Questions_from_Industry_regarding_OSI_Security_Support_Services.pdf

Questions from Industry regarding OSI Security Support Services

Request for Proposal (RFP) HSSCCG-14-R-00029

1. Is there an incumbent on this work?

Response: Yes, with the exception of PWS sections 4.2.1.2, 4.2.1.3 and 4.2.2.3, all of this work is currently performed by an incumbent. The incumbent contractor is Alutiiq

Business Services LLC.

2. If there is no incumbent, is this part of a larger contract that is being broken off with an intent to award to an 8(a)?

Response: See #1 above.

3. Will this be LPTA or Best Value or other?

Response: The source selection approach will be on a Best Value basis using the tradeoff process rather than LPTA.

4. In regards to the place of performance, it is broken down as follows:

Personnel Security

65 Bowdoin Street, South Burlington, VT 05407

Security Support

111 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20529

20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20529

633 Third Street NW, Washington DC 20529

150 Space Center Loop, Lee’s Summit MO 64-64

4500 Fuller Drive, Irving, TX 75038

24000 Avila Rd, Laguna Nigel, CA 92677

390 N. Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL 32801

237 Harvest Lane, Williston, VT 05495

Is there an estimate of percentages of personnel for each place of performance? For example, 10% of the Security Support will be located at 111 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC, 20529, 25% of the Security Support will be located at 150 Space Center Loop, Lee’s Summit

MO 64064?

Response: The percentages are broken down by PWS section, subject to change due to possible realignments of effort.

Location PWS Section

Percen tage

65 Bowdoin Street, South Burlington, VT

05407

4.1 (All

Sections)

100%

4.2 2%

(Sectio n 4.2.2;

Subsection 4.2.2.4)

111 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20529

4.2 (Section

4.2.1) 100%

4.2 (Sectio n 4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.3)

100%

20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20529

4.2 (Sectio n 4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.4)

98%

633 Third Street NW, Washington DC

20529

4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.4)

30%

150 Space Center Loop, Lee’s Summit MO

64-64

4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.4)

15%

4500 Fuller Drive, Irving, TX 75038 4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.4)

15%

4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.2)

25%

24000 Avila Rd, Laguna Nigel, CA 92677 4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.4)

15%

4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.2)

25%

390 N. Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL 32801 4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.4)

15%

4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.2)

25%

237 Harvest Lane, Williston, VT 05495 4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.4)

15%

4.2 (Section

4.2.2;

Subsection

4.2.2.2)

25%

5. What is the anticipated total FTE at each location?

Response: The Government is interested in your approach to satisfying the requirements of the Performance Work Statement. Estimated hours or volume have been included in the RFP.

6. Is the work at the Government’s site or Contractor’s site?

Response: Government’s site.

7. What is the approximate value of the effort?

8. What is the distribution of labor (support services) in terms of LOE and tasks performed between the various locations?

9. What is the expected release date of the RFP?

Response: 9/30/14

10. Will you allow 8(a) JV’s to respond?

Response: 8(a) JVs must be in accordance with 13 CFR 124.513 – Under what circumstances can a joint venture be awarded an 8(a) contract.

11. Will the Government allow use of a GSA MOBIS schedule to bid the subject requirement?

Requirement: This is an open market procurement rather than use of a GSA schedule.

12. Can you clarify whether the subject solicitation relates to the same opportunity as the

Sources Sought notice (HSSCCG-13-I-00005) that was issued early this year?

Response: Yes, the subject solicitation relates to the same opportunity as referred to in the Sources Sought Notice HSSCCG-13-I-00005.