Section L Attachments.docx

ATTACHMENT L-1: PWS SOLICITATION CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX

For Prospective Offerors: See paragraph 2.2.4 regarding instructions for completion of the solicitation Cross Reference Matrix (CRM). If this matrix conflicts with any other requirement, direction, or provision of this solicitation, the other reference shall take precedence over this matrix. Additionally, to the extent this matrix discloses details as to the extent or manner by which the Government intends to evaluate offeror’s proposals for award, Section M references in the matrix are for information purposes only and the Government shall be obligated to evaluate proposals solely in conformance with the provisions of the Section M of the solicitation.

CRM is attached separately and will remain as a separate attachment through solicitation. The CRM will not be a part of the award package.

ATTACHMENT L-2: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of past efforts submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth at paragraph 5.3.3 of Section L of this solicitation.

(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different from the offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume.)

B. Program Title: ____________________

C. Contract Specifics:

1. Contracting Agency or Customer _____________________________________________

7. If Amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

D. Brief Description of Effort as __Prime or __Subcontractor (Please indicate whether it was development and/or production, or other acquisition phase and highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition)

E. Completion Date:

F. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles.)

G. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered unique.

H. For each of the applicable technical element (Schedule Management, Program Management, and Systems Engineering) under the Technical Acceptability factor in Section M, illustrate how your experience on this program applies to that technical element.

I. Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this program and are proposed to support the instant acquisition. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions.

J. Describe the nature or portion of the work on the proposed effort to be performed by the business entity being reported here. Also, estimate the percentage of the total proposed effort to be performed by this entity and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor, or a corporate division related to the prime (define relationship).

ATTACHMENT L-3: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Cover SHeet

Fax

Source Selection cc:

Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply Please Recycle Comments: Please provide a brief synopsis of the information that you are faxing.

ATTACHMENT L-4: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ___________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: __________________________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: __________________________________________________________________________________

D. Number of year’s evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCEPTIONAL/BLUE – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

VG VERY GOOD/PURPLE – During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

S SATISFACTORY/GREEN – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

M MARGINAL/YELLOW – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

U UNSATISFACTORY/RED – During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

N NOT APPLICABLE/WHITE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

E

VG

S

M

U

N

Program Management (Subfactor 1) PM 1. Effectiveness in planning, scheduling, staffing and budgeting.

Notes:

PM 2. Ability to recruit, train and retain qualified personnel.

Notes:

PM 3. Adequacy of communication and interface with customer.

Notes:

PM 4. Effectiveness in managing subcontractors.

Notes:

PM 5. Ability to track and maintain employee certifications for Information Assurance IAW DoDD 8570.01-M, Change 2, April 2010.

Notes:

PM 6. Maintaining appropriate security clearances for all employees.

Notes:

Support Performance (Subfactor 2) SP 1. Ability to provide an online collaboration website and maintain network security, as required by the contract.

Notes:

SP 2. Ability to perform software deficiency investigation (troubleshooting) and track to completion.

Notes:

SP 3. Ability to develop, and perform to, a schedule for fielding new software to geographically separated locations.

Notes:

SP4. Ability to develop and deliver training to users for new software.

Notes:

On-site Performance (Subfactor 3) OP 1. Ability to provide continuous (less than 10 calendar days) on-site systems administration support to multiple geographically separated locations, as required by the contract. Please note the number of locations in the notes section.

Notes:

OP 2. Ability to provide support to deployed military units, whether co-located or geographically separated.

Notes:

OP 3. Ability to manage and maintain computer system configuration control across multiple, geographically separated locations and multiple configurations.

Notes:

OP 4. Ability to understand and provide support for Air Force Operational Test events.

Notes:

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Blake Gibson Blake.Gibson@hill.af.mil Phone: 801-586-3465 OO-ALC/GHSKB Fax: 801-586-3855

ATTACHMENT L-5: SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT LETTER

FOR THE RELEASE OF PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

TO THE PRIME CONTRACTOR

Past performance information, concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent. Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime contractor during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government’s Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent letter be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.

SAMPLE

Dear “Contracting Officer:”

We are participating as a (subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, Hill Air Force Base, Request for Proposal FA8217-10-R-5022 for the Mission Planning Support contract.

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent letter to allow you to discuss our past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Company Name:

Address:

ATTACHMENT L-6: CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER

Past performance information concerning private sector contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners cannot be disclosed to the government without their consent. Client authorization letters are required for each identified effort for a commercial customer. This letter will authorize release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance. The government will need that consent before contacting commercial customers to assess the offeror’s past performance. In an effort to assist the Government's Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following client authorization letter be completed by any commercial customers identified in your proposal. The completed client authorization letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.

Offerors should send with their list of references a letter similar to the following authorizing the reference to provide past performance information to the Government.

Dear “Client:”

We are responding to a Department of the Air Force, Hill Air Force Base Request for Proposal FA8217-10-R-5002 for the Mission Planning Support contract.

In their acquisitions, the government is placing increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor. They are requiring those clients of entities responding to their solicitation to be identified, and their participation in the evaluation process is requested. In the event that you are contacted for information on work performed, you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries.

We have identified Mr./Ms.____________________________ of your organization as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge of our work. Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to .

Sincerely, ATTACHMENT L-7: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONARE COVER LETTER TEMPLATE

LETTERHEAD

(DATE)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for the (PROGRAM NAME) Program (CONTRACT AND ORDER NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) TO BE EVALUATED). The effort was performed by (SPECIFY WHO PERFORMED THE WORK) under (CAGE CODE).

1. We are currently responding to Ogden, Utah Air Logistics Command (OO-ALC), Request for Proposal (RFP) FA8217-10-R-5022 for the OO-ALC Mission Planning Support contract. This acquisition is being conducted as a performance price tradeoff. The RFP specifically requires that we, as an Offeror, send the attached questionnaire to several points of contact (POC) on recent and relevant efforts that we (or a proposed team member) have performed. As such, please take a few moments of your time to fill out the attached questionnaire.

2. DO NOT RETURN THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO US. The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to us, the Offeror. The completed Past Performance Questionnaire should be sent directly to the Government Contracting Officer not later than 22 Nov 10. The questionnaires may be faxed or emailed to:

Blake Gibson Blake.Gibson@hill.af.mil Phone: 801-586-3465 OO-ALC/GHSKB Fax: 801-586-1287

3. If you have any questions regarding the source selection, contact the Contracting Officer mentioned above. If you have questions regarding the clarification of contract number, POC, or program title on the questionnaire, please contact (CONTRACTOR’S POC AND PHONE NUMBER FOR PAST PERFORMANCE ISSUES).

4. Thank you for your timely assistance.

Sincerely, (TITLE AND NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL)

ATTACHMENT L-8: STAFFING PLAN

For Prospective Offerors: See paragraph 4.2.3 (1) regarding instructions for completion of the Staffing Plan. If this file conflicts with any other requirement, direction, or provision of this solicitation, the other reference shall take precedence over this file. Additionally, to the extent this file discloses details as to the extent or manner by which the Government intends to evaluate offeror’s proposals for award, Section M references in the file are for information purposes only and the Government shall be obligated to evaluate proposals solely in conformance with the provisions of the Section M of the solicitation.

The Staffing Plan file is attached separately and will remain as a separate attachment through solicitation. The Staffing Plan file will not be a part of the award package.

Mission Planning Support Section L Attachments Page 13 image1.emf

MPSC II Solicitation Cross Reference Matrix 17 Aug 10.xlsx

PWS

PWS Solicitation Cross Reference Matrix

Mission Planning Support Contract II (MPSC II)

Reference Section Proposal Volume Proposal Paragraph Section L Section M CDRL Attachment

2.1.2.1.1 Aircraft Subject Matter Expert (SME) Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.1.2 Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) SME Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.1.3 Mission Planning Training (MPT) Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.1 Basic USAF / Combatant Command SSR Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.2 Basic US Army Aviation SSR Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.3 Assault Zone SSR Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.4 Mobility Test SSR Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.5 Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) SSR Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.6 Theater Battle Management Core Systems – Unit Level (TBMCS-UL) SSR Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.7 Position Specific Additional Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.2.8 Temporary Coverage of SSR Responsibilities

2.1.2.3.1 Configuration Management (CM) Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.3.2 System Technical Support Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.3.4.1 Technical Publications (Tech Pubs) Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.3.5.1 MPSSF Computer Systems Administrator (CSA) / Functional Systems Administration (FSA) Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.4.1 Mission Planning Central (MPC) Support Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.2.4.2.1 Software Security (SS) Duties and Responsibilities

2.1.3.1 FMS Support Approval

2.1.3.2 FMS Subject Matter Expert (SME)

2.1.3.3 FMS In-Country Familiarization Training

2.1.3.4 FMS Logistics Management

2.1.3.5 FMS Technical Publications / Data Support

2.1.3.6 FMS Configuration Management (CM)

2.1.3.7 FMS Web Services Support

2.1.3.8 FMS Contract Administration / Management Support

2.1.4 Personnel Qualifications