OMSAS Contractor Questions Apr 2021.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HHM402-21-R-0016
- Issued by
-
Defense Intelligence Agency
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| RFP HHM402-21-R-006 | |||||
| OMSAS IV Questions / Comment Matrix | |||||
| # | Document | Reference (Section / Paragraph) | Page / Paragraph/ Line | Question | Response |
| 1 | Labor Category Definitions: The subject RFP does not include an attachment defining labor categories by degree and/or years’ experience. Will the government provide this information? | RFP Amendment 01 will include the description of each Labor Category | |||
| 2 | Pricing Worksheet | Pricing Worksheet: The formula for each Ordering Year Total Labor is incorrect. The formula for Year 1 should be H24+H24*H25 instead of H24*H25. The current formula requires an entry of 100% plus the normal fee% to calculate the correct total labor. Example: For an 8% fee one would enter 108% to calculate correct total labor. Will the government provide a corrected or further guidance? | The Pricing Worksheet was revised to reflect the Fixed Fee amount and correction of the formula. | ||
| 3 | Section L | Factor 2: Technical/Management Capability; Subfactor 2, | Factor 2: Technical/Management Capability; Subfactor 2, Technical Expertise for M&S Model Development and Integration specifically states, “The response to the classified requirements may be submitted separately and shall be no more than two pages.” There are no further references to classified response requirements. Due to the nature of the requirements set for the in the subject PWS, a classified response is necessary to clearly articulate, in detail, overall depth and breadth of experience, technical expertise, and scientific and technical skills as they relate to each discipline. Will the government accept submission of a completely classified Technical/Management Capability Proposal Volume? | Section L and Section M have been revised for Factor II: Technical / Management Capability, to delete the submission of Classified information. Classified proposals are not encouraged for this requirement. | |
| 4 | Section L | Section L.8 | Section L.8 Special Instructions is organized alpha numerically. The evaluation factors start at L.8-d proceeding sequentially to L.8-g Factor 4: Small Business Participation Commitment. However, Factor 5: Price Proposal (Page 170 of 191) has no sequential designator as it should (h). For the purpose of proposing, can we move forward with the assumption that the above-mentioned factor is indeed “h”? | Correct, see revised Section L | |
| 5 | Section L | Section L.6 Table | Considering the highly technical nature of the 22-page Performance Work Statement coupled with the instructions and evaluation criteria in Section L & M, will the government increase page count for the Technical/Management Capability Proposal to 75 pages? | The Maximum page limit for Volume II: Technical / Management Capability is increased from 50 pages to 60 pages. | |
| 6 | Section L | Section L.6 | Number of Copies/Page Limits. The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table below. "Original" proposals containing each volume shall be clearly marked "Original''. The "copy" proposal containing each volume shall be clearly marked "copy"'. The "copy" shall be sanitized by redacting of all Offeror identification and information that may reveal the identity of the offering company. "Copy" proposals shall not contain any Illustrations, company logo, etc. and shall be submitted on plain paper. Illustrations that do not reveal the identity of the offering company are acceptable. Offeror's Name shall be blacked out. Will the Government limit the redaction process to the Technical/Management Capability Proposal only? Redaction of potentially identifying information in all other volumes could lead to perceived questions related to validity and reliability of information presented for evaluation. | Correct, the only required redacted volume is Volume II, Technical / Management Capability | |
| 7 | DD 254 | Will the Government provide form DD 254 in attachment J for classified proposal production? | Amendment 01 provides the DD 254 | ||
| 8 | Section L | Section L.e | Section L & M subfactors listed in the current solicitation do not reflect requirements listed in the PWS. Will the Government correct all evaluation factors to reflect applicability to solicitation HM402-21-R-0016, Offensive Missile System Analysis and Support IV? | Section L and Section M, Factor II: Technical / Management Capability have been revised to reference the RFP PWS |
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 &P
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .