MI_NP_PIRO_11(2)_Bridge_Insp_Rpt.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
693C73-24-B-000006
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

This federal solicitation is seeking sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns for a bridge replacement project at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore in Michigan. The project scope includes removing and reconstructing Miners River Bridge, replacing guardrails, reconstructing pavement, improving drainage, and other miscellaneous work. The total cost of the project is estimated between $700,000 to $2,000,000. Interested vendors must register on SAM.gov and complete annual representations and certifications through that system. The bid due date will be specified on the SF1442 form included with solicitation documents, which are available for download on SAM.gov by searching for opportunity number 693C73-24-B-000006. Security screening is required for access to government buildings to review bids.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results of Bid Opening - MI NP PIRO 11(2).pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - MI NP PIRO 11(2).pdf PDF
Plans - MI NP PIRO 11(2).pdf PDF
ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
VETS-4212 - Form - 2021.pdf PDF
MI_NP_PIRO_11(2)_PVT_Memo.pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - MI NP PIRO 11(2).pdf PDF
MI_NP_PIRO_11(2)_HYD_Memo.pdf PDF
Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
MI_NP_PIRO_11(2)_GEO_Memo.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

MINERS RIVER BRIDGE

MINERS CASTLE ROAD OVER MINERS RIVER

PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE

LOOKING EAST TOWARD MINERS BEACH

STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 9/22/2021

NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

MINERS RIVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 09/22/2021

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

3 - STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

16 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 20 FT (6.1 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

UNKNOWN SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

2 - CONNECTOR ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1986-FOOTING AND SCOUR REPAIRS. 2004-ASPHALT W.S. PLACED, RAILING

SYSTEM REPLACED. 2009-UPSTREAM RETAINING WALLS ADDED. 2012-ASPHALT

W.S. REPLACED, NEW RAIL POSTS #5 AND #6.

LOCATION

PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE MILE POINT: .. .34 (KM PT 0.1)

STATE: .............................. 265 - MICHIGAN LOCATION: .... 0.5 MILES NORTH OF MINERS LAKE

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... MINERS CASTLE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: MINERS RIVER

INSPECTION TEAM: Z. Bailey, M. Miller

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Marcus Miller

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 07/11/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This painted steel multi-beam bridge is in fair to poor condition overall. Problems include differential settlement and cracking of the concrete abutments; the movement has also resulted in a small fracture directly under the upstream exterior beam at the west abutment. The settlement will be monitored during future bridge inspections. In addition, it is not known if the abutments contain any steel reinforcement. It should be noted that the top portions of the upstream wingwalls are delaminated, and that the wingwalls appear to lean toward the stream.

Other problems include widespread deterioration of the paint on the structural steel, with minor rusting present. It should also be noted that scour along the channel bottom has undermined the concrete apron at both abutments.

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

MINERS RIVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 09/22/2021

In view of the high cost of rehabilitation, the ongoing scour issue, the age of the structure, and the projected substantial increase in visitor traffic, it is recommended that this bridge be replaced in the near future. The new bridge could be longer and rest on foundations located beyond the existing abutments, which would then serve as retaining walls; this approach would substantially mitigate the environmental concerns associated with removing the abutments. Please be advised that the load rating of the bridge has been reduced due to the deterioration of the abutments, but the structure does not require posting for a weight restriction at this time.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

MINERS RIVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 09/22/2021

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

B

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

60.1,60.6 REPLACE BRIDGE (SEE REMARKS BELOW).

CONTRACT COSTS FOR

MOBILIZATION,TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN,

AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimate assumes new bridge to be longer and rest on foundations beyond the existing abutments which would then serve as retaining walls.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

MINERS RIVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 09/21/2021

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

G

F

G

N

G

F

N

N

N

G

F

N

G

G

N

G

G

G

F

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

G

G

G

G

G

N

G

N

N

G

G

F

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N 7 FT

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

CONCRETE, STONES, SAND

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS P

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS F

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS G

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION F

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

58.1

58.3

58.5

CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE DECK. ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE IS IN GOOD CONDITION. DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE

STRIPING IS PRESENT BUT FADING.

MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON DECK FACES IN CONSTRUCTION JOINTS BETWEEN CURBS AND DECK. SEE

ALSO 58.7.

MINOR CHIPPING OF CURBS; WATER STAINING ON EXTERIOR FACES ALSO PRESENT.

58.6

59.6

222.3

WEATHERING STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILING SYSTEM INSTALLED ON BRIDGE AND APPROACHES IN 2004. OLD RAIL POSTS ON BRIDGE CUT OFF AND PLUGGED WITH GROUT. OLD POST HOLE REMAINS AT 6TH POST FROM EAST END, NORTH RAIL AT EAST APPROACH. ONE DETERIORATED AREA IN SOUTH TIMBER RAILING NEAR EAST END. MINOR SPLINTERING OF RAILING TIMBER IN

PLACES. ISOLATED AREAS OF WHITE MOLD AND MINOR DECAY ALSO PRESENT.

UNPAINTED STEEL DIAPHRAGMS IN EXTERIOR BAYS BETWEEN BEAMS ACT AS STRUTS FOR RAILING SYSTEM.

58.7 CURB DRAINS HAVE BEEN PAVED OVER. HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH FROM NON-FUNCTIONING DRAINS VISIBLE ON CURB

EXTERIORS.

DRAINAGE CHUTE AT WEST APPROACH BEHIND NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

59.2

59.7

MINOR LOSS OF PAINT COAT WITH MINOR RUST STAINING THROUGHOUT BEAMS, ESPECIALLY ON EXTERIOR BEAMS AND UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM FLANGEs. HEAVY LOSS OF PAINT UNDER CURB DRAIN HOLES.

SEE ALSO 60.4.

60.1

60.3

60.10

CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT.

EAST BREASTWALL:

DIAGONAL CRACK UNDER BEAM #2 MEASURES 1/8" WIDE AT TOP, 1/4" AT BOTTOM FULL HEIGHT.

DIAGONAL CRACK UNDER BEAM #16 MEASURES 1/2" WIDE (UPSTREAM EXTERIOR BEAM) AT EAST ABUTMENT, EXTENDS INTO

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

VERTICAL CRACK UNDER BEAM #9 MEASURES UP TO 1/16" WIDE.

WEST BREASTWALL:

VERTICAL SETTLEMENT CRACK ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT UNDER BEAM #5 MEASURES UP TO 1/4" WIDE.

FRACTURE UNDERMINES BEAM #16 (UPSTREAM EXTERIOR BEAM); DIAGONAL CRACK FROM FRACTURE EXTENDS INTO

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL .

60.4

60.5

ENDS OF BEAMS ENCASED IN CONCRETE BACKWALLS. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF BACKWALLS.

MINOR CRACKING OF CONCRETE FOOTINGS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS; SEE ALSO 60.9, 61.1.

60.6

60.10

CONCRETE SOUNDS POOR IN SOME LOCATIONS ON WINGWALLS. MINOR SPALLING AT WINGWALL EDGES. TOP PORTIONS OF

SOUTH (UPSTREAM) WINGWALLS ARE DELAMINATED, AND APPEAR TO BE PUSHING OUT.

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL:

DIAGONAL CRACKS BEGIN UNDER EXTERIOR BEAM AND EXTEND INTO WINGWALLS (SEE 60.1,3); PORTION ABOVE CRACK

APPEARS SLIGHTLY ROTATED TOWARD STREAM; MODERATE DELAMINATION PRESENT.

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL:

2' X 4' AREA OF CRACKING, DELAMINATION AND MINOR SPALLING ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT NEAR WATERLINE.

VEGETATION (BUSHES, SMALL TREES) GROWTH ON TOP OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

RETAINING WALLS ADJACENT TO WINGWALLS ALONG UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS TO PROVIDE BANK STABILITY (SEE 223.1).

60.9

61.2

CONCRETE APRON AT ABUTMENTS EXPOSED UP TO 16" VERTICALLY AT UPSTREAM END DUE TO SPILLWAY WATER ACTION;

MINOR SCOUR ALONG EXPOSED APRON WITH UP TO 8" UNDERMINING. FULL LENGTH OF FOOTING IS EXPOSED WITH UPTO 18"

AT SOME LOCATIONS.

MODERATE EROSION AT END OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL; ERODED AREA IS PARTIALLY VEGETATED AND STABILIZED WITH

RIPRAP. MINOR EROSION BEHIND NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

60.11 GRAVEL AND RIPRAP SLOPE PROTECTION ALONG SOUTHWEST APPROACH SHOULDER AND SURROUNDING RETAINING WALL;

FILTER FABRIC EXPOSED. RIPRAP PRESENT AT BOTH DOWNSTREAM WINGWALLS.

61.2 SEVERE EROSION OF WEST CHANNEL BANK AT BEND IN CHANNEL APPROXIMATELY 150' DOWNSTREAM OF BRIDGE; EROSION

DOES NOT AFFECT STRUCTURE.

61.4 WALL WITH SPILLWAY (LAMPREY TRAP) IN CHANNEL ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE.

SEVERAL TREES DOWN ACROSS CHANNEL AND ALONG EAST BANK DOWNSTREAM FROM STRUCTURE; INTERFERENCE WITH

FLOW IS MINIMAL.

SEVERAL UNDERMINED TREES ALONG WEST BANK DOWNSTREAM FROM STRUCTURE.

222.4

222.6

ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES. DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE STRIPING PRESENT.

PREVIOUSLY NOTED POTHOLE ALONG SOUTH CURB NEAR WEST END HAS BEEN REPAIRED WITH 7'W X 9'L ASPHALT PATCH.

PATCH HAS SETTLED WITH SOIL ACCUMULATION AND PONDING ALONG CURB.

222.7 "DANGER - UNDERTOW" SIGN AT WEST APPROACH, SOUTH SIDE.

223.1 CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS CONSTRUCTED AT END OF SOUTH (UPSTREAM) WINGWALLS TO REPAIR BANK EROSION. WALLS

WERE CAST AGAINST FORM LINER TO SIMULATE MASONRY APPEARANCE.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 35 32

HS 37 34 63 57

TYPE 3 30 27 51 46

TYPE 3S2 48 44 81 73

TYPE 3-3 59 54 100 91

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 11/13/2019

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SEE REMARKS

REMARKS:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MINERS RIVER BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........6320-001 P

5 - MIDWEST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... UNKNOWN

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

265 - MICHIGAN

26003 ALGER

00000

1 6 1 00012 0

MINERS RIVER

MINERS CASTLE ROAD

6320001P0000000

0 5 MILES NORTH OF MINERS LAKE

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

.34 (KM PT: 0.1 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............20 FT ( 6.1 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............37 TONS ( 33.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............63 TONS ( 57.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 09/22/2021 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 6320-001P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 46° 29'18.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 86°32 '26 20" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 30.0 FT ( 9.1 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 2 MI ( 3 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............150 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................165 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

REQUIRED

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3 00 FT ( 0 91 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 5 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................8 (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: B - MAJOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1986-FOOTING AND SCOUR REPAIRS. 2004-ASPHALT W.S. PLACED, RAILING SYSTEM REPLACED. 2009-UPSTREAM RETAINING WALLS ADDED. 2012-

ASPHALT W.S. REPLACED, NEW RAIL POSTS #5 AND #6.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://29'18.10

Inspector: Marcus Miller Structure Number: 6320001P0000000

Inspection Date: 09/22/2021 Facility Carried: MINERS CASTLE ROAD

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING WEST TOWARD GRAND ISLAND

PHOTO 4

Description SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 6

Description POTHOLE REPAIR (7'W X 9'L) ALONG SOUTH CURB NEAR WEST END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description SETTLEMENT AT SOUTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO 8

Description VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTH CURBLINE AND RAILING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description ROTATED AND MISALIGNED RAIL AT POSTS #1 AND #2 FOR SOUTH RAIL, WEST END

PHOTO 10

Description DECAY AND SPLINTERING OF NORTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description DETERIORATION OF SOUTH RAIL NEAR EAST END

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL CHECKING OF RAILING AND POST, NORTH RAILING SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description VEGETATION GROWTH IN NON-FUNCTIONING DRAIN HOLES ON CURB EXTERIOR; NORTH

SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description RELOCATION OF RAIL POST ON NORTH RAILING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO 16

Description VEGETATION GROWTH ON TOP OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF PAINT ON STRUCTURAL STEEL; NOTE LOSS OF PAINT COAT AND

RUSTING OF STEEL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF ADDED DIAPHRAGMS TO EXTERIOR BEAMS AT RAIL POST

ATTACHMENTS

PHOTO 20

Description DIAGONAL CRACK ON EAST BREASTWALL UNDER BEAM #2

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description CRACK UNDER BEAM #16 (UPSTREAM EXTERIOR BEAM) EXTENDING INTO SOUTHEAST

WINGWALL ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT; NOTE FLOOD MONITORING STATION

PHOTO 22

Description WEST BREASTWALL; NOTE VERTICAL CRACKING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description VERTICAL CRACK ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT UNDER BEAM #5 ON WEST

BREASTWALL

PHOTO 24

Description EXPOSED FOOTINGS AT WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL SCALING OF ABUTMENT

FOOTINGS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description LOG ON WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING

PHOTO 26

Description EXPOSED FOOTING AT EAST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description FRACTURE UNDER BEAM #16 (UPSTREAM EXTERIOR BEAM); DIAGONAL CRACK FROM

FRACTURE EXTENDS INTO SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL NEAR WATERLINE

PHOTO 28

Description EROSION AT SOUTHWEST CORNER; NOTE EXPOSED FILTER FABRIC

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description WARNING "DANGER - UNDERTOW" SIGN AT SOUTHWEST BANK

PHOTO 30

Description TYPICAL OBJECT MARKER MISSING AT EAST END OF GUARDAILS, , NORTHEAST

APPROACH GUARDRAIL SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM BRIDGE

PHOTO 32

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM BRIDGE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .