Attachment_4_-_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf

UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION COMMAND

508 SCOTT DR

SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE IL 62225-5357

23 April 2013

FROM: USTRANSCOM TCAQ-CI

508 Scott Dr.

Scott AFB, IL 62225-5357

SUBJECT: Past Performance Survey for Solicitation HTC711-13-R-C003

The United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), Commercial International Branch is in the process of evaluating offers for award of the Trans-Sahara Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) Services contract.

One of the significant considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past and present performance on contracts which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from sources such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts. If information on this particular contractor has been entered into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), please annotate that in the appropriate block within Section 2 of the attached questionnaire.

We will use this information, as well as the specific information obtained from this questionnaire, to complete our analysis of the offeror’s past performance.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed survey. Request your written response no later than 11:00 am Central Daylight Time 8 May 2013. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of evaluations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the survey may be typed or handwritten and either scanned and emailed to scott.amos@ustranscom.mil, keri.lindsco@ustranscom.mil, and nashae.perez@ustranscom.mil or “faxed” to 618-220-7909 (DSN 770- 7909), Attention: Scott Amos and Nashae Perez. Please call Scott Amos (618-220-6715) prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed survey will become a part of the official records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this award

////SIGNED////

KERI A. LINDSCO

Contracting Officer

Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

Solicitation HTC711-13-R-C003 Attachment 4

Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In

Past Performance Questionnaire Trans Sahara STOL

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract identified below. Your ratings (i.e., Exceptional, Very Good, etc.) should include comments for any question rated higher or lower than Satisfactory. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via e-mail to the address below.

USTRANSCOM TCAQ-CI

ATTN: Mr. Scott Amos, Ms. Keri Lindsco, and Ms. Nashae Perez

508 Scott Drive Scott AFB, IL 62225-5357 E-mail: scott.amos@ustranscom.mil, keri.lindsco@ustranscom.mil, and nashae.perez@ustranscom.mil Phone: 618-220-6715/6732/7058 DSN 770-6715/6732/7058

FAX: 618-220-7909

Request response NLT 11:00 am CDT, 8 May 2013.

NOTE: PPIRS may be reviewed for the contractors as well as responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Work Performed Title:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Dollar value (include per year cost and life cycle cost):

Period of Performance:

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name: ______________________________________________________________________________

Position/Title: ________________________________________________________________________

Business Address: _____________________________________________________________________

Relation to Program: ___________________________________________________________________

Phone: (DSN) _________________________(Commercial)____________________________________

FAX: (DSN) __________________________(Commercial) ___________________________________

Other suggested points of contact: _____

Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver and to/from what locations. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

DESCRIPTION: ________________________________________________________________________

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE 1: Remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify category and question number.

NOTE 2: Rating definitions are provided at the end of this questionnaire.

1. What kind of services are provided under this contract (check all that apply)?

____ Casualty Evacuation ____ Passenger Movements ____ Cargo Delivery

____ Air Drop (Cargo) ____ Air Drop (Personnel)

REMARKS:

2. What, if any, of the above services were provided in Africa? List all applicable services and the locations to which they were provided.

3. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing qualified/experienced personnel and management with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements?

Exceptional______Very Good______Satisfactory______Marginal______Unstisfactory______N/A______

4. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing scheduled maintenance on aircraft to ensure limited interruption of service?

5. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing casualty evacuation services, including effective flight planning and execution to meet contract requirements?

6. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing passenger charter services, including effective

7. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing cargo delivery services, including effective

8. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing air drop services (personnel and cargo), including effective flight planning and execution to meet contract requirements?

9. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in complying with contract response times and aircraft availability percentages?

10. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in maintaining an adequate and effective safety and security program?

11. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing accurate and timely billing processes?

12. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and if so, to what extent?

Yes _____ No ________

13. Contractor’s Overall performance

Exceptional______Very Good______Satisfactory_______Marginal______Unstisfactory______N/A______

14. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes ____________ No____________

If “no”, why? _____________________________________________________________________________

15. Any additional comments:

Rating Definitions:

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.