N3220519R2012_Questions2.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- VERTREP DET A LANT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N32205-19-R-2012
About this file
Q&A2
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
General Q&A
| Item # | Subject | RFP Reference | Question/Comment | USG Response |
| 1 | CLIN/TEP | Attachment 9 | There are complications with Amendment 1 and using the same Daily per Diem for the first and second aircraft since the manning is different: 3 pilots and 3 engineers for the first and only two pilots for the second. | Attachment 9 has been modified to incorporate a CLIN stucture that addresses this concern. |
| 2 | CLIN/TEP | |||
| 3 | Mission Fuel Definition | |||
| 4 | Detachment aircraft requirements | |||
| 5 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 6 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 8 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 9 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 10 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 11 | Price evaluation | |||
| 12 | Source Selection Process | |||
| 13 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 14 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 15 | Instructions to Offeror's | |||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 20 | ||||
| 21 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 23 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| 25 |
&8Page &P
Sheet1
(2) The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to ensure a fair and reasonable price. Examples of such techniques include, but are not limited to, the following:(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation. Normally, adequate price competition establishes a fair and reasonable price (see 15.403-1(c)(1)(i)).(ii) Comparison of the proposed prices to historical prices paid, whether by the Government or other than the Government, for the same or similar items. This method may be used for commercial items including those “of a type” or requiring minor modifications. (A) The prior price must be a valid basis for comparison. If there has been a significant time lapse between the last acquisition and the present one, if the terms and conditions of the acquisition are significantly different, or if the reasonableness of the prior price is uncertain, then the prior price may not be a valid basis for comparison. (B) The prior price must be adjusted to account for materially differing terms and conditions, quantities and market and economic factors. For similar items, the contracting officer must also adjust the prior price to account for material differences between the similar item and the item being procured. (C) Expert technical advice should be obtained when analyzing similar items, or commercial items that are “of a type” or requiring minor modifications, to ascertain the magnitude of changes required and to assist in pricing the required changes. (iii) Use of parametric estimating methods/application of rough yardsticks (such as dollars per pound or per horsepower, or other units) to highlight significant inconsistencies that warrant additional pricing inquiry. (iv) Comparison with competitive published price lists, published market prices of commodities, similar indexes, and discount or rebate arrangements. (v) Comparison of proposed prices with independent Government cost estimates. (vi) Comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through market research for the same or similar items. (vii) Analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data (as defined at 2.101) provided by the offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it.