QASP.pdf

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 1

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

For

Control Test Set

(CTS)

Contract PR Number

FD2060-15-91418

27 Mar 2015

Prepared by

AFLCMC/WNAAC

235 Byron St, Ste 19A Robins AFB, GA 31098-1813

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 2

1.0 Performance Management

1.1 Objective(s): The Contractor shall provide Repair for the Control Test System (CTS) to include:

The CTS is a test set used in support of the A-10C. The CTS performs automatic functional testing of Line Replaceable Units (LRU) used in the AIM-9 Missile Control System aboard the A-10C aircraft. Internal circuitry and software simulates these system’s various inputs and outputs. The CTS also automatically performs extensive Built-In-Test (BIT) to continually ensure self-reliability. It allows United States Air Force (USAF) maintainers to perform maintenance tasks to verify the operational capability of aircraft armament systems/subsystems and armament components. Actions required by the Contractor shall be in accordance with established times identified in the Performance-based Work Statement (PWS).

1.2 Result(s): This QASP has been developed to outline how the Multi-Functional Team (MFT) will assess Contractor performance and manage the success of the contract. This QASP provides for collection of data and review of quantitative and qualitative performance data. The goal of the MFT is to maintain operational CTS units by providing serviceable assets and resolution of system issues in a timely manner to sustain the desired availability, reliability and maintainability of the fielded testers.

1.3 General Responsibilities of Multi-Functional Team (MFT)

1.3.1 Fostering partnerships with industry to ensure cooperation and exchange of information occur. Conducting market research to identify commercial products and services which already exist, product developments, technological advancements, suppliers’ capabilities, new vendors and commercial best practices. Providing findings to the MFT member responsible for preparing the market research report.

1.3.2 Identifying Government requirements. Ensuring the acquisition is linked to the United States Air Force (USAF) mission. Ensuring key stakeholders participate in developing, implementing and executing the acquisition strategy.

1.3.3 Planning, programming, and budgeting adequate funds to ensure the acquisition is executed within approved funding.

1.3.4 Ensuring the acquisition utilizes Performance-Based Service(s) Acquisition (PBSA) methods including establishment of performance thresholds, procedures to evaluate Contractor performance and positive/negative incentives to encourage the highest quality of services.

1.3.5 For other than sole source acquisitions, developing, implementing and executing a source selection that provides a thorough assessment of the proposals of the offerors and the best value for the Government.

1.3.6 Conducting an Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review) in accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 63-138, Acquisition of Services, paragraph 6.4. Preparing

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 3

Annual Execution Review (AER) reports in accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 5.2.

Proactively reporting significant variances in quality of services, cost and/or schedule to Government management throughout the contract/order Period of Performance (PoP).

1.3.7 Developing, implementing and managing milestones to ensure the Contractor is on schedule for meeting Government requirements within the contract/order PoP. Developing, implementing, and executing Contractor performance measurement and management in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).

1.3.8 Conducting surveillance of Contractor performance to ensure Government requirements including quality of services, cost and schedule are met. Providing results of surveillance to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) for input into the Performance Assessment Report (PAR) and to the MFT member updating the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

1.3.9 Identifying opportunities to improve Contractor performance throughout the life of the contract/order including benchmarking against industry. Promoting initiatives to improve Contractor performance, assessing the risks associated with initiatives, using the QASP to implement initiatives, and monitoring the success of implementation.

1.3.10 Ensuring customer needs are met.

1.4 Specific Roles and Responsibilities of MFT Members

1.4.1 Logistics Manager: Responsible for overall program. Serves as MFT lead. Works with the MFT to identify Government requirements and prepare Purchase Request (PR) package.

Prepares and submits Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPAR). Provides guidance on shipping CTS assets.

1.4.2 Engineer: Works with MFT in conducting market research. Prepares market research report. Prepares Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Form 807, Recommended Quality Assurance Provisions and Special Inspection Requirements. Prepares technical Department of Defense (DD) Form 1423-1(s), Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). Works with MFT in developing other technical requirements for PR package. Requests, reviews and approves Engineering Change Proposal(s) (ECP).

1.4.3 Data Management Officer (DMO): Reviews the draft PR package and CDRL Data Call Worksheet and forward them to the external organizations as identified on the worksheet. Assists in preparation of Data Item Description(s) (DID). Validates DIDs. Assists in preparation of CDRL(s). Acts as Approving Official (AO) for CDRL(s). Schedules and co-chairs the Data Requirements Review Board (DRRB).

1.4.4 Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Contract Officer Representative Personnel (Alt COR)

1.4.4.1 In accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 4

Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) 201.602-2(d)(iv), Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities / Contracting officers / Responsibilities, and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Memorandum, Deployment of the Department of Defense (DoD) Contracting Officer Representative Tracking Tool (CORT Tool), dated Mar 21 2011 OUSD memo 21 Mar 11, self-nominates in the CORT Tool.

1.4.4.2 Works with MFT in conducting surveillance on Contractor performance and evaluating Contractor performance in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(v). Reports unethical conduct and instances of fraud, waste and/or abuse to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) in accordance with the OUSD Memorandum, DoD Standard for Certification of Contracting Officer's Representatives (COR) for Service Acquisitions, dated Mar 29 2010 OUSD memo 29 Mar 10. Monitors Contractor payment and verifies it is commensurate with Contractor performance in accordance with the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 29 2010.

1.4.4.3 Documents Contractor performance via PARs, Corrective Action Reports (CAR), etc. in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B). Issues PARs, at a minimum, quarterly and negative PARs or CARs as required. Provides reports (e.g., PARs, CARs, etc.) on Contractor performance to the PCO in accordance with Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedure (MP) 5301.602-2(d)2.9, Designation, Assignment, and Responsibilities of a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) / COR Roles and Responsibilities.

1.4.4.4 Establishes and maintains an online file containing surveillance and training documentation (COR Online File and COR Profile in the CORT Tool) in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi); AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)2.5; the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 29 2010; and the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011. Uploads initial and refresher training certificates in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(iv).

Uploads the Contract-specific Training checklist in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(iv). Uploads the QASP in the CORT Tool. Completes and signs the Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist in the anniversary month of their appointment.

1.4.5 Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC): Supports the MFT in the development of the contract/order quality assurance requirements specifically ensuring the requirements are clearly stated and enforceable in accordance with AFFARS MP5346.1031.c.(2), Contracting Office Responsibilities / Roles and Responsibilities. Provides training to CORs and COR management [e.g., Functional Commander/Functional Director (FC/FD), COR supervisor, etc.] in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)3.1, Designation, Assignment, and Responsibilities of a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) / Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC).

1.4.6 Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

1.4.6.1 Only individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and/or services by obligating the Government. Advises the MFT on QASP development including incentives and remedies tied to performance objectives and performance thresholds in accordance with

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 5

AFFARS MP5346.1031.b.(1). Develops and awards a contract/order based on MFT requirements and acquisition strategy.

1.4.6.2 Determines if a COR is required to conduct/document surveillance of Contractor performance in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.2, Designation, Assignment, and Responsibilities of a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) / Contracting Officer Roles and Responsibilities. Upon notification of COR Supervisor approval of COR nomination in the CORT Tool, approves COR nomination in the CORT Tool and submits Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative memorandum to the COR and Contractor for signature thereby ensuring the Contractor is notified of the COR assigned to the contract/order and their areas of responsibility and limitation of authority in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602- 2(d)(v)(A) and AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.5. Upon transfer/termination of the COR, issues a Revocation (Termination) of Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative memorandum in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.10-1.12. Uploads Designation memorandum and, if applicable, Termination memorandum in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(v)(C) and the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011. Provides Contract-specific COR Training to the COR in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.4.

1.4.6.3 Reviews COR reports (e.g., PARs, CARs, etc.) on Contractor performance in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)1.6. Inspects COR Online File and COR Profile in the CORT Tool, at a minimum annually, in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii). Reviews and signs the Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist and uploads checklist in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii).

1.4.6.4 Responsible for administration of the contract/order except as delegated to the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). Monitors Contractor performance to ensure compliance with contractual requirements. Takes action, if necessary, to enforce contractual requirements.

1.4.7 Contractor

1.4.7.1 Participates as a member of the MFT upon approval of Justification & Approval (J&A) or Sole Source Justification (SSJ) if the acquisition is sole source and upon contract/order award if it is competitive.

1.4.7.2 Responsible for ensuring personnel, information, system, property and facility security requirements are met in accordance with Government regulations including, but not limited to, Department of Defense (DoD) 5200.2-R, Personnel Security Program; DoD Directive (DoDD) 5205.02E, DoD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program; and DoD Manual 5205.02-M, DoD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program Manual.

1.4.7.3 Complies with contractual requirements including the PWS and CDRLs. Performs services required by the contract/order including the PWS and CDRLs. Provides the Government with contractual deliverables and other requested data by which Contractor performance will be evaluated.

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 6

1.4.7.4 In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.246-4, Inspection of Services - Fixed-Price, maintains an inspection process acceptable to the Government and records of inspections which shall be made available to the Government as long as the contract requires.

1.4.7.5 Signs and returns a PAR within five business days. Signs and returns a negative PAR with corrective action identified by the suspense date. Signs and returns a CAR with corrective action plan by the suspense date.

1.4.7.6 In accordance with the Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition (SAF/AQ) Memorandum, Implementation of FY11 NDAA [National Defense Authorization Act] Section 8108 [of Public Law 112-10 of the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011], Contractor Inventory, dated Nov 13 2012 SAF/AQ memo 13 Nov 12, provides an annual count of Contractor personnel performing services if the DoD is the requiring activity, if the acquisition is using United States (U.S.) Government appropriated funds, and if the acquisition is equal to or greater than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) [currently $150,000.00]. In accordance with Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Memorandum, Enterprise-wide Contractor Manpower Reporting Application, dated Nov 28 2012 OSD memo 28 Nov 12, reports all Contractor labor hours, including subcontractor labor hours, required for performance of the services provided under the contract at the Enterprise-wide Contract Manpower Reporting Application (eCMRA) site below.

http://www.ecmra.mil

1.4.8_ Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Supervisor: Upon notification of COR self-nomination in the CORT Tool, approves COR nomination in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(iv), and the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011. Inspects the COR Online File and the COR Profile in the CORT Tool, at a minimum annually, in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii). Reviews and signs the Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii). Considers COR duties in appraisal in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)2.4.

1.4.9 Functional Commander/Functional Director (FC/FD): The Functional Commander or civilian equivalent will determine if services are mission-essential and will continue in the event of a crisis in accordance with DFARS 237.7602(a), Continuation of Essential Contractor Services; DFARS 252.237-7023(a)(2), Continuation of Essential Contractor Services; and AFI 10-403, Deployment Planning and Execution, paragraph 1.9.1.33.2. The [Functional] Commander will ensure mission-essential services are identified in the PWS in accordance with AFI 10-403, paragraph 1.9.1.33.2.

Note: The Functional Commander or civilian equivalent has determined these services are not mission-essential and will not continue in the event of a crisis. Reference PWS paragraph 5.1, Continuation of Mission-Essential Services During a Crisis and QASP signature page.

1.5 Management Strategy

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 7

1.5.1 The MFT will meet quarterly and/or as necessary to review Contractor performance and to ensure mission objectives are being met.

1.5.2 The MFT will evaluate Contractor performance. The Contractor shall provide the Government with contractual deliverables and other requested data. The MFT will collect and analyze Contractor performance data and develop metrics to evaluate Contractor performance.

For superior performance the Contractor shall have delivered enough serviceable assets so that field units have CTSs available for use through the identified reduction of repair turnaround times with no determined Deficiency Reports against the Contractor. Unsatisfactory performance will be defined as no more than one Deficiency Report being determined as Contractor fault per contract year.

1.5.3 The COR will issue PARs, documenting both satisfactory and unsatisfactory Contractor performance, at a minimum, quarterly. The COR will prepare and forward the PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the PAR to the Contractor. The Contractor shall sign and return the PAR to the PCO within five business days. The COR will upload the PAR in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B).

Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR issuing a negative PAR.

1.5.4 If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR will issue a CAR. However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at any time based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance. If the CAR process fails to resolve the unsatisfactory Contractor performance, the PCO has the right to invoke FAR 52.246-4.

1.5.5 Incentives

1.5.5.1 If Contractor performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements, positive incentives may include, but are not limited to, decreased surveillance, favorable CPARs and exercising options.

1.5.5.2 If Contractor performance does not meet contractual requirements, negative incentives may include, but are not limited to, increased surveillance, unfavorable CPARs, not exercising options and Government remedies identified in FAR 52.246-4.

1.6 Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review): In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4, the MFT is responsible for conducting an Initial Contract Performance Review.

The review is a determination by the MFT that the Contractor has successfully started performance, has completed transition, is fully operational, and is within the estimated cost, schedule and performance parameters of the contract/order. In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4.1, the review will take place within 30 [calendar] days after the Contractor assumes full performance responsibility. For acquisitions greater than or equal to one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000.00), results of the review will be reported to the Services Designation Official (SDO) as described in AFI 63-138, paragraph 6.4. The COR will upload the review in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B)..

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 8

1.7 Annual COR Online File Inspection: The COR will maintain the COR Online File in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi); AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)2.5;

the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 29 2010; and the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011.

The COR will complete and sign the Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist in the anniversary month of their appointment. The COR Supervisor will inspect the file and sign the checklist in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii). The PCO will inspect the file and sign the checklist in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii). The PCO will upload the checklist in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vii).

1.8 Annual Execution Review (AER): In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 2.7.5, the SDO is responsible for ensuring an AER is conducted. In accordance with AFI 63-138, paragraph 5.2, the MFT is responsible for preparing AER reports. In accordance with AFI 63- 138, paragraph 5.2, the AER will assess the acquisition’s progress against approved cost, schedule and performance metrics and review the summary of evaluations from CPARS.

1.9 Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)

1.9.1 The total estimated value of the contract does not equal or exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000.00); however, the MFT has decided CPARS reporting should be conducted.

1.9.2 In accordance with FAR Part 42, Contract Administration and Audit Services, the MFT will evaluate Contractor performance. The Logistics Manager will, at a minimum, review the PARs and other information contained in the COR Online File to prepare and substantiate the CPAR. The following areas will be rated on the CPAR as applicable: quality, schedule, cost control, management and regulatory compliance. CPARS will be updated, at a minimum annually, documenting Contractor performance for the contract/order in accordance with the Guidance for the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Additional information about CPARS can be found in the User Manual for Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). More frequent updates may be made, as required, to document a significant improvement or decline in the level of Contractor performance.

1.9.3 The Contractor shall have input into the CPAR prior to it being finalized. For each reporting period, the Logistics Manager will provide the Contractor a draft CPAR with no ratings, only justifications, to examine for seven calendar days. After MFT review of the Contractor’s response, the CPAR will be coordinated through management up to the Division level. Once approved, the CPAR will be sent to the Contractor via CPARS for the official 60 calendar day review. The Contractor shall have the option to concur or non-concur, with comments, via CPARS.

1.10 Safety Requirements

1.10.1 Mishap Notification/Investigation

1.10.1.1 In accordance with AFI 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports, paragraph 2.4.6.1.1, the Contractor shall report mishaps involving damage or injury to USAF interests. In accordance with AFI 91-204, paragraph 1.3.1.1, damage or injury includes: damage to DoD property;

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 9

occupational illness to DoD military or civilian personnel; injury to on- or off-duty DoD military personnel; injury to on-duty DoD civilian personnel; and damage to public or private property or injury or illness to non-DoD personnel caused by USAF operations.

1.10.1.2 In accordance with AFI 91-204, paragraph 2.4.6.1.1, the Contractor shall ensure the USAF [Safety Office] and the applicable contract management authority are notified of mishaps.

The Contractor shall contact the MFT (COR, if available, or another MFT member) by telephone within three business hours. The MFT will notify the Safety Office and the PCO.

1.10.1.3 In accordance with AFI 91-204, paragraph 2.4.6.1.2, the Contractor shall cooperate with USAF safety investigations.

1.10.2 MFT Surveillance: The COR will monitor Contractor reporting and review any mishap notifications. The COR will address safety and/or health issues in the PAR.

1.11 Trafficking in Persons: In accordance with the Defense Contingency COR Handbook section on Combating Trafficking in Persons, the COR must inform the PCO if the Contractor/subcontractor and/or Contractor/subcontractor personnel fail to comply with the requirements of FAR 52.222.50, Combating Trafficking in Persons. The PCO must convey the information to DoD Combat Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) Law Enforcement and Support / OUSD Personnel and Readiness (P&R) Defense Human Resources Activity (DHRA).

1.12 Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP): The Contractor shall review each Alert/Safe-Alert report received from GIDEP to determine if the item or process for which the Alert/Safe Alert report is issued is applicable to the contract/order and take appropriate action.

Upon the determination that an Alert/Safe-Alert report is applicable, the Contractor shall inform subcontractors, the Government and other impacted organizations in accordance with the CDRLs. The Contractor shall maintain a record of the status and disposition of all Alert/Safe- Alert reports in accordance with the CDRLs. The record shall be made available to the Government as long as the contract requires.

2.0 Assessment Management

2.1 Services Summary

Performance Objective

PWS

Reference

Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance

Quality of repair

4.2 No more than one Product

Quality Deficiency Report (PQDR) per contract year that is the fault of the Contractor.

Monthly DR Reviews by the

COR.

Surveillance will be documented, at a minimum, quarterly by the COR in the

PAR.

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 10

2.2 COR Online File Documentation

2.2.1 The COR will establish and maintain an online file containing surveillance and training documentation (COR Online File and COR Profile in the CORT Tool) in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi); AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d)2.5; the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 29 2010; and the OUSD Memorandum, dated Mar 21 2011. The following documentation will be uploaded in the CORT Tool by the COR or PCO as applicable.

1) Contractual Documents PWS, PWS revision(s) QASP, QASP revision(s) applicable CDRL(s)

2) Training and Appointment.

DAU CLC 222 Contracting Officers Representative (COR) Online Training annual ethics training Invoicing, Receipt, Acceptance, and Property Transfer (iRAPT) Overview Lesson annual CTIP training QAPC-Led COR Training Contract-Specific Training Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative Revocation (Termination) of Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative

3) Contractor Performance Data monthly status report(s) DCMA report(s) Commercial Asset Visibility-Air Force (CAV-AF) Repair Item Actions Report(s) iRAPT report(s) and/or other documentation demonstrating oversight of Contractor payment

4) Surveillance and Inspection

PAR(s) CAR(s) Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review) Annual COR Online File Inspection Checklist(s)

2.3 Plan for Corrective Action

2.3.1 Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR issuing a negative PAR.

The COR will prepare and forward the negative PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the negative PAR to the Contractor for corrective action. In Section II of the negative PAR, the Contractor shall explain the discrepancy and identify the corrective action they shall take to resolve the discrepancy and prevent recurrence. The Contractor shall sign and return the negative PAR to the PCO by the suspense date. The COR

PR: FD2060-15-91418 QASP REVISION: 0 11

will upload the negative PAR in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602- 2(d)(vi)(B).

2.3.2 If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR will initiate the CAR process.

However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at any time based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance. The COR will prepare a CAR and forward it to the QAPC. The QAPC will assign a control number and forward the CAR to the PCO and courtesy-copy the COR. The PCO will set a suspense date and submit the CAR to the Contractor for corrective action. The Contractor shall sign and return the CAR, with corrective action plan, to the PCO for acceptance by the MFT by the suspense date. The corrective action will be tracked and documented until the discrepancy is resolved. The COR will notify the QAPC that the CAR has been closed. The COR will upload the CAR in the CORT Tool in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi)(B). The CAR will become part of the PCO contract file. If the CAR process fails to resolve the discrepancy, the PCO has the right to invoke FAR 52.246-4.

2.3.3 As a result of non-compliance with contractual requirements in accordance with FAR 52.246-4, the Government may:

1) require the Contractor to perform the services again at no increase in contract amount;

2) require the Contractor to take action necessary to ensure future performance conforms to contractual requirements;

3) reduce the contract price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed;

4) perform the services, by contract or otherwise, and charge to the Contractor any cost incurred by the Government that is directly related to the performance of such services;

and/or

5) terminate the contract for default.

2.4 Acceptance of Services

2.4.1 In accordance with DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports, the Contractor shall submit/process payment requests (invoices, Receiving Reports or combos) and receipt/acceptance documents via Wide Area Workflow e-Business Suite / Invoicing, Receipt, Acceptance, and Property Transfer (iRAPT). Additional information regarding iRAPT is available at the site below.

https://wawf.eb.mil

2.4.2 CDRL deliverables may be submitted using iRAPT or be submitted directly to the applicable MFT member in accordance with the CDRL. The CDRL will determine submittal requirements; however, separately priced data must be accepted in iRAPT in order for the Contractor to receive payment, and both separately priced and non-separately priced data must be accepted in IRAPT in order for the contract line item to be closed out.

2.4.3 Services will be accepted by the Logistics Manager, AFLCMC/WNAAC.

COONFIELD.SHER

RL.A.1153959427

Digitally signed by

COONFIELD.SHERRL.A.1153959427

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USAF, cn=COONFIELD.SHERRL.A.1153959427 Date: 2015.06.05 14:55:51 -04'00'

MCGAHA.RUSSE

LL.C.1387944334

Digitally signed by

MCGAHA.RUSSELL.C.1387944334

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USAF, cn=MCGAHA.RUSSELL.C.1387944334 Date: 2015.06.08 10:12:35 -04'00'

RODRIGUEZ.THO

MAS.V.1231046573

Digitally signed by

RODRIGUEZ.THOMAS.V.1231046573

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USAF, cn=RODRIGUEZ.THOMAS.V.1231046573 Date: 2015.06.08 07:06:19 -04'00'

X

Signed by: CARTER.ERICA.L.1297552488

Digitally signed by CARTER.ERICA.L.1297552488 DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USAF, cn=CARTER.ERICA.L.1297552488 Date: 2015.06.08 08:47:36 -04'00'