QASP.pdf

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 1

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan for

Aircraft Ferry Services

13 December 2016

1.0 Performance Management

1.1 Objective(s): This Performance-based Work Statement (PWS) describes the services required to safely ferry an aircraft to/from Kabul, Afghanistan, or another designated South West Asia AOR location as determined by the Government, and any authorized repair station for Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM), Isochronal Inspection (ISO) and discrepancy repairs.

These services include an aircraft ferry delivery service by qualified C-130H-1 aircrews to include any or all activities to and from pick-up and drop-off destinations.

1.2 Result(s): Provide support to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Train, Advise, Assist Command – Air (TAAC-Air), specifically the 438th AEW located at Hamid Karzi International Airport, Kabul Afghanistan directly supporting Operation RESOLUTE SUPPORT.

Aircraft will be delivered safely and within defined schedule. This requirement will allow the 438th AEW to continue to meet Operation RESOLUTE SUPPORT training requirements, while supporting the safe delivery of aircraft during the C-130 ISO inspection cycle.

2.0 Assessment Management

2.1 Services Summary

Performance Objective PWS

Reference Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance

Aircraft Delivery 4.0 The Contractor shall be responsible for debriefing the aircraft within six (6) hours upon arrival at final destination(s).

Surveillance will be conducted, by the COR.

COR and PM will monitor aircraft pickup and delivery records. Contractor non-compliance will be reported to the PCO.

Surveillance will be documented, at a minimum, quarterly by the COR in the PAR.

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 2

Aircraft Delivery 4.0 The Contractor shall deploy the ferry flight crew within 10 calendar days of notification for aircraft pick-up of C- 130H-1 from any authorized repair station to a location in South West Asia.

Surveillance will be conducted, by the COR by monitoring aircraft pick-up and delivery records.

Contractor non-compliance will be reported to the

PCO.

Surveillance will be documented, at a minimum, quarterly by the COR in the PAR.

2.2 COR Online File Documentation

2.2.1 The COR will establish and maintain an online file containing training and surveillance documentation (COR Profile and COR Online File in the CORT Tool) in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi); AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)2.4; and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011. The following documentation will be uploaded in the CORT Tool by the COR or PCO as applicable.

1. Contractual Documents

PWS, PWS revision(s) QASP, QASP revision(s)

2. Training and Appointment

DAU CLC 222 Contracting Officers Representative (COR) Online Training DAU ACQ Now CL Annual Values-Based Ethics DAU DOD 002 Combatting Human Trafficking for DOD Acquisition QAPC-Led Training OGE 450 Welcome Page – Confidential Financial Disclosure Report Contract-Specific Training Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative Revocation (Termination) of Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 3

3. Contractor Performance Data

Applicable status report(s) iRAPT report(s) and/or other documentation demonstrating oversight of Contractor payment

4. Surveillance and Inspection

PAR(s) CAR(s) Customer Complaint Record(s) (CCR) Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review) Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist(s)

5. Contract Plans (basic or order, as applicable) The Contractor shall comply with all local aircraft pick-up and drop-off location safety procedures.

2.3 Plan for Corrective Action

2.3.1 Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR issuing a negative PAR.

The COR will prepare and forward the negative PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the negative PAR to the Contractor for corrective action. In Section II of the negative PAR, the Contractor shall explain the discrepancy and identify the corrective action they shall take to resolve the discrepancy and prevent recurrence. The Contractor shall sign and return the negative PAR to the PCO by the suspense date(s) applicable to each PAR. The COR will upload the negative PAR in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B).

2.3.2 If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR will initiate the CAR process.

However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at any time based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance. The COR will prepare a CAR and forward it to the QAPC. The QAPC will assign a control number and forward the CAR to the PCO and courtesy-copy the COR. The PCO will set a suspense date and submit the CAR to the Contractor for corrective action. The Contractor shall sign and return the CAR, with corrective action plan, to the PCO for acceptance by the MFT by the suspense date. The corrective action will be tracked and documented until the discrepancy is resolved. The COR will notify the QAPC that the CAR has been closed. The COR will upload the CAR in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B). The CAR will become part of the PCO contract file. If the CAR process fails to resolve the discrepancy, the PCO has the right to invoke remedies based on clause(s) included in the contract.

2.4 Acceptance of Services

2.4.1 In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and applicable supplements and with all applicable guidance and clauses listed in the contract, the Contractor shall

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 4

submit/process payment requests and receipt/acceptance documents via Wide Area WorkFlow e- Business Suite / Invoicing, Receipt, Acceptance, and Property Transfer (iRAPT).

2.4.2 CDRL deliverables may be submitted using iRAPT or be submitted directly to the MFT member identified on the CDRL. The CDRL will determine submittal requirements; however, separately priced data must be accepted in iRAPT in order for the Contractor to receive payment, and both separately priced and non-separately priced data must be accepted in iRAPT in order for the contract line item to be closed out.

2.4.3 Services will be accepted by the Program Manager or COR

3.0 General Responsibilities of Multi-Functional Team (MFT)

3.1 Fostering partnerships with industry to ensure cooperation and exchange of information occur. Conducting market research to identify commercial products and services which already exist, product developments, technological advancements, suppliers’ capabilities, new vendors and commercial best practices. Providing findings to the MFT member responsible for preparing the market research report.

3.2 Identifying Government requirements. Ensuring the acquisition is linked to the United States Air Force (USAF) mission. Ensuring key stakeholders participate in developing, implementing and executing the acquisition strategy.

3.3 Planning, programming, and budgeting adequate funds to ensure the acquisition is executed within approved funding.

3.4 Ensuring the acquisition utilizes Performance-Based Service(s) Acquisition (PBSA) methods including establishment of performance thresholds, procedures to evaluate Contractor performance, and positive/negative incentives to encourage the highest quality of services.

3.5 For other than sole source acquisitions, developing, implementing and executing a source selection that provides a thorough assessment of the proposals of the offerors and the best value for the Government.

3.6 Conducting an Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review) in accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 63-138, Acquisition of Services, paragraph 6.4. Preparing Annual Execution Review (AER) reports in accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 5.2.1. Proactively reporting significant variances in quality of services, cost and/or schedule to Government management throughout the contract/order Period of Performance (PoP).

3.7 Developing, implementing, and managing milestones to ensure the Contractor is on schedule for meeting Government requirements within the contract/order PoP. Developing, implementing, and executing Contractor performance measurement and management in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 5

3.8 Conducting surveillance of Contractor performance to ensure Government requirements including quality of services, cost and schedule are met. Providing results of surveillance to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) for input into the Performance Assessment Report (PAR) and to the MFT member updating the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

3.9 Identifying opportunities to improve Contractor performance throughout the life of the contract/order including benchmarking against industry. Promoting initiatives to improve Contractor performance, assessing the risks associated with initiatives, using the QASP to implement initiatives, and monitoring the success of implementation.

3.10 Ensuring customer needs are met.

4.0 Specific Roles and Responsibilities of MFT Members

4.1 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

4.1.1 In accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) 201.602-2(d)(iv), Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities / Contracting officers / Responsibilities: DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3 (Procedures), paragraph 1.d and Enclosure 4, paragraph 4.a; and the Under Secretary of Defense (USD) Memorandum, Deployment of the Department of Defense (DoD) Contracting Officer Representative Tracking Tool (CORT Tool), dated Mar 21 2011, self-nominates in the CORT Tool.

4.1.2 Contractor Manpower Reporting: N/A

4.1.3 Works with MFT in conducting surveillance on Contractor performance and evaluating Contractor performance in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(v). Reports unethical conduct and instances of fraud, waste and/or abuse to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 6 (Examples of COR Responsibilities and COR Certification Requirements), Table 4 (DoD Standard for Certification of CORs – Type C).

Inspects and accepts/rejects deliverables during contract/order performance and at close-out to ensure contract/order terms and conditions are met in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 6, Table 4. Monitors Contractor payment and verifies it is commensurate with Contractor performance in accordance with DoDI 5000.72 Enclosure 6, Table 4.

4.1.4 Documents Contractor performance via PARs, Corrective Action Reports (CAR), etc. in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B). Issues PARs, at a minimum, quarterly and negative PARs or CARs as required. Provides reports (e.g., PARs, CARs, etc.) on Contractor performance to the PCO in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and applicable supplements and will be in compliance with all applicable guidance and clauses listed in the contract.

4.1.5 Establishes and maintains an online file containing surveillance, training documentation, initial and refresher training certificates, contract specific training, PWS, QASP and Annual

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 6

COR Online File Inspection Checklists in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and applicable supplements and will be in compliance with all applicable guidance and clauses listed in the contract.

4.2 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Supervisor:

Upon notification of COR nomination in the CORT Tool, approves COR nomination in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(iv); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 2.d and Enclosure 4, paragraph 4.a; AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)3.2, Designation, Assignment, and Responsibilities of a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) / COR Supervisor; and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011. Inspects the COR Online File and the COR Profile in the CORT Tool, at a minimum annually, in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii) and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d) 1.4.5, 1.6 and 3.3. Reviews and certifies/signs the Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii).

4.3 Functional Commander/Functional Director (FC/FD):

The Functional Commander or civilian equivalent has determined these services are not mission-essential and will not continue in the event of a crisis. Reference PWS paragraph 5.1, Continuation of Mission-Essential Services During a Crisis and QASP signature page.

4.4 Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC):

4.4.1 Supports the MFT in the development of the contract/order quality assurance requirements specifically ensuring the requirements are clearly stated and enforceable in accordance with AFFARS MP5346.103.1c(2), Contracting Office Responsibilities / Roles and Responsibilities.

Provides training to CORs and COR management [e.g., Functional Commander/Functional Director (FC/FD), COR supervisor, etc.] in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)5.1, Designation, Assignment, and Responsibilities of a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) / Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC).

4.4.2 Provides functional, not technical, support for CORT Tool users including assistance with registration, role activation and CORT Tool training in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602- 2(d)5.3. Monitors records of COR and COR management training in the CORT Tool in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)5.3.

4.5 Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) .

4.5.1 Only individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and/or services by obligating the Government. Advises the MFT on QASP development including incentives and remedies tied to performance objectives and performance thresholds in accordance with AFFARS MP5346.103.1b.(1). Develops and awards a contract/order based on MFT requirements and acquisition strategy.

4.5.2 Determines if a COR is required to conduct/document surveillance of Contractor performance in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1.a and AFFARS

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 7

MP5301.602-2(d)1.2, Designation, Assignment, and Responsibilities of a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) / Contracting Officer Roles and Responsibilities. Upon notification of COR Supervisor approval of COR nomination in the CORT Tool, approves COR nomination in the CORT Tool. Submits Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative memorandum to the COR and Contractor for signature thereby ensuring the Contractor is notified of the COR assigned to the contract/order and their areas of responsibility and limitation of authority in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(v)(A); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraphs 1.c and 1.f and Enclosure 4, paragraph 2; AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.8-9; and AFFARS MP5346.103.1b(2). The Designation memorandum will require the COR to have access to eCMRA in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.8. Upon transfer/termination of the COR, issues a Revocation (Termination) of Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative memorandum in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1.j, and Enclosure 4, paragraph 3; and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.10-13. Uploads Designation memorandum and, if applicable, Termination memorandum in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(iv), (v)(C) and (vi)(A); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraphs 1.g and 1.j, and Enclosure 4, paragraphs 2.b, 2.e and 3.c; AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.8-9 and 1.12; and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011. Provides Contract-Specific COR Training to the COR in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1.e, and Enclosure 5, paragraph 1.a(6); and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.3 and1.5.

4.5.3 Reviews COR reports (e.g., PARs, CARs, etc.) on Contractor performance in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1.h and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.4. Inspects COR Online File and COR Profile in the CORT Tool, at a minimum annually, in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1.h; and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.5 and 1.6. Reviews and signs the Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist, provides to COR and COR Supervisor to make any corrective actions. Once the COR and COR Supervisor certify the file is compliant, the CO uploads checklist in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii), AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.6 and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011.

4.5.4 Responsible for administration of the contract/order except as delegated to the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). Monitors Contractor performance to ensure compliance with contractual requirements. Takes action, if necessary, to enforce contractual requirements. Approves/Disapproves travel requests for Contractor personnel after coordination with the Program Manager.

4.6 Program Manager

4.6.1 Responsible for overall program. Serves as MFT lead. Works with the MFT to identify Government requirements and prepare Purchase Request (PR) package. Prepares and submits Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPAR).

4.7 Contractor

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 8

4.7.1 Participates as a member of the MFT upon approval of Justification & Approval (J&A) or Sole Source Justification (SSJ) if the acquisition is sole source and upon contract/order award if it is competitive.

4.7.2 Complies with contractual requirements including the PWS and CDRLs. Performs services required by the contract/order including the PWS and CDRLs. Provides the Government with contractual deliverables and other requested data by which Contractor performance will be evaluated.

4.7.3 Signs and returns a PAR within five business days. Signs and returns a negative PAR with corrective action identified by the suspense date. Signs and returns a CAR with corrective action plan by the suspense date.

5.0 Management Strategy

5.1 The MFT will meet and record minutes during quarterly to review Contractor performance.

5.2 The MFT will evaluate Contractor performance. The Contractor shall provide the Government with contractual deliverables and other requested data. The MFT will collect and analyze Contractor performance data and develop metrics to evaluate Contractor performance data.

5.3 The COR will issue PARs, documenting both satisfactory and unsatisfactory Contractor performance, at a minimum, quarterly. The COR will prepare and forward the PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the PAR to the Contractor. The Contractor shall sign and return the PAR to the PCO within five business days. The COR will upload the PAR in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B).

Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR issuing a negative PAR.

5.4 If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR will issue a CAR. However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at any time based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance. If the CAR process fails to resolve the unsatisfactory Contractor performance, the PCO has the right to invoke the Inspection of Supply/Services clause(s) identified in the contract.

5.5 Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review): In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4, the MFT is responsible for conducting an Initial Contract Performance Review.

The review is a determination by the MFT that the Contractor has successfully started performance, has completed transition, is fully operational, and is within the estimated cost, schedule and performance parameters of the contract/order. In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4.1, the review will take place within 30 [calendar] days after the Contractor assumes full performance responsibility. For acquisitions greater than or equal to one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000.00), results of the review will be reported to the Services Designation Official (SDO) as described in AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4. The COR will upload the review in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B).

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 9

5.6 Designation Official (SDO) as described in AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4. The COR will upload the review in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B).

5.7 Annual COR Online File Inspection: The COR will maintain the COR Online File in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 3.d; AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)2.4; and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011.

The PCO will complete and sign the Annual COR File Inspection Checklist in the anniversary month of the COR designation or when the PCO determines an inspection is due in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1.h and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.5 and 1.6. The COR will inspect and/or correct the file and sign the checklist in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 2.h and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.5. The COR Supervisor will inspect the file and sign the checklist in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii) and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d) 1.4.5 and 1.6.

The PCO will upload the checklist in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602- 2(d)(vii), AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.6 and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011.

5.8 Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS):

In accordance with FAR Part 42, Contract Administration and Audit Services, the MFT will evaluate Contractor performance. The LMS/Primary COR and PM/Alternate COR will, at a minimum, review the PARs and other information contained in the COR Online File to prepare and substantiate the CPAR. The following areas will be rated on the CPAR as applicable:

quality, schedule, management and regulatory compliance. CPARS will be updated, at a minimum annually, documenting Contractor performance for the contract/order in accordance with the Guidance for the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

Additional information about CPARS can be found in the User Manual for Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). More frequent updates may be made, as required, to document a significant improvement or decline in the level of Contractor performance.

5.8.1 The Contractor shall have input into the CPAR prior to it being finalized. For each reporting period, the LMS/Primary COR and PM/Alternate COR will provide the Contractor a draft CPAR with no ratings, only justifications, to examine for seven calendar days. After MFT review of the Contractor's response, the CPAR will be coordinated through management up to the Division level. Once approved, the CPAR will be sent to the Contractor via CPARS for the official 60 calendar day review. The Contractor shall have the option to concur or non-concur, with comments, via CPARS.

5.9 Security Regulations:

5.9.1 Actual knowledge and/or generation of classified information and/or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) are not expected to be necessary for performance of the contract/order. Contractor personnel are required to comply with security requirements to preclude potential security incidents or violations. If a change in the security classification of the contract/order becomes necessary after contract/order award, the Contractor shall make a

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 10

reasonable effort to continue performance of tasks under the contract/order in compliance with the change in security classification in accordance with FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements.

5.9.2 Contractor shall ensure personnel, information, systems, property, facility and international security requirements are met. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable security regulations and clauses listed in the contract.

5.9.3 Contractor personnel shall not require security clearances for proper accomplishment of contract/order requirements. Contractor personnel shall not be authorized access to classified information and/or CUI and classified items or be permitted to work on classified projects and/or programs without a valid security clearance and a need-to-know. If security clearances become necessary after contract/order award, the Contractor shall ensure applicable Contractor personnel obtain valid security clearances appropriate to the access required for proper accomplishment of contract/order requirements.

5.9.4 Access to Government Facility or Military Installation:

The Contractor shall ensure Contractor personnel who require access to a Government facility or military installation comply with the security requirements of the facility or installation. The Contractor shall ensure Contractor personnel who require access to a USAF installation comply with the FAR and applicable supplements and shall be in compliance with all applicable guidance and clauses listed in the contract. Contractor personnel requiring access to the Kabul Afghanistan facility shall have a valid Letter of Authorization (LOA). The LOA is a Synchronized Pre-Deployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) generated document.

Department of Defense (DoD) 5200.2-R, Personnel Security Program; DoD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM); DoD Directive (DoDD) 5205.02E, DoD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program; DoD Manual 5205.02-M, DoD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program Manual; and RAFB IDP 31-101, Robins Integrated Defense Plan.

5.9.5 Common Access Card (CAC):

CAC will not be required unless any way point involves Al Udied, Qatar (ICAO Code OTBH). If any way point includes Al Udied, the contractor shall either have a valid CAC for each of the crew members or shall be registered in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) for a CAC to be issued on the spot at Al Udied.

6.0 Incentives-No incentives will apply to this contract

7.0 Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review): In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4, the MFT is responsible for conducting an Initial Contract Performance Review.

The review is a determination by the MFT that the Contractor has successfully started performance, has completed transition, is fully operational, and is within the estimated cost, PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 11 schedule and performance parameters of the contract/order. In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4.1, the review will take place within 30 [calendar] days after the Contractor assumes full performance responsibility. For acquisitions greater than or equal to one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000.00), results of the review will be reported to the Services Designation Official (SDO) as described in AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4. The COR will upload the review in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B).

8.0 Annual COR Online File Inspection: The COR will maintain the COR Online File in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 3.d; AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)2.4; and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011.

The PCO will complete and sign the Annual COR File Inspection Checklist in the anniversary month of the COR designation or when the PCO determines an inspection is due.in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii); DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1.h and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.5 and 1.6. The COR will inspect and/or correct the file and sign the checklist in accordance with DoDI 5000.72, Enclosure 3, paragraph 2.h and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.5. The COR Supervisor will inspect the file and sign the checklist in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii) and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d) 1.4.5 and 1.6.

The PCO will upload the checklist in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602- 2(d)(vii), AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.6 and the USD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011.

9.0 Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS:

In accordance with FAR Part 42, Contract Administration and Audit Services, the MFT will evaluate Contractor performance. The LMS/Primary COR and PM/Alternate COR will, at a minimum, review the PARs and other information contained in the COR Online File to prepare and substantiate the CPAR. The following areas will be rated on the CPAR as applicable:

quality, schedule, management and regulatory compliance. CPARS will be updated, at a minimum annually, documenting Contractor performance for the contract/order in accordance with the Guidance for the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

Additional information about CPARS can be found in the User Manual for Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). More frequent updates may be made, as required, to document a significant improvement or decline in the level of Contractor performance.

9.1 The Contractor shall have input into the CPAR prior to it being finalized. For each reporting period, the LMS/Primary COR and PM/Alternate COR will provide the Contractor a draft CPAR with no ratings, only justifications, to examine for seven calendar days. After MFT review of the Contractor's response, the CPAR will be coordinated through management up to the Division level. Once approved, the CPAR will be sent to the Contractor via CPARS for the official 60 calendar day review. The Contractor shall have the option to concur or non-concur, with comments, via CPARS.

10 Safety Requirements:

The Contractor shall comply with all local aircraft pick-up and drop-off location safety procedures.

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 12

10.1 Trafficking in Persons: In accordance with the Defense Contingency COR Handbook section on Combating Trafficking in Persons, the COR must inform the PCO if the contractor/subcontractor fails to comply with the requirements of FAR 52.222.50, Combating Trafficking in Persons. The PCO must convey the information to DoD Combat Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) Law Enforcement and Support / Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Personnel and Readiness (P&R) Defense Human Resources Activity (DHRA).

PR: FD2060-17-30011 QASP REVISION: 0 13

11.0 Signatures

By signing below, you are appointed to the MFT for this acquisition and accept the above responsibilities.

The QAPC signature above signifies guidance was provided to the MFT in the development of Services Summary requirements in accordance with PZCA direction as of 5 June 2015.

Gregory Hopkins, WLNIG, 478-222-3561 COR Date

Robert Burleigh, WLNIG, 478-222-1271 COR Supervisor Date

Candace Gibson, WLNKB, 327-8244 PCO Date

Contractor Date

By signing below, you are identifying these services as not mission-essential in accordance with DFARS 237.7602(a), DFARS 252.237-7023(a)(2) and AFI 10-403, paragraph 1.9.1.33.2.

FC/FD Date

10 Safety Requirements: