M67001-17-Q-1187_AMENDMENT_ONE.pdf

M67001MARINE CORPS FIELD CONTRACTING SYS

ATTN: CHRIS RABASSI

PO BOX 8368

CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28547

M2036117SU00116

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment is issued to answ er questions received from potential offerors and to extend the response date/time. See Summary of

Changes for details. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

POC: Chris Rabassi

Phone: 910-451-1591

E-Mail: chris.rabassi@usmc.mil

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Jun-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M6700117Q1187

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-May-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Jun-2017

CODE

M67001MARINE CORPS FIELD CONTRACTING SYS

P.O. BOX 8368 BLDG 1116

CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28547-8368

M67001 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE M67001

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M6700117Q1187

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 23-Jun-2017 03:00 PM to 29-Jun-2017 03:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Question #1: Is there an example voucher that you can release, or a technical specification documents for the vouchers?

Answer #1: Vouchers are all purchased from the company that publishes the test (ie, the CompTia Security+ test voucher is purchased from CompTia), and are all just an alphanumeric code. For example, one of our used

Security+ test vouchers is "CMDO1050583F." We enter the code in our testing system to open a test for a student, one use (test) per voucher. So the only product that we receive from the purchase is essentially a spreadsheet list of voucher codes.

Question #2: Would you have a timeframe for release and can you confirm whether the requirement is for training, vouchers & testing or simply exam vouchers?

Answer #2: The requirement is for exam testing vouchers only, and I anticipate posting the solicitation sometime late next week.

Note: This was sent on 18 May and the solicitation posted on 23 May.

Question #3: Reference: EC Council, CEH certifications. Is the Government receiving training from an authorized

ECC training partner?

Answer #3: The Government is not receiving any training. This requirement is only to receive vouchers, so personnel can access the appropriate exam.

Question #4: Reference: EC Council, CEH certifications. Will the Government be able to provide the trainer authentication code?

Answer #4: See answer #3 above.

Question #5: Reference: CompTIA A+ (page 4) and Cisco ICND (page 3) The above certifications have multiple exams associated with them. A+, for example, takes two exams in order to get certified. Does the quantity listed for each of the above certifications under their respective CLINs need to be doubled, i.e. instead of a quantity of 80 for each, should the quantity be 160 for each?

Answer #5: The Government only requires 80.

Question #6: Can you please provide SKU/ Manufacturer Part Number for each Voucher?

Answer #6: There is no SKU/Manufacturer Part Number. Each voucher is associated to the name of the exam only.

M6700117Q1187

Question #7: Reference: NAICS Code. The NAICS code that is used is shown to be a services NAICS code. May the Government please use a supply NAICS code, remove the set-aside requirement, or suggest an alternative solution?

Answer #7: Your question was forwarded to contracting officer and small business specialist for further consideration. We've decided not to change NAICS code based prior procurement history and market research.

(End of Summary of Changes)