N4523A-17-R-0016-01_(Amendment).pdf

N4523A17RQ00012

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment updates: (1) Clarif ies and modif ies Performance Work Statement, clarif ies Instructions to Offerors via provision 52.212-1, clarif ies Evaluation process via 52.212-2, and modif ies or deletes certain provisions and prospective clauses. Solicitation should be review ed in its entirety. While response date is unchanged, see extension of question submission date in 52.212-1.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 39

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Dec-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4523A-17-R-0016

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Nov-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Dec-2016

CODE

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD CODE 441

1400 FARRAGUT AVE

BREMERTON WA 98314

N4523A 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4523A-17-R-0016

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been added by reference:

52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003

52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities APR 2015

52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016

52.222-38 Compliance With Veterans' Employment Reporting

Requirements

FEB 2016

52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014

252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

OCT 2016

The following have been added by full text:

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2016) (Tailored)

NOTE: This provision must be reviewed completely. It contains the guidelines for submission of your proposal.

This is a commercial solicitation using procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-1, Tradeoff Process. This process permits tradeoffs among price and non-price factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal if a higher priced proposal demonstrates additional benefits to the Government.

(a) An Offeror’s proposal is presumed to represent the best efforts to respond to the solicitation. The Government intends to award to the Offeror presenting a best value offer considering technical capabilities, past performance, and price. The proposal shall present evidence of the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements. The proposal shall demonstrate the Offeror’s familiarity with the detailed aspects of the requirements and shall clearly show that the Offeror correctly interpreted all of the requirements. Responses must adequately address specific solicitation requirements. Statements such as "the Offeror understands" and "the Offeror shall/can comply" along with responses that paraphrase the solicitation are inadequate. The use of phrases such as "standard practices" (with a specific government reference or industry reference) is unacceptable. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall contain the information specified within FAR 52.212-2. Offerors are cautioned to not simply restate the specifications in their technical proposal. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired. Failure of a proposal to comply with these instructions may be grounds for exclusion of the proposal from further consideration.

(b) Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.

(1) The offeror’s proposal shall be sent to the Contracting Officer’s point-of-contact (POC) via e-mail:

D. Mirano, Contract Specialist (Code 449); e-mail: david.mirano@navy.mil; Comm: (360) 516-8882

The proposal shall include:

(a) The cover letter of the proposal which must show the following:

(i) The solicitation number;

(ii) The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror;

(iii) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which price is offered;

(iv) Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers and e-mail addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation; and

(v) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

(2) Overview of submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.

(a) Offerors are responsible for submitting proposals and any revisions to be received by the above POC by the time specified in the solicitation.

(b) Any proposal modification or revision not received/submitted by the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered.

(c) Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice to the Contracting Officer provided such notice is received prior to award.

(3) The Offeror must propose to provide all items in requirements to be deemed responsive to this solicitation.

(4) Offerors may submit modifications to their proposals at any time before the solicitation closing date and time.

In the event of an amendment to the solicitation that requires offerors to submit proposal revisions, the amendment will provide instructions for such.

(5) Proposals may be withdrawn at any time before award. Withdrawals are effective upon receipt of notice by the Contracting Officer.

(c) Offer expiration date. Proposals in response to this solicitation shall be valid for 180 calendar days.

(d) Award.

(1) The Government intends to award a contract that results from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror(s) whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government in accordance with the Factors and Subfactors set forth in “Evaluation Factors” of the solicitation.

(2) The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government’s interest.

(3) The Government reserves the right to waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received.

(4) The Government intends to award a contract upon initial proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government may contact any or all or a limited number of offerors with questions concerning their responses as permitted under the FAR Part 15.

(5) The Government reserves the right to make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit price offered, unless the Offeror specifies otherwise in the proposal.

(6) The Government reserves the right to make multiple awards if, after considering the additional administrative costs, quality of proposals, and availability of funding, it is in the Government’s best interest to do so.

(7) Exchanges with Offerors after receipt of a proposal do not constitute a rejection or counter-offer by the

Government.

(8) The Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the price proposed is materially unbalanced between line items or subline items. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, it is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques. A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(9) Proposal analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404.

(10) Once awarded, the contract cannot be modified except by the Contracting Officer electronically signing/awarding a modification.

Each Offeror must electronically submit an offer that demonstrates its understanding of the requirements within the evaluation factors.Offerors may submit questions requesting clarification of solicitation requirements via e-mail.

All questions shall be submitted by 12:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time (PST) on 13 Dec 2016.

The electronic proposal shall be prepared so that if printed, the proposal meets the following format requirements:

- 8.5 x 11 inch paper

- Single-spaced typed lines

- Supporting brochures and other information as may be required or necessary. Each page will have one- inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman Font text, No hyperlinks, and be submitted using Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, Power Point) or Adobe.

All filenames shall include the Offeror's company name and title/subject of file content; all files shall be named with the file extension .doc, .xls, .ppt, or .pdf

While this is a total small business set-aside, teaming agreements between qualifying small and non-small businesses are authorized, provided that the small business is the prime contractor, and that the small business (prime) provides at least 51% of the proposed effort.

Tne North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this effort is Ship Building and

Repairing (663311) with a maximum small business size of 1250 employees.

Non-Price factors shall be submitted separately from Price. Non-Price factors, technical capabilities and past performance shall be submitted in one volume each. Price shall be submitted separately. No pricing information of any kind shall be included in any non-price volume.

A written notice of award or acceptance of a proposal, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the

Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

TIME OF SUBMISSION: All proposals and supporting documents must be submitted by 1200 P.M. PST time 19 December 2016. Late proposals will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Note: Only email submissions will be accepted.

(End of provision)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) (Tailored)

A contract will be awarded to that responsible offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value after evaluation in accordance with the factors described herein. "Factors" shall include any and all of the evaluation factors which are described in this section.

While this solicitation is set aside solely for small business, teaming arrangements with qualifying non-small business are allowed. As such, the small business must be the prime, and shall perform at least 51% of the proposed effort and a small business subcontracting plan is not required.

General:

- It is the intention of the Navy to award one Firm Fixed-Price (FP) contract.

- Award will be made to that Offeror whose proposal is the most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in this section.

- The Government intends to evaluate responsive proposals and award the Contract upon initial proposals.

Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a past performance, technical acceptability, and a price standpoint.

1.0 Basis for Award

a. The following conditions must be met in order to be eligible for award:

(1) The proposal must comply in all material respects with the requirements of the law, regulation and conditions set forth in this solicitation.

(2) The proposal must meet all solicitation requirements.

(3) OFFERORS SHALL NOT BE WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY FOREIGN OWNED. DUE TO TIME

CONTRAINTS, THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO VET FOREIGN OWNERSHIP. FOREIGN

OWNERSHIP IS A DISCRIMINATING CHARACTERISTIC THAT WILL DEEM SUCH AN OFFEROR

INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

b. The Government anticipates a single Contract award resulting from this solicitation. However, the Government reserves the right to award more than one or no contract, depending on the quality of the proposals received and the availability of funds. The Government also reserves the right to make an award without discussions.

c. The award decision will be determined based on the Government’s evaluation of each Offeror’s complete proposal against the evaluation factors identified below. Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal demonstrates the best overall value to the Government based on the factors described herein. Best value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement (FAR 2.101). In making this decision, the Government is more concerned with obtaining offers demonstrating superior past performance and technical acceptability based on the non-price factors at a reasonable price than with making an award to the Offeror with the lowest proposed price. Accordingly, the

Government may be willing to pay a reasonable premium for a contract offering superior past performance and technical acceptability.

d. In order to select the successful Offeror, the Government will compare Offeror proposals. The comparison will trade off differences based on the non-price factors of past performance and technical acceptability and the factor of price. If one Offeror has both the better past performance and technical acceptability and the lower price, then that

Offeror will be the better value. If one Offeror has the better past performance and technical acceptability and a higher price, the Government will decide whether the difference in past performance and technical acceptability is worth the difference in price. If it is determined that the difference in past performance and technical acceptability is worth the difference in price, then the more capable, higher-priced Offeror will be the better value. If not, then the less capable, lower-priced Offeror will be the better value. A best value analysis will not be performed for any

Offerors who are unacceptable or unsatisfactory in any factor and award will not be made to any Offeror who is unacceptable or unsatisfactory in any factor.

2.0 Best Value Evaluation Factors

a. Technical Acceptability

(No sub-factors)

b. Past Performance

c. Price

2.1 Application of Factors

a. General. The Government will apply the best value evaluation factors to identify the best value proposal. The evaluation factors represent key areas of importance to be considered in the source selection decision. The factors and their associated elements have been chosen to support meaningful discrimination between and among competing proposals. As demonstrated in their proposals, prospective Offerors shall be evaluated in terms of their ability to meet or exceed the program’s requirements stated in the PWS. Proposals shall be evaluated in accordance with the factors described in paragraph 2.2 below.

b. Relative Importance. The relative importance of the best value evaluation factors contained in Section 2.0 above reflect the overall requirements of this acquisition as outlined in the PWS. The evaluation factors are divided into three categories, “Past Performance,” “Technical Acceptability,” and “Price.” The evaluation will consider the areas identified above.

When evaluating, “Past Performance” is to be considered more important than “Technical Acceptability.” “Past

Performance” and “Technical Acceptability” are to be considered significantly more important than “Price.”

However, as competing proposals approach “Past Performance” and “Technical Acceptability” equality, “Price” will increase in importance.

c. Adjectival Ratings. The Government will perform an evaluation of the “Past Performance” and “Technical

Acceptability” evaluation factors based on the Offeror’s proposal resulting in the assignment of an adjectival rating for each factor. Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.

1) The following adjectival ratings/definitions shall be used for the “Technical Acceptability” evaluation factor:

Outstanding: An outstanding proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements.

Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is very low.

Very Good: A very good proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal meets the requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements.

Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is low.

Acceptable: An acceptable proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal meets the requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is low.

Marginal: A marginal proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal does not clearly meet the requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more major weaknesses that are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is high.

Unacceptable: An unacceptable proposal is characterized as follows:

• Proposal does not meet the requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. The proposal is un-awardable.

Definitions of terms to be used in evaluation of “Technical Acceptability:”

Weakness is defined as a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. A

“significant weakness” in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency is defined as a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Risk is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor may involve risk of disruption of schedule or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

2) The following adjectival ratings/definitions shall be used for the “Past Performance” evaluation factor:

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definitions:

“Relevant”

Present/past performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

“Not Relevant”

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts.

Performance Confidence Assessment. In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings below:

Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Rating Definitions:

“Substantial Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

“Satisfactory Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

“Limited Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

“No Confidence”

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

“Unknown Confidence” (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Performance Confidence Assessment is an evaluation of the likelihood (or Government’s confidence) that the offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information.

Definitions of terms to be used in evaluation of “Past Performance:”

“Recency,” as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the time that has elapsed since the past performance reference occurred. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant.

“Relevancy,” as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the source solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

2.2 Description of Best Value Evaluation Factors

Factor 1: Technical Acceptability

The Government will evaluate the degree to which the proposal demonstrates specific knowledge, capability and understanding to perform the tasks outlined in the PWS task and sub-task structure.

Factor 2: Past Performance

Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the Offeror satisfied its customers in previous relevant contracts and complied with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. The Government will evaluate Previous

Contract Effort narratives, and may contact some of each Offeror’s customers to ask whether or not they believe: (1) that the Offeror is capable, efficient and effective; (2) that the Offeror’s performance conformed to the terms and conditions of its contract; (3) that the Offeror was reasonable and cooperative during performance; (4) that the

Offeror was committed to customer satisfaction; and (5) if given a chance whether they would select the same or a different Contractor.

The Government may consider past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror, including Federal, State, and local government agencies, Better Business Bureaus, published media and electronic databases. The lack of recent and relevant past performance information will result in the assignment of a neutral rating (i.e. neither favorable nor unfavorable) for this factor.

Factor 3: Price: The Government will conduct price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404 to determine whether the proposed price reflects an understanding of the work and an ability to perform the contract, and is reasonable.

52.219-1 SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REPRESENTATIONS (OCT 2014) - ALTERNATE I (SEPT 2015)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is ___ (insert NAICS code).

(2) The small business size standard is ___ (insert size standard).

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b) Representations. (1) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a small business concern.

(2) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.)

The offeror represents, for general statistical purposes, that it ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a small disadvantaged business concern as defined in 13 CFR 124.1002.

(3) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.)

The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a women-owned small business concern.

(4) Women-owned small business (WOSB) concern eligible under the WOSB Program. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern in paragraph (b)(3) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that--

(i) It ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this provision is accurate for each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB

Program participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: ---- ___ ------.] Each

WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the WOSB representation.

(5) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern eligible under the WOSB Program in (b)(4) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that--

(i) It ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not an EDWOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this provision is accurate for each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the EDWOSB concern and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: ----- ___ -----.] Each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the EDWOSB representation.

(6) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.)

The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a veteran-owned small business concern.

(7) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a veteran-owned small business concern in paragraph (b)(6) of this provision.) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern.

(8) [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.]

The offeror represents, as part of its offer, that--

(i) It ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a HUBZone small business concern listed, on the date of this representation, on the

List of Qualified HUBZone Small Business Concerns maintained by the Small Business Administration, and no material change in ownership and control, principal office, or HUBZone employee percentage has occurred since it was certified by the Small Business Administration in accordance with 13 CFR part 126; and

(ii) It ( ___ ) is, ( ___ ) is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 126, and the representation in paragraph (b)(8)(i) of this provision is accurate for the HUBZone small business concern or concerns that are participating in the joint venture. (The offeror shall enter the name or names of the HUBZone small business concern or concerns that are participating in the joint venture: ___ .) Each HUBZone small business concern participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the HUBZone representation.

(9) (Complete if offeror represented itself as disadvantaged in paragraph (c)(2) of this provision.) The offeror shall check the category in which its ownership falls:

___ Black American.

___ Hispanic American.

___ Native American (American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, or Native Hawaiians).

___ Asian-Pacific American (persons with origins from Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Japan, China, Taiwan, Laos, Cambodia (Kampuchea), Vietnam, Korea, The Philippines, Republic of Palau, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, the Commonwealth of the Northern

Mariana Islands, Guam, Samoa, Macao, Hong Kong, Fiji, Tonga, Kiribati, Tuvalu, or Nauru).

___ Subcontinent Asian (Asian-Indian) American (persons with origins from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri

Lanka, Bhutan, the Maldives Islands, or Nepal).

___ Individual/concern, other than one of the preceding.

(c) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern--

(1) Means a small business concern--

(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and

(ii) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a service-disabled veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.

(2) Service-disabled veteran means a veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with a disability that is service-connected, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).

"Small business concern," means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR Part 121 and the size standard in paragraph (a) of this provision.

Veteran-owned small business concern means a small business concern--

(1) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans (as defined at 38 U.S.C. 101(2)) or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more veterans; and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more veterans.

"Women-owned small business concern," means a small business concern --

(1) That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least

51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more women; or

(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

(d) Notice.

(1) If this solicitation is for supplies and has been set aside, in whole or in part, for small business concerns, then the clause in this solicitation providing notice of the set-aside contains restrictions on the source of the end items to be furnished.

(2) Under 15 U.S.C. 645(d), any person who misrepresents a firm's status as a small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, or women-owned small business concern in order to obtain a contract to be awarded under the preference programs established pursuant to section 8(a), 8(d), 9, or 15 of the Small Business Act or any other provision of Federal law that specifically references section 8(d) for a definition of program eligibility, shall--

(i) Be punished by imposition of fine, imprisonment, or both;

(ii) Be subject to administrative remedies, including suspension and debarment; and

(iii) Be ineligible for participation in programs conducted under the authority of the Act.

52.222-38 COMPLIANCE WITH VETERANS' EMPLOYMENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (FEB 2016)

By submission of its offer, the offeror represents that, if it is subject to the reporting requirements of 38 U.S.C.

4212(d) (i.e., if it has any contract containing Federal Acquisition Regulation clause 52.222-37, Employment

Reports on Veterans), it has filed the most recent VETS-4212 Report required by that clause.

52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov

(End of clause)

252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (MAY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

Document type means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area

WorkFlow (WAWF).

Local processing office (LPO) is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system is the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall--

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://www.acquisition.gov; and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this Web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training

Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through

WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/.

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via Web entry, Electronic Data

Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor must use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract/order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall use the following document type(s).

Invoice/Receipt 2-in-1

(2) Inspection/acceptance location. The Contractor shall select the following inspection/acceptance location(s) in

WAWF, as specified by the contracting officer.

N4523A, Bremerton, WA

(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.

Routing Data Table*

Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF

Pay Official DoDAAC N68732

Issue By DoDAAC N4523A

Admin DoDAAC N4523A

Inspect By DoDAAC N4523A

Ship To Code N/A

Ship From Code N/A

Mark For Code N/A

Service Approver (DoDAAC) N4523A

Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) N4523A

Accept at Other DoDAAC N/A

LPO DoDAAC N4523A

DCAA Auditor DoDAAC N/A

Other DoDAAC(s) N/A

(4) Payment request and supporting documentation. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes appropriate contract line item and subline item descriptions of the work performed or supplies delivered, unit price/cost per unit, fee (if applicable), and all relevant back-up documentation, as defined in DFARS Appendix F, (e.g. timesheets) in support of each payment request.

(5) WAWF email notifications. The Contractor shall enter the email address identified below in the “Send

Additional Email Notifications” field of WAWF once a document is submitted in the system.

david.mirano@navy.mil;erin.malinski@navy.mil;

(g) WAWF point of contact. (1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity's WAWF point of contact.

belen.rosure@navy.mil

(h) For technical WAWF help, contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988.

(End of clause)

HQ C-2-0034 MINIMUM INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS (NAVSEA) (SEP 1990)

In accordance with the clause of this contract entitled "INSURANCE--WORK ON A GOVERNMENT

INSTALLATION" (FAR 52.228-5), the Contractor shall procure and maintain insurance, of at least the kinds and minimum amounts set forth below:

(a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage shall be at least $100,000, except as provided in

FAR 28.307(a).

(b) Bodily injury liability insurance coverage shall be written on the comprehensive form of policy of at least

$500,000 per occurrence.

(c) Automobile Liability policies covering automobiles operated in the United States shall provide coverage of at least $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage. The amount of liability coverage on other policies shall be commensurate with any legal requirements of the locality and sufficient to meet normal and customary claims.

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATMENT

SERVICE CONTRACT

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) WORKSHEET

REV 11/16/16

JML #: 6275-9530

Ship/Activity: U.S. NAVAL VESSEL

Title: 70 CUFT Air Flasks Cleaning

Place of Performance: Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, WA

Period of Performance: 06 March 2017 to 28 April 2017

1. BACKGROUND: Four (4) ea. 70 cubic foot (CF) high pressure (HP) air flasks, that support the catapult hydraulic systems, require cleaning and phosphate coating. All four (4) air flasks are in operating condition.

2. REFERENCES:

CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE NAVAIR LAKEHURST APPROVED CLEANING PROCEDURE

IAW. NAVAIR 51-15ABD-2 PARAGRAPH 5, PRIOR TO SUBMITTING PROPOSAL.

2.1. NAVAIR 51-15 ABD-2 Section 4-7 Spherical Air Flask Inspection

2.2. DWG 509040 (K) Air Flask Assembly 70 CF 3,000 PSI

2.3. DWG 509041 (H) Air Flask Spherical, Ring Mounting 70 CF 3,000 PSI

2.4. TT-C-490F, FEDERAL SPECIFICATION, Chemical Conversion Coatings and Pretreatments for Metallic

Substrates (Base for Organic Coatings).

2.5. NAVSEA Standard Item 009-110, Non-Nuclear Work on Nuclear Vessels

2.6. Local Standard Items 099-01 NW, General Occupational Safety

2.7. Local Standard Item 099-02 NW, General Contractor Environmental Protection Requirements for the

Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC)

2.8. Local Standard Item 099-04NW, Hazardous Material Requirements for the Bremerton Naval Complex

(BNC)

2.9. Local Standard Item 099-06NW, Waste Management Requirements for the Bremerton Naval Complex

(BNC)

2.10. Local Standard Item 099-07NW, Solid Waste Management Requirements for the Bremerton Naval

Complex (BNC)

2.11. Local Standard Item 099-10NW, Maintaining Protection and Cleanliness from Non-Radioactive

Operations; accomplish Requirements for the Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC)

2.12. COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3 – Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual, Volume IV Chapter 10, Work

Authorization and Control

2.13. NAVSEA S0400-AD-URM-010/TUM – Tag-out User’s Manual

2.14. S0570-AC-CCM-8010 Industrial Ship Safety Manual for Fire Prevention and Response

2.15. NAVSEA 389-0288 Radiological Controls

3. WORK REQUIREMENTS/SCOPE: The Contractor shall:

3.1. Obtain NAVAIR Lakehurst approval of cleaning and phosphate coating procedure prior to award as required per 2.1 paragraph 5 (abrasion method not permitted). Provide evidentiary confirmation of approved cleaning procedure from NAVAIR LAKEHURST no later than three (3) weeks after contract award.

3.2. Comply with the requirements of 2.1 through 2.5.

3.3. Accomplish requirements of 2.6 through 2.15.

3.4. Provide and submit a Contractor Hazardous Material Inventory (CHMI) in accordance with 2.7 to the

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) three (3) weeks prior to start of work. Include all hazardous materials that will be requested to bring into the shipyard. The COR will forward the CHMI along with submitted MSDS/SDS sheets to the project ESH manager (para. 9.4) to verify materials are listed and authorized on the shipyard’s

Authorized Use List (AUL). Contractor will report usage of all HAZMAT during execution monthly and no later than the 10 th day on the Government Hazardous Material and Monthly Usage form.

Note: Materials and Chemicals not listed on the AUL may require approval through the ESH manager or be substituted by an alternate chemical that has been approved by the Project ESH Manager.

3.5. Provide electronic copy of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) in accordance with 2.8 to the COR three (3) weeks prior to start of work.

3.6. Provide one legible copy, in electronic media, a production schedule for the execution of all work on the four (4) HP air flasks. Production schedule to include timelines and durations to accomplish the cleaning and phosphate coating of the flasks. Submit to the COR and topside Assistant Project Supervisor (APS) at least 3 weeks prior to start of contract.

3.7. Provide one legible copy, in electronic media, a site visit report containing the following information:

Contract Number, Ship Hull Number and Name, Date, Date of Performance and Services accomplished. Provide media to the COR within 5 business days of completion of services.

3.8. Submit an Electronic Waste Information Sheet (E-WIS) in accordance with 2.8 for all hazardous waste.

3.9. Provide documentation that all pressure containing hoses have been hydrostatically tested prior to use

(hoses used for hazardous materials must be marked with "HAZMAT" along with the MSDS number, hydrostatic test date: month and year).

3.10. Provide one supervisor for each 5 cleaning technicians and ensure all contractors are qualified to operate equipment and handle cleaning agents and effluent. Overtime is authorized.

3.11. Provide double walled poly tank(s) for the storage of cleaning agents and effluent during the process. Note: If unable to provide a double walled poly tank (s), a single walled tank(s) may be used, with an impermeable secondary containment capable of containing 100 percent of the largest container in the containment or

10 percent of the total volume of all containers, whichever is greater. If secondary containment is not protected from the rain, provide additional capacity for 4 inches of rain per paragraph 3.11 of 2.9.

3.12. Provide all pumps, hoses, fittings, containments required to connect to and pump from air flasks and storage tanks to accomplish all cleaning operations.

3.13. Provide storage facility to store hazardous material.

3.14. Provide the following system preparations for flushing each air flask.

3.14.1. Install vents in all high points (1/4” are sufficient).

3.14.2. Install drains in all low points.

3.14.3. Install isolation valves in all loops to allow individual loop flushing.

3.15. Provide Government notifications as follows:

3.15.1. Accomplish (Government notification) as follows: (G) is a symbol inserted in a Work

Item to establish a point in the sequence of accomplishment of work at which time the Subject Matter Expert (SME), via the COR, shall be notified by the prime contractor in all cases to permit Government observation of a specific contractor test or inspection (I)(V).

3.15.2. Notify SME, via the COR, during normal day shift working hours, at least 4 hours, but not more than one working day, prior to commencing specific requirements in the paragraph annotated with the symbol (I)(G).

3.15.3. Notify the SME, via the COR, not later than 4 hours before the end of the last preceding day shift when tests or inspections following a (G) Point are scheduled after normal day shift working hours, on a weekend, or on a federal holiday.

3.15.4. For (G)-Points scheduled after normal day shift working hours, on a weekend, or a

Federal holiday, notify the SME, via the COR, to cancel a scheduled test or inspection as soon as known, but no later than 2 hours prior to the scheduled event.

(I)(G) CLEANLINESS INSPECTION

3.16. Provide chemical cleaning services to remove internal corrosion on four (4) ea. 70 CUFT HP air flasks located in separate compartments as per 2.4.

(I)(G) COATING INSPECTION

3.17. Provide services to phosphate coat four (4) ea. HP air flasks located in separate compartments as per 2.4.

3.17.1. Provide all equipment, chemicals, rigs, adapters, pumps, hoses, tanks, etc. required to connect to and chemically clean (abrasion method not allowed) each air flask internally. Electrical equipment requiring temporary power requires contractor to have pigtails connected to their equipment. All hose/tank connections require testing for leaks at the job site.

3.18. Coordinate with Subject Matter Expert (SME) para. 9.1 and Work Control Manager (WCM) para.

9.6, via the COR, to define work boundaries for ensuring entire work site is isolated.

3.18.1 Review work authorization form (WAF) with the WCM to ensure understanding of authorized work areas prior to starting work.

3.18.2 Request changes to isolation or work boundary to the WCM and SME, via the COR, at least 5 days prior to needing changes.

3.18.3 Ensure the isolation, de-energizing, drainage of the isolated area, and depressurization of mechanical, electrical, electronics and pressure system has been accomplished.

3.19. Ensure all contractor employees have direct knowledge of work control procedures, be able to recognize and initiate alarms, and be familiar with actions to be taken to evacuate the vessel.

3.20. Accomplish a joint on-site brief and walkthrough of the work site with the COR and Cell Manager

(para. 9.7), prior to start of work.

3.21. Prior to starting any work, contractor shall accomplish the following as derived from 2.5, NAVSEA Standard Item 009-110.

3.21.1. Evaluate services/temporary systems to be installed by the contractor that run through spaces and over water for possible leakage/spray protection.

3.21.2. Do not accomplish work or disturb any system or component without specific approved written instructions for accomplishing work on nuclear vessels.

3.21.3. Prohibit the following items from being brought onboard any nuclear powered vessel or nuclear support vessel:

3.21.3.1. Any mercury bearing equipment such as mercury thermometers, portable fluorescent lights, black lights or any other items containing mercury.

3.21.3.2. Nickel-Cadmium fasteners.

3.21.3.3. Any device that contains a source of radioactivity.

3.21.3.4. Bright yellow tools, bags, or equipment.

3.22. Notify the COR 5 days prior to delivering and removing equipment to and from off ship for crane and rigging services.

Note: All equipment must have certified lifting points and contractor provide certification documentation.

4. DELIVERABLE ITEMS

4.1. One legible copy, in electronic media, Evidentiary confirmation of approved NAVAIR LAKEHURST cleaning procedure three weeks after contract award as per 3.1.

4.2. One legible copy, in electronic media, of the Contractor’s Hazardous Material Inventory (CHMI).

4.3. One legible copy, in electronic media of each Safety Data Sheets (SDS).

4.4. One legible copy, in electronic media of the contractor’s production schedule and weekly updates.

4.5. One legible copy, in electronic media, of the contractor furnished report (CFR) of paragraph 3.7.

4.6. One legible copy of contractor documentation of hydrostatic testing of paragraph 3.9.

5. MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES:

5.1. Location of GFP: The 70 CU FT Air Flasks are located in the following spaces:

1 CAT: 03-79-9-Q

2 CAT: 03-69-4-Q

3 CAT: 03-148-8-Q

4 CAT: 03-161-2-Q

5.2. Manufacturer, model # and type include serial number(s):

SPOKANE METAL PRODUCTS MODEL # SMP 681

All 70 CU FT Air Flasks are of the 3092 serial number (same model) P/N 509040-1

5.3. The Government will provide:

5.3.1. PSNS&IMF as the Naval Supervisory Authority (NSA) and Lead Maintenance Activity (LMA) will act as the lead RA for the applicable Planned Incremental Availability (PIA).