J-13 Past Performance Questionnaire - BURLINGTON 21R4190.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS BURLINGTON ROH / DD Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N3220521R4190
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor reference check. The Military Sealift Command is soliciting offers for a contract to provide services in support of the USNS BURLINGTON ROH/DD and is seeking performance information from references for a contractor's past work, including ratings in areas such as quality, timeliness, business relations, and personnel. References are asked to complete the questionnaire and submit responses by June 18, 2021 to the points of contact provided. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on the contractor's overall performance as well as more specific performance in quality, timeliness, customer satisfaction, personnel, and cost control if applicable. References are also asked if they would hire the contractor for future work.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USNS BURLINGTON ROH / DD, newest first.
File Type Posted
USNS BURLINGTON ROH DD N3220521R4190 AMENDMENT 0004.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 37.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 34.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 36.pdf PDF
USNS BURLINGTON ROH DD N3220521R4190 AMENDMENT 0003.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 3 REV ( 10 JUNE 2021).pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 29.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 19.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 16.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 14.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 13.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 10.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 1 REV (10 JUNE 2021).pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 33.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 32.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 28.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 24.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 20.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 9.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 31.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 30.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 26.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 23.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 18.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 17.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 11.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 8.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 22.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 7.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 5.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 4.pdf PDF
J - 2 Category A Items BURLINGTON 21R4190 REV 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
USNS BURLINGTON ROH DD N3220521R4190 AMENDEMENT 0001.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 2.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses RFE.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 6.pdf PDF
Q AND A Responses 3.pdf PDF
J-6.zip ZIP file
J - 13 Past Performance Questionnaire - BURLINGTON 21R4190.docx DOCX document
J - 8 Request for Spec Clarification - BURLINGTON 21R4190.doc DOC document
J - 11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form - BURLINGTON.docx DOCX document
J - 14 Technical Data Non-Disclosure - BURLINGTON 21R4190 (1).docx DOCX document
J - 2 Category A Items BURLINGTON 21R4190.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J - 3 Category B Items - BURLINGTON 21R4190.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-4 GFP BURLINGTON 21R4190.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J - 9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - BURLINGTON 21R4190.doc DOC document
J - 12 Past Performance Data - BURLINGTON 21R4190.doc DOC document
USNS BURLINGTON ROH-DD N3220521R4190.pdf PDF
J-1 WORK ITEMS LIST FOR BURLINGTON 21R4190.docx DOCX document
J- 7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey - BURLINGTON 21R4190.docx DOCX document
Show all 50

USNS BURLINGTON ROH / DD has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, 18 June 2021 at 3:00 pm E.T. to Mr. James Greene and Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Mr. James Greene at james.e.greene@navy.mil, and Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins at alvinia.jenkins@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
James Greene
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Mr. James Greene

Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Mr. James GreeneMrs. Alvinia Jenkins
(Facsimile Number)(757) 3443-2929(757) 443-5881
(E-mail Address)james.e.greene@navy.milalvinia.jenkins@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .