M95494-18-R-0021-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to update the PWS and Instructions.

Changes are highlighted in yellow .

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 23

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Jul-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M9549418R0021

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Jul-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Jul-2018

CODE

MCICOM HQ

3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON

WASHINGTON DC 20350-3000

M95494 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M9549418R0021

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 24-Jul-2018 04:30 PM to 27-Jul-2018 12:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

DESIGNATION OF CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE (COR):

The Contracting Officer has designated the person named below as the authorized COR for this Contract:

NAME: To be provided at Award.

CODE:

TELEPHONE:

EMAIL:

The COR will represent the Contracting Officer in the administration of technical details within the scope of this contract and will perform inspection and acceptance of all deliverables. The COR is not otherwise authorized to make any representations or commitments of any kind on behalf of the Contracting Officer or the Government. The COR does not have the authority to alter the Contractor's obligations or change the specifications in the contract or issue Task Orders. If, as a result of technical discussions, it is desirable to alter contract obligations or statements of work, a modification must be issued in writing and signed by the Contracting Officer. The COR is responsible for reviewing the invoices submitted by the Contractor and informing the Contracting Officer of areas where exceptions are to be taken. The COR authority is non-delegable. The COR may be personally liable for unauthorized acts.

AUTHORIZED CHANGES ONLY BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER:

Except as specified in paragraph (b) below, no order, statement, or conduct of Government personnel who visit the Contractor’s facilities or in any other manner communicates with Contractor personnel during the performance of this contract shall constitute a change under the Changes clause of this contract.

(a) The Contractor shall not comply with any order, direction or request of Government personnel unless it is issued in writing and signed by the Contracting Officer, or is pursuant to specific authority otherwise included as a part of this contract.

(b) The Contracting Officer is the only person authorized to approve changes in any of the requirements of this contract and notwithstanding provisions contained elsewhere in this contract, said authority remains solely the Contracting Officer’s. In the event the Contractor effects any change at the direction of any person other than the Contracting Officer, the change will be considered to have been made without authority and no adjustment will be made in the contract price to cover any increase incurred as a result thereof. The address and telephone number of the Contracting Officers are:

NAME: To be provided at Award.

TELEPHONE:

EMAIL:

EXHIBIT A - REFERENCES

The following orders and directives apply to this effort:

1) HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

2) National Strategy National Strategy for Homeland Security, July 2002

3) Homeland Security Act Homeland Security Act of 2002, November 2002

4) HSPD-5 Domestic Incident Management, February 2003

5) HSPD-8 National Preparedness, December 2003

6) NIMS National Incident Management System, March 2004

7) NRP National Response Plan, December 2004

8) Training Strategy Training Strategy for OSLDPS [G&T] with Implications for WMD Training, September 2001

9) CT-ESG Counterterrorism Exercise Sub-Group (CT-ESG) 1996 and 2002 Charters

10) Joint Training System The Joint Training System, A Primer for Leaders, 1998, DOD Publication

11) CJCSM 3500.03 Joint Training Manual for The Armed Forces of The United States, September 2001

12) CJCSI 3500.01B Joint Training Policy for The Armed Forces of The United States, December 1999

13) TCL Target Capabilities List, 2006

14) UTL Universal Task List, 2006

15) National Preparedness Goal National Preparedness Goal, 2006

16) WMD Test Plan Marine Corps WMD Test Plan

17) JP 3-0 Joint Operations

18) JP 3-07.2 Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Antiterrorism

19) DTRA, “Force Protection Security Classification Guide”

20) MIL-HDBK-1013/10 Design Guidelines for Security Fencing, Gates, Barriers, and Guard Facilities

21) MIL-HDBK-1013/12 Evaluation and Selection Analysis of Security Glazing for Protection Against Ballistic, Bomb, Forced Entry

Tactics

22) MIL-HDBK-1013/14 Selection and Application of Vehicle Barriers

23) MIL-HDBK-1013/1A Design Guidelines for Physical Security of Facilities

24) OPNAV 5530.13 C DON Physical Security Instruction for Conventional Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives (AA&E)

25) DoD 4160.21-M Defense Materiel Disposition Manual

26) DoD 5100.76-M Physical Security of Sensitive Conventional AA&E

27) DoDD 5210.56 Carrying of Firearms and the Use of Force by DoD Personnel Engaged in Security, Law and Order, or

Counterintelligence Activities

28) DoD 5200.8R Physical Security Program

29) DoDD 5200.8 Security of DoD Installations

30) DoDD 5100.76 Physical Security of Sensitive Conventional AA&E

31) DoDD 5200.8 Security of DoD Installations and Resources and the DOD Physical Security Review Board (PSRB)

32) DoDD 8190.3 Smart Card Technology

33) DoDD 2000.12 DoD Antiterrorism (AT) Program

34) DoDI 2000.16 DoD AT Program Standards

35) DoDI 3020.40 DoD Defense Critical Infrastructure Program

36) DoDI 6055.17 DoD Installation Emergency Management

37) DoD O-2000.12-H DoD AT Handbook

38) SECNAVINST 5510.30A DON Personnel Security Program (PSP) Regulation

39) SECNAVINST 5510.36 DON Information Security Program (ISP) Instruction

40) NAVSEA OP 5 Ammunition and Explosives Safety Ashore

41) OPNAVINST 5530.13C DON Physical Security Instruction for Conventional AA&E

42) MCO 1630.4A Law Enforcement and Physical Security Activities

43) MCO 4340.1A Reporting of Missing, Lost, Stolen, or Recovered (MLSR) Government Property

44) MCO 5510.15A Security of Marine Corps Installations & Resources

45) MCO 3058.1 Marine Corps Mission Assurance (23 October 2014)

46) MCO 3302.1E AT Awareness Training

47) MCO 5530.14A Marine Corps Physical Security Program Manual

48) MCO 5500.6F Arming of Law Enforcement (LE) and Security Personnel and The Use of Force

49) MCO 5500.18 Crime Prevention

50) MCO 5580.2 Law Enforcement Manual

51) MCO P5530.14 Marine Corps Physical Security Program Manual

52) MARADMIN 052/00 Policy Clarification on the AA&E Program

53) MARADMIN 220/00 Follow-on Policy Clarification on the AA&E Program

54) MARADMIN 305/00 Reporting of Missing, Lost, Stolen, and/or Recovered (MLSR) Government Property

55) MARADMIN 360/01 Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives Program Policy Change

56) MARADMIN 362/01 Common Access Card (CAC) Status

57) MARADMIN 601/02 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) System Policy for Marine Corps Installations

58) Naval Message CMC NAVAL MSG DTG 151425Z OCT 01

59) Naval Message CMC NAVAL MSG DTG 121647Z SEP 03

60) UFC 4-010-10 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standoff Distances for Buildings; (For Official Use Only (FOUO))

61) UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings

62) UFC 4-021-01 Design and O&M Mass Notification Systems

63) MIL-HDBK-1013/8 Combination Locks

64) MIL-HDBK-1013/11 Instruction for Planning and Design of High Security Magazine Door Construction Projects

65) MCPP 3-02D Combating Terrorism

66) SECNAV M-5510.30 Department of the Navy Personnel Security Program, June 2006

67) DoD 5220.22-M DoD Manual - National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), 28 FEB 2006

68) MCO 5110.1D Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision, 22 May 2006

69) DoDI 8510.01 DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process, 28 Nov 07

70) SECNAVINST 5239.3B DoN Information Assurance Policy, 17 Jun 09

71) SPAWARINST 5721.1B SPAWAR Section 508 Implementation Policy, 17 Nov 09

72) SECNAVINST 4440.34 Implementation of Item Unique Identification within the DoN, 22 Dec 09

73) DoDI 8510.01 DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process, 28 Nov 07

74) SECNAVINST 5239.3B DoN Information Assurance Policy, 17 Jun 09

75) SPAWARINST 5721.1B SPAWAR Section 508 Implementation Policy, 17 Nov 09

76) DoD 5205.02-M DoD Manual – Operations Security (OPSEC) Program Manual, 03 Nov 08

77) DoD 5200.2-R DoD Regulation – Personnel Security Program

78) DoDD 5205.02E DoD Directive – Operations Security (OPSEC) Program, 20 Jun 12

79) DoDD 5220.22 DoD Directive – National Industrial Security Program

80) DoDD 8500.1 DoD Directive – Information Assurance (IA)

81) DoDI 8500.2 DoD Instruction – IA Implementation

82) SECNAVINST 5510.30 DoN Regulation – Personnel Security Program

83) SPAWARINST 3432.1 SPAWAR Instruction - Operations Security (OPSEC) Policy, 02 FEB 05

84) SPAWARINST 4440.12 OM&S, GFP, CAP, Property, PP&E, and Inventory

85) NAVSUP P-723 Navy Inventory Integrity Procedures, April 2012

86) DoD JMAA Benchmarks Department of Defense Joint Mission Assurance Assessment Benchmarks 2015

87) DoD MA Strategy DoD MA Strategy, May 2012

88) DoD MA SIF DoD MA Strategy Implementation Framework, OCT 2013

89) OPNAVINST 3030.5B Navy Continuity Of Operations Program And Policy, 20 OCT 2009

90) SECNAVINST 3030.4C Department Of The Navy Continuity Of Operations Program, 22 JUL 2009

91) OPNAV 3432.1A Operations Security, 4 August 2011

92) PPD-21 Presidential Policy Directive 21: Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience, FEB 2013

93) SECNAVINST 3501.1C Department Of The Navy Critical Infrastructure Protection Program 13 DEC 2011

94) DODI 5240.19 Counterintelligence Support of DCIP

95) OPNAV 3440.17A Navy Installation Emergency Management Program, 01 AUG 2014

96) SECNAVINST 3400.4 DON Installation CBRNE Emergency Response Guidelines, 08 JUN 2004

97) UFC 2-100-01 Installation Master Planning

98) UFC 3-230-01 Water Storage, Distribution and Transmission

99) UFC 3-400-02 Engineering Weather Data

100) UFC 3-400-10N Mechanical Engineering

101) UFC 3-430-09 Exterior Mechanical Utility Distribution

102) UFC 3-460-01 Design: Petroleum Fuel Facilities

103) UFC 3-520-01 Interior Electrical Systems

104) UFC 3-540-04N Diesel Electric Generating Plants

105) UFC 3-550-01 Exterior Electrical Power Distribution

106) UFC 3-600-01 Fire Protection Engineering For Facilities

107) UFC 3-410-02N HVAC and Dehumidifying Systems

108) UFC 4-020-01 DoD Security Engineering Facility Planning Model

109) NFPA 30 Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code

110) NFPA 58 Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gas Code

111) NFPA 76 Standard for the Fire Protection of Telecommunications Facilities

112) NFPA 101 Life Safety Code 2015

113) SECNAVINST 3501.1C Department of the Navy Critical Infrastructure Program, DEC 2011

114) MIL-HDBK-1003/3 Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Dehumidifying Systems

115) DoD Directive 8500.1 Information Assurance, 24 OCT 2002

116) DoD Instruction 8500.2 Information Assurance Implementation, 06 FEB 2003

117) The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, The White House, FEB 2003 Guide to ICS Security NIST SP800-82, 01 JUN 2011

118) DoD Directive 8500.01 IA, AUG 2004

119) DODI 8500.2 IA Implementation 06 FEB 2003

120) DoDI 8552.01 Use of Mobile Code Technologies in DoD Information Systems, 23 OCT 2006

121) Certification and Accreditation Requirements Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration/DoD Chief

Information Officer Memorandum, “Certification and Accreditation Requirements for DoD-wide Managed Enterprise Services Procurements,” 22 JUN 2006

122) DTM 08-060 Policy on Use of DoD Information Systems, Standard Consent Banner and User Agreement, 9 MAY 2008

123) NIST 800-39 National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-39, “Managing Information Security Risk:

Organization, Mission, and Information System View,” March 2011, as amended

124) DoD Directive 8570.01 Information Assurance (IA) Training, Certification, and Workforce Management, 15 AUG 2004

125) DoD Instruction 8551.1 Ports, Protocols, and Services Management (PPSM), 13 AUG 2004

126) DoD Instruction 8580.1 Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System, 09 JUL 2004

127) NIST 800-53 National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-53, “Recommended Security Controls for

Federal Information Systems and Organizations,” FEB 2009, as amended

FAR 52.212-1 ADDENDUM

FAR 52.212-1 ADDENDUM

This solicitation utilizes FAR Part 12 along with FAR Part 15, Negotiated Procedures. After receipt of proposals, the Government may, with or without notice, negotiate with and, if desired, seek proposal revisions from as many or as few Offerors as it, in its discretion, deems appropriate. Offers are solicited on an “all or none” basis. Failure to submit an offer for all requirements of the PWS shall be the cause for rejection of the offer. Non-compliance with any of the provisions herein may lead the Government to determine that a proposal is non-compliant and may result in removal from the evaluation.

Proposals shall be submitted electronically using Microsoft Word / Excel / Adobe format to Ms. Erika Chavarria (erika.chavarria @usmc.mil) and Mr. F. Paul Lirio (francis.lirio@usmc.mil). Offerors are advised that the Government may be unable to receive other types of electronic files (e.g., .zip files) or files in excess of 10 megabytes. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that their proposals are received by the date and time listed on the SF1449.

The proposal must demonstrate an understanding of and ability to meet all of the requirements set forth in the RFP’s performance work statement (PWS). The Offeror shall provide sufficient detail to substantiate the validity of all statements. The Offeror shall demonstrate that the proposal is in compliance with the requirements, terms, and conditions of the RFP. Comprehensive responses to the requirements of the RFP are required to enable the Government to evaluate the Offeror’s understanding of and capability to accomplish the requirements of the PWS.

General statements that the Offeror can or will comply with the requirements, that standard procedures will be used, that well known techniques will be used, or paraphrasing the solicitation’s requirements in whole or in part, will NOT constitute compliance. Failure to conform to any of the requirements of the solicitation may form the basis for rejection of the proposal.

Brochuremanship is not desired. Clarity, completeness, and conciseness are essential and the overall quality of the proposal will be evaluated in the context of being representative of the Offeror’s services. An Offeror’s proposal is presumed to represent the best efforts to respond to the solicitation.

Since only the proposal submitted in response to this solicitation will be evaluated, Offerors should make certain that their proposal is complete with regard to the information provided. Data previously submitted, or presumed to be known, e.g., previous projects performed for the Government, will not be considered in the evaluation unless that information is physically contained in the proposal.

Proposals shall be presented in three (3) separate volumes:

• Volume I (Technical)

• Volume II (Past Performance)

• Volume III (Price and Solicitation Documents)

VOLUME I SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY PRICING DATA.

Format requirements:

• 8.5 x 11 inch paper

• Single-spaced typed lines

• 1 inch margins on all sides

• No smaller than 12 point font, Times New Roman

• Graphs and drawings must be clear and legible

• No photographs or hyperlinks are permitted

• Microsoft Office compatible files are required – Microsoft Excel documents must be in *.xlsx format mailto:francis.lirio@usmc.mil

Each volume of the proposal shall be clearly marked as to the volume number, the solicitation number, and the Contractor’s name. Pages shall be numbered consecutively within each volume showing volume and page. For example, page 9 of Volume I would be numbered I-9 and page 10 of Volume II would be numbered II-10. Offerors are advised that the Government may selectively verify any information provided in the proposal. Offerors are cautioned that they are responsible to ensure that material that they desire to have evaluated for a particular section is contained in that specific section.

VOLUME I: TECHNICAL

The Offeror's technical volume shall include all relevant supporting information required or specified in the solicitation. This Volume shall be limited to 30 pages. All supplemental documentation to the technical proposal, such as foldouts, charts, figures, tables may be included as an Appendix (limited to 5 pages). If supplemental documentation is incorporated into the technical volume, the 30 page limit applies. The Coversheet, Table of Contents, personnel resumes, and contingency offer letters are not included in the page limitation. Individual resumes shall not exceed two (2) pages per resume. All material in excess of the page limits will not be read or evaluated. Offeror’s shall submit the following information:

Factor 1 – Technical Capabilities

The Offeror shall provide a narrative describing their technical approach to performing each task requirement specific in the PWS. The narrative must describe the Offeror’s ability to perform the workload identified in the PWS using the personnel and labor mix proposed. The Offeror must demonstrate its understanding of the PWS requirements and the overall scope of work.

Factor 2 – Staffing Plan (Key Personnel Resumes)

The Offeror shall demonstrate the ability to properly staff the contract to successfully meet the requirements of the PWS. The Offeror shall provide the labor mix to be utilized to perform the requirements of the PWS including the quantity of each labor category and a breakdown of labor hours. The Offeror shall identify all Key Personnel by name and provide resumes for those individuals demonstrating they meet all key personnel qualifications as required by Section 4.0 of the PWS. The Offeror shall provide letters of intent for the Key Personnel not currently employed by the Offeror or subcontractor identified in the Offeror’s proposal. A letter of intent shall be signed by the prospective employee stating his or her intent to accept employment in a stated position with the Offeror or subcontractor if the Offeror is successful in being awarded this contract.

Factor 3 – Management Plan

The Offeror shall demonstrate the ability to properly manage the contract while illustrating its capability to keep cost, schedule, and performance on track and minimize technical risk. The plan must include any proposed subcontracting arrangements along with any communication and coordination plans with the Government. The Offeror shall include a mitigation plan to address any potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest, if any.

VOLUME II (PAST PERFORMANCE)

Factor 4 – Past Performance

This Volume shall be limited to 10 pages. Offerors are requested to provide information on up to two (2) previous Government contracts whose effort is recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. If the Offeror does not have recent and relevant past performance experience, then the Offeror must make an affirmative statement to this effect.

a. “Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last five (5) years. If the offeror has not had two (2) Government contracts within the last five (5) years, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.

b. “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.

i. Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the PWS.

ii. Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the PWS.

iii. Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the PWS. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).

For each of the Past Performance Information (PPI) identified in Volume II, the Offeror must:

(1) Describe how the work was/is similar to HQMC PP&O’s requirement for Mission Assurance program support;

(2) Identify a Point of Contact (POC) (e.g. Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Representative, Contracting

Officer’s Technical Representative, or Government Program Manager), name of contracting agency, agency representative, telephone number, and email address;

(3) Include the type of contract, dollar value, brief description of work performed, problems encountered during contract performance, and corrective actions taken; and

(4) Provide the POC with a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Exhibit a) and request that the POC submit the completed questionnaire to the Government in accordance with the instructions on the questionnaire (Exhibit a). The Offeror and any subcontractors should complete all applicable items of the Past Performance Questionnaire prior to providing it to each POC. It is requested that the reference POC, not the offeror, email the completed Past Performance Questionnaire (Exhibit a) BEFORE THE DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS directly to Ms. Erika Chavarria (erika.chavarria @usmc.mil) and Mr. F. Paul Lirio (francis.lirio@usmc.mil).

The offeror, NOT THE GOVERNMENT, is responsible for ensuring that the Government receives a sufficient number of questionnaires.

VOLUME III (PRICE AND SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS)

Solicitation Documents:

1. Offer Letter – The Offer Letter shall be signed by an authorized company official and include the following:

(1) The Solicitation number.

(2) Company Information: The name, address, DUNS number, CAGE Code, Tax Identification Number, and telephone number of the Offeror.

(3) Authorized Personnel: Provide the name, title, telephone number, and e-mail address of the company/division point of contact who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government and who can answer questions regarding your proposal.

(4) Terms of any express warranty.

(5) “Remit to” address, if different than mailing address.

(6) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments (if applicable).

(7) Agreement with terms – A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the RFP. Offerors are to clearly detail any exceptions taken and the rationale for the exceptions taken to the RFP. Please note that exceptions taken to the RFP may render the proposal unacceptable to the Government.

(8) Proposal expiration date.

2. Standard Form (SF) 1449 – Complete Blocks 17a and 30a-c of Page 1 of the Solicitation (signed and dated).

Failure to do so may lead to rejection of the offer.

3. Representations and Certifications – A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR

52.209-11 and DFARS 252.203-7005. Offerors who have completed the representations and certifications in the System for Award Management (SAM) do not need to submit a separate copy, but must include a statement stating their representations and certifications are up to date in SAM.

4. DD 254 – Review the DD 254 (Attachment 2), fill out blocks 6(a, b) and 7(a, b), if applicable.

Pricing Documents:

Factor 5 – Price

1. All information relating to pricing data shall be included in Volume III. The price proposal shall cover all aspects of the proposed effort. Data contained in the price proposal shall be consistent with data contained in Volume I and the filled-out CLINs in the RFP. The price data shall support the level of resources required to complete the requirements of this solicitation. The Offeror shall provide sufficient price information to allow the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of the proposed price. The price proposal shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel (*.xlsx) format.

2. Offerors shall provide their price proposal using the Pricing Template (Exhibit b). This template provides a breakdown of pricing to include the proposed labor categories, hours proposed, labor rates, and any travel costs associated with completing this effort for each period of performance. This is a firm-fixed-price effort; therefore, all labor rates and pricing totals shall be inclusive of all overhead, G&A, profit, etc. The estimated amount of hours to fulfill this effort is 35,840 per period.

NOTE: In accordance with Section 10.0 of the PWS, travel will be funded by the Government on a reimbursable basis, when required. The Government has estimated the travel during each period of performance and those amounts are included in the Pricing Template. For evaluation purposes, the Government will use the Government’s estimated values.

3. CLINS – The Offeror shall fill in the firm-fixed-price for each of the CLINs in the solicitation, which should match their completed Price proposal.

QUESTIONS: Offeror’s may submit questions requesting clarification of solicitation requirements. All questions must be received by 11:00 AM EST 16 July 2018. All questions must be submitted via email to the Contracting Office only. Questions shall be submitted electronically to Ms. Erika Chavarria (erika.chavarria @usmc.mil) and Mr. F. Paul Lirio (francis.lirio@usmc.mil).

(End of provision)

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

PP&O MISSION ASSURANCE SUPPORT

1.0) Scope

Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), Plans, Policies and Operations (PP&O), Security Division (PS) is seeking Mission Assurance Program support for the Marine Corps. PP&O, PS is responsible for supporting the safeguarding of personnel, property, and resources during all phases of operations in coordination with the USMC Mission Assurance (MA) Program, designed to deter, detect, delay, deny, or defend against the pre-attack planning cycle, enhance protection responsibilities for Marine Corps elements and personnel. The Marine Corps MA Assessment (MAA) program provides protection related risks to personnel and infrastructure from acts of terrorism and destructive or potentially destructive events. In an operating environment of constant and asymmetric threats, the Marine Corps must remain the most effective fighting force possible by ensuring that MA is embedded in all aspects of Marine Corps planning, operations, and daily activities. The multi-faceted, comprehensive MA program must include an all-hazard, risk to mission approach, be proactive in nature, and be coordinated throughout appropriate commands.

Under this effort, the Contractor will provide MAA Program support in the following Task Areas:

Task 1: Antiterrorism Program Support Task 2: Physical Security Program Support Task 3: Law Enforcement Support Task 4: Critical Infrastructure Program Analytical Support Task 5: Hazard & Threat Assessment Development Support Task 6: Emergency Management Program Analytical Support Task 7: CBRNE Program Support Task 8: Communications Support

Task 9: ICS Cybersecurity Support Task 10: Engineering (CE/ME/EE) Support Task 11: MA Program Support Task 12: Technical Writing Support Task 13: Geographic Information System Analysis Support Task 14: MCCAMS Date Entry and Training Support Task 15: Policy & Planning Support Task 16: Program Management Support

Please see Exhibit A, References, for a list of orders and directives applicable to this requirement. The Contactor must be cognizant with the references and their impacts while performing under this contract.

2.0) Tasks

The Contractor must provide technical and training support for Mission Assurance in the areas of on-site assessment, analysis and characterization, exercise, and contingency support for the Tasks under this contract.

The analysis efforts range from focusing on a single asset to all infrastructure/networks and protection related areas to the installations/facilities listed under Section 6.0 and the functions that provide protection/security to the missions being supported. The Contractor must conduct on-site program reviews, MAAs, Operational Utility Assessment (OUTA), and Energy Security Assessment (ESA) in accordance with the Marine Corps MA program guides and MA benchmarks. The Contractor must provide observations, discussions, and recommendations to facilitate the improvements of protection programs to include gap analyses in support of the USMC Protection Advocate (PA) for the tasks below. The Contractor must facilitate inter- and intra-service coordination efforts and identify emergent policies that impact and support these requirements. The Contractor must provide support to prepare responses to Requests for Information (RFI), Joint Staff Action Process (JSAP), DON Tracker, and Marine Corps Action Tracking System (MCATS) taskers under this contract. The Contractor must review and update Formal Annual Benchmark Review reports; prepare executive summary papers and reports for MAA; and support the development of semi-annual assessment Integrated Planning Team (IPT) agendas, briefs and AAR. Contractor support for the tasks below shall include: researching and documenting MA capabilities; providing protection related gap analysis and documentation; providing recommendations to revise policy documents; updating program guides and benchmarks; reviewing concept plans, Marine Corps Orders, strategic plans, manuals and newsletters, and applicable Department of Defense regulations.

2.1 Task 1 – Antiterrorism Program Support

The Contractor must:

• Provide recommendations for AT program assessments, requirement analyses, plan reviews, and field capability evaluation support.

• Provide technical support to develop AT assessment training criteria.

• Provide support to develop assessment reports and plans of action and milestones.

2.2 Task 2 – Physical Security (PS) Program Support

• Provide recommendations and facilitate development of physical security law enforcement program.

• Provide technical writing and review of Mission Assurance/Critical Infrastructure Protection reports and information papers in a timely manner in order to support report publication timelines.

• Document and collect restricted area survey and mitigation reports.

• Provide PS program technical support in the areas of On-site Assessment, Analysis and Characterization, Exercise and Contingency Support.

• Provide technical support to develop PS assessment training criteria.

2.3 Task 3 – Law Enforcement Support

• Provide Law Enforcement risk and readiness assessments.

• Align support with Doctrine, Organizational, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) assessments to the program management functions executed by HQMC Deputy Commandants, force provider commands, and Marine Forces Reserve.

• Provide assessment results and products to the Government in a variety of formats including written reports, information papers, data spreadsheets, and briefings. This includes providing raw and interpreted data for import into related risk products and established readiness reporting systems.

2.4 Task 4 – Critical Infrastructure Program/Mission Analytical Support

The Contractor must provide Subject Matter Expert (SME) support with an emphasis on Critical Infrastructure Program (CIP) and Continuity of Operations (COOP) through technical, analytical, and investigative work to support service level MA within the USMC. The Contractor must:

• Analyze installation utility infrastructure and determine Task Critical Assets (TCA) for major operational commands using the Critical Asset Identification Process (CAIP).

• Provide technical support to the TCA validation process to establish an approved list for the organization.

• Conduct a risk assessment to determine the impact of the degradation/loss of the TCA and provide recommendations to mitigate or eliminate the risk or provide rationale to accept the risk.

• Conduct detailed analyses to identify TCA for operating forces and other installation tenants based on assigned missions and ensure assets are properly entered and maintained in the data management system.

• Provide a trend analysis based on asset data in the Marine Corps Critical Asset Management System

(MCCAMS).

• Enter Mission Chains, Baseline Elements of Information (BEI), and risk data into MCCAMS.

• Update MCCAMS documentation and diagrams annually, to include inventory data.

• Provide training support during MCCAMS training events.

• Provide support in documenting Mission Dependency Index (MDI) for facilities.

• Provide CIP WG, CIP Working Groups agendas, briefs, and AAR updates

2.5 Task 5 – Hazard & Threat Assessments

• Develop an All Hazard Threat Assessment (AHTA) report specific to Marine Corps Installations/facilities supporting USMC MA program. The report must follow the current AHTA methodology published by HQMC. The Draft will be reviewed and approved by the COR before submitting the Final report.

• Provide research and analysis of a wide-array of threats/hazards and develop threat information to determine the likelihood and probability of specific enhanced threats/hazards may occur in a manner which impacts the mission of USMC installations, commands, and areas of operation.

• Track and document the production of the AHTAs for Marine Corps installations under this Task.

• Provide technical support to conduct trend and impact analyses of hazards and threats that may affect

HQMC. The analyses should include the methodologies used to determine the probability of each event.

• Develop AHTA and production-related briefings for HQMC. The COR will coordinate briefing schedules.

• Develop training courses on threat and hazard analysis, all hazard threat assessment development, and provide updates to the AHTA program guidelines.

2.6 Task 6 – Emergency Management Program Analytical Support

• Provide recommendations for improving emergency management functions on military installations.

• Analyze and evaluate risk assessment processes and provide recommendations for improvement of

Emergency Management capability gaps.

• Draft briefs for internal and external use on emergency management topics.

• Develop schedules, reports, plan of action and milestones.

• Identify protection related deficiencies at installations/facilities listed under Section 6.0 through the program review process ensuring the protection of personnel and organizational assets for this task.

2.7 Task 7 – CBRNE Program Support

• Provide hazard related data to support the AHTA report specific to Marine Corps installations/facilities listed under Section 6.0 supporting the USMC MA program. The report must follow the current AHTA methodology published by HQMC. The Draft will be reviewed and approved by the COR before submitting the Final report.

• Provide technical support to conduct trend and impact analyses of CBRNE threats that may affect HQMC.

The analyses should include the methodologies used to determine the probability of each event.

• Provide recommendations for improving CBRNE protection functions on military installations.

• Analyze and evaluate risk assessment processes and provide recommendations for improvement of CBRNE capability gaps.

• Draft briefs for internal and external use on CBRNE topics.

• Develop schedules, reports, plan of action and milestones.

• Identify deficiencies at installations through the program review process ensuring the protection of personnel and organizational assets for this task.

2.8 Task 8 – Communications Support

The Contractor must provide communications support to analyze information technology infrastructure (ITI) and information systems (IS). The Contractor must support telecommunications infrastructure, communications technology systems, and integrated capabilities that support Command and Coordination (C2) activities. The Contractor must:

• Conduct detailed assessments of IT infrastructure at the installations/facilities listed under Section 6.0.

• Provide MA program communications technical support focusing systematic review of the network infrastructure necessary to support both wired and wireless networks. This includes determining the condition of current network wiring; network pathways; and networking equipment such as routers, switches, facilities, antennas and towers.

• Conduct and document interviews with equipment owners and managers.

• Perform risk analyses on ITI and IS issues and provide recommendations for risk reduction.

• Draft briefs for internal and external use on ITI and IS topics.

• Map and analyze commercial communication networks supporting the installations’ wired and wireless communications and data paths to identify risks to missions.

• Assess installation communication distribution networks and dependencies to identify single points of failure.

2.9 Task 9 – ICS Cybersecurity Support

• Conduct field surveys of the utility Facility Related Control Systems (FRCS) for the USMC installations under Section 6.0 to identify both physical and logical (e.g. electronic data, wired, wireless, etc.) security weaknesses and provide recommendations to correct the issues.

• Analyze the Cybersecurity posture of FRCS to ensure compliance with DoD Cybersecurity standards and military mission requirements including possible mission impact of failed or compromised control systems.

• Collect and analyze Cybersecurity and network data relating to control systems to identify potential system deficiencies and vulnerabilities.

• Document and collect detailed dependency linkages of control system cyber vulnerabilities to each supporting facility that could impact TCAs and Supporting Infrastructure Critical Assets (SICA).

2.10 Task 10 – Engineering (CE/ME/EE) Support

• Draft briefs for internal and external use on Engineering (CE/ME/EE) topics.

• Conduct field surveys of the utility infrastructure for the USMC installations under Section 6.0 to identify vulnerabilities and provide recommendations to correct risks to missions.

• Document redundant sources or means of providing electricity to the installation and its facilities, specifically those housing critical assets.

• Identify key regional commercial electric generation and transmission nodes and pathways leading to the installation, especially critical electrical infrastructure nodes serving as single points of failure.

• Provide technical capability and gap analysis for installation/facility utilities (e.g., water, natural gas, and fuel infrastructure, water, transportation, HVAC, etc.) including critical assets supporting those infrastructures to include energy profiles for each asset.

2.11 Task 11 – Program Support

• Provide support for the coordination, preparation, and execution of MA program related activities to include preparation of written reports, briefs, and Automated Message Handling System (AMHS) responses.

• Provide research support for program areas such as MA, energy security, water vulnerability, and protection-related programs.

• Document and track all assessment report data in the Marine Corps Enhanced Mission Assurance Assessment Tool (EMAAT).

2.12 Task 12 – Technical Writing Support

• Provide technical writing support for MA reports, information papers, and AMHS responses.

• Provide technical support for establishing guidelines for document formatting

• Provide recommendations for automating and/or streamlining current technical writing processes.

2.13 Task 13 – Geographic Information System Analysis Support

• Provide technical support for Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in support of MA via the mission

Assurance development Lab (MADL), and provide assessment overlays in MC-CAMS and the Mission Assurance Development Lab (MADL) to support the MAA process.

• Consolidate and graphically visualize assessment data collected during the various assessments into the Mission Assurance Development Lab and the MCCAMS.

• Develop FOUO GIS capabilities within MADL to capture and visually represent other data relevant to the installations and facilities in support of the MAA Program.

• Provide support to analyze risks to Installation/Facility infrastructures posed by natural disasters and intentional/ unintentional human action. Support should include graphical illustrations and pertinent documentation that details the risks’ impacts on critical and supporting infrastructure, assets, and their interdependencies within the supply chain.

• Provide technical collection methods for data critical to spatial visualization during site surveys.

• Conduct interviews with equipment owners and managers and document the findings.

• Collaborate with GIS stakeholders, facilitate data sharing, and document best practices.

• Analyze and document strengths and weaknesses of GIS findings.

2.14 Task 14 – MCCAMS Date Entry and Training Support

• Provide support to monitor the MCCAMS for risk assessment (RA) results, Unfunded Requirements

(UFR), and Risk Decision Package (RDP) submissions.

• Provide support to analyze and document installation utility infrastructure dependencies and determine

TCA using the CAIP process.

• Provide MA support to the commands in support of the validation process that culminates in an approved list of TCAs for the organization.

• Conduct risk assessments to determine the impact of the degradation or loss of the TCA and provide recommendations/rationale to mitigate, eliminate, or accept the risk.

• Analyze data in MC-CAMS and identify TCAs for operating forces and other installation tenants based on assigned missions to ensure assets are properly entered and maintained in the data management system.

• Analyze and collate data collected in the MCCAMS tool to identify trends that the installations face in critical asset protection.

• Enter Mission Chains, BEI, and risk data into MCCAMS.

• Provide training support during MCCAMS and EMAAT training events.

2.15 Task 15 – Policy & Planning Support

• Provide policy, planning, program assessment, evaluation, exercise, and support to assist in the effective implementation of the MA Program and related capabilities across the Marine Corps, including capabilities related to the evolving 21st Century risk and Marine Corps operating environments.

• Provide support to HQMC to facilitate engagement with the Joint Staff regarding implementation of the DoD Mission Assurance Strategy and Framework and evolving MA policy and programs.

• Provide support to assist in DoN and HQMC MA policy, strategy, and plan review, development, and implementation, including development, update, and/or implementation of the Marine Corps MA Order/Implementation Plan and supporting policies/programs; Marine Corps MA enterprise governance/advocacy structure; and Marine Corps MA doctrine, plans, and program-specific best practices.

• Facilitation of Service-level working groups and the coordination of draft policy, plans, and other documents through the DoN/HQMC and MA-specific governance structure and related processes

• Program Gap Analysis – Provide technical support to integrate MA requirements into: the Marine Corps Program Objective Memorandum (POM); capabilities development processes; the Marine Corps Force Development System (MCFDS); and service acquisition programs. Contractor support must include development of annual Protection Advocate Capabilities and Gaps Lists and facilitating the requirements derived therein through the Service POM and MCFDS processes, which will be in close coordination with the MA OAG.

• Protection Advocacy Gap Analysis – Provide support for technical reviews and document development for the Protection Advocate Capabilities and Gap Lists. Additional deliverables include input into the validation and prioritization of solutions designed to mitigate identified gaps.

• Assist in MA policy, plans, and strategy development; policy and planning coordination; and technical capability development with the Joint Staff and Office of the ASD (HD&GSA), Combatant Commands, Services, as well as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and other government agencies. Contractor support must include providing recommendations on OSD, Joint Staff, Combatant Command, and other Service-generated MA policy and supporting programs and ensuring that Marine Corps Title X responsibilities and other equities are integrated throughout the policy, program, and plan development processes.

• Provide inputs into the review and development of a wide array of MA-related draft policy, program, and planning documents originated by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, Defense Agencies, Combatant Commands, Other Services, and Federal civilian agencies.

• Attend MA events and Table Top Exercises (TTX) to include Defense Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA), OAG, and Marine Expeditionary Forces exercises and provide an after action report that details lessons learned in accordance with appropriate DoD and Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) guidance.

• Provide document development support for MA Exercises to include TTX Situation Manuals, Full Scale Exercise (FSE) Plans, and Master Scenario Events Lists.

2.16 Task 16 – Program Management Support

The Contractor must provide a Program Management Plan to document the program management system. The Contractor must develop, define, monitor, report, and maintain program scope, cost, schedule, performance, and risk metrics for Government approval. The Contractor must provide monthly execution reports and support Program Management Reviews, which are held on a quarterly basis. The Contractor must ensure that the requirements of this PWS are met to the standards and conditions identified in the government’s Performance Requirements Summary (PRS), Exhibit B. The Contractor must notify the COR regarding any issues that may impact cost, schedule, or performance. The Contractor must notify the COR regarding any changes to the schedule at least five (5) working days prior to the start of the event, to ensure no gap in support. The Contractor must keep the Government informed at all times of any personnel staffing or performance issues that have a direct impact on the contractor’s ability to meet the requirements of the contract. The Contractor must maintain administrative and operational control of contract staff personnel to include contractor personnel working on-site.

3.0) Deliverables

3.1 Deliverables Table:

Deliverable Reference Due Date / Frequency

After Action Notes from Inter-/Intra-Service Meetings 2.0 Within 10 days after conference

RFI, JSAP, DON Tracker, and MCATS Tasker Responses 2.0 As required Annual Assessment IPT agendas, briefs, and AAR 2.0 Semi-Annually

On-Site Program Review Reports 2.1-9 Within 5 business days after each visit

Draft Program Review AAR 2.1-9 As required MAA Briefs 2.1-10 As required

MAA Executive Summary 2.1-10 Within 5 business days after each MAA

MAA Reports (Draft and Final) 2.1-13 Within 90 days after MAA

MAA Program Guide Updates 2.1-13 Annually Update USMC benchmarks and provide formal Annual Benchmark Review Reports 2.1-13 Annually MA, MCCAMS, and eMAAT Training Deliverables 2.1-15 As required Mission Chains, BEI, and Risk Data in MCCAMS 2.4, 2.14 As required Quarterly CIP…