SOC_trainer_Solicitation.pdf

FA701419QA016

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

For

Secure Operations Console (SOC)

(i) This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. Simplified procedures as outlined in FAR Part

13.5 will be used for the acquisition of this commercial item.

(ii) This solicitation/synopsis is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ). Submit written proposals (oral quotes will not be accepted) reference number is FA701419QA016.

(iii) This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2019-03, Dated 12 Jun 2019.

(iv) This acquisition is 100% set-aside for small businesses. The associated North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541611 Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services with a $27.5 million size standard.

(v) The purpose of this combined synopsis and solicitation is to advertise the requirement to have an Offeror perform Secure Operations Console (SOC) Operator Trainer Services. The objective of this effort is to ensure we develop or modify, maintain and implement our ongoing training program to ensure we provide the Joint Staff (JS) with well-trained and prepared airmen for day-to-day mission support. The Secure Operator Console (SOC) must pass evaluation and certification by the JS Operations Training and Standards Evaluation (OT&SE) Branch. Additional objectives under this contract include: centralize database management supporting both the National Military Command Center (NMCC), and the Alternate NMCC; participation in the development of various NMCS exercises/exercise scenarios; provide monthly and yearly conference statistics; identify possible deficiencies with site equipment and/or personnel; conducting regularly scheduled monthly communications systems tests and assessments for all Emergency Actions communications systems. The trainer(s) will also be required to travel with the OT and SOC operators numerous times per year to maintain proficiency training at remote operating locations. The bid schedule is in the attached Excel spreadsheet (Attachment 4) for your convenience. The quote shall be submitted on company letterhead, and include at a minimum the following information:

• Solicitation Number

• Contact name

• Address

• Telephone number of the offeror

• Unit prices for the base year of performance and each option year

• Discount terms

• Cage code & DUNS Number

• Tax Identification Number (TIN) http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/12.htm#P292_49018 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/13.htm#P427_61446 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/13.htm#P427_61446

• Business Size.

All responsible sources may submit a quote, which shall be considered. A firm fixed price contract is contemplated.

(vi) Refer to the attached PWS for a detailed description of requirements for the service being acquired FA701419QA016 SOC Operator Trainer Services at the 844thCS/SCON, 1600 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20030. (See attached Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1))

(vii) Period of Performance is anticipated to be as follows:

Base Year: 16 September 2019 through 15 September 2020 Option Year 1: 16 September 2020 through 15 September 2021 Option Year 2: 16 September 2021 through 15 September 2022 Option Year 3: 16 September 2022through 15 September 2023 Option Year 4: 16 September 2023 through 15 September 2024 Six-Month Extension 16 September 2024 through 15 March 2025

(viii) (52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition. With the following addendum:

52.212-1 Addendum

The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the Offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts:

Part I – Technical Capability

(1) Qualification

(2) Staffing Plan/Technical, and

(3) Security

Part II – Price Proposal

Part III – Past Performance Information

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1403_190669 price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and, if in the contracting officer’s opinion adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists Offerors may be required to submit information other than certified cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness.

C. Specific Instructions:

Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully compliant and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (Item Numbers) and Performance Work Statement (PWS), and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award.

Part I – Technical Capability - Submit one (1) copy & one (1) redacted copy.

Factor 1. Technical- the Capability of the service offered to meet the Governments requirement. The offeror’s proposal shall, at a minimum, address the technical sub factors, as it applies to the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

a. Subfactor 1. Qualifications - The offeror shall provide a summary of positions that identifies the personnel resources and skill set proposed for the fulfillment of PWS requirements. The summary of positions shall address the knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs), experience, and qualifications outlined in section 3.0 of the PWS. The proposal must clearly quantify years of experience, must identify when the experience occurred and must describe how the proposed labor categories meet minimum KSA and experience levels identified in the PWS.

b. Subfactor 2. Staffing Plan/Technical - The offeror shall submit a detailed staffing plan.

The staffing plan shall explain the proposed number and categories of personnel and shall explain how that mix will be successful in performing the tasks in the PWS. The staffing plan shall demonstrate: (1) an adequate number and categories of personnel proposed to perform the services in the PWS; (2) the offeror’s plan to obtain personnel, minimize turnover and fill vacancies in accordance with the PWS; and (3) that the proposed labor categories are tied to specific PWS tasks.

c. Subfactor 3. Security - The offer shall clearly identify how it will meet and comply with the clearance requirements in section 7.0 of the PWS (Security Instructions). The offeror must hold the minimum facility clearance at the time of proposal submission and all http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm#P587_118401 personnel must hold the required clearances prior to commencing work on the task order.

A Rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable” will be assigned for each technical subfactor. An overall factor rating will not be completed.

Note: Failure to address any one or more areas of the technical proposal sub factors above will render your technical proposal unacceptable, and therefore, unawardable.

Part II – Price Proposal - Submit one (1) copy (Attachment 4). Offerors shall, at a minimum, submit their pricing on the attached Bid Schedule (Attachment 4). The offeror shall provide unburdened labor rates and fringe benefits for the labor categories.

Factor 2. Price – the Government will evaluate the total price of the offer for award purposes.

a. Offers will be evaluated for fairness &reasonableness, balance, and the unburdened labor rates will be evaluated for realism. Insert proposed unit and extended prices for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including all option periods and option to extend services in accordance with FAR 52-217-8. The offeror shall include a fully completed price schedule of the solicitation in this section of their proposal. Any offeror, which fails to cite a price for each item, or fails to make an entry, which indicates that work will be provided at no charge, will be rejected as non-compliant, and will not be considered for award to this solicitation. Only firm-fixed price offers will be evaluated. The staffing plan shall include a cross-matrix that assigns the proposed labor categories to specific PWS tasks and shall provide an unburdened rate (basic gross compensation rate) and fully burdened rate breakout information for all proposed labor categories to support price proposal. The unburdened labor rates for all proposed labor categories will be evaluated for realism based on the Washington DC area. Unrealistically, low unburdened labor rates may be grounds for eliminating an offeror’s proposal from competition.

b. Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Bid Schedule (Attachment 4). Unit prices must be whole dollar values (e.g. $10.00). The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. The proposal(s) must be submitted for a 1-year base plus four (4) Option Years.

c. (Options) - The Government will evaluate options in accordance with FAR clause 52.217- 5, Evaluation of Options, July 1990, as prescribed in FAR 17.208(c)(1). The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Offerors are required only to price the base and option CLINs.

Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential six-month extension of services period.

d. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provisions. All offerors shall include a completed copy of FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representation and Certifications -- Commercial Item (Oct 2018) or complete electronic annual representations and certifications at the System for Award Management http://www.sam.gov and it shall be http://www.sam.gov/ returned along with the proposal

e. Include the total dollar value of your proposal at the bottom of the bid schedule.

PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Only references for similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity are desired. Submit one (1) copy (Attachments 5 and 6).

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three (3) Years:

Provide information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, etc.

(b) Past Performance References: The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of the Offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will use information submitted by the Offeror and other sources such as other federal government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Provide a list of no more than three (3) of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation with a minimum of six (6) months of performance period. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

(c) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information, pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime Offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

(End of Addendum)

(i) 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition as follows:

52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Items (Jan 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1 - Technical Capability

Subfactor 1 - Qualification Subfactor 2 - Staffing Plan/Technical Subfactor 3 - Security

Factor 2 - Price

Factor 3 - Past Performance

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options including the option to extend service to the total price for the basic requirement.

The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

52.212-2 Addendum

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing Offerors’ technical capability, past performance history, and cost or price considerations will be evaluated. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process will proceed as follows:

A. Technical Capability: Initially, the government technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis assigning one of the ratings described below for the technical factor. If the technical factor is evaluated as “Unacceptable”, it will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. The term “technical” as used herein, refers to non-price factors other than past performance. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the Offeror’s proposal will satisfy the government’s minimum requirements.

The Government will use the following table to assess the contractor’s technical acceptability:

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements.

The following Technical Capability subfactors will be evaluated:

Qualification:

The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this technical subfactor if the Offeror’s proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s qualifications, personnel, and resource skill set to fulfil the PWS requirements. The offeror must clearly identify how it will meet and comply with the PWS in section 3.0 of the PWS (Task Requirements).The summary of positions shall address the knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs), experience, and qualifications outlined in section 3.0 of the PWS. The proposal must clearly quantify years of experience, must identify when the experience occurred and must describe how the proposed labor categories meet minimum KSA and experience levels identified in the PWS.

Staffing Plan/Technical:

The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this technical subfactor if the Offeror’s detailed staffing plan clearly explains the proposed number and categories of personnel and explains how that mix will be successful in performing the tasks in the PWS. The offeror must clearly identify how it will meet and comply with the PWS in section 3.0 of the PWS (Task Requirements). The staffing plan shall demonstrate (1) an adequate number and categories of personnel proposed to perform the services in the PWS; (2) the offeror’s plan to obtain personnel, minimize turnover and fill vacancies in accordance with the PWS; and must demonstrate (3) that the proposed labor categories are tied to specific PWS tasks.

Security:

The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this technical subfactor if offeror clearly identifies how it will meet and comply with the clearance requirements in section 7.0 of the PWS (Security Instructions). The offeror must hold the minimum facility clearance at the time of proposal submission and all personnel must hold the required clearances prior to commencing work on the task order.

B. Price Evaluation. Next, the government will rank all technically acceptable offers (and unacceptable offers with correction potential) by the total evaluated price (TEP). The government will verify the offeror’s proposed extended price by multiplying the quantities by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to confirm the total proposed price. The proposals will be evaluated based on the TEP. The offeror’s TEP will be evaluated for fairness & reasonableness, balance, and the unburdened labor rates will be evaluated for realism. The TEP consists of the total proposed price for all CLINs including Option CLINs for the five-year period (i.e. Base Period and all four (4) Option Periods). The six month extension under FAR 52.217-8, “Option to Extend Services,” will be evaluated; however, it is not part of the TEP. Offerors are not required to submit pricing for a six-month extension of services. The Government will calculate one-half of the last option year (i.e. Option Year 4) to evaluate the six month extension under FAR 52.217-8. Evaluation of the option period prices shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options

C. Past Performance. The contracting officer will seek recent and relevant performance information on all Offerors based on: (1) the references provided by the Offeror; and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources.

1. Relevant present/past performance is defined as effort involving a similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity as this solicitation requires. The government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced Offerors if none of the lower priced Offerors receives a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the Offeror’s ability to provide Secure Operations Console (SOC) Operator Trainer Services.

The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of “Substantial Confidence,” “Satisfactory Confidence,” “Limited Confidence,” “No Confidence,” or “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)” as defined in the table below. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement may be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal Offeror. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the Offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will receive the rating “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)”, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Performance Confidence will be evaluated in accordance with the following Table:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

2. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

Relevancy will be evaluated in accordance with the following table:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

3. If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance confidence assessment rating and the Offeror is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value to the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award will be made to that Offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

a. If the lowest priced Offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance confidence assessment rating, the next lowest priced Offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an Offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance confidence assessment or until all Offerors are evaluated. The Contracting Officer will then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

b. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

(ix) Include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items, with your offer.

(x) Clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition.

(xi) Clause at 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or Executive Orders -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition with the following clauses cited within the clause applicable to this acquisition:

52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Sept 2006), with Alternate I (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 253g and 10 U.S.C. 2402)

52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Jul 2013) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note) 52.209-6, Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Aug 2013) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (May 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d) (2) and (3)) 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 637(a) (14)) 52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C.

632(a) (2)) 52.222-3, Convict Labor (June 2003) (E.O. 11755) 52.222-19, Child Labor – cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Jan 2014) (E.O.

13126) 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Mar 2007) (E.O. 11246)

52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Jul 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212) 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (Jul 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (Jul 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212) http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1479_204463 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1760_244281 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1959_284871

52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (Dec 2010) (E.O. 13496) 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons. (Jan 2019) 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (Aug 2013). (Executive Order 12989).

52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (Aug 2011) (E.O. 13513) 52.225-13, Restriction on Certain Foreign Purchases (Jun 2008) (E.O.’s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury).

52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer— System for Award Management (Jul 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332) 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67.)

52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act—Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts) (May 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.)

(xii) The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by reference. Clauses with an asterisk indicate they will be incorporated by full text in the actual contract award (contact the CO with any questions you may have pertaining to the fill-in data if you feel it may have an effect on your proposal):

52.203-3 -- Gratuities (Apr 1984)

52.203-12- Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Oct 2010) 52.203-16 -- Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest (Dec 2011)

* 52.217-8 -- Option to Extend Services (Nov 1999)

* 52.217-9 -- Option to Extend the Term of the Contract. (Mar 2000)

* 52.222-42 -- Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires. (May 2014) 52.222-50 -- Combating Trafficking in Persons (Feb 2009)

52.222-17 -- Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers (May 2014) 52.222-62 – Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 52.232-23 -- Assignment of Claims (May 2014)

52.232-8 -- Discounts for Prompt Payment (Feb 2002) 52.323-18 -- Availability of Funds (Apr 1984)

52.232-34 -- Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer (Jul 2013)

52.232-40 -- Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (Dec 2013)

52.237-2 - Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation (Apr 1984) 52.233-1 -- Disputes (May 2014)

52.233-3 -- Protest After Award (Aug 1996) 52.246-4 -- Inspection of Services (Aug 1996)

* 52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions (Apr 1984)

* 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses (Apr 1984)

252.203-7000, Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DOD Officials (Sep 2011)

252.203-7002, Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights (Sep 2013)

252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product (Apr 1992)

252.204-7004 Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors. 2019-02

252.204-7012, Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information (Nov 2013) 252.209-7004 Subcontracting with Firms That Are Owned or Controlled by the Government of a Terrorist Country (Dec 2014) 252.211-7007 Reporting of Government-Furnished Property (Aug 2012)

252.225-7001 Buy American and Balance of Payments Program (Dec 2017)

252.243-7001 Pricing of Contract Modifications (Dec 1991) 252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration. (Apr 2012) 252.226-7001, Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns (Sep 2004)

252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests (Jun 2012)

* 252.232-7006 Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (May 2013) 252.232- 7010 Levies on Contract Payments (Dec 2006)

* 252.237-7023 Continuation of Essential Contractor Services (Oct 2010) 252.243- 7002, Request for Equitable Adjustment (Dec 2012)

* 5352.201-9101 Ombudsman (Apr 2014)

* 5352.223-9000 Elimination of Use of Class I Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) (Nov 2012) (No substances identified)

* 5352.223-9001 Health and Safety on Government Installations (Nov 2012)

* 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access To Air Force Installations (Nov 2012)

* 5352.242-9001 Common Access Cards (CAC) for Contractor Personnel (Nov 2012)

The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by full text:

52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference (Feb 1998)

This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address (es):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm

(End of Clause)

(xiii) Proposals are due by 1100 hours Eastern Time on 28 August 2019 via email to the Contracting Officer Agatha Hebbe, Contracting Officer, Phone (240) 612-6264, email agatha.w.hebbe.civ@mail.mil and Bettie F. Bowles at: bettie.f.bowles.ctr@mail.mil . Any proposal that arrives to the contracting office after 1100 hours Eastern Time on 28 August 2019 may not be considered for award.

(xv) If you have any questions about this solicitation, please submit them in writing no later than 14 August 2019. Please send questions to contracting officer, via email to the contracting officer Agatha Hebbe, Contracting Officer, Phone (240) 612-6264, email agatha.w.hebbe.civ@mail.mil and Bettie F. Bowles at: bettie.f.bowles.ctr@mail.mil .

(xvi) List of Attachments:

Attachment 1: SOC PWS Attachment 2: QASP Attachment 3: DD254 Attachment 4: Bid Schedule (Excel) Attachment 5: Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 6: Past Performance Information Form mailto:agatha.w.hebbe.civ@mail.mil mailto:bettie.f.bowles.ctr@mail.mil mailto:barbara.makamson.1@us.af.mil mailto:barbara.makamson.1@us.af.mil mailto:agatha.w.hebbe.civ@mail.mil mailto:bettie.f.bowles.ctr@mail.mil mailto:barbara.makamson.1@us.af.mil mailto:barbara.makamson.1@us.af.mil