Attachment_3_-_GCSSJ_Data_Analysis_PPQ.pdf

ATTACHMENT 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE COVER LETTER & QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the

Global Combat Support System-Joint (GCSS-J) Data Applications & Integration Analysis Support.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflects the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from Agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. The acquisition schedule for GCSS-J Data Applications & Integration Analysis Support is streamlined, and as such, your written response to the questionnaire is requested no later than the proposal due date. The questionnaire should be completed electronically and emailed to the Contracting Officer, Christopher.A.Gray54.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist, brian.p.bilenki.civ@mail.mil.

Your completed questionnaire will be considered SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION I.A.W. FAR

2.101 & 3.104 and will become a part of the official contract file.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Respectfully, CHRISTOPHER A. GRAY

Contracting Officer

1 Attachment

Past Performance Questionnaire mailto:Christopher.A.Gray54.civ@mail.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1 - CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of Contractor Contract Was Awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract Number: _______________________________________

D. Task Order Number (if applicable): ___________________________

D. Contract Type: ______________________________ (FFP, FPI, Cost, CPFF, CPIF, LH, T&M)

E. Was this a Competitive Contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Was this Contract Performance-Based? Yes _____ No _____

G. Was the Contractor a Prime or Subcontractor on this Effort? __________________________________

H. Additional Past Performance Information for this Contract Available in PPIRS? Yes _____ No _____

I. Period of Performance (including option periods): _____________________________________________________

J. Number of Users Supported by this Contract: __________

K. Number of Locations/Sites Supported by this Contract: ____________

L. Initial Contract Cost: $____________________________

M. Current/Final Contract Cost: $_______________________________

N. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract cost: _____________________________________

O. Description of service provided:__________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2 - CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable): ____________________________________________________________

C. Geographic Description of Services under this Contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3 - EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's Title: _____________________________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's Phone/Fax Number: _________________________________________________________________________

D. Evaluator’s E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________________

E. Number of Years Evaluator Worked on Subject Contract: _____________________

SECTION 4 - EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

EXCEPTIONAL (E) - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD (VG) - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY(S) – Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M) – Performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U) – Performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (NA) - Unable to provide a score.

TECHNICAL APPROACH E VG S M U NA

T1. Expertise in query development

T2. Ability to conduct test and evaluation of software products

T3. Ability to conduct analysis of data sources

T4. Ability to analyze requirements and user stories

T5. Quality of deliverables

T6. Timeliness of deliverables

MANAGEMENT APPROACH E VG S M U NA

M1. Ability to recruit and retain fully trained quality personnel

M2. Ability to provide administrative, planning and functional expertise for working groups

M3. Ability to resolve problems effectively

M4. Effective Contract Management (i.e. ability to lead, manage and control the program)

M5. Overall effectiveness in establishing and meeting customer satisfaction objectives

COST PERFORMANCE E VG S M U NA

C1. Ability to effectively manage fixed price tasks

C2. Ability to Alert the Government of Constructive Changes before They Occur

C3. Number of Cost-related Equitable Adjustments

C4. Number of Projects / Tasks that Incurred Additional Costs

C5. Ability to Meet Forecasted / Projected Costs

C6. Sufficiency, Accuracy and Timeliness of Cost Reporting

C7. Timely Submission of Correct Invoices

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5 - NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract (what strengths did the contractor bring to the effort)?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract (what were the contractor’s weaknesses)?

Would you have any reservations about using this contractor again?

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire via e-mail to to the Contracting Officer, Christopher.A.Gray54.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist, brian.p.bilenki.civ@mail.mil.

mailto:Christopher.A.Gray54.civ@mail.mil mailto:brian.p.bilenki.civ@mail.mil