J-5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Utility Floats 25 & 28 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00024-17-R-4437
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command

About this file

J-5 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Utility Floats 25 & 28, newest first.
File Type Posted
J-1_RSC_10.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_08.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_07.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_04.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_09.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_06.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_05.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_03.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_01.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_02.doc DOC document
J-1_RSC_form.doc DOC document
J-2_Five-Way_Breakdown_UF25.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-8_CDRLs.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-4437_SOLICITATION.docx DOCX document
J-4_Past_Performance_Data_Sheet.docx DOCX document
J-7_SOW_UF_28.docx DOCX document
J-3_Five-Way_Breakdown_UF28.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-6_SOW_UF_25.docx DOCX document
UF_25&28_FBO_Synopsis.docx DOCX document
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N00024-17-R-4437 UFs 25 & 28

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-5

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (21 JUNE 2017 at 2:00 PM (EST) to Doug McCreary. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Doug McCreary at douglas.mccreary@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Doug McCreary
Contract Officer

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing is provided below.

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF)
Attn: Doug McCreary, SEA02444

1333 Isaac Hull Ave Washington, D.C. 20376

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Doug McCreary
(Facsimile Number)(202) 781-3877
(E-mail Address)douglas.mccreary@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .