Questions and Answers - 3 June.pdf
PDF 363 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation - OES Services
- Solicitation number
- FA8601-25-Q-0098
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers response from the Department of the Air Force Business and Enterprise Systems Directorate dated 3 June 2025, addressing Solicitation Number FA8601-25-Q-0098 for OES Services. The specific Q&A addresses a clause in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), section 2.0, subsection 2.1, which requires contractors to supply services to restore systems to manufacturer specifications. In response to the inquiry about system status, the government clarified that the equipment is currently fully operational and the contract is for preventative maintenance, not repair services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment FA860125Q00980001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers - 30 May.pdf | ||
| Performance Work Statement (PWS).docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - FA860125Q0098.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis-Solicitation.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DIRECTORATE
WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO
3 June 2025
FROM: AFLCMC/PZIBA
2000 Allbrook Drive, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433
SUBJECT: Response to Inquiries Regarding FA8601-25-Q-0098
QUESTIONS
- The PWS, section 2.0, subsection 2.1 reads “Contractor shall supply all necessary services… to restore the system to good operating condition as determined by the original manufacturer’s specifications.” Can you let us know if the system is currently in need of repair, or is it fully operational? If repair services are currently needed, what is the nature of the failure?
This equipment is currently fully operational and is not in need of repair.
This requirement is for a preventative maintenance contract.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .