YCs_Amend_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

YCs 1489 & 1490

This Amendment makes corrections to paragraphs 3.2.b. in Section L (page 71) and 3.2.b.vii. in Section M (page 76) of the solicitation, as reflected in the Summary of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Apr-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4523A-15-R-0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Apr-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Apr-2015

CODE

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD CODE 400

1400 FARRAGUT

CONTRACTING CODE 440

BREMERTON WA 98314-5001

N4523A 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4523A-15-R-0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT

1. GENERAL

a. Instructions: Offerors shall submit proposals in accordance with the following preparation instructions.

b. Packaging & Marking: Each volume is to be submitted in sealed boxes or envelopes. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the offeror’s name, solicitation number N4523A-15-R-0005, and contents of the package. Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs.

However, originals shall be separately wrapped inside the container, and be clearly labeled, as applicable, on the exterior of the packaging. At a minimum, the exterior of each box/envelope shall be marked:

SOLICITATION N4523A-15-R-0008

DELIVER UNOPENED TO KAREN CARTER OR JULIE THOMAS (CODE 441)

c. Place of Submission: Proposals shall be delivered to the following address:

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & IMF, NWRMC

Attn: Karen Carter or Julie Thomas

808 Burwell Street, Bldg 844, 1 st floor

Bremerton, WA 98337-5001

d. Quantities: Proposals shall be submitted in the following quantities:

Volume Title Original Copies Electronic (CD)

I Legal Offer 1 0 1

II Technical 1 3 2

III Price Proposal 1 0 1

e. Format and Size: Each volume shall be prepared on 8.5 x 11 paper and bound separately in three ring binders (to permit removal of sections) with each major part tabbed. All pages and paragraphs shall be numbered so that its location is traceable to the appropriate volume and page.

Text shall be at least 12-pitch type size and lines shall be double-spaced. Attachments and exhibits may be included to support the text and will be counted against the page limitation.

Offerors are warned that the Government will NOT evaluate any portion of a proposal that exceeds the page limitation specified herein. A cover letter is not required, but may be included. Each page shall be numbered by volume and page number. Each side of a piece of paper will be counted as one page toward the page limit except for the following items:

The first page of each volume, which shall be a title page containing the volume number and name, the company name of the offeror, and the offeror’s position regarding disclosure of proposal data. The next page(s) of each volume shall be a table of contents.

Any pages of a proposal volume which are used solely for the purpose of separating sections of the proposal or as tabs.

NOTE: Pages which are numbered by the offeror and designated with a marking such as “Intentionally

Left Blank” or similar marking will be counted against the page limitation.

f. Electronic Format Instructions: The electronic format shall be in a Microsoft Products version 2003 or later (Office, Excel, Word, PowerPoint, etc.). The electronic format data shall be submitted on a quality, virus scanned, virus-free CD, with an external label indicating (1) the name of the offeror, (2) the RFP number, (3) a list of files contained on the disk, and (4) the application/software versions used to generate the files.

In the event that data contained on the CD submitted is inconsistent with the paper submission, the paper submission will be considered to be the intended data. Note that a secure means for offerors to submit large electronic information, other than on CD, is currently unavailable.

g. Ship checks will be conducted at 8:00 A.M. – 11:00 A.M. PST on Wednesday, 08 April 2015 at Pier D, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton. Prospective offeror’s shall notify Gerry Vincent at (360) 476-4016 or email at gerald.m.vincent@navy.mil at least 48-hours in advance to reserve time and submit the names of employees and subcontractors who will attend. Pre-registration is mandatory to meet security and access requirements prior to arrival at Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton.

h. Subcontract Information: All offerors are responsible for informing their prospective subcontractors of the solicitation requirements. The Government will not advise prospective subcontractors as to the requirements of their transactions with offerors, nor will the Government respond to direct inquiries from prospective subcontractors concerning clarifications of specification or solicitation requirements. ALL

SUCH REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT

THROUGH THE PRIME CONTRACTOR (OFFEROR).

i. Requests for Clarification: Offerors are expected to reach a reasonable understanding of the requirements of the solicitation by careful examination and study of the schedule, the applicable statement of work, specifications, and plans, and by the application of qualified knowledge and experience.

If a correction or clarification is identified, the contractor must submit it using the Request for Clarification form (Attachment J-3) to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer identified in Section G no later than 9:00 A.M. (PST), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 to allow the Government sufficient time to prepare and issue answers. Responses to all Requests for Clarification will be posted as an amendment to the solicitation on FBO on or about Friday, 17 April 2015.

Failure of a prospective offeror to submit questions will be construed to mean that the offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. All prospective offerors are advised that solicitation requirements, terms, or conditions are changed only via solicitation amendment(s).

To ensure non-disclosure, all pages of the proposal should be marked as “Business Sensitive/Proprietary

Information.”

2. VOLUME I – LEGAL OFFER

a. Legal Offer: The legal offer shall include a complete copy of the solicitation consisting of Sections A through M with all attachments and acknowledgement of all amendments to include but not limited to:

Complete Standard Form 33, “Solicitation, Offer, and Award,” Blocks 12 through 18 (including

CAGE Code, Name, and Title of Person Authorized to Sign the Offer, Official Signature, and

Date);

mailto:gerald.m.vincent@navy.mil

Complete Section B of the Solicitation, providing proposed prices for each line item;

Complete all fill-in clauses, Section K Certifications/representation, and other submittals as required; and

Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer for 60calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an amendment to the solicitation.

b. Notification/Exceptions: The proper completion and submission to the Government of the above items will constitute an offer. With respect to specific terms and conditions of this Solicitation, any exception to any of the terms and conditions shall constitute a deficiency, which may make the offer unacceptable.

3. VOLUME II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

THE OFFER MUST BE DETERMINED TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE BEFORE FURTHER

CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN.

a. Organization: Volume II shall be bound separately and organized in the sequence conforming to the required proposal content. The technical proposal will consist of the sub-factors Corporate Experience, and

Technical Capability. Each sub-factor shall be tabbed and labeled.

1. Corporate Experience: Limited to 10 pages.

The contractor shall discuss their relevant corporate experience providing and managing qualified journeyman-level mechanics and technicians in accomplishing preservation, maintenance, repair, and overhaul of waterborne and/or dry-docked U.S. Navy vessels and surface ships during the past three years. The types of vessels deemed relevant to this procurement are DD, FFG, YTB, YT, YC, YON, YRB, YD, Caisson and Utility Craft

2. Technical Capability: No page limit.

Submit evidence of the following:

a. Facility. Documentation that demonstrates the offeror’s facility is capable of safely accomplishing dry-docking of a barge with the following measurements: L 100-ft x W 32-ft with a 8-ft draft.

Full barge displacement is 694 tons, and 144 light displacement tons. The facility must be located in the Puget Sound Washington region. For this procurement, the Puget Sound Washington region is defined as the west coast of the continental United States starting from Olympia, WA extending northward to Bellingham, WA.

b. Quality Management Plan. Submit evidence of your company’s Quality Management Plan.

c. Property Control Process. Submit a copy of your company’s Property Control Process which demonstrates the following:

i. Storage capability which meets the minimum needs of this procurement;

ii. Record keeping system;

iii. Inventory control process; and

iv. Property management point(s) of contact.

4. VOLUME III – PRICE PROPOSAL

a. Since adequate price competition is anticipated in response to this solicitation, certified cost or pricing data is not required at this time. However, if only one proposal is received in response to the solicitation, then cost and pricing data information is required to ascertain that proposed prices are fair and reasonable.

b. The price proposal has no page limitation.

c. Offeror is required to submit prices for all line items in Section B of this solicitation. Failure to submit a price for any line item may result in the offer being rejected as unacceptable. The prices will be compared to the Government Estimate, other offers received and/or other independent price cost information.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

1. CONTRACT AWARD

Award will be made to one offeror determined to be the lowest price technically acceptable offer, whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, represents the best value to the Government, given the outcome of the

Government’s evaluation of each offeror’s technical capability, past performance, and price.

2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY – LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

In selecting the best value, the following factors will be considered: (1) technical, (2) past performance, and (3) price. The offeror must be determined to have acceptable technical and past performance before further consideration will be given; that is, selection of the contractor is to be based on the establishment of minimum requirements to be evaluated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked, using the non-price factors. In order to be considered awardable, there must be an “acceptable” rating in every non-price factor. The non-price factors include Technical and Past Performance.

All offers with acceptable technical and past performance will be further considered. From those offers, the

Government will select the offer, in conformance with the solicitation, which offers the lowest price.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS AND CRITERIA

a. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: Technical proposals will be evaluated on an “Acceptable/Unacceptable” basis. The proposal will be evaluated for completeness and accuracy of information. An offer will be determined technically acceptable based on the following criteria:

1. Corporate Experience. The offer’s corporate experience shall be evaluated as having a minimum of three years of corporate experience providing and managing qualified journeyman level mechanics and technicians in accomplishing preservation, maintenance, repair and overhaul services on a minimum of three waterborne or dry-docked U.S. Navy vessels or surface ships within the vessels classes defined as relevant in Section L.

2. Technical Capability

a. Facility. The Offeror’s facility will be evaluated to determine that the facility has adequate lifting and operational capacity to safely dock the vessel. An on-site survey conducted by the

Government Docking Observer (GDO) may be required to validate the facility’s capability.

b. Quality Management Plan (QMP): The following components of the Offeror’s QMP will be evaluated for compliance with the following:

i. Control of Documents. A documented procedure which meets or exceeds ISO 9001:2008 paragraph 4.2.3.

ii. Control of Records. A documented procedure which meets or exceeds ISO 9001:2008 paragraph 4.2.4.

iii. Corrective Action. A documented procedure which meets or exceeds ISO 9001:2008 paragraph 8.5.2.

iv. Preventive Action. A documented procedure which meets or exceeds ISO 9001:2008 paragraph 8.5.3.

v. Internal Audit. A documented procedure which meets or exceeds ISO 9001:2008 paragraph

8.2.2.

vi. Management Review. A documented procedure which meets or exceeds ISO 9001:2008 paragraph 5.6.

vii. Gage Calibration. A documented procedure which meets or exceeds ISO 9001:2008 paragraph 7.6.

c. Property Control Process. The Offeror’s Property Control Process will be evaluated to determine the offeror’s capability to meet the requirements at FAR 52.245-1. The process must address, at a minimum, all four elements listed in Section L (3.a.2.c).

TECHNICAL EVALUATION RATING TABLE

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The proposal must meet or exceed the requirements in the solicitation, and any subsequent amendments.

Statements and representations made in an Offeror’s technical proposal may be subject to verification by

Government evaluators. If the proposal is found to be technically unacceptable in any of the Technical factors or sub-factors, the proposal will be found technically unacceptable overall. Any proposal deemed technically UNACCEPTABLE in accordance with the terms of the solicitation will NOT be considered for award.

b. PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance is a measure of whether an Offeror has satisfied customers in the past. Past Performance will be rated as “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable,” focusing on performance that is recent and relevant to the contract requirements. For the purposes of this source selection, recent past performance is defined as contracts performed within the three years immediately prior to the date of solicitation issuance. The types of vessels deemed relevant to this procurement are DD, FFG, YTB, YT, YC, YON, YRB, YD, Caisson and Utility Craft. Trends showing improving or deteriorating performance will also be considered.

The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation performed in support of this selection process does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers existing information regarding how well the offeror has performed on past contracts.

Past performance information shall be obtained from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System

(PPIRS).

Past Performance will be evaluated on an “Acceptable/Unacceptable” basis. Any rating of unsatisfactory on past performance elements Quality, Cost Control, Schedule, or Management will render an Offeror’s overall past performance rating as UNACCEPTABLE, and the proposal will NOT be considered for award.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptable/unacceptable rating, “unknown” past performance shall be considered “acceptable.”

c. PRICE: Price proposals shall be evaluated to determine whether the proposed prices reflect an understanding of the work and an ability to perform the contract, and are reasonable.

Offeror’s are required to submit prices for all line items included in the solicitation (Section B). Failure to submit a price for any line items may result in the offer being rejected as unacceptable. The Government will evaluate proposals by summing the total price for each contract line item to determine the total contract price.

(End of Summary of Changes)