Copy_of_RFI_question_spreadsheet_2014_07_30.pdf

Specific Section/

Paragraph Page Number Clause or Citation Requiring Clarification

Task E, Advanced

Minuteman Batteries

Task H

General

Section C, Para III.D 55 If an offeror has a comprehensive subcontracting plan, the offeror shall so state in their

Business/Price proposal and provide a copy of the signature page of the comprehensive subcontracting plan and any supplements to the plan, the identification number thereof, and any pages identifying the subcontracting goals.

Section D, Para

4.A.1.b.1

58 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror's open system architecture approach incorporates hardware and software open system architecture design requirements, as documented in the Offeror's Open Systems Management Plan

(OSMP), is thorough, complete, adequate, feasible, and represents an understanding of the

RFP requirements

DD1423_GB

SD_DemVal_

Tech_Studies

_1_Jul_14

28 of 28 A015

Section A, Para K

Additional Tasks 1. a.

44 Program Reviews/Technical Interchange Meetings

ICBM NC2 Apps

BAA Topic B

Model

Contract

4 CLIN 0003 Data

DD1423_GB

SD_DemVal_

Tech_Studies

_1_Jul_14

14 of 28 A006

Statement of

Objectives, Section D

58 of 71 Para e. Criterion 5 – Past Performance

Statement of

Objectives, Section C, Para II

54 of 71 Paragraph B. Government Furnished Property

(GFP)

DD1423_GB

SD_DemVal_

Tech_Studies

_1_Jul_14

28 of 28 A015

Statement of

Objectives, Section A

Study B Strategic TPS Materials Development and

Testing

PenAids

For BAA Technology

Area G

For BAA Technology

Area G

Strategic TPS materials

Area B

Strategic TPS materials

Area B

Strategic TPS materials

Area B

Strategic TPS materials

Area B

Strategic TPS

Area B

Strategic TPS materials

Area B

PSRE

TVA

Strategic TPS materials

Area B

Strategic TPS materials

Area B

Strategic TPS

Area B

Question

Can you provide a copy of the RV Arming and Fuzing Assembly (AFA) Battery

Specification for a technical evaluation?

The advanced ordnance initiation system is to be compatible with mission/flight computers. Can the Government provide interface descriptions for current and future ICBM systems?

In viewing the CDRL list we don’t see any regarding financial reporting, what, if any, kind of financial reporting will be required on this contract?

Request the government add the DFARS Clause 252.219-7004 Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (Test Program), which invokes an offeror's comprehensive subcontracting plan, to Section I of the GBSD Dem/Val solicitation/contract and to

Para VI of the Introduction (Page 4), to be consistent with this requirement.

Item a. (kickoff meeting) under the Program Reviews/Technical Interchange

Meetings tasks is missing additional detail for "The agenda for the meeting shall include the following:" Request the government include the missing items required for the kickoff agenda meeting.

What is the purpose of the NC2 Application Part 1 study?

a. SOO says, "Produce doucmentation as the ICBM NC2 system exists today."

b. Is existing documentation insufficient? If so, how so?

What documentation is required for the NC2 Application Part 2 Study?

a. SOO says, "Produce doucmentation as the ICBM NC2 system exists today." It also says, "Items to be included are, but not limited to, fuctional descriptions of all sub-systems, mechanical/electrical interfaces and data transfer protocol.

CDRL A015 requires submission of an Open System Management Plan (OSMP) 30 days after contract award. Proposal Evaluation Criterion 2 part 1) states “The

Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s open system architecture approach incorporates hardware and software open system architecture design requirements, as documented in the offeror’s Open System

Management Plan (OSMP), is thorough, complete, adequate, feasible, and represents an understanding of the RFP requirements.” Since the OSMP is submitted after contract award, are you referring to evaluating the proposal’s narrative description of the OSMP?

Which "FFRDC's" do we need NDA's with?

a. Soo Section F.7. says, "Non-Geverment personnel from BAE Systems, BAE subcontractors, FFRDC, and Tecolote may have access to proposals for the purposes specified above. All proposal submissions will require an NDA with the contractors

Pages 3 and 4 of the Model Contract says Clins 0001 and 0003 are Cost Plus Fixed

Fee, but the BAA SOO Section B - Award Information says, "Contractor may propose

Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Firm Fixed Price for each study proposed." Are either contract types accepable for CLINS 0001 and 0003?

As an interface between part 1 and part 2, are you desiring an analysis that dexcribes how the existing architecture has evolved to satisfy stringetnt nuclear surety, safety, hardness, survivablibity constraints?

How should we request document in the applicable documents section for each study?

Could the Air Force please provide or tell us how to access SDL-62-2014-01, 02 and

03 so we may review the specific requirements for the BAA target areas?

is it appropriate to proposed only one or two of the TPS materials identified, assuming that other manufacturer(s) are better suited to others?

Specifically, FMI would be interested mainly in nosetip (per prior RVAP efforts), but also in the antenna window material (per RSAP experience). We would not plan to offer Heatshield unless specifically directed.

Further, should the proposal separate the two materials, in the event that only one is selected by the government?

CLIN 0001 identifies that a receiving report is required for the inspection/acceptance report. Is the receiving report meant to apply to study areas that require hardware deliverables? Block 7 in CDRLs A001 through A015 identifies that letters of transmittal are required.

CLIN 0002, which is for travel, identifies that a receiving report is required for the inspection/acceptance report. Is the receiving report requirement applicable to CLIN

0002?

CLIN 0003 identifies that a receiving report is required for the inspection/acceptance report. However, Block 7 in CDRLs A001 through A015 identifies that letters of transmittal are required. Is the receiving report requirement applicable to CLIN

0003?

CLIN 0003 seems to indicate that an estimate total cost is required. Prior to release of the BAA, it was the bidder’s understanding that CLIN 0003 would be NSP and that the costs to execute CLIN 0003 would be bid into CLIN 0001. Will CLIN 0003 require bidders to specify a price? If not, are bidders required to complete Blocks 17 and 18 for CDRLs A001 through A015?

CLIN 0003 (Data) is identified as CPFF. Typically Data is Not Separately Priced (NSP).

Please confirm CLIN0003 should be CPFF.

The list of FAR and DFAR clauses in Section II of the Solicitation appear to exclude

FAR 52.227‐11 (Patent Rights – Ownership by the Contractor). Would it be possible to include this clause in the Solicitation?

Which "FFRDC's" do we need NDA's with?

a. Soo Section F.7. says, "Non-Geverment personnel from BAE Systems, BAE subcontractors, FFRDC, and Tecolote may have access to proposals for the purposes specified above. All proposal submissions will require an NDA with the contractors

The List of FAR and DFAR clauses in Section II of the Solicitation appear to exclude

DFAR 252.227‐7014 (Rights in Noncommercial Computer Software and

Noncommercial Computer Software Documentation). Would it be possible to include this clause in the Solicitation?

CDRL A006 requires QAPP be submitted 30 days after Contract Award, followed by a review period by the Government. Then the updated QAPP is to be submitted “30

Days after Contract Award” (same day as the original submittal)? Please provide clarification between the original and updated QAPP submittal due dates.

Criterion 5‐Past Performance Item 1) refers to “…propulsion technology development program.” Is reference to propulsion an artifact of the cut and paste process and Past Performance is based on relevant technology development programs?

Last Paragraph of Section II Labeled “B. Government Furnished Property (GFP):”

Seems to be a typo and should be “G. Government Furnished Property (GFP):”

CDRL A014 Requires a Risk Management Status Report Quarterly, but there is no requirement for a Risk Management Plan. Our interpretation is that a risk plan is not a deliverable. Do you agree with this interpretation?

No applicable documents have been identified in “Study B, Strategic TPS Materials and Testing”. What Mk5/MK21 data/requirements will be made available to support proposal development?

Could the Air Force please provide detailed Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) for each of the identified CDRL items A001 through A015?

For BAA Technology Area G., could the Air Force provide additional definition for the terms “Open Architecture”, Modular design”, “Scalability” and “Interoperability” as they see it with respect to TVC systems across the missile stages?

There are two unclassified documents referenced that are available for use and are specific to one of the tasks we are bidding. This is a request for the EAWG Final

Report and the TAWG Final Report. If you cannot send them to me electronically then the address in my signature block can be use to send a CD.

The DD254 has Block 11 c. “Receive and generate classified material” checked as a requirement for the BAA awards. However on page 48, Paragraph E of the BAA it notes that “it is anticipated that all information generated under this contract will be

UNCLASSIFIED”. Can you please confirm if the generation of classified material under any award is required/anticipated?

Is funding currently appropriated for this BAA? If not, when do you anticipate funding?

What level of funding is available/potentially available for the BAA and how will it be allocated amongst the 11 BAA areas?

The outline for the Technical/Management Proposal given in the SOO Proposal

Instructions does not directly correlate to the outline given as a template in the BAA

Guide (Ref: BAA Guide, Section B, Proposal Table of Contents/Checklist, p. 16). The order of the sections is different, and some sections aren’t mentioned (e.g., Executive Summary; Technical Approach). Since the SOO Proposal Instructions state that they take precedence over the BAA Guide (Ref: SOO, Section C, I, General

Instructions, Para. A, p. 50) and also direct us to follow them as closely as possible

(Ref: SOO, Section C, II, Technical/Management Proposal Instructions, p. 51), can you please confirm that the outline given in the instructions is what we should follow for the Technical/Management Proposal? Or are we to use the BAA Guide outline as a template to respond to the SOO Proposal Instructions?

On Page 30 of the BAA it notes that “In addition to the design package the interested parties shall include: Estimated cost to develop prototype hardware/software. Does the proposal need to include firm pricing for the Phase 2 effort (procure/build/test) the representative TVC system? Or is ROM sufficient for the Phase 2 effort?

Please confirm if the design package at the end of Phase 1 is for a Conceptual design or a preliminary prototype design sufficient to support the procurement and build of prototype hardware.

Will the flight test hardware (heat shields, window, nosetip) be manufactured to existing Mk5 "classified" drawings? Contractor generated unclassified drawings?

Contractor generated classified drawings?

Will the Navy, Mk5 material specifications and manufacturing processes be required for producing the heatshield flight hardware?

Page 11, B. 1. TC Plugs - How many plug blanks will be provided for development of the finishing plugs?

Page 11, B. 2. & 3. Fwd & Aft Heatshields (plural) - How many heatshields of each configuration are to be manufactured and delivered for integration into the vehicle?

Page 12, B.a.3 CFTE Milestones and meetings - meeting dates extend beyond a 24 month POP. What POP should be used for Study Area B? Start date?

Page 12, B.a.3 CFTE Milestones and meetings -SRR, PDR, CDR, FRR are these meetings being held at Hill AFB? If not, where?

Can the Government provide key interface and specification goals for next generation PSRE? This includes the following information: S-133-1004-51 PIDS, Current PSRE TDP, Third Stage Interface Requirements, Payload Shroud Interface

Requirements.

Can the government provide insight on radiation environment requirements on open architecture TVA.

We are wondering whether the intent is to respond at a prime contractor level, managing those materials and services which are outside FMI capability (Heatshield, arc jet testing).

Are the technical requirements for the individual TPS elements defined by Air Force or Navy legacy? The Mk-5 heatshield is called out, but the overall solicitation is offered by USAF, so some clarification is appreciated.

Will Air Force requirements be made available to us before the proposal deadline?

Specifically, we’re interested in the thermal protection system (heatshield, antenna window, and nosetip) material manufacturing requirements.

Answer

Yes. See updated SOO and request documents as appropriate.

An ICD will be provided for the existing interface.

A future computer interface has not been determined and will not be available for this effort.

Format 1 defines cost and schedule performance data by product-oriented Work Breakdown

Structure (WBS).

Clause will be added to the model contract and only applicable in awards requiring a small business plan.

Added requirements for section a, Para K additonal tasks 1.a. On page 44. Clarrified requirements in all studies.

the NC2 study has been changed significantly.

Please reference changes in amended SOO.

the NC2 study has been changed significantly.

Please reference changes in amended SOO.

Yes. We clarified the evaluation requirements.

See amended SOO.

We have clarified FFRDC to be Aerospace

Corporation. Request contact information for

NDA's from the contracting officer.

Contractors may propose as they see fit at this point the government encourages the contractors to propose CLIN 0003 as NSP.

The NC2 study has been changed significantly.

Please reference changes in amended SOO.

Yes. You can propose separately and provide separate proposals per material.

Yes.

Yes

Model contract will be changed to LT for CLIN

0003.

Yes. IAW FAR 27.303, patent right clause FAR

52.227-11 will be added

Contractors may propose as they see fit. At this point the government encourages the contractors to see CLIN 0003 as NSP.

BAA wording has been clarified. Please request any documents through the contracting officer.

We have clarified FFRDC to be Aerospace

Corporation. Request contact information for

NDA's from the contracting officer.

Yes. The list in Part II-Contract Clauses Section I

(pp. 7-17) has been amended to include:

252.227‐7014 Rights in Noncommercial Computer

Software and Noncommercial Computer Software

Documentation ((Feb 2012))

252.227-7015 Technical Data--Commercial Items

(Dec 2011)

252.227-7019 Validation of Asserted Restrictions--

Computer Software (Sep

2011)

252.227-7025 Limitations on the Use or

Disclosure of Government-Furnished

Information Marked with Restrictive Legends

(Mar 2011)

252.227-7027 Deferred Ordering of Technical

Data or Computer Software (Apr

1988).

"change the CDRL to read "Contract shall submit revised Quality Assurance Program Plan incorporating Government comments, if applicable, NLT 30 days after recite of

Government comments."

See amended BAA.

See amended BAA.

Yes. We agree that you do not need a formal Risk

Management Plan. If a risk management Status

Report is required, include your risk management approach in your PMP.

Please specify what specific data/documents the contractor requires to complete the proposal.

See http://quicksearch.dla.mil/

Open Architecture: The bidder is to propose a ‘vendor agnostic’ system architecture that the Air Force could give to any qualified vendor or vendors and they could propose any or all of the modules of the system. The Air

Force requires unlimited data rights to the interfaces, the envelope, the inputs, and the outputs of each module.

This gives the Air Force maximum flexibility, while still allowing a vendor to protect their critical intellectual property.

Modular design: The design shall be such that the TVC system can be subdivided into smaller parts or modules that can be independently created and then used separately to create the entire system. A modular design facilitates multi-sourcing. Only the envelope, the inputs, and outputs shall be controlled or common in the system.

Scalability: The best example of scalability as it relates to a

TVA/TVC system is the actuator. Obviously with different sized stages, it makes no sense to employ a common actuator. However, having a common design that can be sized to fit each stage of the booster makes a lot of sense.

The same is true for TVC power. See the BAA.

Interoperability: The architecture described above shall be such that each module can be replaced by a module with the same inputs and outputs and operate the same as the original.

Neither final report will be available for distribution and will be deleted under Applicable

Documents in SOO.

We do not need to amend the dd254, but we will have to change the wording in the BAA. I would change it to read, "it is anticipated that most of the information generated under this contract will be

UNCLASSIFIED". Also, we are fine with you just telling them the total funding for the BAA.

The Government has adequate funding to award all studies.

The Government has adequate funding to award all studies.

Propose as directed in the BAA/SOO

We want you to propose to everything in Phase 1 and Phase 2. We believe that proposers will have a reasonable idea as to what all of the costs will

be. That said, while your total proposed cost, for both phases, is binding, your proposed prototype estimate is non-binding (it just helps us get a feel for the prototype (procure/build/test) cost. We reserve the right to award the study to multiple offerors and exercise Phase 2 to all, some or none. Also, remember that while your preliminary design must be rad hardened or rad hardenable, your prototype does not need to be.

We are looking for a preliminary prototype design sufficient to support the procurement and build of prototype hardware.

Yes. Anticipate to design against existing Mk5 drawings whether it is unclassified or classified. If classified, contractor generated drawings should match classification.

Yes. See last paragraph in Task Descriptions and

Objectives.

Pending Navy and Air Force Reentry System

Working Group decisions. See last paragraph in

Task Descriptions and Objectives.

One Fwd and one Aft heatshield.

Contractor should bid for a PoP of 36 months for the Strategic TPS Materials Development and

Testing (Paragraph B) SOO. The start date is contract award - estimated Jan 2015.

Meeting locations are TBD. It can be estimated that these meetings will be held at Sunnyvale, CA and/or the Washington DC area.

For next generation PSRE, concentrate on technologies outlined in the study and others you think might be benefical to a new generations misssile system. S-133-1004-51 will be in the bidders library. Other doucments should be listed in the GFP/GFI section of the proposal.

Appropriate documentation is available in the classified bidders library. See BAA for directions on how to access the classified bidders library.

Yes, that is the intent. Proposing at the prime contractor level is desireable, but will not impact evaluation scoring. You can propose separately and provide separate proposals per material.

The primary technical requirements are defined by Air Force legacy, but the contractor will also need Navy requirements to adequately support the CFTE.

No, material manufacturing processes will not be delivered prior to proposal deadline.