4.

(I)(G) COATING INSPECTION

3.17. Provide services to phosphate coat four (4) ea. HP air flasks located in separate compartments as per 2.4.

3.17.1. Provide all equipment, chemicals, rigs, adapters, pumps, hoses, tanks, etc. required to connect to and chemically clean (abrasion method not allowed) each air flask internally. Electrical equipment requiring temporary power requires contractor to have pigtails connected to their equipment. All hose/tank connections require testing for leaks at the job site.

3.18. Coordinate with Subject Matter Expert (SME) para. 9.1 and Work Control Manager (WCM) para.

9.6, via the COR, to define work boundaries for ensuring entire work site is isolated.

3.18.1 Review work authorization form (WAF) with the WCM to ensure understanding of authorized work areas prior to starting work.

3.18.2 Request changes to isolation or work boundary to the WCM and SME, via the COR, at least 5 days prior to needing changes.

3.18.3 Ensure the isolation, de-energizing, drainage of the isolated area, and depressurization of mechanical, electrical, electronics and pressure system has been accomplished.

3.19. Ensure all contractor employees have direct knowledge of work control procedures, be able to recognize and initiate alarms, and be familiar with actions to be taken to evacuate the vessel.

3.20. Accomplish a joint on-site brief and walkthrough of the work site with the COR and Cell Manager

(para. 9.7), prior to start of work.

3.21. Prior to starting any work, contractor shall accomplish the following as derived from 2.5, NAVSEA Standard Item 009-110.

3.21.1. Evaluate services/temporary systems to be installed by the contractor that run through spaces and over water for possible leakage/spray protection.

3.21.2. Do not accomplish work or disturb any system or component without specific approved written instructions for accomplishing work on nuclear vessels.

3.21.3. Prohibit the following items from being brought onboard any nuclear powered vessel or nuclear support vessel:

3.21.3.1. Any mercury bearing equipment such as mercury thermometers, portable fluorescent lights, black lights or any other items containing mercury.

3.21.3.2. Nickel-Cadmium fasteners.

3.21.3.3. Any device that contains a source of radioactivity.

3.21.3.4. Bright yellow tools, bags, or equipment.

3.22. Notify the COR 5 days prior to delivering and removing equipment to and from off ship for crane and rigging services.

Note: All equipment must have certified lifting points and contractor provide certification documentation.

4. DELIVERABLE ITEMS

4.1. One legible copy, in electronic media, Evidentiary confirmation of approved NAVAIR LAKEHURST cleaning procedure three weeks after contract award as per 3.1.

4.2. One legible copy, in electronic media, of the Contractor’s Hazardous Material Inventory (CHMI).

4.3. One legible copy, in electronic media of each Safety Data Sheets (SDS).

4.4. One legible copy, in electronic media of the contractor’s production schedule and weekly updates.

4.5. One legible copy, in electronic media, of the contractor furnished report (CFR) of paragraph 3.7.

4.6. One legible copy of contractor documentation of hydrostatic testing of paragraph 3.9.

5. GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED ITEMS-PROPERTY, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES:

5.1. Location of GFP: The 70 CU FT Air Flasks are located in the following spaces:

1 CAT: 03-79-9-Q

2 CAT: 03-69-4-Q

3 CAT: 03-148-8-Q

4 CAT: 03-161-2-Q

5.2. Manufacturer, model # and type include serial number(s):

SPOKANE METAL PRODUCTS MODEL # SMP 681

All 70 CU FT Air Flasks are of the 3092 serial number (same model) P/N 509040-1

5.3. The Government will provide:

5.3.1. PSNS&IMF as the Naval Supervisory Authority (NSA) and Lead Maintenance Activity (LMA) will act as the lead RA for the applicable Planned Incremental Availability (PIA). PSNS&IMF has agreed to accept responsibility to act as the Repair Activity Representative (RAR) for contractor’s cleaning and phosphate coating of all four 70 CF high pressure air flasks.

5.3.2. PSNS&IMF Code 246 will ensure work authorization requirements of 2.12, 2.13, and any

PSNS&IMF local instructions are met in support of contractor. This includes preparation and execution of Work

Authorization Forms (WAFs), isolation of work site (tag-outs), and coordination with Ship’s Force in regards to

WAFs and tag-outs.

5.3.3. Assist in the classification and disposal of all cleaning effluent and other hazardous bi-products from the cleaning process.

5.3.4. Temporary power and electrical services to work site and power equipment. PSNS will connect equipment pigtail to power source IAW standard color-coding for phasing, and will not switch cables if rotation is incorrect and will not make connections inside contractor’s equipment.

5.3.4.1. 440 volt, 3 phase, 60 cycle power, 60 starting amps and 50 running amps

5.3.5. Potable Water (6500 gallons) 1 ½” water supply at 60 psi at the pump site.

5.3.6. Crane and rigging services to place and remove equipment.

5.3.7. Steam source nearby 100 psi (1” minimum).

5.3.8. Industrial compressed air source (90 psi).

5.3.9. Temporary lighting for night work.

5.3.10. Temporary shelter for flushing skid if work is on the flight deck.

5.3.11. Dry Air to blow dry system.

5.3.12. Steam piped to the exchanger 1” NPT at 60 PSI.

5.3.13. Deck space and equipment lay-down area (50 ft. x 10 ft.) on pier and (80 ft. X 20 ft.) on flight deck.

5.3.14. Disconnect valves, piping, and interferences from air flasks.

5.3.15. Portable emergency eye wash stations and additive for the flight deck, pier, and air flask locations.

Contractor shall fill with water and make available for use prior to cleaning operation.

6. QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:

6.1 The Contractor is solely responsible for the quality of services provided. For flask certification purposes, the shipyard will provide an inspector to accomplish checkpoints to certify the flasks were cleaned and coated satisfactorily.

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

Primary Performance Objectives Performance Standard/AQL Performance Assessment Method

Services provided such that repaired equipment functions as intended

100% Compliance Contractor shall provide assessment report to COR

Contractor maintain close liaison and good communication with

Government

Any problems or questions encountered by either party are addressed within 24 hours (1 business day)

Provide COR with written report of discrepancies

Final condition assessment 100% Compliance SME final assessment condition

7. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS: Visitors Request and Green Badge access required.

7.1 All references and deliverable items associated with this task are unclassified.

7.2 PSNS&IMF CONTROLLED INDUSTRIAL AREA (CIA): Contractor Access Control Policy:

Contractor personnel entering through Burwell or Bremerton turnstiles will no longer have access without having in their possession one of the three credentials listed below:

7.2.1 Common Access Card (CAC). Contractors who have a need to access a government computer system may be eligible for a contractor CAC card; most contractors are not eligible for a CAC.

7.2.2 Single Day Pass: Contractors requiring infrequent access may apply for a single day pass, requiring a new pass for access each day. Passes are issued by Naval Base Kitsap (NBK). The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI's) National Crime Information Center (NCIC) criminal database and the FBI Terrorist Watch

List will be checked daily prior to entry. In addition, Naval Base Kitsap must check the Navy’s Consolidated Law

Enforcement Operations Center (CLEOC) database to ensure an unescorted visitor has no objectionable criminal record, is not on the terrorist watch list, and has not been previously barred from entry onto any Navy installation.

7.2.3 Navy Commercial Access Control System (NCACS): A third option is the

Commander Navy Installations Command (CNIC) sponsored NCACS program. Under this program contractors may, for a fee, apply for an NCACS credential which allows base entry. The NCACS system is operated by a contractor on behalf of CNIC and applies to initial and subsequent follow-on checks of criminal and other databases.

7.3 Contractor employees must be U.S. citizens. Security clearance information, including confirmation of required GREEN badges, shall be submitted with contractor proposal to C/400 Security Official Mr.

Aaron Peal, aaron.k.peal@navy.mil. There are no other known requirements for access to restricted areas or information connected with the performance of this task.

file:///E:/Users/DAVID~1.MIR/AppData/Local/Temp/2/aaron.k.peal@navy.mil

7.4 Submit the Visit Request List with a cover letter on company letterhead to the COR and C/400

Contracting Officer’s Security Official, Mr. Aaron Peal, phone 360-476-0418 (office), 360-286-8120 (mobile), email: aaron.k.peal@navy.mil. The cover letter shall be a formal request for badging and access during the contract or delivery order period of performance. The letter shall include (1) purpose for access, (2) dates of validity

(period of performance), (3) contract number, and (4) name of subcontractors to be employed.

7.4.1 The letter shall be signed by the prime Contractor's Facility Security Official and shall be received by C/400 Contracting Officer’s Security Official no less than five (5) working days prior to access being granted.

a) The Visit Request List shall be organized alphabetically by last name and contain the following information in column form:

(1) Name (Last, First, MI)

(2) Date of birth

(3) Place of birth (City & State)

(4) Social security number

(5) Citizenship

(6) Company (Prime Contractor or Subcontractor)

b) Badges may be picked up at the PSNS & IMF Pass & ID office, and requires Contractor employees to provide identification of citizenship.

Valid forms of citizenship are:

(1) Original raised seal Birth Certificate (not a copy)

(2) Un-expired Passport

Note: If Contractor employees are providing a document with no photo, they shall also be required to present state issued photo identification (e.g. Driver’s License or ID card).

c) To grant Contractor Vehicle Access to the PSNS & IMF CIA, a list of vehicles, a copy of each vehicle registration and a justification for access shall be submitted 5 days after contract award for processing via

PSNS & IMF Form 5530/25. Contractors are required to stop at PSNS Pass & ID Office with proof of a valid, current Driver’s License, vehicle registration, and proof of insurance, prior to receiving access.

7.5 Any electronic device equipped with a camera is prohibited in the PSNS&IMF CIA.

7.6 Request form from COR for any Contractor company-owned computer that is needed to be brought aboard a government facility.

8. TRAVEL REQUIREMENTS: Contractor is responsible for all travel, per diem, lodging and car rentals required for the accomplishment of inspections.

8.1 Place of required service is:

PSNS&IMF

Pier Bravo

1400 Farragut Ave.

file:///E:/Users/DAVID~1.MIR/AppData/Local/Temp/2/aaron.k.peal@navy.mil

Bremerton, WA. 98314-5001

9. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE:

9.1 Subject Matter Expert: TBD

9.2 Contracting Officer’s Representitive (COR): TBD

9.3 Topside APS: TBD

9.4 Project ESH Manager: TBD

9.5 NAVAIR Lakehurst Representative: TBD

9.6 Work Control Manager (WCM): TBD

9.7 ALRE Cell Manager: TBD

10. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:

10.1 Estimated Work Hours: With the exception of Federal holidays, normal shipyard working hours are 07:20 to 16:02, Monday through Friday. Contractors may work alternate schedules if desired. However, most shipyard support will only be available during these hours. Working after hours or on holidays or weekends requires coordination with project management.

10.2 Technical Clarifications: All technical clarifications shall be coordinated through the COR and

SME.

11. Environmental Safety Concerns:

11.1 Safety and protection programs established at PSNS&IMF require the use of personal protective equipment, such as hard hats, safety eyeglasses, safety shoes, and hearing protection and shall meet the requirements of references 2.5 through 2.10.

11.2 Environmental, Safety and Health: The Contractor shall comply with current applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations in their entirety. Any reference to a specific portion of a federal, state, or local law, code, ordinance, or regulation in this PWS shall not be construed to mean that relief is provided from any other sections of the law, code, ordinance, or regulation. The Contractor shall comply with all current environmental, health, safety, and hazardous waste requirements/regulations.

11.3 Accident/Injury/Environmental Mishap Report: Reports of accidents, injuries, and environmental mishap incidents/events (actual and potential) involving Contractor personnel and equipment shall immediately be reported by verbal means to the COR, the designated Project POC, and the QA/ESH Director. Verbal reports shall be followed within 24 hours by a written report after each occurrence. The accident/injury/environmental mishap report, as a minimum, shall contain the following

11.3.1 Identity of Contractor/subcontractor witnesses;

Descriptive location of incident/mishap (e.g. ship name and hull number, space, compartment name, compartment location, frame number, etc.); type of incident/mishap (e.g. accident, collision, fire, fall, environmental spill, etc.);

name and PSNS & IMF badge number of each injured or affected person; date and time of the accident, injury, and mishap; brief description of the incident/mishap including occurrences and conditions leading up to the incident/mishap; extent of each personal injury or property damage sustained; whether personal injuries required medical treatment or property damage required immediate repair to prevent further damage or injury to personnel or property

11.4 Contractor employees are required to attend a Project Safety Briefing prior to working onboard naval vessel. Anticipate (1) one hour for attending briefing and coordinate date/time with the Project POC.

NOTE: The Contractor shall cooperate with each environmental, health, safety, and accident/mishap investigation.

12. Additional Considerations:

12.1 Radiological Requirements: Contractor will not access any area onboard ship that requires personal monitoring of radiation (i.e. wearing a TLD). Contractor personnel shall not be issued a Thermo-

Luminescent Dosimeter (TLD). Contractor personnel shall not handle radioactive materials, perform Nuclear Work, or perform work on radiological controlled systems. Contractor shall be briefed by project and be familiar with radiological controlled boundary markings in accordance with reference (2.14).

Note: Planning, supervising, or performing nuclear work is not authorized without the express approval of Code

300N, Code 1200N, Code 2300, and Code 105.

13. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:

13.1 The contractor must have their cleaning process approved in writing by NAVAIR LAKEHURST.

Contractors seeking approval can submit their process to NAVAIR representative listed in para. (9.5).

13.1.1 Access to the flask will be via a 1/4” union ended globe valve (similar to CPV PN

380-1) connection at the top and bottom. The globe valve uses a 1 3/16 – 12 UN Thread. Alternatively, connection to the flask may be made directly to the straight thread ports, 2”-11-1/2 NPSM on top and 1/4"-18NPSM on the bottom as per reference 2.2 and 2.3.

13.1.2 The contractor will be fully responsible for the use and handling of hazardous materials within the shipyard.

13.1.3 Each hose/tank connection carrying hazardous material requires sleeving filled with absorbents. The sleeving and absorbents must be compatible with the substances being transferred.

13.1.4 Contractor is responsible for all waste materials stored in contractor supplied storage tanks until it is transferred from the waste storage tanks for disposal.

13.1.5 Contractor is responsible for ensuring contractor supplied storage tanks do not leak and are responsible for cleaning up any spills or leaks from contractor supplied containers.

13.1.6 Contractor must coordinate with the shipyard when storing waste in tanks to ensure residual non-treatable wastes do not contaminate treatable wastes.

13.1.7 Contractor is responsible for staging spill kits compatible for material being used.

13.1.8 Contractor is responsible for rinsing and returning all leased tanks.

13.1.9 Contractor is responsible for building containment for pumps and tanks.

13.1.10 Contractor shall segregate oxidizers from other chemicals.

13.1.11 Contractor will verify all flasks are dry before final inspection.

CMRA REPORTING REQUIREMENT

Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) requirement:

The contractor shall report contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the U. S. Navy via a secure data collection site. Contracted services excluded from reporting are based on Product Service Codes

(PSCs). The excluded PSCs are:

(1) W, Lease/Rental of Equipment;

(2) X, Lease/Rental of Facilities;

(3) Y, Construction of Structures and Facilities;

(4) D, Automatic Data Processing and Telecommunications, IT and Telecom-

Telecommunications Transmission (D304) and Internet (D322) ONLY;

(5) S, Utilities ONLY;

(6) V, Freight and Shipping ONLY.

The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address https://doncmra.nmci.navy.mil.

Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each

Government fiscal year (FY), which runs October 1 through September 30. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the help desk, linked at https://doncmra.nmci.navy.mil.

EVALUATION METHOD

EVALUATION METHOD AND FACTORS

A contract will be awarded to that responsible offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value after evaluation in accordance with the factors described herein. "Factors" and "Sub-factors" shall include all of these evaluation factors and sub-factors which are described in this section.

This solicitation set aside solely for small business. As such, the small business prime shall perform at least 50% of the proposed effort and a small business subcontracting plan is not required.

General:

1. It is the intention of the Navy to award one Firm Fixed-Price (FP) contract.

2. Award will be made to that Offeror whose proposal is the most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in this section.

3. The Government intends to evaluate responsive proposals and award the Contract upon initial proposals.

Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. However, the Government may contact any or all or a limited number of awardees with questions concerning their responses as permitted under FAR Part 15.

1.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

a. The following conditions must be met in order to be eligible for award:

(1) The proposal must comply in all material respects with the requirements of the law, regulation and conditions set forth in this solicitation.

(2) The proposal must meet all solicitation requirements.

(3) OFFERORS SHALL NOT BE WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY FOREIGN OWNED. DUE TO TIME

CONTRAINTS,

THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO VET FOREIGN OWNERSHIP. FOREIGN OWNERSHIP IS A

DISCRIMINATING CHARACTERISTIC THAT WILL DEEM SUCH AN OFFEROR INELIGIBLE FOR

AWARD.

https://doncmra.nmci.navy.mil/

b. The Government anticipates a single Contract award resulting from this solicitation. However, the Government reserves the right to award more than one or no contract, depending on the quality of the proposals received and the availability of funds. The Government also reserves the right to make an award without discussions.

c. The award decision will be determined based on the Government’s evaluation of each Offeror’s complete proposal against the evaluation factors and sub-factors identified below. Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal demonstrates the best overall value to the Government based on the factors and sub-factors described herein. Best value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement (FAR 2.101). In making this decision, the Government is more concerned with obtaining offers demonstrating superior past performance and technical merit based on the non-cost factors at a reasonable cost or price than with making an award to the Offeror with the lowest proposed cost/price. Accordingly, the Government may be willing to pay a reasonable premium for a contract offering superior past performance and technical merit.

d. In order to select the successful Offeror, the Government will compare Offeror proposals. The comparison will trade off differences in past performance and technical merit based on the non-cost factors and cost-factors. If one

Offeror has both the better past performance and technical merit or capability and the lower price, then that Offeror will be the better value. If one Offeror has the better past performance and technical merit or capability and a higher price, the Government will decide whether the difference in past performance and technical merit/capability is worth the difference in price. If it is determined that the difference in past performance and technical merit/capability is worth the difference in price, then the more capable, higher-priced Offeror will be the better value. If not, then the less capable, lower-priced Offeror will be the better value. A best value analysis will not be performed for any

Offerors who are unacceptable or unsatisfactory in any factor or sub-factor and award will not be made to any

Offeror who is unacceptable or unsatisfactory in any factor or sub-factor.

2.0 Evaluation Factors and Sub-factors

Best Value Factors

Sub-factors

1. Technical Acceptability

A. Technical Capabilities

2. Past Performance

(None)

3. Cost/Price

(None)

2.1 Application of Factors and Sub-factors

a. General. The Government will apply the best value evaluation factors and sub-factors to identify the best value proposal. The evaluation factors and sub-factors represent key areas of importance to be considered in the source selection decision. The factors, sub-factors, and associated elements have been chosen to support meaningful discrimination between and among competing proposals. As demonstrated in their proposals, prospective Offerors shall be evaluated in terms of their ability to meet or exceed the program’s requirements stated in the PWS.

Proposals shall be evaluated in accordance with the factors and sub-factors described in paragraph 2.2 below.

b. Relative Importance. The relative importance of the best value evaluation factors and sub-factors contained in

Section 2.0 above reflect the overall requirements of this acquisition as outlined in the PWS. The evaluation factors are divided into two categories, “Technical Acceptability,” “Past Performance” and “Price”. The evaluation will consider the areas identified above. Within the “Technical Acceptability” factor, sub-factors (a) and (b) are listed in descending order of importance.

When evaluating, “Past Performance” is more important than “Technical Acceptability.” “Past Performance” and

“Technical Acceptability” are significantly more important than “Price,” however, as competing proposals approach

“Past Performance” and “Technical Acceptability” equality, “Price” will increase in importance.

c. Adjectival Ratings. The Government will perform an evaluation of the “Past Performance” and “Technical

Acceptability” evaluation factors and sub-factors based on the Offeror’s proposal. This evaluation focuses on strengths and weaknesses of the Offeror’s proposal, resulting in the assignment of an adjectival rating for each factor and sub-factor. Cost/Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.

1) The following adjectival ratings/definitions shall be used for the “Technical Acceptability” evaluation factor and sub-factors:

Outstanding: An outstanding proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements.

Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is very low.

Very Good: A very good proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal meets the requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements.

Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is low.

Acceptable: An acceptable proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal meets the requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is low.

Marginal: A marginal proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal does not clearly meet the requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more major weaknesses that are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is high.

Unacceptable: An unacceptable proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal does not meet the requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. The proposal is unawardable.

Weakness is defined as a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. A

“significant weakness” in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency is defined as a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Risk is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or sub-factor may involve risk of disruption of schedule or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

2) The following adjectival ratings/definitions shall be used for the “Past Performance” evaluation factors:

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definitions:

“Relevant”

Present/past performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

“Not Relevant”

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts.

Performance Confidence Assessment. In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings below:

Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Rating Definitions

“Substantial Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

“Satisfactory Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

“Limited Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

“No Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

“Unknown Confidence” (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Performance Confidence Assessment is an evaluation of the likelihood (or Government’s confidence) that the offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information.

“Recency,” as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the time that has elapsed since the past performance reference occurred. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant.

“Relevancy,” as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the source solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

2.2 Description of Best Value Evaluation Factors and Sub-factors

Factor 1: Technical Acceptability

Sub-factor A) - Technical Capability

The Government will evaluate:

The degree to which the proposal demonstrates specific knowledge, capability and strategy to perform the tasks outlined in the PWS sub-task structure.

Factor 2: Past Performance

Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the Offeror satisfied its customers in previous relevant contracts and complied with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. The Government will evaluate Previous

Contract Effort Narrative Forms, and may contact some of each Offeror’s customers to ask whether or not they believe: (1) that the Offeror is capable, efficient and effective; (2) that the Offeror’s performance conformed to the terms and conditions of its contract; (3) that the Offeror was reasonable and cooperative during performance; (4) that the Offeror was committed to customer satisfaction; and (5) if given a chance whether they would select the same or a different Contractor.

The Government may consider past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror, including Federal, State, and local government agencies, Better Business Bureaus, published media and electronic databases. The lack of recent and relevant past performance information will result in the assignment of a neutral rating (i.e. neither favorable nor unfavorable) for this factor.

Factor 3: Price: The Government will conduct cost and price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404 to determine whether the proposed prices reflect an understanding of the work and an ability to perform the contract, and are reasonable.

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision –

In writing or written means any worded or numbered expression which can be read, reproduced, and later communicated, and includes electronically transmitted and stored information.

Proposal modification is a change made to a proposal before the solicitation’s closing date and time, or made in response to an amendment, or made to correct a mistake at any time before award.

Proposal revision is a change to a proposal made after the solicitation closing date, at the request of or as allowed by a Contracting Officer.

Time, if stated as a number of days, is calculated using calendar days, unless otherwise specified, and will include

Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays. However, if the last day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal legal holiday, then the period shall include the next working day.

(b) Amendments to the solicitation. If this solicitation is amended all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this solicitation by the date and time specified in the amendment(s).

(c) Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.

(1) Proposals and revisions of proposals shall be sent to the Contracting Officer’s point-of-contact (POC) via e-mail under the appropriate solicitation number and its latest amendment (if any).

Contracting Officer’s POC:

D. Mirano, Contract Specialist (Code 449) e-mail: david.mirano@navy.mil

Comm: (360) 516-8882

In addition to the proposal and representations and certifications, submissions shall include:

(a) The cover letter of the proposal which must show the following:

(i) The solicitation number;

(ii) The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror;

(iii) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

(iv) Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers and e-mail addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation; and

(v) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

(2) Overview of submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.

(a) Offerors are responsible for submitting proposals and any revisions to be received by the above POC by the time specified in the solicitation.

(b) Subject to FAR clause 52.215-1, any proposal modification or revision not received/submitted by the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered. The solicitation will close at the exact date and time specified in the solicitation and offers will not be accepted after that time.

Each proposal submitted shall be time/date stamp recorded as per receipt of the e-mail submission.

(c) Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice to the Contracting Officer provided such notice is received prior to award.

(3) The Offeror must propose to provide all items in requirements to be deemed responsive to this solicitation.

(4) Offerors shall submit proposals in response to this solicitation in English and in U.S. dollars.

(5) Offerors may submit modifications to their proposals at any time before the solicitation closing date and time.

In the event of an amendment to the solicitation that requires offerors to submit proposal revisions, the amendment will provide instructions for such.

(6) Offerors may submit revised proposals only if requested or allowed by the Contracting Officer.

(7) Proposals may be withdrawn at any time before award. Withdrawals are effective upon receipt of notice by the Contracting Officer.

(d) Offer expiration date. Proposals in response to this solicitation shall be valid for 180 calendar days.

(e) Restriction on disclosure and use of data. Offerors that include in their proposals data that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, shall:

(1) Mark the title page with the following legend:

"This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this Offeror as a result of, or in connection with, the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government’s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]"; and

(2) Mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the following legend:

"Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal."

(f) Award.

(1) The Government intends to award a contract that results from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror(s) whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government in accordance with the Factors and Subfactors set forth in “Evaluation Factors” of the solicitation.

(2) The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government’s interest.

(3) The Government reserves the right to waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received.

(4) The Government intends to award a contract upon initial proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost/price and technical standpoint. The Government may contact any or all or a limited number of offerors with questions concerning their responses as permitted under the FAR Part

15.

(5) The Government reserves the right to make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit cost or prices offered, unless the Offeror specifies otherwise in the proposal.

(6) The Government reserves the right to make multiple awards if, after considering the additional administrative costs, quality of proposals, and availability of funding, it is in the Government’s best interest to do so.

(7) Exchanges with Offerors after receipt of a proposal do not constitute a rejection or counteroffer by the

Government.

(8) The Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced between line items or subline items. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost and price analysis techniques. A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(9) Proposal analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404.

(10) Once awarded, the contract cannot be modified except by the Contracting Officer electronically signing/awarding a modification.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL

Each Offeror must (1) submit an offer, (2) electronically submit information that pertains to the evaluation factors, and (3) submit supporting cost/price data. The Government will evaluate each Offeror's understanding of the

Government's requirements and ability to perform the work on the basis of its proposal. It is the Offeror's responsibility to provide information and evidence that clearly demonstrates its ability to respond satisfactorily to the solicitation requirements. The Government intends to award one contract as detailed in “Evaluation Methods and

Factors.”

Offeror…