Attach_3_Past_Perf_Quest.docx

DOCX document 41 KB Posted

Attached to
DLNSEO Defense Language Program and Foreign Area Officer Program Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
H98210-17-R-0019
Issued by
Defense Human Resources Activity

About this file

Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DLNSEO Defense Language Program and Foreign Area Officer Program Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
17R0019_Amendment_01_FAO_LREC__17Aug.pdf PDF
Attach_5_PWS_Crosswalk.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach_4_DD254.pdf PDF
17R0019_LREC_FAO,_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attach_2_Past_Perf_Exper.docx DOCX document
Attach_1_Price_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:_______________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

J. Project name/Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________ C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number/email: ___________________________________________________

Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

A. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODEPERFORMANCE RATING
EEXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.
VVERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
SSATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
MMARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UUNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.
N/ANOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance

E
V
S
M
U
N/A

T1. How effective was the contractor in providing key personnel that met the requirements of the contract? (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

T2. How effective was the contractor in recruiting, staffing, and retaining qualified personnel to meet the critical needs of the sponsor (consider staffing levels, skills and experience levels, and personnel security clearances to be provided on day one of the contract)? (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

T3. If the work involved staffing located in overseas locations, how effective was the contractor in placing and maintaining staff in these locations while complying with U.S. and foreign regulations, procedures, and constraints? (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

T4. If the work involved IT systems supporting intelligence sharing and collaboration (between agencies, Combatant Commands, IT systems, or foreign partners), characterize the contractor’s contribution and its value to the effort. (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

T5. If the work involved provision of IT systems supporting combat or security operations, characterize the contractor’s contribution and its value to the effort. (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

T6. If the work involved substantive interactions with Combatant Commands and their Components, characterize the contractor’s contribution to these relationships and its value to the effort. (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

T7. If the work involved substantive interactions with foreign partner nations, characterize the contractor’s contribution to these relationships and its value to the effort. (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

T8. If there was a requirement to identify and mitigate Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) in the contract, how effective was the contractor’s approach and implementation? (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

Program Management
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

P1. How effectively was the contractor able to execute overall contract management activities (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control, and deliver on-time)?

P2. To what degree was the contractor reasonable and cooperative when dealing with program staff (U.S. Government personnel, as well as other contractors supporting the project) (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. To what degree was the contractor able to timely and effectively resolve contract challenges without extensive customer guidance and did the contractor take the initiative to do so?

P4. How effectively did the contractor understand/comply with program objectives and technical requirements?

P5. To what degree was the contractor able to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge requirements (to include additional staffing or new staff skill/experience requirements)?

P6. How effectively did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts? (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

P7. How effectively did the contractor develop and meet realistic project schedules?

P8. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract? (Please elaborate in Section 5, below)

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

S1. How effective was the contractor in using small business and small disadvantaged businesses to meet requirements of the project?

S2. How effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

(NOTE: Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets as necessary).

B. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

C. Was the contractor ever issued a “cure” or “show cause” notice under the referenced contract?

Yes____ No____ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Overall Summary) Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to the following email addresses:

Darryl Barnes Darryl.D.Barnes4.civ@mail.mil Todd E. Davis: Todd.E.Davis2.civ@mail.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .