SectionM.pdf

PDF 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Limiter, Electrical
Solicitation number
fa821219r0022
Issued by

About this file

Not Listed

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
CDRLA001.pdf PDF
FA821219R0022.pdf PDF
CDRLB001.pdf PDF
1653 Transportation FMS.pdf PDF
SourceQual.pdf PDF
158 Packaging.pdf PDF
EDL.pdf PDF
1653 Transportation FMS.pdf PDF
SourceQual.pdf PDF
1653 Transportation.pdf PDF
SectionL.pdf PDF
EDR.pdf PDF
CDRLA001.pdf PDF
FA821219R0022.pdf PDF
SectionL.pdf PDF
SectionM.pdf PDF
1653 Transportation.pdf PDF
EDR.pdf PDF
EDL.pdf PDF
CDRLB001.pdf PDF
158 Packaging.pdf PDF
FA821219R0022.zip ZIP file
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. INTRODUCTION:

1. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced procedures restricted to technically qualified “Approved Source” offeror(s) This acquisition shall use price as the only evaluated factor

2. The Government intends to award the requirement(s) represented in this solicitation to one awardee. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROCEDURES:

1. The Government shall evaluate proposals based on the evaluation factor below:

Factor 1- Price

The Offeror’s price will be evaluated based upon the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The Offeror’s Price Proposal will be evaluated for the criteria of Price Reasonableness, Balance, and Completeness.

Price Reasonableness: The proposed prices will be evaluated for Price Reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it will represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For additional information see

FAR 31.201-3.

Balance: The Government may also determine a proposal unacceptable should the proposed prices be unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more items/Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques as those defined by FAR 15.404-1.

Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be calculated to be used for evaluation of offers to determine the lowest priced proposal. The TEP calculation will be a summation of all Contract Line Item Pricing under either Bid A, or Bid B if a First Article waiver is requested by the offeror, and granted by the Government.

Completeness: Not Separately Priced (NSP) and Informational CLINs (0001, 0002, 0004, and 0005) in the solicitation will not be evaluated for completeness.

The Government will evaluate if the contractor has requested a First Article waiver. If a First Article waiver has been requested is granted, the Government will evaluate whether the offeror provided unit prices for all CLINs under Bid B of the solicitation. If a First Article waiver is granted but the offeror did not provide unit prices for all CLINs under Bid B, the proposal may be considered incomplete and ineligible for award.

If a First Article waiver is denied, or not requested, the Government will evaluate whether the Offeror provided unit prices for all CLINs under Bid A of the solicitation. If the offeror did not provide unit prices or a proposed delivery date for all CLINs under Bid A, the proposal may be considered incomplete and ineligible for award.

2. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: In addition to meeting the identified factor above, Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and required delivery schedules.

Furthermore, all Offeror’s shall be listed as an approved source in the Government’s Screening Analysis Worksheet Form 761 prior to contract award.

A qualification package request is attached to this solicitation for those contractors who are not already qualified; however, per FAR 9.202(e), the Government reserves the right not to delay contract award in order to provide a potential offeror with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards.

3. The process for the evaluation of proposals is as follows:

a. This award will be made to the offeror that submitted the proposal with the lowest

Total Evaluated Price and is a qualified source.

b. Past performance record and history will be assessed via Government databases as one of the multiple standards required for a successful offeror to be determined responsible as described in FAR 9.104. Contractors shall meet the required delivery dates, as well as the terms and conditions in this solicitation, to be determined responsible.

File details come from the government source that posted it.