Past_Perf_Questionnaire _CIPS_FY16.docx

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

ATCH ???

Past Performance Questionnaire Record Solicitation FA8773-16-R-0002

CIPS

VENDOR NAME:

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CONTRACT #:

1. Scale/Scope of Work:

2. Performance Areas:

Please tell us if the contactor provided or performed the following services or tasks:

Utilized the following system platforms and tools…

A. MS Windows Server 2008 or newer

B. Oracle 11g

C. Oracle 12c

D. .ASP

E. C#

F. Java

G. PKI-enabled user authentication

H. Non-PKI form of electronic user authentication

I. Web-enabled system over a WAN

Remarks:

A. Provided Help Desk services to support system users

B. Provided system training services

A. Identified required hardware and software necessary to sustain, maintain, and develop an enterprise, web-enabled system

A. Implemented a virtualization strategy

B. Managed a virtualization strategy

A. Developed, tested, implemented, and documented at least 4 (four) or more software releases per year

B. Utilized a software lifecycle tool such as MS Team Foundation Server (TFS) to manage periodic software releases

A. Managed an enterprise, web-enabled GIS system

B. Managed a GIS system with data capture and visualization capabilities

C. Managed a GIS system with import capabilities

3. Performance Ratings:

Performance Rating Definitions:

Exceptional: During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

Very Good: During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

Satisfactory: During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

Marginal: During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For any problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

Unsatisfactory: During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

How well did the contractor perform on the referenced contract? Please use the rating system above to assign a performance rating for the following areas. Please provide a detailed narrative to support ratings above or below Satisfactory.

Areas Rated:

(1) Quality of Service Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(2) Schedule Rating:

(3) Cost Control:

(4) Business Relations Rating:

(5) Management of Key Personnel Rating:

4. Specific Problems or Issues:

Were there any adverse performance issues/problems? If so, please use “Remarks” to explain how they were resolved.

Cure Notice

Show Cause Notice

Suspension of Payment

Termination for Convenience/Default

Denial of Claim

Other

Response by: