JSPDS Task Order 15_Jul_11_AFL.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION SERVICES (OTES) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA7046-11-R-0003
About this file
DRAFT SAMPLE TASK ORDER JSPDS
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION SERVICES (OTES) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SAMPLE TASK ORDER 0003
JOINT SERVICE PERSONNEL SKIN
DECONTAMINATION SYSTEM - (JSPDS)
25 Jul 11
1.0 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this task order is to provide test capability support to Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC) Detachment 2 (Det 2) on the Joint Service Personnel Skin Decontamination System (JSPDS) operational test program. This task is within the scope of the Operational Test and Evaluation Services (OTES) Performance Work Statement (PWS) Section 3.
1.1 BACKGROUND
In early 2003, the Joint Requirements Office (JRO) decided to administratively split the Joint Service Family of Decontamination System (JSFDS) into four sub-programs, one of which is JSPDS. The four programs are managed by Marine Corp Systems Command (MARCORSYSCOM) and share many of the same programmatic documents. AFOTEC Det 2 is the lead for conducting the Multi-Service OT&E (MOT&E) for JSPDS.
The JSPDS is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medical device. It is an individually carried skin decontamination kit consisting of three packets that fits in the warfighters pockets. It provides the same or greater capabilities (number of decontamination operations and area of coverage) as the currently fielded M291 Skin Decontaminating Kit (SDK). The JSPDS will be used by the warfighter to perform immediate decontamination of skin, field protective masks, mask hoods, chemical protective gloves and individual and crew served weapons under .50 caliber.
The JSPDS will be employed on the integrated battlespace as a means to reduce or eliminate Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear/Toxic Industrial Material (TIM) hazards posing threats to personnel conducting military operations. The JSPDS will be used for immediate decontamination, during Mission Oriented Protective Posture (MOPP) gear exchange, and during Detailed Troop Decontamination (DTD) operations. Immediate decontamination, also known as emergency decontamination, includes personal wipe down (including hood, mask, gloves, and individual equipment) and patient or casualty decontamination (excluding wounds for Increment I).
Reactive Skin Decontaminant Lotion (RSDL) was competitively selected for JSPDS Increment I. A full-spectrum decontamination system, the JSPDS will consist of both decontaminant(s) and applicator(s) required to immediately reduce morbidity and mortality resulting from Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) contamination of the skin. RSDL consists of a free oxime and potassium salt of an oxime, dissolved in a polyethylene glycol ethylether and water mixture. RSDL is an aqueous based solution and is provided in individually sized packets with a pre-impregnated foam pad that is used to apply the active, viscous, liquid lotion to the suspected contamination area.
2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
In addition to guidance in the PWS, Section 2.0, the following documents are applicable to this task order:
| 2.1 | JSPDS ORD |
| 2.2 | JSPDS TEMP |
| 2.3 | AFOTECMAN 99-101 |
| 2.4 | DoDD 5134.08 |
3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS Applicable to the basic effort and each option, if exercised.
3.1 Management. The contractor shall provide a management structure to accomplish this task order in compliance with the provisions in Section 3.1 of the PWS. (A001, A002, & A003)
3.2 Test Capability. (A003, A016, A017) The contractor shall:
3.2.1 Perform analysis of test capabilities. Activities include: identifying test capability requirements, documenting existing test capabilities, identifying shortfalls, performing trade-off analyses, and recommending approaches to solve issues.
3.2.2 Identify, develop, modify, validate, and/or verify modeling and simulation tools such as test support tools that simulate real world entities by means of computer models, hardware-in-the-loop simulators, human-in-the-loop simulators, test range facilities and simulators, installed system test facilities, and distributed interactive simulations.
3.2.3 Develop accreditation packages.
3.2.4 Maintain configuration management of developed and modified tools.
3.2.5 Provide Information Technology (IT) test support.
3.2.6 Identify, develop, and/or apply analytical techniques, methodologies, and tools for T&E.
3.2.7 Identify, develop, acquire, integrate, and/or specify state of the art instrumentation, recent breakthroughs in simulation hardware for ranges (live and virtual), and creative ways to use constructive simulations to answer operational questions.
3.3 Test Planning. (A003, A007, A008, A0009, A014, A016, A017) The contractor shall:
3.3.1 MOT&E Planning Services : Identify test capability requirements, existing test capabilities, and shortfalls. Conduct JSPDS MOT&E planning and provide a test plan that describes all test and assessment activities. Provide overall assessment planning services to AFOTEC for the MOT&E. The contractor shall attend meetings, IPTs and conferences.
3.3.2 Develop test documentation such as T&E plans, execution documents, and test and evaluation master plans (Sections 4&5) that address operational effectiveness, operational suitability, OIA for OT&E, and assessment objectives.
3.3.3 Develop Joint T&E plans. Identify test resource requirements, and prepare/update test resource plans. Support program, technical, and test readiness reviews.
3.3.4 Review test and evaluation considerations and document feedback for AFOTEC on program documents.
3.3.5 Review test planning documentation for technical adequacy. Review and comment on Program/T&E documentation.
3.3.6 Prepare, submit and/or revise AFOTEC portions of test documentation such as COIs, objectives, and measures.
3.3.7 Develop measures of effectiveness (MOE), measures of performance (MOP), and measures of suitability (MOS).
3.3.8 Develop data management and analysis plans (DMAP), test procedures, evaluation methodologies, analysis methods, and schedules. Provide multimedia data file management and archiving. Develop operational test scenarios.
3.3.10 Perform site surveys on potential test sites and develop site preparation requirements, such as defining site-specific installation, integration, preparation of environmental permit plans, and integration of AFOTEC equipment with equipment available from other agencies or host areas. Develop input requirements for range documentation (for example, Program Introduction Documents (PID)). Prepare PIDs. Evaluate statements of capability (SOC) for ability to meet program requirements, including cost, schedule, technical performance, and risk aspects.
Define instrumentation requirements, propose instrumentation solutions, and develop instrumentation to collect and store data. Define instrumentation requirements, propose instrumentation solutions, and develop instrumentation to collect and store data.
3.3.11 Provide environmental health and safety planning services for test programs addressing occupational health, and environmental concerns.
3.3.13 Develop and/or operate and maintain the required automated data collection/reduction systems. Assure configuration control of any software codes used by or in support of the evaluation activity.
3.4 Test Execution (A014 and A016): Conduct and execute each planned test event. The estimate is for three test events at three separate locations. Each test event will last approximately two weeks.
The contractor shall:
| 3.4.1 | Provide field operations services such as deployment/redeployment, tracking, requesting/scheduling of all resources, and overseeing general field test operations needed to achieve stated test objectives. Develop and conduct training for JSPDS MOT&E data collectors. |
| 3.4.2 | Provide test site surveys and perform site preparation such as defining site-specific installation, integration, preparation of environmental permit plans, and integration of AFOTEC equipment with equipment available from other agencies or host areas. |
| 3.4.3 | Provide safety services such as ground, flight, and environmental protection in compliance with safety, occupational health, and environmental concerns/regulations. |
| 3.4.4 | Prepare the draft OT&E plans. Execute the approved data management and analysis plans. Develop and deliver OT&E briefings and debriefings. Review and update OT&E documentation. |
| 3.4.6 | Provide evaluation services for special interest items as defined in AFOTECMAN 99-101 |
| 3.5 | Test Evaluation (A014 and A016): Test evaluation determines the extent to which the system under test meets the warfighters’ mission needs, in addition to system requirements as outlined in the program requirement documents. The contractor shall: |
| 3.5.1 | Compile, review, analyze and evaluate test data. Identify the impact of lost data. |
| 3.5.4 | Support a comprehensive correlation of test results to the mission decomposition. Determine effectiveness and suitability and assess the operational impact of that system. |
| 3.6 | Test Reporting (A003, A014, A016, and A017): Test reporting consists of communicating the analysis and evaluation of test results. Test reporting may be required in any multimedia format. |
The contractor shall prepare:
| 3.6.1 | Draft Test reports and documentation for inclusion in OT&E reports. |
| 3.6.2 | Status Report & Quick-look reports. |
| 3.6.3 | Briefings as a part of the report coordination process. Final reports from evaluation/assessment activities. |
| 3.6.4 | Lessons learned reports. |
4.0. Surveillance Matrix
Table 4.1. Surveillance Matrix
| Performance Objective |
| PWS Ref |
| Performance Threshold |
| Method of Assessment |
| Item 1: Provide responsive Task Order/team management including quick response to contingencies, to include timely and accurate task order document and report requirements, customer interaction and feedback, and contributions to meetings and reviews. |
| All |
| Contractor receives no more than three customer complaints per assessment period. Unsatisfactory performance must be resolved within 10 working days |
| Customer Complaint as validated by COR and PCO |
| Item 2: The Contractor must effectively monitor funding on each individual Task Order and effectively control the expenditures of all Other Direct Costs (ODCs). . |
| 3.1 |
| The Contractor can receive no more than three total customer complaints (substantiated by the COR and the PCO), to include timely CDRL delivery, per assessment period. Unsatisfactory performance must be resolved to the action within 10 working days |
| Customer Complaint as validated by COR and PCO |
| Item 3: The Contractor must be responsive to Government requirements, ensure PWS compliant performance, provide prompt identification and resolution of problems, effectively communicate concerns with the Air Force Contracting Officer Representative (COR)/Program Manager, and meet the delivery schedule required in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). |
| All |
| The Contractor can receive no more than three total customer complaints (substantiated by the COR and the PCO), to include timely CDRL delivery, per assessment period. Unsatisfactory performance must be resolved to the action within 10 working days |
| Customer Complaint as validated by COR and PCO |
| Item 4: Comply with applicable portions of the DD Form 254 for Task Order requirements. |
| All |
| Compliance is mandatory; no failures to meet security requirements are acceptable. Each security violation must be resolved to the government's satisfaction within 3 working days using the CDR process. |
| Customer Complaint as validated by COR and PCO |
| Item 5: Overall Quality of Performance: Contractor must efficiently perform all PWS tasks, including those requiring contributions to meetings and reviews. |
| All |
| No more than three total instances of failure to meet PWS requirements, listed in the above items per assessment period. |
| Customer Complaint as validated by COR and PCO |
5.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
5.1 Government Furnished Property – Base Support
Government Furnished Property (GFP)/Government Furnished Information (GFI). The government will provide, at Detachment 2, AFOTEC, Eglin, FL workstations; all necessary reference data; furnishings; equipment (to include computer hardware and software); and office supplies to the contractor. All materials will remain the property of the Government and will be returned to the COTR upon request or at the end of the Task Order period of performance.
5.2 Travel Requirements
Contractor employees may be required to travel to various locations, both CONUS and outside the continental United States (OCONUS), in performance of task orders. For OCONUS travel, contractor employees shall possess passports, visas, and medical clearance for designated operations areas. The Government will not directly reimburse the contractor for these types of expenses. Travel will be cost reimbursable (no fee) in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulation. Contractors will not be required to price any travel costs on task orders. The travel ceiling for this task order is $20K per year and is inclusive of all indirect costs and tax.
5.3 Transition
It is anticipated that some important work will be in progress through the phase-in and phase-out periods of this contract. Interruptions or delays to the work would impact the mission. It is essential that attention be given to minimizing any interruption; therefore, the contract must provide for maximum cooperation between successor and incumbent, while also insuring that no work receives inadequate attention during phase-in/phase-out. The contractor shall plan for the transfer of work control, delineating the method for processing and assigning tasks, during phase-in/phase-out.
5.3.1 Phase-In. As a successor, the OTES contractor shall insure a smooth transition with the incumbent Engineering and Technical Services (ETS) contractor(s) during the phase-in period. There will be no Phase-in if the successor contractor subcontracts to an ETS incumbent. The contractor shall develop plans for assumption of awarded task orders. The contractor must provide an orderly transition of work acceptance and accomplishment such that any impact to a program is minimized. The phase-in time period is 30 days and is the first month of the 12-month period of performance for the basic effort.
5.4 Deliverables. Delivery shall be made by electronic means compatible with AFOTEC software. All reports shall meet Det 2 standards for structure and content. The contractor shall provide the following reports to:
| AFOTEC Det 2/CS |
| 303W C Ave Ste 117 |
| Eglin AFB FL 32542 |
| 5.4.1 | Funds & Manpower Expenditure Report (A001). Due the tenth day after the end of the contractor’s reporting period. |
| 5.4.2 | Status Report (A002). Due the tenth day after the end of the contractor’s reporting period. |
| 5.4.3 | Conference Minutes/Trip Reports (A003). Conference minutes shall be developed for meetings held in the Det 2 facilities and identified in advance by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). A summary of other interchanges and technical services provided in support of this PWS shall be documented in a Trip Report. The contractor shall deliver the report to the COR within five working days after each conference/trip. |
| 5.4.4 | Environmental Permit (A007). The contractor shall prepare an environmental permit for each test location. The permit is due 30 working days prior to Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR). |
| 5.4.5 | Environmental Health and Safety Plan (A008). The contractor shall prepare an environmental health and safety plan as part of test planning and preparation. The permit is due 30 working days prior to Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR). |
| 5.4.6 | System Safety Hazard Analysis Report (A009). The contractor shall prepare a system safety hazard analysis report as part of test planning and preparation. Report is due 30 working days prior to Operational Test. |
| 5.4.7 | Presentation Material (A014): Briefing charts may be developed by the contractor to augment the technical reports, and or facilitate meetings. Format, delivery dates, and distribution will be determined by the COR prior to start work for each effort. |
| 5.4.8 | Scientific and Technical Reports (A016). The contractor will prepare a test plan outlining an overall strategy for the MOT&E according to program schedule requirements IAW AFOTECMAN 99-101. The contractor shall develop and deliver the DMAP according to program schedule requirements, as an attachment to the OT Plan IAW AFOTECMAN 99-101. |
The contractor shall develop and deliver test reports within 90 days after the last test event IAW AFOTECMAN 99-101
5.4.9 Technical Report – Study/Services (A017). The contractor shall develop and deliver a comment resolution matrix as required and applicable for all test document reviews as reviews occur. The contractor shall record and deliver to the COR all lessons learned as they transpire during all phases of testing, from planning to execution to reporting, that yield unexpected results. The contractor shall prepare a test resource plan IAW AFOTEC format and guidelines to support MOT&E activities. The contractor shall develop and deliver detailed test procedures listing day-to-day test activities supporting MOT&E activities 45 days prior to test.
5.6 Schedule / Period of Performance. Basic effort is 12 months, 1 Feb 12 through 31 Jan 13; Option 1 is 12 months, 1 Feb 13 through 31 Jan 14; Option 2 is 12 months, 1 Feb 14 through 31 Jan 15; Option 3 is 12 months; 1 Feb 15 through 31 Jan 16; Option 4 is 12 months, 1 Feb 16 through 31 Jan 17
6.0 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
6.1 Security Clearances
6.1.1 DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification applies to this task order.
6.1.2 The contractor may require access to classified source data up to and including Top Secret in support of this effort. Any extracts or use of such data will require the contractor to apply derivative classifications and markings consistent with the source from which the extracts were made IAW DoD 5220.22M, Industrial Security Manual for Safeguarding Classified Information and Executive Order 12356.
6.2 Safeguarding Information
The contractor shall:
6.2.1 Comply with DoD 5400.7-R, Chapter 4, DoD Freedom of Information Act Program, and AFI 33332, Privacy Act Program requirements. These regulations set policies and procedures for the disclosure of records to the public and for marking, handling, transmitting, and safeguarding official material.
6.2.2 Report to an appropriate authority any information or circumstances, of which they are aware, that may pose a threat to the security of DoD personnel, contractor personnel, resources, and/or classified or unclassified defense information. Contractor employees shall be briefed by their immediate supervisor upon their initial on-base assignment.
6.2.3 The contractor is prohibited from attaching any computer hardware to the Air Force network, or running any computer software unless it has been certified and accredited according to current USAF Instructions. Any such requests for reconfiguration, upgrade, or addition of computer hardware or software must be approved by the USAF Designated Approval Authority (DAA) Representative via the contractor's submission of a written request to the COR. Contractor use of computer modems, thumb drives, and external hard drives on any machine attached to the Air Force network is prohibited. Use of commercial internet service providers is prohibited.
6.2.4 Contractor personnel using computer assets shall comply with all computer security requirements. In addition, should contractor personnel require access to computer networks or databases, they shall inform the COR or Alternate COR, who will arrange for the contractor personnel to complete the required documentation for a new computer account. The contractor shall notify the COR or Alternate COR within one workday of any contractor personnel who no longer require an open account and shall take action to close the computer account with the appropriate office within that same workday.
6.2.5 All contractor personnel who will be using C4 systems belonging to the federal government to generate, process, store, transfer, or communicate information shall attend mandatory C4 systems security training. The format for the training may be either the Air Force C4 Systems Security Awareness Training program format or an in-house contractor program that meets DOD requirements, subject to agreement by the COR. The training must be completed within the first thirty calendar days of the start of the contract or within the first 10 calendar days for contracts that have duration of 60 days or less. The contractor shall inform the COR when the training has been completed. The notice shall include the contract number and any applicable task order number, names of contractor personnel who attended and dates of training.
6.2.7 The contractor shall immediately notify the COR of any government C4 system problems or issues which come to their attention which may impact the contractor's or the government's ability to access the systems.
6.2.8 No foreign nationals are authorized to work on this effort without prior written notification to the COR and PCO, and until approval is obtained from the PCO in accordance with current government policy and regulations.
6.2.9 All contractor personnel who require access to C4 systems are required to obtain a National Agency Check (NAC) consistent with Public Trust Positions (Standard Form 85P or most current form). The contractor may submit a request to the COR that the government grant contractor employee(s) interim access to the C4 network while awaiting the results of a NAC. Interim access to the C4 network will only be granted after the contractor employees obtain at least a local background files check, and have submitted the appropriate documentation to obtain a NAC. These requests will be processed in accordance with government information security regulations and policy, and must include Security Office and DAA Representative approval. These requests may be subject to disapproval. In no case will a contractor be given access to the network, including a group account, until a favorable NAC has been completed or interim access granted by the DAA Representative. Any interim accesses that may be granted may be rescinded at any time by the PCO, COR, Directorate Security Office or DAA Representative at the government’s discretion. Any individual who subsequently does not pass the requirements for a full NAC shall not be authorized to work under this effort.
7.0 ATTACHMENTS / MISC. INFO:
7.1 Environmental Controls. The contractor shall comply with all environmental requirements imposed by the Federal Government, the Air Force, and at locations where services are being performed. Such requirements are delineated in AF Policy Directive 32-70, “Environmental Quality”, and other laws and regulations.
7.2 Safety Requirements. The contractor shall comply with all safety requirements imposed by the Federal Government, the Air Force, and at locations where services are being performed. Such requirements are delineated in AFPD 91-2, “Safety Programs”, AFI 91-301, “AF Occupational and Environmental Safety, Fire Protection and Health Program”, and AFI 91-202, “USAF Mishap Prevention Program.”
7.3 Administrative Dismissal for Safety Reasons. The contractor will provide alternate work sites for personnel during local emergency situations when the Base Commander has declared an emergency and has stated personnel should not report to Base or should leave the Base during a workday. Local emergency conditions include inclement weather (i.e., snow, tornados, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc.). NOTE: Only the Base or AFOTEC Commander can declare such an emergency (not a Government Director, Division Chief, Site Commander, Program Manager, COR, PCO, etc.).
7.4 Performance of Services during crisis declared by the President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, or Overseas Combatant Commander. The performance of these services is not considered to be mission essential during time of crisis. Should a crisis be declared, the PCO or his/her representative will verbally advise the contractor of the revised requirements, followed by written direction.
7.5 Conflict of Interest. In accepting and performing the work required by this task order, and all amendments thereto, the contractor certifies that the requirements of clause AFFARS 5352.209-9000, Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) have been or will be adhered to. The contractor must immediately bring any OCI issues to the attention of the PCO for a determination of whether a mitigation plan is required.
8. WORKLOAD DATA: To be removed upon award.
A total of two (2) estimated Full-time Equivalents (FTEs) for this task order is provided based on historical data. This information is merely an estimate and is not considered mandatory. This data may not necessarily reflect manpower needed to perform this task order. The offeror shall propose the manpower as they determine appropriate for this task order. An FTE is defined as 40-hour workweek.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .