Attch_1_FACTS_Sheet.doc

DOC document 90 KB Posted

Attached to
UNIVERSAL MAINTENANCE STAND Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8533-08-R-10163
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

Attachment 1

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to UNIVERSAL MAINTENANCE STAND, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA853308R10163_0004.pdf PDF
FA853308R10163______0003.pdf PDF
RFP FA8533-08-R-10163 Questions_6May08doc —
PD08WRGBGBEA01 Revision 1.pdf PDF
FA853308R10163______0002.pdf PDF
UMS QUESTIONS.pdf PDF
UMS QUESTIONS - 2.pdf PDF
FA853308R10163______0001.pdf PDF
UMSSOW.doc DOC document
SOW_UMS.pdf PDF
ExhibitB_UMS.pdf PDF
PD08WRGBGBEA01.pdf PDF
ExhibitC_UMS.pdf PDF
ExhibitA_UMS.pdf PDF
ExhibitJ_UMS.pdf PDF
ExhibitG_UMS.pdf PDF
UMS_ProvisioningSOW.pdf PDF
Attch_2_Client_Ltr.doc DOC document
EDL_UMS.pdf PDF
ExhibitK_UMS.pdf PDF
AFBC158_Packaging.pdf PDF
Attch_4_Transmittal_Ltr.doc--03-22-2007.doc DOC document
ExhibitL_UMS.pdf PDF
ExhibitH_UMS.pdf PDF
Attch_3_Tracker.doc DOC document
ExhibitE_UMS.pdf PDF
Attch_5_Teaming.doc DOC document
ExhibitF_UMS.pdf PDF
ExhibitD_UMS.pdf PDF
FA853308R10163.pdf PDF
Attch_6_Questionnaire_Performance.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP FA8533-08-R-10163

UNIVERSAL MAINTENANCE STAND

ATTACHMENT 1

Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR

FOR EACH EFFORT)

Offerors complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See “Instructions to Offerors” of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Offeror is requested to provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in B. below.

A. OFFEROR:

(1) Name (Company/Division)

(2) Address:

(3) CAGE Code B. PROGRAM TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER:

C. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:

D. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – CHECK ALL THAT APPLY

D. firm fixed price

D. time & materials

D. cost

D. other (explain)

E. CONTRACT VALUE:

1. Original contract $ value:

2. Current $ value:

3. Estimated value at completion and primary causes of changes:

4. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last 3 years?

F. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT:

PRIME

SUBCONTRACTOR

1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition; addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in B. above. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the table below regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.

2. This paragraph shall also include details to support the offeror’s record for on time delivery, technical quality and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B. above.

3. Discuss your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. That is, did you carry out the policy of the United States in the awarding of subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? This is applicable to all offerors.

4. Include relevant information concerning your compliance with subcontracting plan goals for small disadvantaged business (SDB) concerns, monetary targets for SDB participation (FAR 52.219-24), and notifications submitted under FAR 52.219-25, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program-Disadvantaged Status and Reporting.

G. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (include start and end dates, i.e., Jan 2003 – Dec 2005)

1. Original schedule:

2. Current schedule (if changed):

3. Estimate @ completion:

4. How many times changed and primary causes of changes:

H. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)

Name and Office Symbol (Customer’s Information) Phone Number (DSN & Commercial) FAX Number (DSN & Commercial)

1. Procuring Contracting Officer

2. Program Manager

3. Administrative Contracting Officer

4. Other (Please Specify)

I. Specify, by name, key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

J. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.

K. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.

L. Additionally, for those efforts where the offeror is cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that the offeror's performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

M. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

RELEVANCY TABLE

(Complete with each effort submitted for evaluation)

This table will assist the PCAG in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirement. Offerors answers are applicable only to the effort identified in paragraph B above, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. If additional space is needed, please attach a separate sheet to your response (limited to two pages).

Category
The Proposed Effort

Requires:

(DO NOT CHANGE)

Fill-in for the Effort Identified in paragraph B above (Offeror completes) The effort in paragraph B required:

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved
Design/Production/

Manufacturing Circle all that apply

Design
Manufacture
Production
2. Required Levels of Technology
COTS or Modified COTS
2a. System
Universal Aircraft

Maintenance Stand

2b. Type
Powered by

(circle one) Circle One

Gas/Diesel
Electric Technology
Both
2c. Platform
Split
2d. Platform Height
36 feet
2e. Platform Weight
2000 lbs
2f. Interface
Aircraft

3. Materials and Production Processes

3a. OSHA Standards

29 CFR 1910

3b. Welding Standards

AWS D1.1

4. Performance Location

List address where production occurred

5. Contract Type(s)
FFP
Circle One
Firm Fixed Type
Cost Type
6. Quantities produced or other quantitative data
10 units per year
Monthly
Yearly

7. Program Similarity

Yes or No

(explain)

8. Program Complexity
Non-complex
Circle One
Non-Complex
Complex
9. Program Phase
Design/Production
Circle all that apply
Design
Production

10. Other

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .