N3220519R2012_Questions2.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted

Attached to
VERTREP DET A LANT Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N32205-19-R-2012
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

Q&A2

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to VERTREP DET A LANT, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_9_Pricing_Spreadsheet_REV3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220519R2012_Amendment0003.pdf PDF
N3220519R2012_Amendment0002_Conform.pdf PDF
N3220519R2012_Amendment0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_Pricing_Spreadsheet_REV2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_9_Pricing_Spreadsheet_Rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220519R2012_Questions1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220519R2012_Amendment0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_Detachment_Performance_Plans.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Closed_Circuit_Refueling.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_7_DD254_N3220519R2012.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_T-AKE_Hanger_Dimensions.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_Performance_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment_5_Reporting_Templates_.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Primary_Logistics_Ports.docx DOCX document
N3220519R2012.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_Government_Furnished_Property.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_Past_Performance_Data_Sheet.doc DOC document
SYNOPSIS_N3220519R2012.docx DOCX document
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

General Q&A

Item #SubjectRFP ReferenceQuestion/CommentUSG Response
1CLIN/TEPAttachment 9There are complications with Amendment 1 and using the same Daily per Diem for the first and second aircraft since the manning is different: 3 pilots and 3 engineers for the first and only two pilots for the second.Attachment 9 has been modified to incorporate a CLIN stucture that addresses this concern.
2CLIN/TEP
3Mission Fuel Definition
4Detachment aircraft requirements
5Instructions to Offeror's
6Instructions to Offeror's
8Instructions to Offeror's
9Instructions to Offeror's
10Instructions to Offeror's
11Price evaluation
12Source Selection Process
13Instructions to Offeror's
14Instructions to Offeror's
15Instructions to Offeror's
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

&8Page &P

Sheet1

(2) The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to ensure a fair and reasonable price. Examples of such techniques include, but are not limited to, the following:(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation. Normally, adequate price competition establishes a fair and reasonable price (see 15.403-1(c)(1)(i)).(ii) Comparison of the proposed prices to historical prices paid, whether by the Government or other than the Government, for the same or similar items. This method may be used for commercial items including those “of a type” or requiring minor modifications. (A) The prior price must be a valid basis for comparison. If there has been a significant time lapse between the last acquisition and the present one, if the terms and conditions of the acquisition are significantly different, or if the reasonableness of the prior price is uncertain, then the prior price may not be a valid basis for comparison. (B) The prior price must be adjusted to account for materially differing terms and conditions, quantities and market and economic factors. For similar items, the contracting officer must also adjust the prior price to account for material differences between the similar item and the item being procured. (C) Expert technical advice should be obtained when analyzing similar items, or commercial items that are “of a type” or requiring minor modifications, to ascertain the magnitude of changes required and to assist in pricing the required changes. (iii) Use of parametric estimating methods/application of rough yardsticks (such as dollars per pound or per horsepower, or other units) to highlight significant inconsistencies that warrant additional pricing inquiry. (iv) Comparison with competitive published price lists, published market prices of commodities, similar indexes, and discount or rebate arrangements. (v) Comparison of proposed prices with independent Government cost estimates. (vi) Comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through market research for the same or similar items. (vii) Analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data (as defined at 2.101) provided by the offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it.