Mini_Crypto_RFP_Sections_L-1_through_L-4.docx

ATTACHMENT L-1: Past Performance Information Solicitation Number: FA8307-14-R-0002 Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted.

A. Offeror Name (Company/Division):

CAGE Code:

DUNS Number:

(See Section L, paragraph 5.3 "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume.)

B. Program Title:

C. Contract Title:

1. Contract Agency or Customer

2. Contract Number

3. Contract Type

4. Period of Performance

7. If Amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason

D. Indicate if ___ Prime or ___ Subcontractor E. Completion Date:

1. Original date:

2. Current Schedule:

3. Estimate at Completion:

4. How Many Times Changed:

5. Primary Causes of Change:

F. Indicate if Production was involved:

G. Indicate if operators, and/or embedment manuals were developed/provided:

H. Indicate if a Helpdesk and/or telephone support was provided:

I. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts provide current information on all three individuals, in the format shown below. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles.)

1. Program Manager:

Name

Office

Address

Telephone

Email

2. Contracting Officer:

Name

Office

Address

Telephone

Email

3. Administrative Contracting Officer:

Name

Office

Address

Telephone

Email

FA8307-14-R-0002 Attachment 13 Section L: Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors 28 May 14

L1-3

ATTACHMENT L-2: Past Performance Questionnaire

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS DIVISION

To: Contractor References Date:

The Cryptologic Systems Division (CPSD) is in the process of selecting contractors for award under the Mini Crypto (MC) development contract. The objective of this acquisition is to design, develop, test, and procure NSA Type 1 certified devices. The Government wants to be confident that the contractors selected will be able to successfully accomplish our requirements.

One of the ways the Government intends to evaluate each Offeror is through the verification of the Offeror's past and present performance on other contracts. For this, we must depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an Offeror.

We have tried to make our questionnaire easy to complete. We ask that you complete and submit our questionnaire as soon as possible, but no later than proposal due date. General contract information was provided by the Offeror. Please confirm this information and, in the text box provided, identify any errors or changes you feel should be made. Then, answer the questions that follow. We would greatly appreciate your comments describing why you rated a particular question the way you did. When finished, you may email, fax or mail to the addressee below. If you have any questions or difficulty completing the questionnaire, please contact:

Lori A. Robarge 230 Hall Blvd, Suite 205 San Antonio, TX 78243-7058 lori.robarge@us.af.mil

FAX: 210-925-1143

Thank you for your valuable comments and time.

Lori A. Robarge Contracting Officer L2-1

ATTACHMENT L-2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation Number: FA8307-14-R-0002

1. Please complete this questionnaire. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages or write on the back. Responses will be treated as source selection information. Send the completed questionnaire to:

Lori A. Robarge 230 Hall Blvd, Suite 205 San Antonio, TX 78243-7058

2. Explanation of codes:

3. Please complete the following identifying information and past performance assessment:

A. Contractor:

B. Contract number:

C. Period of Performance:

(DD-MMM-YYYY to DD-MMM-YYYY) D. Negotiated cost at award:

E. Current estimated contract dollar amount:

F. Describe services and/or products acquired:

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS

4. Circle the appropriate letter for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative/rationale.

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS.

(a) How effective was the contractor’s risk management process (especially risk identification and risk mitigation)?

E V S M U N

Rationale:

(b) How effective was the contractor at working with NSA and achieving certification of cryptographic device?

E V S M U N

(c) How effective was the contractor’s process for the use of an open standard approach during development, to minimize proprietary solutions?

E V S M U N

(d) How well did the contractor meet the tasks/milestones in the contract Integrated Master Schedule? How did the contractor handle the difficulties?

E V S M U N

(e) How effective was the contractor’s overall software/firmware development process to include design and debug?

E V S M U N

(f) How effective was the contractor at recovering from failed test events (responsiveness, timeliness, and impacts on schedule)?

E V S M U N

(g) How effective was the contractor at meeting costs goals established during development, in the production contract?

E V S M U N

(h) How effective were the contractor’s cost controls/processes? How well did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to or estimated price/cost?

E V S M U N

(i) If applicable, did the Contractor’s Help Desk Support meet customer requirements?

E V S M U N

(j) How effective was the contractor at providing operator and/or embedment manuals?

E V S M U N

(k) How well did the contractor achieve small business subcontracting goals during contract performance?

E V S M U N

(l) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

E V S M U N

(m) What would you consider the most significant strengths of this contractor?

(n) What would you consider the most significant weaknesses of this contractor?

(If more comment space needed, write on back, or attach pages.)

5. Additional Comments

(If more comment space needed, write on back, or attach pages.)

6. Please provide the name, title, address, phone number and e-mail address of the person completing this questionnaire.

Name

Title

Address

Telephone

Email

7. Thank you for your assistance in this source selection. If you have any questions, please call the point of contact identified in paragraph 1 above.

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

WHEN COMPLETED, SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

L2-2

WHEN COMPLETED, SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

L2-8 ATTACHMENT L-3: Example Format for Consent Letter

Lori A. Robarge 230 Hall Blvd, Suite 205 San Antonio, TX 78243-7058

ATTN:

We are currently participating as a (subcontractor/team member) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing the proposal) in responding to the Request for Proposal (FA8307-14-R-0002).

We understand the Government is placing great emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent letter that allows you to discuss past performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company:

Offeror Team member Team member’s Address Team member’s Cage Code

Team member’s Phone Number and Fax Number L3-1

ATTACHMENT L-4: Example Format for Client Authorization Letter

Lori A. Robarge 230 Hall Blvd, Suite 205 San Antonio, TX 78243-7058

We are currently participating as a (subcontractor/team member) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing the proposal) in responding to the Request for Proposal (FA8307-14-R-0002). We understand the Government is placing great emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process, we are signing this authorization letter that allows the Government Past Performance Evaluation Team (PPET) to discuss past performance information with previous commercial customers during the source selection process. This letter authorizes release to the Government of requested information on the team member’s performance.

Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company:

Offeror Team member Team member’s Address Team member’s Cage Code Team member’s Phone Number and Fax Number

L4-1

L5-1