A0001_RFP_SEACAT_Tanker_ONE.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Special Mission Time Charter, SEACAT 2018
Solicitation number
N32205-18-R-3411
Issued by

About this file

N32205-18-R-3411 SEACAT Tanker Amendment 0001

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N3220518P3411.docx DOCX document
18-R-3411_QA_0002.docx DOCX document
18R3411-Amendment_0002.docx DOCX document
18-R-3411_QA_0001.docx DOCX document
SPECIALTIME_PROFORMA_2018.docx DOCX document
SPECIALTIME_Fuel_Consumption_Temp.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SPECIALTIME_PROFORMA_2018.docx DOCX document
N3220518R3411_RFP.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

31 JULY 2018

THIS IS THE MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND NORFOLK, STRATEGIC SEALIFT PROGRAM SUPPORT OFFICE, N04103A2

TO: ALL POTENTIAL OFFERORS

SUBJECT: N32205-18-R-3411, AMENDMENT 0001

REF: (A) MSC RFP N32205-18-R-3411, DATED 31 JULY 2018, AS AMENDED

1. SUBJECT RFP PROFORMA IS HEREBY UPDATED.

2. SUBJECT RFP IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

A. PER THE PROFORMA ATTACHMENT, THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS ARE UPDATED:

1. SECTION X-1 (10) IS AMENDED TO READ-- PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: (TAILORED)

FOR THE PURPOSES OF EVALUATING OFFERORS’ PAST PERFORMANCE:

A. “RECENT” IS DEFINED AS A CONTRACT IN-PROGRESS OR COMPLETED WITHIN THE LAST THREE (3) YEARS.

B. “RELEVANT” IS DEFINED AS A CONTRACT THAT IS OF SIMILAR SCOPE, MAGNITUDE, AND COMPLEXITY TO THE REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTH IN THIS SOLICITATION.

(1). SCOPE: EXPERIENCE IN THE AREAS DEFINED IN THE PWS.

(2). MAGNITUDE: THE MEASURE OF THE VOLUME, DOLLAR VALUE AND/OR DURATION OF THE WORK ACTUALLY PERFORMED UNDER A CONTRACT.

(3). COMPLEXITY: THE MEASURE OF TECHNICAL DIFFICULTY, MANAGERIAL INTRICACY AND/OR REQUIRED COORDINATION OF EFFORTS AND DISCIPLINES PERFORMED UNDER A CONTRACT. FOR COMPLEXITY, NOT ONLY WILL THE TASKS PERFORMED BY THE OFFEROR BE CONSIDERED, BUT ALSO THE OFFEROR’S ABILITY TO COORDINATE TASKS (E.G., CONCURRENT PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS).

2. SECTION XI-I (A) IS AMENDED TO READ:

THE GOVERNMENT WILL AWARD A CONTRACT RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION TO THE RESPONSIBLE OFFEROR WHOSE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROPOSAL WITH ACCEPTABLE PAST PERFORMANCE REPRESENTS THE LOWEST PRICE TO THE GOVERNMENT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CARGO PREFERENCE ACT OF 1904, PREFERENCE WILL BE GIVEN TO U.S. FLAG VESSELS.

AN OFFEROR THAT DOES NOT HAVE RECENT AND RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE TO PROVIDE FOR CONSIDERATION IS REQUESTED TO AFFIRMATIVELY STATE THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE RECENT AND RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO CONSIDER.

3. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.

SIGNED: LORRIE LEEDY, CONTRACTING OFFICER, N04103A2

File details come from the government source that posted it.