ICS Attach 4 -- Prime Analysis.pdf
PDF 71 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced Development for Enhanced Performance Technologies (ADEPT) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8650-20-S-6009
About this file
This document contains a prime contractor's analysis template for evaluating subcontractor costs on a federal contract. It requires the prime contractor to provide analysis and documentation for each subcontractor concerning the reasonableness, realism, and completeness of their proposal. The analysis should include comments on labor hours and mix, labor rates, materials quantities and types, travel needs and costs, and other direct costs. It also directs the prime contractor to review material values and profit rates, and support any conclusions.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Air Force Materiel Command Research Laboratory. It seeks to develop, mature, validate, and transition technologies to provide monitoring, assessment, sustainment and enhancement of Airman performance and safety in various mission sets. Envisioned technologies include physiological and cognitive performance sustainment and enhancement systems personalized for individual Airmen. The acquisition would acquire experimentation, development, engineering and integration skills to produce prototype systems for demonstration and eventual transition to production programs. Activities would encompass technology readiness levels 5 through 7 to provide documentation for acquisition program design reviews. Offerors may propose other transaction agreements for experimentation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ICS Solicitation -- Revised (Final).pdf | ||
| ICS QA - NEW 15Jan2020.pdf | ||
| ICS QA - UPDATE 3Jan2020.pdf | ||
| ICS Industry Day Attendees.pdf | ||
| ICS Industry Day overview - v.2.3.pdf | ||
| ICS QA - Industry Day FINAL 23Dec19 (JPM).pdf | ||
| ICS Attach 5 -- COG Pack 88ABW-2019-4175.pdf | ||
| ADEPT Attach 1 -- DD254 (Final).pdf | ||
| ADEPT Attach 2 -- SOO (Final).pdf | ||
| ICS Attach 3 -- Model Contract (Final).pdf | ||
| ICS Attach 2 -- DD254 (Final).pdf | ||
| ICS Solicitation -- 10Dec19 (Final).pdf | ||
| ADEPT -- Basic ARA (Final).pdf | ||
| ICS Attach 1 -- SOO -- 10Dec19 (Final).pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PRIME CONTRACTOR’S ANALYSIS OF SUBCONTRACTOR’S COSTS
(REFER TO FAR 15.404-3)
SUBCONTRACTOR ANALYSIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WHENEVER A
SUBCONTRACTOR IS INVOLVED (NO DOLLAR LIMITATION)
The prime contractor should provide for each subcontractor an analysis and documentation concerning the reasonableness, realism, and completeness of the subcontractor’s proposal.
Analysis should include, but not be limited to an analysis of materials, labor and reasonableness of other direct costs (types and quantities), and proposed profit rates. Merely a statement concerning technical necessity does not demonstrate reasonableness, realism and completeness.
LABOR: Comments should be made concerning the adequacy of the proposed labor hours and mix. The labor rates, which may be fully burdened, should be reviewed and comments should be provided regarding the reasonableness of the rates. Proposed rates may be compared with rates negotiated for previous efforts, with the prime’s own similar type rates or with other subcontractor’s similar type proposed rates.
MATERIAL: These costs should be reviewed and comments should be made concerning quantities, types and needs of material items. In addition, a value review of the materials should be performed and submitted. (Is the value of the item commensurate with effort’s requirement)
TRAVEL: Comments should be made concerning the number and necessity of proposed trips as well as the reasonableness of the per diem rates, air fares, and car rental rates.
OTHER DIRECT COSTS: These costs should be reviewed and comments made concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the proposed costs.
PROFIT: Is the profit reasonable for the type effort contemplated? Support your conclusions.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .