2016_ITMAINT-QASP.doc

MARINE CORPS INSTALLATION EAST MISSION ASSURANCE PROGRAM

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

UNITED STATES MARINE FORCES, MARINE CORPS INSTALLATION EAST MISSION ASSURANCE PROGRAM

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

(QASP)

MMP100-16-SU-TM007/M67001-16-T-0019

1. Purpose. This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) has been developed for non-personal services in support of the Camp Lejeune Range Maintenance Division Electronic Maintenance services. The Contracting officer will appoint William VanPelt as the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) for this contract. COR contact information: (DSN 751) 451-7899. As the COR, Mr. VanPelt will serve as the Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE) and will use this QASP to ensure the contractor is conforming to the Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements.

2. Performance Standards. The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the service the Contractor is required to furnish. The COR will assess the Contractor’s performance to ensure the Contractor is performing up to the specified standards. The performance standards for this Performance Work Statement (PWS) are stated in the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) included in this QASP. The standards for this procurement are subjective since specific metric-driven standards are not appropriate.

3. Management and Oversight. The QASP is based on the premise that the Contractor and not the Government, is responsible for the management and any Quality Control action required to meet the terms of the contract. The performance requirements recognize that the Contractor is not a perfect manager and that unforeseen requirements and uncontrollable problems do occur. Good management and use of an adequate Quality Control Plan will allow the Contractor to operate within specific performance requirements. QASPs are designed to be objective, fair and consistent in evaluating Contractor performance against the provided standards.

4. Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs). AQLs have been established in the PRS and provide performance standards that the Contractor will meet in performing this contract. In the event the Contractor does not meet the established AQLs, the Contracting Officer has the right to exercise the negative incentives stated in this QASP.

5. Primary Method of Surveillance/Evaluation. The COR will perform evaluation based on using one of the various methods outlined in the PRS table included in this QASP. The following methods may be incorporated into the PRS to monitor contract performance:

100% inspection: Inspection where specific characteristics of every performance unit are examined and tested to determine conformance with requirements.

Planned Inspections: Planned inspections will be performed as deemed necessary by the POC to ensure adhere to PWS.

Random inspection: Sampling method in which each unit of the population has an equal chance of being selected.

Customer Surveys and Feedback: A review method where customers and end users are surveyed to provide input on specific service levels.

Ongoing Review: A review method where performance units are examined on a continuous basis to determine conformance with requirements.

6. Negative Incentives. If any of the performance requirements does not meet the AQL set in the PRS table, the COR shall document the discrepancy(s) and shall notify the Contractor promptly, and the Contracting Officer, on a monthly basis, for appropriate action. When the performance is below the AQL standard, the Government may implement a negative incentive that includes increased surveillance and/or Contractor reporting, as well as, documentation on the Contractor’s Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

7. Notification. The COR will notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, of unacceptable quality levels. The Contracting Officer will promptly provide written notification of discrepancies on a monthly basis, or immediately if the situation significantly affects the well-being of the project. The Contractor will be given the opportunity to respond, in writing, to each discrepancy.

8. Response. The Contractor shall provide a written response to the cause and the corrective action to prevent recurrence within 10 working days after receipt of Contracting Officer’s notification. The Contractor should cite specific quality assurance program procedures or new procedures instituted to prevent recurrence.

9. Records. The COR will maintain contract surveillance files as directed by the Contracting Officer. Surveillance files will include, in part, the following documentation:

a. A copy of the contract and all contract modifications

b. QASP and any other tools, checklists, etc.

c. All correspondence including Contracting Officer notifications and the Contractor’s responses

d. Contractor monthly status reports.

e. Evidence of satisfactory performance.

f. Quarterly reviews

g. Surveillance reports will be prepared by the COR, and submitted to the Contracting Officer quarterly and annually.

h. Out-of-cycle reports may be submitted in support of unacceptable performance identified during the performance period by the COR, or when there is a significant change in performance that alters the assessment in one or more evaluation areas.

i. Annual in-progress reviews will be conducted and entered into CPARS.

10. Ratings. The following criteria will be used for performance evaluations: Exceptional, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory.

a. Exceptional. (100 – 96%) Indicates performance clearly exceeds contractual requirements. The area of evaluation may contain a few minor problems for which corrective action appears highly effective.

b. Satisfactory. (95 – 90%) Indicates performance clearly meets contractual requirements. The area of evaluation contains some minor problems for which the corrective actions appear satisfactory.

c. Marginal. (89 – 84%) Indicates performance meets contractual requirements. The area of evaluation contains one or more serious problems for which corrective actions have not yet been identified, appear only marginally effective, or have not been fully implemented.

d. Unsatisfactory. (83 – 79%) Indicates the Contractor is in danger of not being able to satisfy contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The area of evaluation contains one or more serious problems for which the corrective actions appear ineffective.

11.

Documentation. Documentation used and referenced to perform surveillance will consist of monthly reports, Contractor plans and procedures, schedules, customer feedback and contract data requirements.

a. Recording Observations. Use Surveillance Logs to record information on scheduled observations and deficiencies noted. Each observation is recorded on the log. The documents then become a formal record for reference. The Contractor is to be told each time that a deficiency is found during scheduled observations. The COR makes a notation on the Surveillance Log of the date and time the deficiency was discovered, and subsequently requests that the Contractor initial the notation, documenting notification of the deficiency only.

b. Potential Unacceptable Performance. The COR must identify the specific service that is unacceptable and the possible causes, and ask a number of questions which if answered, will probably pinpoint the source of the problem.

c. Documenting Unacceptable Performance. The COR must attempt to resolve the problem with the Contractor. The original log and the attempted solution (along with an evaluation of results) are forwarded to the Contracting Officer through the COR.

Based on the severity of the discrepancy and the success of the solution, the COR will notify the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall complete a response to the unacceptable evaluation if requested by the Contracting Officer or by its own choice.

12. Taking Action.

a. The COR may evaluate the Contractor’s performance and document any non-compliance, but only the Contracting Officer may take action against the Contractor for an unacceptable rating.

b. When the Contractor’s performance is unacceptable and a formal action is indicated, the COR will determine what action is appropriate for the specific circumstances and make a recommendation to the Contracting Officer.

13. Documentation. The COR retains a copy of all inspection schedules and surveillance activity logs during the course of the contract, and forwards them for inclusion in the contract file at the end of the surveillance period. However, when a specific service becomes unsatisfactory during a surveillance period, the inspection documentation supporting the contract discrepancy report is promptly forwarded to the Contracting Officer.

deduction if AQL is not met Incentive

Performance Standard

performance.

Exercise Option period for Satisfactory performance.

Exercise Option period for Satisfactory performance.

Preventive Maintenance work shall include, but not be limited to: operational inspection and adjustment to ensure satisfactory functioning of equipment and systems, detecting and correcting causes of unusual noises, vibrations, temperatures, manufacturer’s recommended lubrications or adjustments to bring equipment or systems within manufacturers’ specifications, repairs, including defective parts and component replacements, equipment housekeeping and cleaning, maintaining lamps and active signals, battery replacement, and other services as required to maintain a safe and acceptable operating condition.

The contractor shall submit copies of the completed PM Checklist(s) with the monthly invoice to the government.

5% of monthly contract price penalty for unsatisfactory

Exercise Option period for Satisfactory performance.

Exercise Option period for Satisfactory performance.

Exercise Option period for Satisfactory performance.

Exercise Option period for Satisfactory performance.

Failure to meet the above stated Acceptance Quality Level (AQL)/ Frequency will result in the Contracting Department opting to not exercise the following option period.

The Contractor shall provide maintenance (preventative and corrective) on electronic and communications systems and equipment throughout the Greater Camp Lejeune Training Complex.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only