LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-100126 GEC Services for Alternative Delivery Program
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2027-000000624
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution/Progress. The evaluation covers consultant performance in resource management, independence from agency staff, adherence to scope of work, communication and cooperation with GDOT personnel, timely completion of deliverables, quality and completeness of invoices and reports, and budget compliance. The form is designed to be completed by the GDOT Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert and includes space for project identification details such as GDOT PI number, PM name, Agency information, project description, phase, and service dates. Evaluators assign ratings of 5 (Exceeds Requirement and Expectation), 3 (Meets Requirement and Expectation), 1 (Does Not Meet Requirement and Expectation), or N/A to each factor.

The evaluation employs a scoring methodology that converts individual ratings into weighted scores based on the total number of ratings recorded, with point values decreasing from 50 for a single rating of 1, to 12.50 for four ratings of 1. The form requires justification from the GDOT PM for all scores and permits consultant response if applicable. Signatures and acknowledgments are required from the GDOT Project Manager, consultant PM, agency evaluator's supervisor, and GDOT leadership, with mandatory Assistant Office Head and Office Head acknowledgments required if any item receives a rating of 1. This evaluation mechanism serves as a quality assurance tool for monitoring consultant performance on GDOT-administered projects throughout their contract duration.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 484_100126 GEC Services for Alternative D.pdf PDF
Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .