Question_and_Answer_8.18.16.docx

DOCX document 12 KB Posted

Attached to
9MM MARKING CARTRIDGES Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HSSS01-16-Q-0376
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security US Secret Service

About this file

From the source

Question and Answer

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 9MM MARKING CARTRIDGES, newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions_and_Answers_8.19.16.docx DOCX document
HSSS01-16-Q-0376.pdf PDF
Statement_of_Work_HSSS01-16-Q-0376.docm DOCM document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Question:

The part number per CLIN (see below examples) indicate the non Tox Free versions, but the Statement of Work indicates that the ammunition should be tox-free. This is to include a submission of a MSDS sheet with the proposal. Can you clarify this issue for us? We want to make sure we are offering the Government the best value and correct product.

Examples:

CLIN 0001 #5320761 9mm FX Marking Cartridge vs #5320771 Tox-Free 9mm FX Marking Cartridge CLIN 0002 #5320762 9mm FX Marking Cartridge vs #5320772 Tox-Free 9mm FX Marking Cartridge CLIN 0003 #5320763 9mm FX Marking Cartridge vs #5320773 Tox-Free 9mm FX Marking Cartridge

Answer:

The difference is, the primer should be standard primer (as the non- tox primers do not function our weapons), however the solutions within the projectile need to be non-tox in content.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .