Attachment_7_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 58 KB Posted

Attached to
MK 5 Velocimeter
Solicitation number
N00024-16-R-5369
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 7

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Velocimeter_QA_1-3.pdf PDF
RFP_Conformed.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A025.pdf PDF
CDRL_A002.pdf PDF
CDRL_A026.pdf PDF
CDRL_A023.pdf PDF
CDRL_A022.pdf PDF
RFP.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A005.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_WS-35463_Sys_Spec_GWS_MK_34.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_WS-32820A_GCS-Velocimeter_IDS.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_Previous_Contracting_Efforts.doc DOC document
CDRL_A010.pdf PDF
CDRL_A014.pdf PDF
CDRL_A012.pdf PDF
CDRL_A001.pdf PDF
CDRL_A019.pdf PDF
CDRL_A015.pdf PDF
CDRL_A016.pdf PDF
CDRL_A024.pdf PDF
CDRL_A006.pdf PDF
CDRL_A008.pdf PDF
CDRL_A017.pdf PDF
CDRL_A003.pdf PDF
CDRL_A007.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Phase_II_Evaluation_Factors.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_MK_34_Gun_Weapon_System_Item_Unique_Identification_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A026.pdf PDF
CDRL_A013.pdf PDF
CDRL_A019.pdf PDF
CDRL_A016.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment_6_Previous_Contracting_Efforts.doc DOC document
CDRL_A027.pdf PDF
CDRL_A024.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_WS-32820A_GCS-Velocimeter_IDS.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Installation_Drawing_MK_5_Velocimeter.pdf PDF
CDRL_A023.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_WS-35463_Sys_Spec_GWS_MK_34.pdf PDF
CDRL_A014.pdf PDF
CDRL_A015.pdf PDF
CDRL_A006.pdf PDF
CDRL_A012.pdf PDF
CDRL_A009.pdf PDF
CDRL_A020.pdf PDF
CDRL_A021.pdf PDF
CDRL_A010.pdf PDF
CDRL_A017.pdf PDF
CDRL_A003.pdf PDF
CDRL_A008.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N00024-13-R-3041 Attachment 5 N00024-17-R-5369

Attachment 7

Recent and Relevant Past Performance Questionnaire

1. Past Performance Assessment. The Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems (PEO IWS) is soliciting competitive proposals for MK 5 Velocimeter.

It is requested that you complete this questionnaire and provide via email to the below listed individual no later than the closing date and time specified in Block 9 of the solicitation.

PROCURING CONTRACTING OFFICER (PCO)

Naval Sea Systems Command Attn: Mr. Brian Kimm, SEA 02533 1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376 Telephone: (202) 781-3027 E-mail: brian.kimm@navy.mil

RETURN THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER.

NOTE: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFEROR TO ENSURE THAT ALL PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT BY THE CLOSING DATE AND TIME IF THE CLOSING DATE AND TIME IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE.

If you need more space than that which has been provided, please attach additional pages. Responses will be treated as Source Selection Sensitive information. If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer at the above e-mail address.

2. Contract Information. Please complete the following:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Dollar Amount at Award:

Dollar Amount at Completion (or Current Dollar Amount, if not Completed):

Contract Type: Fixed-Price; Labor Hour or Time and Material; Cost-Reimbursement (CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, etc.)

Describe the Products or Services:

3. Contract Relevancy. For comparison with the size and scope of the MK 5 Velocimeter acquisition, please provide the following information pertaining to the contract identified in Section 2 above:

(a) Size: _______ hours per year in contract services.

$_______ per year in contract services.

(b) Scope: Check all that apply:

______ Program Management Support

______ Planning Support

______ Business and Financial Management Support

______ Acquisition and Contract Management Support

______ Technical Management Support

______ Test and Evaluation Management Support

______ General Logistics Management Support

______ Production Management Support

______ Engineering Support

______ Other Support (please describe: _________________________)

4. Performance Assessment Values.

5 - Outstanding. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4 - Excellent. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3 - Good. Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

2 - Satisfactory. Performance barely meets some contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

1 - Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

0 - Not Applicable. Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

5. Assessment Elements. Please select/circle the appropriate performance assessment value for each item on the questionnaire and provide a supporting narrative.

a. Cost Control. Rate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes).

Comments:

b. Schedule. Rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?

Comments:

c. Mission Requirements. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements.

Comments:

d. Quality. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.)

Comments:

e. Subcontract Management. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts.

Comments:

f. Business Relations. Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner.

Comments:

g. Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel.

Comments:

h. Recommendation. To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the following scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 = No, not ever; 0 = N/A.

Comments:

6. Other References. If you are aware of any other contract or a Point of Contact (POC) who is familiar with the contractor’s performance under this contract, please identify.

Name, Phone, and E-Mail Address:

7. Assessor Information. Please provide the following information about yourself:

Name:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

Thank you for your assistance.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAGE

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .