Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 118 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MPS Guard & Admin Svs Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HC1028-15-R-0008
- Issued by
- Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_2_-_SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| HC1028-15-R-0008.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3_-_QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_2_-_SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| Enclosure_2_-_Electronic_Product_List.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_3_-_QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| HC1028-15-R-0008.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_1_-_Proposal_Format_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Enclosure_1_-Positions_and_Posts.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(This questionnaire is intended as a sample. Tailor the questionnaire to your technical/management subfactors/cost/price to solicit the information your PCAG will need to make their Performance Confidence Assessment. This questionnaire should be accompanied by a transmittal letter explaining its purpose.)
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104
THIS QUESTIONNAIRE SHALL BE PROVIDED DIRECTLY TO CUSTOMERS FOR COMPLETION AND SUBMISSION. QUESTIONNAIRES RECEIVED FROM THE OFFEROR WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. offerors shall be responsible for ensuring that customers submit completed questionnaires by the rfp due date to christopher.p.jordan13.civ@mail.mil (copy terri.l.rollins.civ@mail.mil)
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
C. Contract number: _______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _________________________
J. Description of service provided:________________________________________________________________________ K. Number of Guard Posts:________________________ L. Contract includes continuous operation (24/7) Security Operations Center (SOC)? Yes______ No______
SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________
D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
*Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
| *B |
| *P |
| G |
| *Y |
| *R |
| N |
Technical Approach
T1. Adequacy/effectiveness of proposed approach for operating a continuous Security Operations Center (SOC)
T2. Adequacy of proposed methods for staffing the SOC
T3. Adequacy of proposed methods of training personnel prior to assignment
T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5. Ability to implement current standard practices for security services
T6. Adequacy/effectiveness of safety procedures
T7. Overall quality and effectiveness of Security Services
*Comments:__________________________________________________________________________________________________
| *B |
| *P |
| G |
| *Y |
| *R |
| N |
Management Approach
M1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
M2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
M3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
M4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
M5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
M6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
M7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
M8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
M9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
M10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
*Comments:__________________________________________________________________________________________________
| *B |
| *P |
| G |
| *Y |
| *R |
| N |
Key Personnel
K1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
K2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
K3. Contractor’s ability to ability to retain and recruit qualified key personnel
*Comments:__________________________________________________________________________________________________
| *B |
| *P |
| G |
| *Y |
| *R |
| N |
Cost Performance
C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
*Comments:__________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
General Comments. Please provide any other relevant performance information.
Evaluator’s Signature
Date
PAST PERFORMANCE REF SHEET
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCES
Please ensure that this reference sheet is completed outlining Past Performance references used for the questionnaires. All offerors should submit this sheet as part of their proposal by the due date.
Reference Number 1:
Contract/Task Order Title
POC Name:
Title:
Customer Agency, Address:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Contract Title:
Contract No:
Contract POP:
Contract Value:
Contract Type:
Reference Number 2:
Name:
Title:
Customer Agency, Address:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Contract Title:
Contract No:
Contract POP:
Contract Value:
Contract Type:
Reference Number 3:
Name:
Title:
Customer Agency, Address:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Contract Title:
Contract No:
Contract POP:
Contract Value:
Contract Type:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .