L4WC26 Sources Sought 30 April 24.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C130 Prop Shop Test Stands (NP2000 Compatible)
- Solicitation number
- L4WC26
About this file
This document is a Sources Sought notice for a federal contract opportunity to provide two NP2000 Compatible C-130 Test Stands to the 402d Commodities Maintenance Group at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia. The government is conducting market research to identify potential sources with the expertise and capabilities to manufacture, deliver, assemble, and commission the test stands. The test stands must be capable of testing 54H60 and NP2000 propeller control assemblies under simulated flight conditions. This will be a firm-fixed price contract with a delivery schedule of 20 months after award. The contractor will also support the removal of five existing test stands and provide training and manuals. The government has not determined the level of security clearance or foreign participation required. Interested parties, including small businesses, are invited to respond to the Contractor Capability Survey by May 29, 2025 providing details on their facilities, experience, manufacturing capabilities, quality assurance processes, and other information to demonstrate their qualifications.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| L4WC26 Sources Sought 30 April 24.docx | DOCX document | |
| PD L4WC26 C130 Prop Shop Test Stand 30 April 24.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCES SOUGHT
C130 Prop Shop Test Stands (NP2000 Compatible)
L4WC26
CAUTION:
The Government is conducting market research to identify potential sources that possess the experience to provide all materials, equipment, labor, and shipping costs necessary to manufacture, deliver, assemble on-site and commission two Prop Shop Stands (NP2000 Compatible) to accommodate a C-130 Aircraft to the 402d Commodities Maintenance Group (CMXG), Robins Air force Base, Georgia. The test stands shall be capable of testing 54H60 and NP2000 propeller control assemblies in accordance with manufacturer's specifications while under simulated flight conditions. The level of security clearance and amount of foreign participation in this requirement has not been determined.
The Government does not own or have access to the data for these items. The Government has determined that this system is a commercial item. Commercial item descriptions, commercial vendor catalog or price lists or commercial manuals assigned a technical manual number apply.
Contractor shall furnish all material, support equipment, tools, test equipment, and services. The contractor is responsible for providing, maintaining, and calibrating all support equipment required at their facility or a subcontractor’s facility. Contractor furnished material or parts used for replacement shall equal or exceed the quality of the original material or parts.
Contractors/Institutions responding to this market research are placed on notice that participation in this survey may not ensure participation in future solicitations or contract awards. The government will not reimburse participants for any expenses associated with their participation in this survey.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. The document(s) below contain a description of the C-130 Prop Test Stands (2 ea, NP2000 Compatible) for C-130 Aircraft requirement and a Contractor Capability Survey. The Survey allows Contractors to provide their company’s capability. See attached Purchase Description.
2. If, after reviewing these documents, you desire to participate in the market research, you should provide documentation that supports your company’s capability in meeting these requirements. Failure to provide documentation may result in the government being unable to adequately assess your capabilities.
3. ATTENTION: SMALL BUSINESS RESPONDENTS who are interested in participation for this effort:
a. No set aside decision has been made; however, the Government will determine the final strategy after thorough analysis of the small business responses and other market research available, considering the demonstrated interest and capability. Please ensure that you provide a thorough response to each question. If your company does not currently possess the full capability required to fulfill the entire requirement, what teaming/partnership/joint venture/subcontracting arrangement do you have in place to fulfill the government needs? Providing evidence of this arrangement, e.g. emails, letter, etc. that demonstrates a united response to this RFI is highly encouraged, but not required. The evidence should state the type of arrangement and the role each member will fulfill. If you are only interested in being a subcontractor to the future awardee, state the portion of the work that your organization has capability of fulfilling.
b. Identify any areas of work that your organization believes should be broken out exclusively for Small Business.
4. Both large and small businesses are encouraged to participate in this Market Research. Joint ventures or teaming arrangements are encouraged.
5. Questions relative to this market survey should be addressed to the PCO.
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION
The Government is conducting market research to identify potential sources that possess the expertise, capabilities, and experience to meet qualification requirements to provide all materials, equipment, labor, and shipping costs necessary to manufacture, deliver, assemble on-site and commission two (2) C130 Prop Shop Test Stands (NP2000 Compatible) to the 402d Commodities Maintenance Group (CMXG), Robins Air force Base, Georgia. This shall be a turnkey solution that shall include shipping, delivery, rigging, installation, leveling, utilities connections, initial training, and five years of sustainment. The test stands shall be capable of testing 54H60 and NP2000 propeller control assemblies in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications while under simulated flight conditions.
Contractor shall support the dismantling and removal of all 5 of the existing test stands.
During development of the test stand, contractor shall conduct a preliminary design review (“PDR”), critical design review (“CDR”) and final design review (“FDR”)
Test stands shall be capable of testing the following components:
| PN |
| Description |
| Acronym |
| Propeller |
| 714325-6,(-3,-7) |
| Valve Housing Assembly |
| VHA |
| 54H60 |
| 826620-2 |
| Valve Housing Assembly |
| VHA |
| EPCS/EVH200-1 |
| 826650-2 |
| Valve Housing Assembly |
| VHA |
| NP2000 |
| 733872-2 |
| Pump Housing Assembly |
| PHA |
| 54H60 |
| 733872-6 |
| Pump Housing Assembly |
| PHA |
| 54H60 |
| 733872-8 |
| Pump Housing Assembly |
| PHA |
| EPCS/EVH200-1 |
| 733872-10 |
| Pump Housing Assembly |
| PHA |
| NP2000 Slave |
| 733872-13 |
| Pump Housing Assembly |
| PHA |
| EPCS/EVH200-1 |
Contractor shall provide test stand operator/maintenance training as well as operating/maintenance manuals after installation and acceptance of the first test stand.
CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY SURVEY
Part I. Business Information
Please provide the following business information for your company/institution and for any teaming or joint venture partners:
| Company/Institute Name: |
| Address: |
| Point of Contact: |
| CAGE Code: |
· Phone Number:
· E-mail Address:
· Web Page URL:
| Government Proposed North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code: 332311, Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing | ||||
| Based on the Government proposed NAICS Code, state whether your company is: | ||||
| · Small Business | (Yes / No) | |||
| · Woman Owned Small Business | (Yes / No) | |||
| · Small Disadvantaged Business | (Yes / No) | |||
| · 8(a) Certified | (Yes / No) | |||
| · HUBZone Certified | (Yes / No) | |||
| · Veteran Owned Small Business | (Yes / No) | |||
| · Service Disabled Veteran Small Business | (Yes / No) | |||
| · System for Award Management (SAM) | (Yes / No) |
· A statement as to whether your company is domestically or foreign owned (if foreign, please indicate the country of ownership).
Responses to the Capability Survey Part I and Part II must be received no later than close of business 29 May 2025. Please ensure data is in a readable electronic format that can be received through a firewall. Attachments shall not to exceed 10 MB per email. Multiple emails are acceptable. Responses must be sent via email to the following:
· , PCO, jimmy.ezzell.1@us.af.mil
· Phyllis Vail, CIP PM, phyllis.vail@us.af.mil
Questions relative to this market research should be addressed to the PCO and cc CIP Program Manager.
Part II. Capability Survey Questions
A. General Capability Questions:
1. Describe briefly the capabilities of your facility and nature of the goods and/or services you provide. Include a description of your staff composition and management structure.
2. Describe your company's past experience on previous projects similar in complexity and size to this requirement. Include contract numbers, a brief description of the work performed, period of performance, agency/organization supported, and individual point of contact (Contracting Officer or Program Manager).
3. Describe your company's capabilities and experience in generating C-130 Prop Stands (NP2000 Compatible).
4. What is your company’s current maximum capacity per month for this particular type of requirement? Provide information on any facility reserves you may possess to increase capacity in the event of an immediate need do to critical operational mission requirements.
5. What quality assurance processes and test qualification practices does your company employ? Provide a description of your quality program (ISO 9001, AS9100, etc.).
a. Provide a detailed quality plan implementing AS9100 (or equivalent).
B. Commerciality Questions:
1. Is there established catalog or market prices for our requirement?
2. If you offer this product and/or service to both U.S. Government and commercial sources, is the same workforce used for both the U.S. Government and general public?
3. Is our requirement offered to both under similar terms and conditions? Briefly describe any differences.
4. Describe your standard warranty and return process for goods and services furnished to the government for items similar in nature to this requirement.
C. Manufacturing Questions
1. Describe your capabilities and experience in manufacturing with regard to the requirements of this effort.
2. Describe your capabilities and experience in developing/modifying manufacturing procedures. Include associated upgrade of technical orders and preparation of new technical orders.
3. Demonstrate your ability and experience in the manufacture of the same or similar components, which are currently utilized in the commercial or military environment by providing the following information on the same or similar items:
a) Contract Number
b) Procuring Agency
c) Contract Value
d) Number of assets shipped
4. Provide your commercial manual(s) or Acceptance Test Procedures (ATP) and your rights to these manuals and or ATP used in the manufacture and functional check of these or similar assets for Government Engineer review.
5. Describe your capabilities and experience in test, evaluation, and repair processes/procedures with regard to manufacturing items.
6. Describe your configuration management processes and how you identify and resolve parts obsolescence and diminishing manufacturing sources problems?
7. Discuss your process for addressing any fit, form, and or function issues that may arise out of the requirements of this effort.
8. Describe your process for maintaining inventory records and reporting on hand/work-in-process balance and manufacturing status to your customer.
9. Include a detailed listing of facilities and equipment, including quantities, required to satisfy the requirements of this effort.
a. Provide an outline of the proposed process, including inspections.
i. State the type of test procedures are anticipated for this effort.
ii. State the type of inspection processes anticipated for this effort.
1. NDI/T.
2. Destructive testing/inspection.
10. How will your organization address the absence of drawings, specifications, technical data, test procedures, etc.
11. If the item cannot be manufactured in total, state what your organization can produce.
12. State any technology insertion ideas for the item that would be suitable for this effort.
13. Discuss any reverse engineering or item replacement opportunities that may be present.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .