SAP Limited Source Justification_Redacted.pdf
PDF 220 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N3904023Q0208
About this file
This document is a limited source justification for the procurement of a Nightingale CXO High Back Chair or equal brand name product from a single source. The justification cites the brand name exception under FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), as market research found other vendors could produce the same or equal product at the same or lower cost. The chair requires specific salient features including an Enersorb memory foam seat, lumbar support, adjustable ratchet headrest with built-in coat hook, and capacity of 275 pounds or more. The solicitation number is for the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command for brand name or equal high back chairs with a graphite finish. The response and award dates or pricing terms are not specified in the document.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Document Number:
(This is only applicable to acquisitions under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Acquisition using FAR Subpart 13.5 shall follow the special documentation requirements at FAR 13.501.)
USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION FOR AN ACQUISITION
UNDER THE SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD
I. BACKGROUND:
1. FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) states for purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, Contracting Officers may solicit from one source if the Contracting Officer determines that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, brand-name or industrial mobilization).
2. As required by FAR 13.106-3(b)(3)(i), this memorandum explains the absence of competition for this acquisition, as only one source will be solicited for this requirement (or for a portion of the requirement) and the requirement is not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
II. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM OR SERVICE:
Brand name or equal for a Nightingale CXO High Back Chair
Salient Features:
• Enersorb memory foam seat
• Lumbar support
• Black Web fabric
• Flexible mesh back for comfort and support
• Contoured seat foam with waterfall design
• Infinite position tilt-lock
• Adjustable ratchet headrest with built-in coat hook
• Overall Height: 47 ½” to 55”
• Seat Height: 16” to 21”
• Seat Size: 20”W x 19” to 21 ½” D
• Back Size: 22”W X 29 ½”
• Weight Capacity: 275lbs or more
RDD 10/31/2023
III. THE DETERMINATION FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN
COMPETITION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING (select all that apply):
A. ___ ONLY ONE RESPONSIBLE SOURCE (select all that apply):
1. ___ RESTRICTIVE RIGHTS. The source has established proprietary rights, limited rights in data, patent rights, copyrights or secret processes in the item or service required.
Explain what rights are restricted, why the restrictive rights make the required item or service available from only one source, and why another company could not satisfy the Government’s need.
2. ___ EXCLUSIVE LICENSING AGREEMENTS. The item or service is only available from the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), or there is only one authorized distributor or technical representative for the OEM.
Identify the OEM and explain the circumstances surrounding why the item or service is only available from the OEM.
OR
Identify the distributor(s)/authorized technical representative(s) for the item or service. Provide evidence of the exclusive licensing agreement as an attachment to this document. NOTE: If there is more than one distributor/authorized technical representative for an OEM part, then Part B, BRAND NAME SOLE SOURCE, is applicable, and Part A, ONLY ONE RESPONSIBLE SOURCE, should be left blank).
3. ___ OTHER REASONS. Other reason not identified above. Provide details on mission impact if requirement is not solicited from only one source.
B. _X__ BRAND NAME. Item required must be a brand name product, or feature of a product, particular to one manufacturer. Discuss why you are precluding consideration of a product manufactured by another company. Describe how the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government’s requirements and why a “brand name or equal” purchase description cannot be used (see FAR 11.104). Describe how market research indicates other companies’ similar products or products lacking the particular feature do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency’s needs.
The requested procurement was intended to be awarded to UNICOR per mandatory sources in FAR Part 8. However, it was discovered other vendors could produce the same product or equal for the same cost or lower; therefore a waiver was obtained from UNICOR to purchase from another source. Due to this information, it was determined that a brand name or equal product would meet the requirement. Salient features are provided.
C. ___UNUSUAL AND COMPELLING URGENCY. The supplies or services are of such unusual and compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured unless the agency is permitted to limit the number of sources from which it solicits bids or proposals.
Urgent requirements are supplies or services that will result in a work stoppage, or are mission critical and the routine processing time would result in injury to the Government. The determination that the procurement for the above item/service is an urgent and compelling requirement is based on the following:
1. Date on which the requirement was first identified:
2. Required delivery date/period of performance:
3. Explanation of why delivery/commencement of services by the date mentioned above is required: Explain the impact to the mission if the date above is not met, any special circumstances or conditions that exist which validate the requirement as “urgent,” estimated production lead time for the item, etc.
4. If appropriate, include any additional pertinent information:
IV. CERTIFICATIONS/APPROVALS:
A. Technical / Requirements Certification: I certify that the facts and representation under my cognizance which are included in this justification are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature Name (Printed) / Phone # Date
B. Contracting Officer Approval:
Signature Name (Printed) / Phone # Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .