HC1028-09-R-2011-0001.doc

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Request for Proposal (RFP) Questions and Answers

1. Who is the incumbent? (Please provide name and address)

Logistics Management Institute

2000 Corporate Ridge

McLean, VA 22102-7805

2. What was the previous contract number?

W91QV1-04-C-0011

3. What was the previous total award amount?

$242,941.00 (Time and Materials)

4. What was the signed date of the previous contract?

9 September 2004

5. Can you provide an electronic copy of the PCOLS ConOps and the 3 in 1 Requirements Brief as referenced on page 70 of the solicitation? (1st tasking SOW Section 6)

Please contact the Contract Specialist to request a copy of the PCOLS ConOps. The 3in1 Requirements brief is currently business sensitive and will be provided to the winning contractor after award.

6. If this project/contract was performed in the past, can you provide insight of the number of hours needed to complete work?

Hours Expended in Support of PCPMO

7. Can you provide the name of existing software program the DoD is utilizing for payment processing? (Example: Verisign or customized in house)

This contract will be paid via Wide Area Workflow. For additional details see:

http://www.dfas.mil/contractorpay/electroniccommerce/wideareaworkflow.html

8. If the software is customized/in-house, can you provide the software language for development? (Example: Oracle, Java, .Net)

See answer to number 7 above.

9. Can a Small Set Aside business bidding on the contract enter into a sub-contracting or partner agreement with another firm?

Yes; small business can enter into a sub-contracting or partner agreement with another firm.

10. Should proposals include fully burdened costing for subcontractors, if there are any?

Yes, proposal should include fully burdened costing for subcontractors.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

M.1. EVALUATION OF OFFERORS

M.1 EVALUATION OF OFFERS (JAN 2007) (DITCO/PL8312).

a. The Government intends to conduct a source selection in accordance with the competitive negotiated source selection procedures contained in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Part 15. The Government anticipates awarding contracts based on initial proposals and does not plan to conduct discussions. However, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to establish a competitive range, and conduct discussions with those offerors whose proposals fall within the competitive range.

b. The Government will evaluate initial proposals in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.212-2-Evaluation-Commercial Items, below. Based on the ratings of each proposal against all evaluation criteria, the Government will identify the most highly-rated proposals.

c. All elements, subfactors and factors will be measured against standards, which have been developed to represent guidelines for adequacy of approach and understanding of the requirements.

d. Evaluation will include the determination of strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, deficiencies and risks for each element, subfactor and factor.

e. In accordance with FAR 15.306(a), Offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or to resolve minor or clerical errors.

f. Any proposal that does not substantially and materially comply with all of the requirements of this solicitation will be rejected and not considered for further evaluation. Rejection of a proposal on this basis does not constitute creation of a “competitive range.”

g. Once the basic proposal for the ID/IQ and the first task order is deemed technically acceptable, the Government will, in addition, evaluate Section B pricing and the pricing of the first task order based on the total Discounted Life Cycle Cost (DLCC).

(End of Summary of Changes)