HC1028-15-T-0215_RFQ_AMD01.pdf
PDF 100 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CA Technologies Project Portfolio Management Installation, Configuration, and On-Site Knowledge Transfer
- Solicitation number
- HC1028-15-T-0215
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
RFQ HC1028-15-T-0215 amendment 0001 to extend quote due date to August 12 2015 by 2 00pm CST
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
F3ST955141GC01
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
A. The purpose of this modification is to extend the quote due date until Wednesday, August 12, 2015 by 2pm CST.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
S 1 5
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 10-Aug-2015
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HC1028-15-T-0215
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
05-Aug-2015
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
10-Aug-2015
CODE
DISA/DITCO-SCOTT-PL83
2300 EAST DRIVE
SCOTT AFB IL 62225-5406
HC1028 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
HC1028-15-T-0215
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The required response date/time has changed from 10-Aug-2015 10:00 AM to 12-Aug-2015 02:00 PM.
SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES
The following have been modified:
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 AND 2
Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items and FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items
1. This request for quotation (RFQ) is to support the United States Transportation Command’s
(USTRANSCOM) requirement for Project Portfolio Management (PPM) Installation, Configuration, and On-Site Knowledge Transfer from a CA Technologies authorized service provider. This RFQ is open only to Women Owned Small Businesses.
2. Offerors are requested to submit a written technical and price quote in response to the
Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) included in this request for quotes (RFQ). Further information on submission of your quote is provided throughout this document in addition to FAR Clause 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors –
Commercial Items and FAR Clause 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items.
a. IAW with DISA Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DARS) 52.209-9000, the offeror shall specifically identify in its quote, whether or not any potential or actual
Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest (OCCI) as described in Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5 exists for this instant procurement. If the offeror believes that no OCCI exists, the OCCI response shall set forth sufficient details to support such a position. If an offeror believes that an actual or perceived OCCI does exist on the instant procurement, the offeror shall submit an OCCI plan with the quote, explaining in detail how the OCCI will be mitigated and/or avoided.
b. Offerors must complete Blocks 6 and 7 of the DD Form 254 included in this RFQ with the appropriate information for their company and any subcontractors (when applicable).
Completed DD Forms 254 must be submitted with quotations.
3. Evaluation Factors and Basis for Award Determination:
a. Award will be made to the contractor whose quotation is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government using a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) evaluation process. Quotations will be evaluated with regard to how they respond to the requirements of the PWS and on price submissions. The technical portion of the quotation should include all information the contractor wants the Government to consider and evaluate regarding its company’s ability to perform all required tasks and conform to all required terms and conditions. In order to be eligible for award, the contractor’s quotation must sufficiently address all aspects of the PWS. The Government reserves the right, but is not obligated, to conduct a realism analysis. With regard to the best value analysis for the award decision, the below evaluation factors and subfactors will be used in the determination of technical acceptability. Section 508 Accessibility Standards do apply to this requirement. Section 508 requirements are listed in the included PWS. Compliance with Section 508 standards will be considered prior to evaluating any of the selection criteria listed below. Any quotation failing to meet the Section 508 Accessibility Standards, as listed in the PWS, shall be eliminated from consideration for award.
b. After receipt of quotations, the Government will first evaluate the lowest price quotation.
If the lowest price quotation is determined to be technically acceptable and otherwise properly awardable, no further evaluations will be conducted, and award will be made. If, however, the lowest price quotation is determined to be technically unacceptable and/or otherwise not properly awardable, further evaluations will be conducted.
c. The standards for determining technical acceptability are below, as well as information concerning price quotations. Page limitations are identified below under each evaluation factor and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in evaluation of the quotation. The following items will not be considered when calculating page limits: cover page, table of contents, glossary, executive summary, generic resumes, past performances, OCCI mitigation plans, and Section 508 compliance. The technical portion of the quotation is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 (or newer) or PDF document. The page format shall have a 1 inch margin using no smaller than an 11 point Ariel, Times New
Roman, or Courier New font for all text to include any text contained in a table. The price quotation spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical quotation and shall be submitted in MS Excel 2007 (or newer) format. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification. The file size of each document shall not exceed 2MB. Page limitations shall not be circumvented by including inserted text boxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information; such inclusions are not acceptable and will not be considered part of a quotation. The Government reserves the right not to consider for award any quotation that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this RFQ.
(1) Technical/Management Approach Factor: The Technical/Management Subfactors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable. The offeror must provide a CA
PPM Project/Solution Implementation Plan. Also, the offeror shall conduct solution requirements and design workshops and provide Solution Requirement Document and Solution
Design Documents. In addition, the Offeror shall work with end-users to define and create
Group-Based Security Models, up to 5 groups. In order for a contractor’s proposal/quotation to be rated Technically Acceptable overall, each of the following subfactors must be rated
Acceptable. Technical/ management quotations should not exceed 10 pages.
(a) Subfactor 1: CA PPM Project Implementation Plan and Status Report, PWS
Paragraph 6.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the Offeror proposes qualified technical and project resources who are Manufacturer-certified in the implementation of the product.
(b) Subfactor 2: CA PPM – Solution Implementation General Application
Requirements and Design, PWS Paragraph 6.3. In order for this subfactor to be rated
Acceptable, the Offeror provides Manufacturer-approved Solution Requirement
Document and Solution Design Document.
(c) Subfactor 3: CA PPM – Implement and Create Group-based Security Model, PWS
Paragraph 6.4. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the Offeror shall demonstrate direct access to manufacturer’s product engineering and development teams to ensure proper Security Model implementation.
(2) Cost/Price Factor:
(a) Since this requirement is based on LPTA, award will be made to the contractor that presents the lowest priced technically acceptable approach. The contractor’s price proposal will be evaluated to determine if it is reasonable and complete. Normally, price reasonableness is established through price analysis. The Government will determine completeness of the offeror's proposal by verifying that all solicitation requirements have been priced, figures are correctly calculated, and costs are presented in a clear and useful format. The Government reserves the right to conduct a realism analysis of the proposed price. The total evaluated price will consist of the contractor’s proposed price for the full 45 day period of performance, with an anticipated start date of August 14, 2015.
(b) Offerors should ensure price quotations include detailed information regarding the resources required to accomplish the task (e.g., labor categories, labor hours, number of employees for each labor category, rates, travel, incidental equipment, contract access fees, etc.).
Again, the price quotation spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical/management quotation.
(c) All travel must show the specific detail, if known (e.g., number of days, locations, number of personnel, etc.). All ODCs shall annotate the specific detail (e.g., quantity, part number, manufacturer, etc.) to include supporting documentation to justify the costs (i.e., price quotes, price history, etc.). Travel shall be authorized by the COR in writing prior to performance and will be paid IAW FAR Part 31.205-46.
4. In order to be eligible for award, an offeror must be an authorized service provider of CA
Technologies. Quotations shall include documentation confirming that the offeror is an authorized service provider as of the quotation due date and will be an authorized service provider for the period of performance identified in this solicitation.
5. Quotations are due on August 12, 2015 2:00PM (CT) and should be submitted to the contract specialist at DITCO via the following email address:
shannon.k.fuehne.civ@mail.mil mailto:shannon.k.fuehne.civ@mail.mil
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .