PPPQ.doc

DOC document 64 KB Posted Jul 12, 2016

Attached to: SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGERS COURSE Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: HQ0516-16-R-0006
Issued by: Defense Media Activity

About this file

From the source

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGERS COURSE, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
DOD_Public_Affairs_Guidance_on_SM.pdf	PDF	Jul 29, 2016
USMC_Social-Media-Handbook_REVISED_pdf_(1).pdf	PDF	Jul 29, 2016
DOD_SM_Policy_Reference_List.docx	DOCX document	Jul 29, 2016
Social_Media_Training_RFP_QandA1.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jul 28, 2016
SOCIAL_MEDIA_MOD_1.pdf	PDF	Jul 28, 2016
HQ0516-16-R-0006.pdf	PDF	Jul 12, 2016
FINAL_TTI_Social_Media_TLO_ELO.docx	DOCX document	Jul 12, 2016
PPPI.doc	DOC document	Jul 12, 2016

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ORGANIZATION’S PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection

Please complete this questionnaire and email to:

Keta S. Humphrey, Contract Speciaist keta.s.humphrey.civ@mail.mil Defense Media Activity Response Date: 8 August 2016 6700 Taylor Ave Fort Meade, MD 20755

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR

1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS

4. CONTRACT NO.:

5. CONTRACT START DATE:

6. COMPLETION DATE:

7. CONTRACT VALUE $

2. PROJECT NAME:

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT(FFP, T&M, etc.):

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

10. EVALUATION

a. EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other) AND ORGANIZATION

b. EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER

c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this contractor:

EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed

A. Quality of Products and Services- Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

N/O

B. Overall Performance- Assess the contractor’s overall performance for the project.

FORMCHECKBOX

C. Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).

FORMCHECKBOX

D. Technical Requirements- Assess the contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.

FORMCHECKBOX

E. Cost Control- Assess the contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.

FORMCHECKBOX

N/O

F. Subcontracting- Assess the contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.

FORMCHECKBOX

G. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.

FORMCHECKBOX

H. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.

FORMCHECKBOX

I. Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.

FORMCHECKBOX

N/O

J. List Contractor’s Weak Points:

List Contractor’s Strong Points:

List any other projects this contractor has completed for you:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.