FA7014-16-R-5007_-_Amendment_2_-_Q As.doc

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ITO

Addendum to FAR Provision 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors (ITO) – Commercial Items

1.0 Contract: This Contract is a competitive small business et-aside. This acquisition will result in a Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract which will have a three (3) year ordering period.

2.0 General Instructions:

2.1 ITO – Commercial Items:

2.1.1 The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by this ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in this solicitation. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in this ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal.

2.1.2 System for Award Management (SAM): Offerors will not be eligible to receive a contract award from a Department of Defense (DoD) activity unless they are registered in SAM. Offerors must be registered in the SAM Database prior to award of any contract. Firms must register on a one-time basis and annually confirm accuracy and completeness of registration information. On-line registration and instructions can be accessed at https://www.sam.gov/index.html.

2.1.3 Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provision FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items, shall be returned along with the proposal.

2. 2 Points of Contact: The Contracting Officer (CO), Bumjoon J. Pak and the Contract Specialist (CS), Cynthia I Harper are the sole points of contact for this acquisition. All questions or concerns on this requirement should be e-mailed to the CO and CS by 12:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on 29 April 2016. The CO may be reached via e-mail at bumjoon.j.pak.civ@mail.mil and the CS may be reached via e-mail at Cynthia.i.harper.ctr@mail.mil.

2.2.1 The Government intends to provide responses via solicitation amendment on www.fbo.gov NLT COB on 3 May 2016. The Government is not obligated to answer every question submitted by potential offerors. Any question submitted after the due date for receipt may not be answered by the Government. In addition, questions submitted after the due date for receipt of questions will not result in an extension of the proposal submittal date and time in order to answer a question received after the due date for submissions of offeror questions has passed.

2.3 All proposals shall be received (5 hard copies, plus CD-ROM or CD-R), by the CO or CS by 2:00 PM EDT on 24 May 2016. Proposals can be submitted by mail via common carrier or hand carried delivery. Submissions via e-mail will not be accepted.

Access to Joint Base Andrews for Delivery of Hand Carried Proposals:

Offerors may hand deliver proposals directly to the CS, Cynthia I Harper at 1500 W. Perimeter Rd STE 2720, between 10:00AM and 2:00PM EDT on Tuesday, 24 May 2016. Offerors who intend on hand delivering their proposal MUST complete the 11th Security Support Squadron Visitor Control Center Destination, Unofficial Visitor Base Pass Request, Attachment 2, and it must be returned to the CS no later than 12:00 PM EDT on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 to allow time for processing through the Visitor Center for base access. The main gate, off Allentown Rd., is the entry control point offerors must use. Please contact Cynthia I Harper via email cynthia.i.harper.ctr@mail.mil with any questions concerning the Visitor Base Pass or access to the base.

This process if for those vendors who do not have a current DoD CAC card or military ID. If you have a CAC or military ID it is highly recommended that you call the Visitor Center at 301-981-0689 to verify it will be accepted to enter the base.

SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS AS WELL AS MAILING BY COMMON CARRIER DUE TO POTENTIAL BASE MAILROOM DELAYS.

Mailing Instructions:

Complete proposals (all volumes including electronic media) and all requested copies shall be shipped together through certified mail using either United States Postal Service or FedEx to the address and POC shown below. To assure a timely and equitable evaluation, ALL proposals are due to the CS, NO LATER THAN 2:00, EDT on 24 May 2016. Delivery by USPS or FedEx of proposals must reach the CS by this time as well.

Offerors may hand deliver proposals directly to the CS, Cynthia I Harper at 1500 W. Perimeter Rd STE 2720, between 10:00AM and 2:00PM EDT on Tuesday, 24 May 2016.

The sealed package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date received by CO or CS (if hand carried), the Solicitation Number, and the name and address of the offeror. Offerors should notify the listed Points of Contact if they intend to hand deliver their proposal.

SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS AS WELL AS MAILING BY COMMON CARRIER DUE TO POTENTIAL BASE MAILROOM DELAYS.

AFDW/PKSB

Solicitation FA7014-16-R-5007 Attn: Mr. Bumjoon J. Pak/Ms. Cynthia I Harper

1500 West Perimeter Rd., Suite 2720

Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762

Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR Provision 52.212-1(f) Late Submissions, Modifications, Revisions and Withdrawals of Offers.

2.4 Communications: Exchanges of source selection information between Government and offerors will be controlled by the CO. E-mail will be used to transmit such information to offerors. The Government intends to send answers to questions by amendment to the solicitation and posted to www.fbo.gov.

2. 5 Amendments to Solicitation: If this RFP is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this request by the day and time specified in the amendment(s).

2.6 Oral Presentations: Oral Presentations will not be permitted.

2. 7 Period of Acceptance of Offers: The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for sixty (60) calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

2.8 Federal Holidays: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed:

· New Year’s Day

· Martin Luther King Day

· President’s Day

· Memorial Day

· Independence Day

· Labor Day

· Columbus Day

· Veterans Day

· Thanksgiving Day

· Christmas Day

3.0 Preparation Instructions to Offerors:

3.1 Introduction: The purpose of these instructions is to prescribe the format of proposals and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. They are designed to ensure the essential information required for evaluation of proposals is submitted. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government intends to make an award based on initial offers received without discussions.

3.2 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits: To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of five (5) separate volumes; Volume I – Technical Proposal, Volume II - Continuous Improvement Course (CPI), Volume III – Small Business Participation, Volume IV – Past Performance Proposal, Volume V – Price Proposal and as outlined below in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Vendor shall submit five (5) copies of all volumes outlined below:

Number

I

Representative resumes or

Curriculum Vitae (CV) for the Course Instructors outlined in the PWS Section 4.5 3 pages per proposed Course Instructor

Note: Use the Past Performance Information Form for all references. Attachment 3 is for the Past Performance Volume IV 9 total pages

(Applies to both Prime and subcontractor or teaming partner)

NOTE: The limitations do not apply to the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 5)

3.3 Specific Instructions:

3.3.1 Page Limitations: Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Blank pages, title pages, cover pages, table of contents, tab indexing, glossaries, list of tables and figures, and subcontractor consent letter(s) are not included in page limitation. Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures may be used to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc.

3.3.2 Page Size and Format: A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8½ x 11 inches. Pages shall be single-spaced and typed, except for displays and the reproduced sections of the solicitation document. The font shall be Times New Roman and no less than 12 point in size. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. When text is included within displays, it may be no smaller than 8 point, but must be clearly legible without magnification, as determined solely by the CO. The size of these displays shall not exceed the page size as defined above. Do not include foldout pages. The page size and format restrictions shall also apply to responses to Evaluation Notices. These limitations shall apply to both CD-ROM and CD-R and hard copy proposals.

3.3.3 CD-ROM or CD-R Copies: The Offeror is to submit one (1) copy of the final submission to include each volume (I to V) on CD-ROM or a CD-R disk. Do not compress any files. Do not submit your proposal on a flash drive or CD-RW media. The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. Electronic storage media shall be submitted in one of the following formats: pre-recorded (pressed) CD-ROM or CD-R (No CD-RWs). Each volume shall be in a different directory on a CD. One electronic copy of the proposal shall be submitted in the following formats: Microsoft (MS) Word 2010, MS Excel 2010, or MS-Power Point 2010, or Portable Document Format (PDF), as applicable.

3.3.4 Title Page: Each volume must include a title page. The title pages must show:

· Solicitation Number

· Name, address, telephone numbers and e-mail address of the offeror

3.3.5 Cross-Referencing: The proposal volumes shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross referencing to another volume. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

3.3.6 Indexing: Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections and will not count against page limitations IAW paragraph 3.3.1 above.

3.3.7 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms: Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. As stated above in paragraph 3.3.1, glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

3.3.8 Responsive: Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with the terms and conditions of the solicitation or may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

4.0 Proposal Volume Instructions: The following details the specific instructions for each volume.

4.1 Volume I, FACTOR I – Technical Approach:

4.1.1 Executive Summary (Volume I - NTE 2 pages)

The Executive Summary of the entire proposal should be concise, to include addressing the significant risks, and highlighting any key or unique features, excluding price. The salient features should tie in with evaluation factors. Any summary material presented here shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any portions of other volumes of the proposal.

4.1.2 Format and Specific Content

4.1.2.1 Volume Organization

The Technical volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

(1) Table of Contents

(2) List of Table and Drawings

(3) Glossary

(4) Cross Reference Matrix

4.1.3 Technical Approach (NTE 25 pages):

The Government will evaluate technical approach to determine offeror’s overall understanding, program management, staffing and capability to successfully create and execute a Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) Executive Leadership Course. In determining which rating to apply to the technical approach, the Government will evaluate the approach, schedule, learning methodologies and case studies that will be incorporated into the course to achieve the stated objectives. The Technical Approach will evaluate the CPI course that will provide/deliver a 2-day live, instructor led course, including training materials on the Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) for Executive Leadership as outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to an audience of executive leadership who support SAF/MG and their shareholders. The submission of a current CPI course to be evaluated as part of the technical approach as outlined below:

The Technical Approach will include the submission of a current Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) CPI course (Volume IV) IAW the PWS.

4.1.4 Volume II, Continuous Improvement Process (CPI) Executive Training Course (Unlimited)

The CPI Training Course shall be evaluated as part of the Technical Approach but shall be submitted as a separate volume with no limitations on number of pages.

(i) The vendor shall submit a full version of a current or recently taught CPI Training Course for Volume III. This course shall contain all information, course material, course outline, information on the class participation that would be presented to the Executive Leadership. The delivery of a current taught CPI Course adapted to the Air Force to include SAF/MG and executive leadership or shareholders attending this training shall be a submission to this solicitation with no page limitations. The contractor's CPI Course will be evaluated based on the professional level CPI Course containing the Course Content Areas outlined IAW the PWS, and needs only minimal changes to adapt the course to be appropriate for the target audience outlined in the PWS.

*Technical volume submissions shall NOT contain any Pricing information.

4.2 Volume III, FACTOR 2 Small Business Plan (NTE 5 pages)

(1) The extent of participation of small businesses to include service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns in performance of the contract shall be evaluated under this factor.

The offeror’s Small Business Participation Plan will be incorporated into and become part of the contract.

If the offeror is other than a small business, the offeror's Small Business Subcontracting Plan submitted in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, or Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan submitted in accordance with DFARS 219.702, shall also be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror identifies and commits to the participation of Small Businesses (SB), Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU), and Minority Institutions (MI) whether as joint venture members, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. Failure to submit such a plan will render the offeror ineligible for award. Failure to submit such a plan will render the offeror ineligible for award.

4.3 Volume IV, FACTOR 3 – Past Performance:

4.3.1 Recent and Relevant Contracts: Offeror shall provide past performance information on no more than three (3) contracts/ work efforts which are considered relevant in similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities in accordance with the relevancy criteria stated within the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation, Section 2.3. The scope and magnitude of this requirement can be broadly defined by the tasks in the PWS. Offeror should consider subcontractor past performance submission if their proposal includes substantial subcontracting efforts. To be recent, the effort must have at least six (6) months of continuous active contract performance within the last three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Offeror’s proposal shall provide examples of past performance that indicates a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the acquisition.

4.3.1.1 Offeror shall furnish the following information for each contract submitted:

· Company/Division name

· Description of service and a detailed explanation of relevance to this requirement

· Contracting Agency/Customer point of contact or reference having knowledge of contract performance

· Contract Number

· Contract Type and Dollar Value (per year cost and life cycle cost)

· Designation as prime or subcontractor

· List of significant subcontractors

· Period of Performance

· Completion Date

· Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the Contracting Officer

· Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

· Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

· Questionnaire log including the name, address, telephone number and e-mail address for each point of contact to whom the Past Performance Questionnaire was sent for completion

4.3.1.2 Offerors are cautioned to ensure respective past performance information submitted is RECENT from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Any past performance information submitted over the maximum five (5) contracts (including prime and subcontractors) will be disregarded in its entirety.

4.3.2 Teaming Arrangement: If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide a summary as to the overall arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. The teaming arrangement summary is excluded from the Past Performance Volume page count.

4.3.3 Past Performance Questionnaires and Cover Letter: Past Performance Questionnaires and Cover Letter (RFP Attachments 4 and 5) shall be sent to the offeror’s points of contact (POC). The offeror should make its best effort to send out a sufficient number of past performance questionnaires to reasonably expect the CO will receive at least one questionnaire on each cited contract/work effort. The questionnaire recipient will e-mail completed questionnaires directly to the contracting office listed on the questionnaire. Offerors shall not complete any information in the Past Performance Questionnaire and questionnaires received directly from offerors will not be evaluated. Past Performance Questionnaires are requested to be received in the issuing office by 2:00 pm EDT on 24 May 2016 from the POC listed on the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 5). Late submissions on the questionnaire may not be used for the evaluation.

4.3.4 Quality of Past Performance: The Government reserves the right to obtain information relative to present and past performance on its own, in addition to information provided by the offeror. The quality of an offeror’s past performance may be reviewed and evaluated through the use of systems such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of this acquisition or other sources or databases known to the Government. Interviews may be conducted with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, Fee Determining Officials, Defense Contract Management Agency or other sources known to the Government.

4.3.5 Subcontractor Consent Letter: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor. The subcontractor consent letter(s) is excluded from the Past Performance Volume page count.

4.4 Volume V, FACTOR V - Price:

4.4.1 General Instructions

4.4.2 Price Reasonableness

This section is to assist you in submitting data other than certified cost or pricing data that is required to evaluate the reasonableness, and the balance of your proposed price. Compliance with these requirements is mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of your proposal. Note that unrealistically low or high proposed prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement or has submitted an unrealistic proposal. Additionally, unbalanced pricing poses an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror’s proposal. Offers should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness and the proposed price. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed prices rests with the offeror.

4.4.3 Price Data

Data beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your price position. All data relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting documentation, must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price volume. Under no circumstances shall this data and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal.

4.4.4 Cost or Pricing Data Requirements

In accordance with FAR 15.403-1(b) and 15.403-3(a), data other than certified cost or pricing data may be required to support a determination of price reasonableness. Data shall be provided in accordance with FAR 15.403-5. If, after receipt of proposals, the CO determines that there is insufficient data available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 apply, the offeror shall be required to submit additional cost or pricing data.

4.4.5 Rounding

All dollar amounts provided shall be rounded to the nearest dollar. All loaded labor rates shall be rounded to the nearest penny.

4.4.6 Volume Organization

The Price volume shall consist of the following sections:

SECTION 1 ‑ Table of Contents; summary descriptions of estimating, purchasing, and accounting systems; changes to estimating, accounting practices, or Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Disclosure Statement if applicable.

SECTION 2 – Data other than certified cost or pricing data, to include estimating methodology.

4.5 General Information:

4.5.1 Discrepancies: If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the omission or error. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. Accordingly, offerors are advised to submit initial proposals that are fully and clearly acceptable without additional information. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.

4.5.2 Debriefings: Offerors excluded at any time during the source selection process will be afforded the opportunity to request a post-award debriefing in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(l). Information relating to other offerors proposals will not be disclosed.

4.5.3 Use of Contractor on Staff Supporting Requirement in Source Selection: Offerors are advised that technical and price data submitted to the Government in response to this solicitation may be released to non-government advisors for review and analysis. A warranted Government Contracting Officer will review all analysis and approve all contractual documents.

The non-government advisor support may be provided by:

Dawson Technical LLC, http:// www.dawson8a.com 1101 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 600

Washington, DC 20004

Program Management Solutions www.pmsolutions-llc.com 42233 St. Huberts PL

Chantilly, VA 20152-4117

4.5.3.1 Submission of proposal will constitute acceptance of the statement in paragraph 4.5.3.1.2

Or Offeror’s shall provide written objection to disclosure as indicated in paragraph 4.5.3.1.1. If the

Offeror objects to disclosure of a portion of the proposal, the consent in 4.5.3.1.2 should be provided for the remainder of the proposal.

4.5.3.1.1 Any objection to disclosure:

· Shall be provided in writing to the Contracting Officer within 5 days of RFP issuance; and

· Shall include a detailed statement of the basis for the objection. The detailed statement shall identify the specific portions of the proposal the offeror objects to disclosure to non-government advisors.

4.6.3.1.2 “I understand technical and price data submitted to the Government in response to this solicitation may be released to non-government advisors. I consent to release of any (unless objection is provided in 4.4.3.1.1 above) proprietary, confidential, or privileged commercial or financial data provided in response to this solicitation, to non-government advisors for review and analysis.”

4.5.3.2 The Contracting Officer shall evaluate any objection to disclosure and make a determination whether the non-government advisor(s) shall be permitted to participate in the source selection. The Contracting Officer shall inform the objecting offeror of the final determination, and, if the use of non-government advisors has been changed, shall inform all offerors of the change.

SAMPLE Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Letter for the Release of Past Performance Information to the Prime Contractor Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent. Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime contractor during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government’s Past Performance evaluation team in assessing your recent past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent letter be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent letters should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume.

SAMPLE

Dear “Contracting Officer:”

We are participating as a (insert “subcontractor” or “teaming partner”) with (insert name of prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, (insert name of Air Force Base), Request for Proposal (insert RFP number - XXXXXX-XX-R-XXXX) for (insert name of program or acquisition).

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent letter to allow you to discuss our past performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Company Name:

Address:

CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER

Past performance information concerning private sector contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners cannot be disclosed to the government without their consent. Client authorization letters are required for each identified effort for a commercial customer. This letter will authorize release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance. The government will need that consent before contacting commercial customers to assess the offeror’s past performance. In an effort to assist the Government's Past Performance evaluation team in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following client authorization letter be completed by any commercial customers identified in your proposal. The completed client authorization letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.

Offerors should send with their list of references a letter similar to the following authorizing the reference to provide past performance information to the Government.

Dear “Client:”

We are responding to a Department of the Air Force, XXX Air Force Base, Request for Proposal XXXXXX-XX-R-XXXX for the XXXXXX contract.

In their acquisitions, the government is placing increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor. They are requiring those clients of entities responding to their solicitation to be identified, and their participation in the evaluation process is requested. In the event that you are contacted for information on work performed, you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries.

We have identified Mr./Ms.____________________________ of your organization as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge of our work. Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to

Sincerely, SECTION B

SECTION B – SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

CONTRACT MINIMUM AMOUNT/BEST ESTIMATED QUANITY/MAXIMUM AMOUNT

a) The Minimum Amount of this contract is: $2,500.00.

b) The Best Estimated Quantity (BEQ) of this contract is:

One (1) each Course Content Development (CLIN 0001)

Six (6) each Course Delivery in the Basic Period (CLIN 0002)

Six (6) each Course Delivery in the First Option Period (CLIN 1002)

Six (6) each Course Delivery in the Second Period (CLIN 2002) One (1) each Level II Course Refinement in the Base Year (CLIN 0003)

One (1) each Level II Course Refinement in the First Option Period (CLIN 1003)

One (1) each Level II Course Refinement in the Second Option Period (CLIN 2003)

Three (3) Expanded Content Executive Leadership Course Base Year (0004)

Three (3) Expanded Content Executive Leadership Course Option Year One (1004)

Three (3) Expanded Content Executive Leadership Course Option Year One (2004) The BEQ is not a representation to an offeror or contractor that the estimated quantity will be required or ordered.

c) The Maximum Amount of the number of individual course training events shall not exceed twelve (12) per ordering period, including the dollar value of all options, is: $150,000.00 per task order issued.

Note A – CLINs 0002, 1002 and 2002, Air Force CPI Leadership Training Course Delivery. The quantity, location, and period of performance of the course delivery will be stated in individual Task Orders issued under the terms of this contract.

Table B-1

Air Force CPI Leadership Training Course Delivery Pricing

(FIRM FIXED PRICE)

SAN ANTONIO, TX

NATIONAL CAPITOL REGION

DAYTON, OH

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

*Contractor Specified Location

*The Contractor specified location.

Note B – CLINs 0003, 1003 and 2003, Air Force CPI Leadership Training Course Refinement. The quantity, scale, and period of performance of the course refinement will be stated in individual Task Orders issued under the terms of this contract. The scale of course content refinement shall reflect the level of sustentative change from the then-current SAF/MG approved Air Force CPI Leadership Training Course content to the revised course content which addresses student feedback. Any approved course refinement changes shall not vary the duration or primary academic focus of the course content.

Changes in the order of presentation or corrections in grammar, and comparable minor revisions affecting less than 5% of the then-current SAF/MG approved Air Force CPI Leadership Training Course content are determined to be within the scope of CLINs 0002, 1002 and 2002, and shall be performed by the Contractor at no additional cost to the Government.

Table B-2

Air Force CPI Leadership Training Course Refinement Pricing

(FIRM FIXED PRICE)

Level I – 5-10% of Content Refined

Level II – 11-15% of Content Refined

Level III – 16-20% of Content Refined

Level IV – 21-25% of Content Refined

Level V – 26-30% of Content Refined

Table B-3

Air Force Expanded Content Leadership Training Course Delivery Pricing

(FIRM FIXED PRICE)

SAN ANTONIO, TX

NATIONAL CAPITOL REGION

DAYTON, OH

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

*Contractor Specified Location

*The Contractor specified location.

Note C – CLINs 0004, 1004 and 2004, Air Force Expanded Content Leadership Training Course Refinement. The quantity, scale, and period of performance of the course refinement will be stated in individual Task Orders issued under the terms of this contract. The scale of course content refinement shall reflect the level of sustentative change from the then-current SAF/MG approved Air Force CPI Leadership Training Course content to the revised course content which addresses student feedback. Any approved course refinement changes shall not vary the duration or primary academic focus of the course content.

(End of Summary of Changes)