Limited Sources Justification_Agilent Maintenance Agreement.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Limited Source Justification - Agilent Laboratory Equipment Maintenance Agreement
Solicitation number
75D30121F10276
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Please wait...

If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.

You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.

For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.

Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.

Template for a Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Limited-Sources Justification

Completion Instructions: HHS has established a standard template for the preparation of a Limited-Sources Justification (LSJ) pursuant to FAR Subpart 8.4. This template is for use with orders issued under the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) program where the value exceeds simplified acquisition threshold and competition is restricted: (1) to fewer schedule contractors than required in FAR 8.405-1, 8.405-2, or 8.405-3, or (2) to an item peculiar to one manufacturer. See FAR Subpart 8.4 for additional guidance. This template is not for use with acquisitions other than those under FAR Subpart 8.4.

Tailor all aspects of this template to the individual acquisition. Consult FAR 8.405-6 for guidance. An addendum may be added in case additional space is needed.

When this document is printed, the blue italic instructions are automatically deleted on the printed version.

FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE

LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION

2. Description of Action:

Nature:

Pricing:

Funds:

<For each proposed contractor if more than one (e.g., brand name):>

3. Description of Supplies and Services to Include Contract Vehicle/Number Utilized:

Briefly describe the supplies or services to be provided, including make & model number where appropriate. Indicate whether the item to be procured is peculiar to one manufacturer (e.g., a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer). If applicable, include quantities of supplies or period of performance for services. Provide information for any options included in the order. If the action is a modification to an existing order, distinguish clearly between the work covered by the basic order and the work to be obtained by the proposed modification.

4. Authority:

When competition is limited to items peculiar to one manufacturer, this justification must explain why the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government's requirements, and that market research indicates other companies' similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency's needs in accordance with FAR 11.105.

5. Market Research:

Describe the extent of the market research conducted among the schedule holders and the results, or a statement of the reason that market research was not conducted. Brand name specifications shall not be used unless the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government’s requirements, and market research indicates other companies’ similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency’s need.

6. Actions to Increase Competition:

Describe the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration prior to any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services is made. If no such actions have been taken, explain why.

7. Any other facts supporting the justification:

8. Technical / Requirements Certification: By my signature below, I certify that the supporting data under my review which is included in this Limited-Sources Justification is accurate and complete.

Program Manager Name:

Position Title:

Email address:

Phone:

Program Manager Supervisor (or one level above Program Manager) Name:

Position Title:

Email address:

Signature:

Date:

9. Best Value Determination: By my signature below, after review of the relevant documents, I have determined that the order subject to this Limited-Sources Justification represents the best value for the Government as set forth in FAR 8.404(d), and constitutes a fair and reasonable price. The basis for my determination is as follows:

Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order provides the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.

10. Contracting Officer's Approval (Required for proposed contract not to exceed $700,000 (value calculated including all options)): I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I approve this justification subject to the availability of funds, and provided that the services and supplies herein described have otherwise been approved for acquisition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

11. Legal Review:

All J&As greater than $68 million must have a legal review from the General Law Division of the Office of the General Counsel prior to sending it to the Department.

12. OPDIV Competition Advocate Approval (Required for proposed contract over $700,000 but not exceeding $13.5 million (value calculated including all options)):

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports limiting sources.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

13. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization:

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports limiting sources.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

14. OPDIV HCA Approval (Required for proposed contract over $13.5 million but not exceeding $68 million (value calculated including all options)):

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

15. Department Competition Advocate:

Concur:

Non-Concur:

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

(The below approval paragraph is required if the cumulative contract value, including all options, exceeds $68 million.)

16. HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) Approval:

Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve limiting sources for the above stated procurement, subject to the availability of funds, and provided that the services herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

State supplies/services being procured:

State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304:

State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304 Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

11.0.0.20130303.1.892433.887364 Justification & Approval - Federal Supply Schedule Health and Human Services Justification & Approval - Federal Supply Schedule

AcquisitionTitle: Service and Maintenance Agreement for Agilent Technologies, Inc
Agency: CDC
PSCDrop:
NIHDrop:
PSCOther:
AcqusitionYear: 2021
Author: Carla P Butler, Public Health Analyst
CheckBox4: 1
CheckBox5: 0
CheckBox1: 0
Order/Contract Number::
CheckBox8: 1
CheckBox7: 0
CheckBox6: 0
CheckBox9: 0
Other Pricing:
CheckBox10: 0
CheckBox11: 0
Funding amount:
TextField5: Agilent Technologies, Inc
TextField5: 2850 Centerville Road BU3-2
TextField5: Wilmington, DE 19808-1610
Button2:
Button1:
3. Description of Supplies or Services:: This laboratory maintenance agreement will keep all instruments running optimally and ensure timely repairs while eliminating costly repairs due to damaged or malfunctioning equipment, Per CLIA requirements and CDC policies this contract is necessary in order to keep the instruments in optimal running condition and performance to assure accurate measurement results and to assure compliance with CLIA regulations.
TextField7:
State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304: The work to be performed consists of telephonic support, on-site repairs by qualified engineers, priority response time, and coverage of all parts and travel to CDC. This contract covers over hundreds of instruments and instrument components that comprise over 140 Agilent analytic systems that are no longer covered by warranties and are utilized by the CDC/NCEH/Division of Laboratory Sciences.

State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304: The Division of Laboratory Sciences (DLS) utilizes Agilent mass spectrometers and components attached to these instruments including GCs, LCs, nitrogen generators, pumps, autosamplers. To ensure our laboratory efficiency, capability, and emergency readiness laboratory instruments must be operational at least 95% of the time. This means lab equipment must be regularly maintained and rapidly repaired when needed. The maintenance and repairs must be done expertly to maintain the peak performance of the equipment. Agilent is the OEM of the instruments, components, and analytical systems to be covered under this maintenance agreement and is the only contractor that can fulfill the requirements of the contract. Acceptable maintenance and repairs vendors must have and maintain the following capabilities:

1. Provide timely repair using new OEM parts or factory warranted replacement parts which must be either manufactured by the OEM or approved by the OEM for use.

2. Must provide end users acknowledgment within four hours and technical/applications and/or engineer support for Agilent covered instrumentation within 24 hours of initial request.

3. Must possess the specific training and access to proprietary OEM software as well as OEM replacement parts to successfully repair, maintain, and update software on the Agilent mass spectrometers and other covered equipment.

4. Service engineers must be certified by Agilent-certified trainers. Service engineers must be kept up to date on system updates and able to be trained to repair, troubleshoot and maintain existing and new models of Agilent instrumentation which may be added to the contract.

5. Must provide factory-directed updates, instrument and software upgrades for all eligible Agilent instruments.

6. Must be capable of repairing all Agilent equipment or instrumentation. This includes onsite Agilent service engineer support and factory engineer/designer/applications support if needed for repairs.

7. Engineers must have proficient written and oral communication skills in the English language.

State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304:
CheckBox12: 1
CheckBox13: 0
CheckBox13: 1
CheckBox13: 0
CheckBox13: 0
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: Market research was conduced and concluded that Agilent is the only source that can fully meet the governments requirement. Other contractors were able to repair some equipment but not the mass spectrometers, or could offer currently certified engineers, but could not guarantee engineers could maintain current or updated training certificates. Further no other company could guarantee response times which is critical for DLS emergency response capabilites. Agilent Technogies, Inc. includes a maintenance agreement on their GSA contract (GS-07F-0564X). GSA has already determined the prices and items under schedule contracts to be fair and reasonable. A notice of intent to sole source will be posted. Any responses will be considered to determine acceptability.
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: There is currently no company or individual that has the ability to provide a service agreement that meets all technical requirements for maintenance on Agilent equipment. In the future, immediate consideration will be given to any company that meets the CDC's minimum vendor qualifications. Given that there are no other special circumstances; any available competitors will be considered based on their total cost as well as a detailed review of their quality of service.
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: NA
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: The pricing will be at or better than GSA established pricing. GSA pricing is already determined to be fair and reasonable.
Program Manager name: Carla P Butler
Program Manager position title: Public Health Analyst
Program Manager email address:
Program manager phone number:
Program Manager Supervisor name: Dylan Sorensen
Program Manager Supervisor Position title: Resource Management Specialist
Program Manager Supervisor email address: xag3@cdc.gov
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) signature:
Program Manager Supervisor date:
filepath:
Contract Officer's Approval name: H. Dale Bish
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) phone:
Contract Officer's Approval date: 2020-12-18
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) name: Sherry Smallwood
DateField6: 2020-12-22
Office of Small Business date:
OPDIV HCA date:
Concur with Acquisition: 0
Non-Concur with Acquisition: 0
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) date:
State supplies/services being procured:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .