PastPerformanceQuestionnaire15Sep14.pdf

Past Performance Questionnaire

Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

1. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the offeror's performance with the judgment of others in your activity. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has or has had contracts with this offeror. Please use a separate questionnaire for each contract identified. If you need more space than the comment sections provided, please attach a separate sheet to the end of this questionnaire.

2. Some of the terms used in this questionnaire are related to government contracting.

Commercial firms are requested to answer to the best of your understanding of these terms.

3. Complete Questionnaire Sections 1-5 below.

WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract Type:

E. Was this a competitive contract ?

Yes No

F. Period of Performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost:

I. Prime contractor or Sub-contractor on this effort?

J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

K. Description of service/product provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description ( if applicable):

C. Geographic Scope of services under this contract (specify locations):

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of year's evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. Provide comments in the block below each item if rated SATISFACTORY or below. This scale is defined as follows:

Management Approach and transition

M1. How effective was the contractor in achieving the user’s system availability requirements?

Comment:

M2. How effective was the contractor at overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)?

Comment:

M3. How effective was the contractor at creating a comprehensive Program Management Plan (PMP) for the entire life of a project/program?

Comment:

M4. How effective was the contractor at identifying and managing risk through the term of the contract?

Comment:

M5. How well did the contractor establish, manage, update, and follow approved plans?

Comment:

M6. How effective was the contractor in providing timely, quality CDRLs?

Comment:

M7. How successful was the contractor at executing an orderly transition?

Comment:

M8. How well did the contractor provide a seamless transition to the user?

Comment:

M9. How effective was the contractor at executing all expected transition tasks within the contractual timeframe?

M10. How prepared was the contractor to conduct business on day 1 after transition was complete?

Comment:

M11. How well did the contractor keep the Government apprised of all issues during transition?

Comment:

M12. How effective was the contractor’s quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements?

Comment:

Technical Approach

T1. How knowledgeable was the contractor regarding shipping and customs processes?

T2. How effectively did the contractor ship internationally within required timeframes?

Comment:

T3. How effective was the contractor with regard to quality/integrity of configuration management processes (maintaining control of performance, functional, and physical baselines)?

Comment:

T4. How well did the contractor develop, and execute test and evaluation efforts?

T5. How effective was the contractor with regard to quality/integrity of integration of hardware and software?

Comment:

T6. Was the contractor knowledgeable and able to contribute to Government Information Assurance processes?

Comment:

T7. How effective was the contractor in submitting quality artifacts for use in obtaining an Authority to Operate (ATO) on DoD networks?

Staffing and Experience

S1. How effective was the contractor in its ability to hire a qualified workforce for this effort?

Comment:

S2. How effective was the contractor in retaining a qualified workforce for this effort?

Comment:

S3. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Comment:

S4. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

S5. How effective and timely did the contractor perform with regard to contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance?

Comment:

S6. How successful was the contractor at providing knowledgeable personnel who were available to answer Government questions and concerns?

Comment:

S7. How successful was the contractor with timely award and effective management of subcontracts?

Comment:

A. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

A. What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

B. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

C. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

D. Given what I know about the contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in their proposal, would you award to them today?

Yes No

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE.

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

AFLCMC/PZZKB

ATTN: Ms Michelle Esquivel Contracting Officer michelle.esquivel@us.af.mil 801-586-4693

Or

AFLCMC/PZZKB

ATTN: Ms Lori Noble Contract Negotiator lori.noble2@us.af.mil 801-586-1233