Atch_6_-_PP_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Single Mobility System (SMS)/Coalition Mobility System (CMS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HTC711-13-R-D012
Issued by
Department of Defense United States Transportation Command

About this file

From the source

Attachment 6 - PP Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Single Mobility System (SMS)/Coalition Mobility System (CMS), newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_2_-_HTC711-13-R-D012.pdf PDF
Conformed_HTC711-13-R-D012_(includes_all_Amendments).pdf PDF
Atch_10_-_DODAF_SV6_ _AV1_Draft_Documents.pdf PDF
Atch_4_-_Labor_Rates_-_Price_Proposal_Break_out.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Questions_and_Answers_2_(all_inclusive).pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_1.pdf PDF
Conformed_HTC711-13-R-D012_(includes_Amendment_1).pdf PDF
Amendment_1_-_HTC711-13-R-D012.pdf PDF
HTC711-13-R-D012_-_RFP.pdf PDF
Atch_4_-_Labor_Rates_-_Price_Proposal_Break_out.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_7_-_PP_Log.doc DOC document
Atch_9_-_Subcontracting_Plan_Template.doc DOC document
Atch_5_-_PP_Reference_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Atch_2_-_SMS-CMS_QASP.pdf PDF
Atch_3_-_SMS_CMS_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Atch_1_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Atch_8_-_PWS_Sections_to_CLIN_Mapping_Table_(For_Info._only).pdf PDF
SMS_CMS_PWS_FY14-18_-_9_May_13_(DRAFT).pdf PDF
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

HTC711-13-R-D012

ATTACHMENT 6

Recent and Relevant Past Performance

USTRANSCOM

HTC711-13-R-D012

Single Mobility System (SMS)/Coalition Mobility System (CMS)

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings (i.e. Satisfactory, Exceptional, etc.) should include comments for any question rated exceptional or lower than satisfactory. Definitions for ratings are provided on page 5. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via e-mail to the address below.

USTRANSCOM/TCAQ-D
ATTN: Chastity Hill
E-mail: chastity.hill@ustranscom.mil
Phone: 618-220-7073 DSN : 770-7073

Index Number _____________________ (To be completed by USTC/TCAQ upon receipt of completed questionnaire.)

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Work Performed Title:____________________________________________________________________

Brief Description of Work Performed:________________________________________________________

Dollar value:____________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance:____________________________________________________________________

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:____________________________________________________________________________ Position/Title:______________________________________________________________________ Business Address:___________________________________________________________________ Relation to Program:_________________________________________________________________ Phone:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ FAX:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________________ Other suggested points of contact:___________________________________________________________

Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify category and question number.

1. Staffing

a. Were the types of personnel (skill, expertise, and certification level) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort without Government intervention?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

b. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality, skills, and certification level of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

c. Did the contractor provide personnel meeting the DOD 8570.01M requirement?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

d. How effective was the contractor in aligning and re-aligning resources (personnel and other) to meet varying workloads?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

e. How would you rate the contractor’s emphasis on customer satisfaction?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

2. Technical Approach

a. How would you rate the contractor's overall technical approach?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing planned project activities/requirements within the established milestones/timeframes?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

c. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure that the final deliverables met the Performance Work Statement requirements?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

d. How effectively did the contractor perform database development, administration and maintenance?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

e. How effectively did the contractor operate and maintain a server environment?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

f. How effectively did the contractor develop code, and process large volumes of data, particularly relating to the Department of Defense and Transportation communities to meet customer timelines?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

g. How effectively did the contractor model and design database tables and views to meet customer requirements?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

h. How effectively did the contractor draft proper documentation and perform the necessary steps to obtain and/or maintain a Government system accreditation (i.e. DIACAP)?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

i. How effectively did the contractor coordinate and interact with customers and peers to develop technical solutions to complex problems.

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

j. How effectively did the contractor develop and document solutions to interface with other systems via database to database, XML, SFTP, etc.?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

k. How effectively did the contractor develop, maintain, and administer complex software applications using Perl, C++, JavaScript, MS SQL, and Oracle databases adhering to Government and industry standards?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

l. How effectively did the contractor provide transportation-related Department of Defense command center activities at operational and support levels (or similar commercial experience)?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

m. How effectively did the contractor design, develop, and maintain web pages to view and manage complex datasets?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________ n.. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and if so, to what extent?

Yes ___________ No_______

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

3. Cost Control.

a. If the contract was other than firm fixed price, did the contractor use effective methods and effective cost controls?

Yes___________ No_______

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

4. Contractor’s Overall performance

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

5. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes___________ No_________ If “no”, why?_____________________________________________________________________________

Any additional comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________

6. Small Business Subcontracting Utilization?

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING UTILIZATION
Unsatisfactory
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Exceptional
Unknown
A.
Compliance with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns.
B.
Compliance with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
C.
Contractor met small business subcontracting goals as established in the contract.

DOD uses a common DOD assessment rating system to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Ratings range from “Unsatisfactory” to “Exceptional”.

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the governments benefit.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government’s benefit.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .