19RJN78_SOL_0002.pdf
PDF 243 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CIRCUIT CARD MULTIPLE AWARD CONTRACT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0016419RJN78
About this file
This document provides details for a forthcoming Circuit Card Multiple Award Contract solicitation from the Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division. The solicitation will seek fixed price, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity multiple award contracts for circuit card production and related services over a five year period. The contracts will have a minimum value of $3,000 and maximum value of $49.9 million, with individual delivery order values ranging from a minimum of $3,000 to a maximum of $49.9 million. The solicitation will include 47 contract line items for step-ladder pricing over five years and five option years for quantities of 1 to 100 units. Delivery schedules, inspections, and acceptance will be determined on each delivery order, which may provide government furnished property. Offerors must submit one sample unit to drawing 3392AS2433 Rev G with their proposals. The procurement is set aside entirely for small businesses. Award is expected in February 2020 based on technical acceptability, past performance, and price factors.
19RJN78_SOL_0002
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19RJN78_SOL_0003.pdf | ||
| 19RJN78_SOL_0001.pdf | ||
| 19RJN78_sol.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of N0016419RJN78 Amendment 0002 is to update Attachment 2 - Drw gs to Rev 5 - 10-16-19, Attachment 3 - TDP Updates to Rev 2 - 10-16-19, Attachment 6 - Drw g List to Rev 1 - 10-16-19, and correct language in Section L, Instructions to Offerors, Section 1.4 - Classification to "This requirement is being solicited in accordance w ith (IAW) FAR 6.203, Set-asides for small business concerns." All other terms and conditions remain the same.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 12
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 16-Oct-2019
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0016419RJN78
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
21-Aug-2019
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
16-Oct-2019
CODE
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV
J. ROBERTS (812-854-2433)
BLDG 3373
300 HIGHWAY 361
CRANE IN 47522-5001
N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N0016419RJN78
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS
The following have been modified:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents
DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE
Exhibit A N0016419RJN78 - CDRLs
A001-A005 - 10-31-18
7 31-OCT-2018
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
N0016419RJN78 – SOW
- 7-17-19 N0016419RJN78 - Drwgs-
REV 5 – 10-16-19
N0016419RJN78 - TDP
Updates - Rev 2 – 10-16-19
N0016419RJN78 – PPQ
- 7-17-19 GFP Attachment (from WAWF Module) N0016419RJN78 - Drwg List
– REV 1 – 10-16-19
Per File
17-JUL-2019
16-OCT-2019
16-OCT-2019
17-JUL-2019
26-AUG-2019
16-OCT-2019
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
1.1 General Information
This provision specifies the organization, format, and contents of an Offeror’s past performance, technical proposal, and price proposal to be submitted in response to this solicitation for evaluation by the Government. The purpose of the instructions contained in this provision is to provide for uniform submission of all Offerors’ proposals.
Uniformity is expected to facilitate Government efficiency and accuracy in the technical and price evaluation and source selection process. The contents of the Offeror’s proposal shall be organized to conform to the requirements specified herein.
Requirements for the contents of each of the submitted written technical proposals are identified below. The order of presentation in the Offeror’s submitted written proposal shall correspond to the order of the Factors discussed below.
The content requirements described below address major topics of concern to the Government. Failure to respond to any of these topics may be considered a "deficiency." All proposal information provided must be relevant and clearly explain how the proposed item will meet the requirements of the solicitation. Each written proposal must be separate and contain sufficient information to permit a detailed evaluation.
Previously submitted data, if any, will not be used in the evaluation of the Offeror’s response to this solicitation.
Any Offeror’s experience, capability, knowledge, and understanding not specifically described in the submitted proposal will not be assumed to exist by the Government during evaluation.
This will be an acquisition effort utilizing a best value approach. The Offerors’ product samples and proposals will be evaluated to ensure that the items being offered comply with the criteria listed in the solicitation.
Offerors are cautioned that the Government reserves the right to make award based on initial offers without discussions with Offerors. Therefore, it is imperative that the information provided in the Offeror’s response to the solicitation be complete and accurate and that the prices proposed be the Offeror’s best terms. Each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, if considered necessary by the Contracting Officer, discussions may be conducted with those Offerors determined to be in the competitive range.
THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PROPOSAL THAT DOES NOT COMPLY
WITH THESE PROPOSAL PREPARATION/SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS.
PROPOSALS SHALL NOT CONTAIN CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
1.2 Restriction of Disclosure/Proprietary Information
If the Offeror wishes to restrict the disclosure or use of its proposal, a proper legend must be included on materials provided. Individual subcontractor/vendor proprietary information may be submitted via separate binders/CD- ROMs. The information contained in these binders/CD-ROMs must be referenced (by binder title, page number, and section number, as appropriate) within the main proposal where the information would have been included if it were not subcontractor/vendor proprietary. The information in these separate binders/CD- ROMs is subject to all other requirements of the solicitation and must be well-marked to clearly indicate any special handling instructions.
1.3 Questions
It is the Offeror’s responsibility to bring to the attention of the Contracting Officer at the earliest possible time, but prior to the closing date, any ambiguities, discrepancies, inconsistencies, or conflicts between the statement of work (SOW), drawings, and other solicitation documents attached hereto or incorporated by reference. All questions shall be submitted to john.c.roberts3@navy.mil. The deadline for submitting questions is 60 calendar days after issuance of the solicitation.
1.4 Classification
This requirement is being solicited in accordance with (IAW) FAR 6.203, Set-asides for small business concerns.
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code applicable to the requirements contained within this solicitation is 334418. The size standard for NAICS 334418 can be found at www.sba.gov.
1.5 Start Date
In order to allow for procurement lead time and a fair and equal evaluation of all proposals submitted under this competitive procurement, all proposals shall be based on a contract award date of March 2020. This date is only an estimate of the anticipated contract award date and will be used for the purpose of proposal evaluation only. A definitive award date will be incorporated into the contract document.
1.6 World Wide Web Solicitation Information
The complete solicitation package, including all amendments, should be received and reviewed prior to submitting a response. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to obtain all amendments and/or other applicable documents prior to submission of the offer. Under these circumstances, Offerors are reminded to include acknowledgement of acceptance of these amendments in their offer. Any amendments to the subject solicitation will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities web portal (FedBizOpps), https://www.fbo.gov.
ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS OF PROPOSALS, TO INCLUDE E-MAIL AND FAX, IN RESPONSE TO
THIS SOLICITATION ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE METHOD TO SUBMIT
AN OFFER UNDER THIS SOLICITATION IS TO MAIL BOTH A HARDCOPY PROPOSAL AND A CD-
ROM CONTAINING AN ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE PROPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
INSTRUCTIONS FOUND IN THE RFP SO THAT THE ENTIRE SUBMISSION IS RECEIVED BEFORE
THE DATE AND TIME SET FOR CLOSING OF THIS SOLICITATION.
2.1 General
Award will be made under Solicitation No. N0016419RJN78 based on a best value source selection process.
Proposals that do not comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal may render the Offeror ineligible for award.
2.2 Proposal General Guidance
Each technical proposal shall enable the Government evaluation personnel to facilitate a thorough evaluation and arrive at a sound factual-based determination as to whether or not the proposal will meet the Government’s requirements. Each technical proposal shall be specific, detailed and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate the degree of the prospective contractor’s knowledge and understanding of the requirements. The technical proposal shall be used as a method to determine if the proposed solutions to technical problems are valid and practical.
Statements which merely paraphrase the SOW or attest that “standard procedures will be employed” are inadequate to enable the Government to evaluate and do not allow the Government to determine if the proposal complies with the requirements of the SOW. Unsupported promises to comply with contractual requirements will not be sufficient.
Failure to thoroughly describe (i.e. test data, test methods, design/drawings, etc.) how the proposed item meets a requirement will result in a negative evaluation in regards to the subject requirement. If the technical proposal is deficient in supporting data, the Government may assign a deficiency for the subject requirement regardless of any claims to meet the requirement. Proposals must contain supporting rationale for any statements related to proposed performance. No assumptions will be made by evaluators regarding areas that are not addressed in the Offeror’s written proposal.
2.3 Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Proposals
Mailed or commercially delivered hard copies of proposals and CD-ROMs shall be sent to the address listed below.
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV
JOHN ROBERTS (BLDG 3373; ROOM 135; CODE 0232)
N0016419RJN78
BLDG 41 SE CENTRAL RECEIVING
300 HWY 361
CRANE, IN 47522-5001
TEL: 812-854-2433
Offerors shall clearly mark the package with the following:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
DO NOT OPEN
The Offeror shall provide tracking information for all proposals submitted to john.c.roberts3@navy.mil prior to the closing date/time in order to ensure proper handling of proposals.
Hand delivered proposals will not be accepted. All proposals must be mailed.
It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that any courier service used has access to NSWC Crane. Only approved couriers will be given access to the base to make delivery.
An electronic copy of the proposal must also be provided on a non –rewritable CD-ROM. Electronic files submitted with hard copy proposals shall be submitted on CD-ROMs formatted for Microsoft Windows Office 2010; text shall be prepared using Microsoft Word compatible applications; and spreadsheets, worksheets, or workbooks shall be prepared using Microsoft Excel compatible applications. The CD-ROM shall be clearly marked with the following:
Solicitation number Offeror’s name Contents of disk (Volume #).
Offerors shall not embed sound or video files into the electronic files. Graphics, tables, photographs, and other data beyond the capability of Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Excel, may be submitted in Adobe Acrobat format. Electronic cost data must be submitted in Microsoft Excel with formulas.
Offerors must ensure copies of proposals submitted on CD-ROM that the submission is readable, in the format specified in the solicitation, and free of computer viruses. Prior to any evaluation, the Government will check all files for viruses and ensure that all information is readable. In the event that any files are defective (unreadable), the Government may only evaluate the readable electronic files. Further, if defective (unreadable) media results in a significant deficiency in the Offeror’s proposal, the Government may consider the proposal incomplete and not consider such proposal for further evaluation.
The Offeror must ensure that:
(i) The electronic and paper copies of its proposal submitted in response to the solicitation are identical;
(ii) It has verified that its electronic proposal is readable on a computer running either Windows 7 Enterprise or Windows 10;
(iii) It has verified that the electronic proposals are free of computer viruses.
2.4 Proposal Format
No graphics or pictures, other than graphs/tables/charts as may be required, shall be submitted with the proposal.
Three-ring binders are preferred. The pages in the binders shall be easily removed and replaced to facilitate page changes. Any pages that are changed (as the result of negotiations) shall be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page and/or circling if changing data in a chart. The Offeror shall indicate the new date on revised pages.
2.4.1 Page Formatting
The requirements below apply equally to subcontractors. The electronic proposal shall be prepared so that if printed, the proposal meets the following format requirements:
8.5 x 11-inch paper.
1 inch margins.
No smaller than 11-point Times New Roman Font text. No hyperlinks. Pages shall be single sided, one and one half spaced, with a minimum of one inch margins on all sides.
Pages shall be dated and numbered sequentially by volume.
The spreadsheets (landscape) shall be formatted for printing such that all data is in a type size no smaller than 10 characters per inch and row and column headings shall appear on each printed page.
These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11” x 17” in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume and count as one page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics; not for pages of text.
2.4.2 Cover Page, Table of Contents, Glossary & List
Each proposal volume shall include a Cover Page and a Table of Contents. The Cover Page shall identify the solicitation number, amendment number, proposal volume and title, date of proposal, proposal validity length, and the Offeror’s name. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each. Cover Pages, Tables of Contents, Glossaries, and Lists of Acronyms do NOT count against page limitations.
2.4.3 Page Limitations
Page limitations are identified for each volume/section of the proposal as shown below and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in proposal evaluation. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Graphs, charts, and tables are included in the page count. The following are NOT included in the page limitations:
Proposal Cross-Reference Tables Standard Commercial Warranty
Document / Information Volume and Factor Number
Completed signed Solicitation package to include signed Amendments, all representations and certifications executed, and a cover letter.
(1 hard copy and 1 CD-ROM)
Volume I Cover Letter 3 page limit
Written Technical Proposal:
-Technical Approach and Capability
-Technical Documentation (1 hard copy and 1 CD-ROM)
Volume II; Factor I (Technical Proposal: 25 page limit)
(All matrices, manuals, and data sheets: no page limit)
Past Performance Proposal and Matrix (1 hard copy and 1 CD-ROM)
Volume III; Factor II (10 page limit, Max 5 references)
Price Proposal (1 hard copy and 1 CD-ROM)
Volume IV; Factor III
(10 page limit exclusive of the Matrix)
Product Sample IAW Drawing 3392AS2433 REV G , One (1) - Rocket Control Unit - Circuit Card Assy
The technical proposal and the cost/price proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes. The technical proposal shall NOT contain any cost/pricing information.
2.5 Proposal Requirements
a. A complete proposal consists of the following:
b. Complete Solicitation Package (See 2.5.1)
c. Written Technical Proposal (See 2.5.2)
d. Past Performance Information (See 2.5.3)
e. Price Proposal (See 2.5.4)
f. Product Sample, One (1) - Rocket Control Unit - Circuit Card Assy (See 2.5.5)
2.5.1 Completed Solicitation Package
The completed and signed solicitation package shall include signed amendments, all representations and certifications executed, and a cover letter. The cover letter shall be signed by an individual authorized to commit the company to the proposal. The cover letter described below is required in addition to the requirements of FAR 52.215-1 Alt. I, paragraph (b). One hard copy and one CD-ROM shall be submitted.
2.5.1.1 Cover Letter
Offerors shall provide a cover letter with the following information:
a. Solicitation number N0016419RJN78
b. Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number
c. DUNS Number
d. Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)
e. Name, address and telephone number of the cognizant DCMA Office (can be found at http://www.dcma.mil/)
f. Proposal validity 120 days after proposal closing date
g. Names, telephone numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to conduct negotiations, as well as the names of the official authorized to bind the Offeror’s organization
h. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the prices set forth in the pricing matrices in the solicitation; or any exceptions taken to any requirements of the solicitation, to include, but not limited to, technical exceptions, clauses, and/or provisions.
i. In which volume and on what page of the Offeror’s proposal the exception is addressed, should the Offeror identify any exceptions to the requirements in the solicitation, as described above.
j. A copy of the Offeror’s SAM registration information from the SAM website. This does not count towards the page limitation of the cover letter.
2.5.2 Product Sample – Factor 1 – Subfactor A
a. Offerors shall provide 1 each Product Sample IAW Drawing 3392AS2433 REV G - Rocket Control Unit - Circuit Card Assy with the written proposal. The product sample must be in conformance to all specifications and standards in the solicitation.
b. No GFM will be provided for the Product Sample. As stated in Section J, N0016419RJN78 - TDP Updates document, Product Samples to be provided without LED Part Numbers LN1371SG-(TR), LN1471SY-(TR), LN1271R-(TR). The Government will provide these as GFM on future Delivery Orders.
c. Product samples will not be returned to the offeror after evaluation.
d. The product sample shall be sent to the address below and shall be received by the closing date specified on page 1 of the solicitation:
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV
JOHN ROBERTS (BLDG 3373; ROOM 135; CODE 0232)
BLDG 41 SE CENTRAL RECEIVING
300 HWY 361
CRANE, IN 47522-5001
TEL: 812-854-2433
Offerors shall clearly mark the package with the following:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
DO NOT OPEN
2.5.3 Written Technical Proposal —Factor I – Subfactor B
Offerors shall submit a Written Technical Proposal in response to the specifications described in the solicitation in such detail to allow the Government to evaluate the proposal.
The Written Technical Proposal shall define the Offeror’s technical approach that would satisfy the requirements of the SOW, drawings, and solicitation requirements.
Each Written Technical Proposal shall enable Government evaluating personnel to make a thorough evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether or not the proposal will meet the requirements of the Government as specified in the solicitation. To this end, each Written Technical Proposal shall be so specific, detailed and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements.
Statements which paraphrase the specifications or attest that "standard procedures will be employed," are inadequate to demonstrate how the Offeror proposes to comply with the requirements of the solicitation. Statements that the Offeror "understands" the methods and procedures for performing the described requirements will be considered inadequate as will statements such as "straightforward engineering techniques" and the "highest quality control procedures". The material must be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate an understanding of the technical specifications and the solicitation requirements. Unsupported promises to comply with contractual requirements will not be sufficient. Proposals must contain supporting rationale for any statements relating to proposed performance.
The Written Technical Proposal shall include a complete description of how your company will manufacture the CLIN/FMS CLIN(s) you are proposing on from start to finish. This includes, but is not limited to, the following:
1. Address your capability to produce 100/ea CCA’s per month by describing your maximum monthly capacity/capability for CCA production. Consider your current and projected workload when proposing your capacity.
2. Address your company’s type of equipment for placement of components i.e. pick and place machine, ball grid array, etc.
3. Address your company’s types of assembly machines i.e. wave solder machine, selective solder machine/certified hand solder technicians, flux application machines, etc.
4. Address your company’s types of coating application apparatus i.e. conformal coating sprayer, etc.
5. Address your company’s type of inspection equipment, i.e. X-Ray, Automated Optical Inspection, etc.
No assumptions will be made by evaluators regarding areas that are not addressed in the Offeror’s written proposal and any pages that exceed the 25 page maximum will not be evaluated.
2.5.3.1 SOW and Drawing Compliance
Offerors shall provide the following information to allow the Government to determine acceptability of products being proposed:
a. An acceptable technical proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
b. Offerors shall identify any “exceptions” to the SOW and/or drawings and state precisely how the offered supplies differ from the solicitation documents.
c. Offerors SHALL include a hard copy of the following Technical Capability/Compliance Information in response to the requirements described in the solicitation in such detail to allow the Government to evaluate the technical acceptability of the proposal. This SHALL include:
Compliance with the SOW.
Compliance with drawings.
d. The Offerors shall include a summary of how they will comply with these requirements. The summary shall enable Government evaluating personnel to make a thorough evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether or not the proposal will meet the requirements of the Government.
2.5.4 Past Performance Proposal – Factor II
a. The past performance portion of the proposal shall be submitted as a part of Volume III, and shall be no more than a maximum of 10 pages for the narrative.
b. Proposals shall not contain classified information.
c. The past performance proposal shall not contain any pricing information.
d. Past performance information shall include:
1) The Offeror shall submit descriptions for a maximum of five recent past performance references which are relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. For the purposes of this solicitation, recent contracts are defined as those on which performance occurred from calendar year 2016 to present. Relevant contracts are defined as either prime contracts or significant subcontracts for present/past performance efforts involving similar scope and magnitude, dealing with manufacture, test, inspection, packaging and delivery of circuit card assemblies or related technology, to this solicitation. (See Item 7 below for more details.) Commercial and state/local contracts may be included, if necessary.
2) The description shall include the below information in the following format:
i. Identify in specific detail for each contract listed how that effort is considered relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation.
ii. Offeror’s (and/ subcontractor's) CAGE and DUNS numbers
iii. Government or commercial contracting activity, address, telephone number, and email address
iv. Procuring Contracting Officer's (PCO's) name, telephone number, and email address
v. Government or commercial contracting activity technical representative, or COR; and telephone numbers
vi. Government or commercial contract administration activity, and the name and telephone number of the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
vii. Contract number
viii. Contract award date
ix. Contract type
x. Awarded price/cost
xi. Final, or projected final, price/cost
xii. Original delivery schedule
xiii. Final or projected final, delivery schedule
xiv. A narrative explanation on each previous contract listed describing the objectives achieved and any cost growth or schedule delays encountered and any revised delivery schedules as well as the reason(s) the delivery schedule was revised. For any contracts which did not or do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. The Offeror shall also provide as an attachment a copy of any cure notices or show cause letters received on each previous contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the Offeror or proposed subcontractor.
3) In addition to the prior relevant contract references, the Offeror shall also provide the above required information for any and all contracts under which it has been terminated in whole or in part, for default or cause during the past 10 years, to include those currently in the process of such termination as well as those which are not similar to the proposed effort.
4) Offerors which lack relevant past performance information or for which such information is not available (e.g., new corporate entities) shall instead submit the above required past performance data on its predecessor companies (if any), its personnel that will perform this contract who have relevant experience, and any significant or critical subcontractors the Offeror is proposing to use, which shall serve as the basis for the Government’s past performance evaluation of such Offerors.
However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the Offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited.
5) Offerors shall submit an outline of how the effort required by the solicitation will be assigned for performance within the Offeror's corporate entity and among proposed subcontractors.
Information required in the above paragraphs shall be provided for each proposed subcontractor who will perform a significant portion of the effort. "Significant" is defined for these purposes in terms of criticality of the subcontracted work to the whole. With regard to prime contract assignments that will be performed by the Offeror and not a proposed subcontractor, the Offeror shall indicate:
i. what internal corporate bodies/divisions will accomplish which portions of the effort,
ii. whether or not those divisions were responsible for performance under the previous contracts for which the Offeror is providing information under the instant proposal, and
iii. if those divisions have relocated since the accomplishment of previous cited contract efforts, a description of any changes arising from that relocation in terms of responsible personnel, processes, facilities and equipment.
6) Offerors shall include in their proposal the written consent of their proposed significant subcontractors to allow the Government to discuss the subcontractor's past performance assessment with the Offeror during negotiations.
Note: Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by Offerors in their proposals may be used to assess Offeror past performance. Since the Government may not necessarily interview all of the sources provided by the Offerors, it is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance source data remains with the Offerors. Proposals that do not contain the information requested by this solicitation risk rejection or high performance risk assessment by the Government.
7) In determining relevancy, the Offeror should consider the size, content, and complexity type and value of the contract, and the type of requirement compared to this solicited requirement. The Offeror should also consider the level or amount of effort. The Offeror must provide details (if its past performance reference is based upon “related technology” as a reference) including how the “related technology” is applicable to the solicited effort. Should the Offeror not explain how the “related technology” is applicable, the reference may not be considered relevant. If an Offeror has no current or relevant past performance information for itself, its predecessor companies, its responsible personnel who will perform this contract, or its significant or critical subcontractors, the Offeror should so state that in this volume and explain.
8) Each Offeror shall submit present and past performance information for itself on projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity. The Offerors may choose to submit present and past performance information for major or critical proposed subcontractors, team members, or joint venture partners that have experience in projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity with its proposal. This volume shall provide a list of current and relevant contracts on which the Offeror has performed in the format requested in the proposal requirements portion of this document. This information, as well as other information the Government may obtain elsewhere via Government database s (CPARS, PPIRS etc.) and other Government agencies (DCMA, DCAA, etc.), will be used to evaluate the Offeror's past performance. The Government reserves the right to solicit feedback beyond what is identified in the questionnaire.
NO CLASSIFIED PAST PERFORMANCE SUPPLEMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
The Offeror may submit performance on classified programs as long as that information can be verified. If the Offeror intends to submit in this manner the information that is classified (customer, contract number, etc.) should be marked “reserved” and the description/write up of the work performed shall remain unclassified. If the Offeror cannot describe what work was accomplished in an unclassified manner the Offeror cannot submit that program for past performance evaluation. Offerors are notified that the Government will evaluate the data provided in this volume and data obtained from other sources that is determined to be current and relevant to the effort at hand in the development of its performance risk assessments.
e. Past Performance Matrix - Offeror shall provide a Past Performance Matrix for each of the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 4) sent out listing the following:
1) Organization/Customer
2) Brief Description
3) Contract Number
4) Telephone & E-mail of Organization/Customer Point of Contact (POC)
5) Date PPQ being sent to POC and transmission method utilized
f. The Offeror shall provide a maximum of five past performance references on prior contracts that are recent and relevant to this requirement. The Offeror shall contact past performance references directly and request that they complete and submit directly to the agency, the Past Performance Matrix and the Past Performance Questionnaire to the address in Block 9 of SF33, Page 1 of the Solicitation or to john.c.roberts3@navy.mil in accordance with the timeline set in Block 9 of SF33, Page 1 of the Solicitation.
The completed questionnaires shall be sent directly from the reference POC to the contract specialist, John Roberts. Under no circumstances shall the questionnaires be returned to the Offerors. Any information provided by the Offeror’s references is subject to verification/validation by the Government during the evaluation process. The Government may make contact and follow up with the listed references identified on the Offeror’s Past Performance Matrix. The Offeror may provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts as well as the Offeror’s corrective actions. The questionnaires do not count against the page limitations stated above.
RECENCY REQUIREMENT: References will be considered recent that are either currently being performed, or have been performed, from calendar year 2016 to present, which are relevant to the effort required by this solicitation.
New corporate entities which lack past performance information, or for which such information is not available, shall submit the above required past performance data on its predecessor companies and its personnel that will perform this contract who have relevant experience, which shall serve as the basis for the Government’s past performance evaluation of such Offerors.
2.5.5 Price Proposal – Factor III
The Offeror shall submit prices for the CLINs and FMS CLINs listed in SECTION B:
a. Price Proposal - The Offeror shall complete the price matrices. Pricing shall not be submitted in any other area of the proposal. The Government anticipates the potential to award multiple contracts as a result of the solicitation. Offeror is not required to propose on every CLIN and FMS CLIN. The Government plans to award on a CLIN and FMS CLIN basis with one award per CLIN and FMS CLIN. Awardee of any CLIN and FMS CLIN will also be awarded the unpriced Build to Print emerging requirements CLIN and FMS CLIN which the Awardee will be offered the opportunity to compete on as requirements emerge over the course of the contract.
b. Offerors are directed to Section J, N0016419RJN78 - TDP Updates document, which shows materials which will be provided as Government Furnished Material (GFM).
c. The Offeror shall indicate in Price Proposal if they have ever produced any of the items/CLINs and if so, when was last date of production.
d. The prices shall include all shipping for CLINs marked FOB destination in Section B.
e. The Offeror shall provide any recommended quantity break changes to improve price to the Government.
f. One hard copy and one CD-ROM required.
g. All pricing shall be confined exclusively to the pricing proposal. No pricing information is permitted in the technical proposal.
2.6 Exceptions
Offerors are not encouraged to take exceptions to this solicitation; however, if any exceptions are taken, Offerors are to detail the particular section, clause, paragraph and page to which they are taking exception.
ANY EXCEPTION TO THE GOVERNMENT'S TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS/SPECIFICATIONS
MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE TECHNICAL PROPROSAL. ANY EXCEPTION(S) MUST BE
ADDRESSED IN THE COVER LETTER.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .