FA6703-16-R-0008-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide questions & answers from the Site Visit conducted on 11 Aug 2016.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Sep-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA6703-16-R-0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Aug-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 2 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Sep-2016

CODE

94 CONF/LGC - FA6703

1538 ATLANTIC AVENUE

DOBBINS ARB GA 30069-4917

FA6703 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA6703-16-R-0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 12-Sep-2016 02:00 PM to 16-Sep-2016 02:00 PM.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Orientation/Phase-In Period 30 Sep - 30 Nov 2016.

To:

Orientation/Phase-In Period 15 Oct - 30 Nov 2016..

The following have been modified:

B-1 ORIENTATION PERIOD

Date of Orientation: 15 Oct 2016 – 30 Nov 2016. The contractor shall enter below a one-lot price for the orientation period. Orientation is anticipated to be approximately 60 days; however, since the required orientation tasks are not dependent upon the number of days allowed, the orientation price is for one lot, regardless of the actual number of days realized. Accordingly, no price adjustment will be negotiated for any change in the actual number of days in the orientation period.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC

POP 30-SEP-2016 TO

30-NOV-2016

N/A 94 CONF/LGC (SHEFFIELD)

PATRINA D. SHEFFIELD

1538 ATLANTIC AVENUE

DOBBINS ARB GA 30069-4917

678-655-5778 FOB: Destination

FA6703

To:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC

POP 15-OCT-2016 TO

30-NOV-2016

N/A 94 CONF/LGC (SHEFFIELD)

PATRINA D. SHEFFIELD

1538 ATLANTIC AVENUE

DOBBINS ARB GA 30069-4917

678-655-5778 FOB: Destination

FA6703

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (MAY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

Document type means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF).

Local processing office (LPO) is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system is the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall--

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://www.acquisition.gov; and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this Web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/.

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via Web entry, Electronic Data Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor must use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract/order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall use the following document type(s).

Invoicing/Receiving Report Combo

(2) Inspection/acceptance location. The Contractor shall select the following inspection/acceptance location(s) in WAWF, as specified by the contracting officer.

Government/Government

(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.

Routing Data Table* Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF Pay Official DoDAAC F87700 Issue By DoDAAC FA6703 Admin DoDAAC FA6703 Inspect By DoDAAC SEE SCHEDULE (5 - WAWF email notifications) Ship To Code N/A Ship From Code N/A Mark For Code N/A Service Approver (DoDAAC) SEE SCHEDULE Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) SEE SCHEDULE Accept at Other DoDAAC N/A LPO DoDAAC N/A DCAA Auditor DoDAAC N/A Other DoDAAC(s) N/A

(4) Payment request and supporting documentation. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes appropriate contract line item and subline item descriptions of the work performed or supplies delivered, unit price/cost per unit, fee (if applicable), and all relevant back-up documentation, as defined in DFARS Appendix F, (e.g. timesheets) in support of each payment request.

(5) WAWF email notifications. The Contractor shall enter the email address identified below in the “Send Additional Email Notifications” field of WAWF once a document is submitted in the system.

INSPECT BY ACCEPTOR/APPROVAL

FA6703: Patrina Sheffield, patrina.sheffield@us.af.mil Same as Inspect By F5B155: Elvin Rivera, elvin.rivera@us.af.mil Lt Col John Jones, John.Jones.1@us.af.mil F5B323: Seth Allen, Joseph.allen.22@us.af.mil J Campos, j.campos@us.af.mil F5B340: (Tabs C & D):

Kelly Denger, kelly.denger.2@us.af.mil Dallas Godfrey, Dallas.Godfrey@us.af.mil (Tabs B & G)

Mark Young, mark.young.3@us.af.mil Willie Daniel, Willie.Daniel@us.af.mil

(g) WAWF point of contact. (1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity's WAWF point of contact.

Dave Ball, david.ball.1@us.af.mil, 678.655.4982

(2) For technical WAWF help, contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988.

(End of clause) mailto:patrina.sheffield@us.af.mil mailto:elvin.rivera@us.af.mil mailto:John.Jones.1@us.af.mil mailto:Joseph.allen.22@us.af.mil mailto:j.campos@us.af.mil mailto:kelly.denger.2@us.af.mil mailto:Dallas.Godfrey@us.af.mil mailto:mark.young.3@us.af.mil mailto:Willie.Daniel@us.af.mil mailto:david.ball.1@us.af.mil

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Work

Statement

279 16-JUN-2016

Attachment 10 Department of Labor Wage Determination, CBA-2014-6619

42 21-APR-2014

Attachment 11 Pre-Authorization Group/Access Form

DARB4

1 14-JUN-2013

Attachment 2 Government Furnished Equipment Listing

5 05-APR-2016

Attachment 3 Contract Security Classification

Attachment 4 Pricing Matrix 10 01-JUL-2016 Attachment 5 Statement of Equivalent

Rates

1 18-MAY-2016

Attachment 6 Department of Labor Determination, 2015-4471 Rev 2

10 17-JUN-2016

Attachment 7 Department of Wage Decision, Building

GA134

6 20-MAY-2016

Attachment 8 Department of Labor Decision, Heavy

GA160079

4 11-MAR-2016

Attachment 9 Department of Labor Decision, HIghway

GA16003

4 08-JAN-2016

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Dobbins PWS Revision 1 280 25-AUG-2016 Attachment 10 Department of Labor

Wage Determination, CBA-2014-6619

42 21-APR-2014

Attachment 11 Pre-Authorization Group/Access Form

DARB4

1 14-JUN-2013

Attachment 12 Vehicle Master List

(VML)

8 24-AUG-2016

Attachment 13 Solicitation FA6703-16- R-0008 Questions & Answers

62 31-AUG-2016

Attachment 2 Government Furnished Equipment Listing

5 05-APR-2016

Attachment 3 Contract Security Classification

Attachment 4 Pricing Matrix 12 24-AUG-2016 Attachment 5 Statement of Equivalent

Rates

1 18-MAY-2016

Attachment 6 Department of Labor Determination, 2015-4471 Rev 2

10 17-JUN-2016

Attachment 7 Department of Wage Decision, Building

GA134

6 20-MAY-2016

Attachment 8 Department of Labor Decision, Heavy

GA160079

4 11-MAR-2016

Attachment 9 Department of Labor Decision, HIghway

GA16003

4 08-JAN-2016

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

L-1 PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

Section L – Instructions to Offerors

I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

(A) General Information: This section of the Information to Offerors (ITO) provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror’s proposal must contain all data and information requested by the ITO and be submitted IAW the instructions contained herein. Failure to follow the prescribed format and instructions or failure to submit the specific required information may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

(B) Point of Contact: The Contracting Officer (CO) is the sole point of contract for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns to the CO. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO via email. Email is the preferred method of communication. The CO for this acquisition is as follows:

Juanita Steinmetz 255 Richard Ray Blvd Robins AFB, GA 31098-1637 Commercial Phone: 478-327-1606 Email address: juanita.steinmetz@us.af.mil

(C) Discrepancies: If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

mailto:juanita.steinmetz@us.af.mil

(D) Debriefings: The CO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range; whereupon, they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award debriefing. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

(E) Organization/Distribution/Number of Copies/Page Limits:

(1) Proposal Organization:

(a) The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth below.

(i) The titles and content of the volumes should be as defined.

(ii) All proposal volumes (original, paper copies, e-copies) identified shall be delivered to the address specified in paragraph I(B) of section L of the SF33 by the date and time specified in Block 9 of the SF33.

(b) Specific format requirements are identified in paragraph I(E)(2)(a)(ii) Proposal Format of section L.

(c) The contents of each proposal volume are described in the respective paragraphs of this ITO.

Table 1. Proposal Organization Table Proposal Volume

Title Page Limit Original Paper Copies

Electronic Copies

I Administrative/Contract Documentation

Master Table of Contents Unlimited 1 1 1 Standard Proposal Information Unlimited 1 1 1 Validity Information Unlimited 1 1 1 Contact Information Unlimited 1 1 1 Teaming Arrangements and/or Letters of

Intent (NOTE: Joint Venture agreements under mentor-protégé arrangements and some 8(a) Joint Ventures require SBA District approval fo the arrangement. Otherwise, the “joint Venture” contractor will be unawardable.)

Unlimited 1 1 1

Exceptions to Terms and Conditions Unlimited 1 1 1 Completed Section K Unlimited 1 1 1 Clause 52.214-16 Unlimited 1 1 1 II Technical Capabilities 80 (See

Note 1)

Standard Proposal Information Unlimited 1 3 1 Quality Control Plan 1 3 1 Resource/Management Plan 1 3 1 Note 1: The 80 page limit shall be divided among the plans at the offerors discretion.

https://cs.eis.af.mil/airforcecontracting/knowledge_center/Documents/AFFARS_Library/5315/templates/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR15.DOC#b15505

Proposal Volume

Title Page Limit Original Paper Copies

Electronic Copies

III Price Proposal Unlimited 1 1 1 Accounting System Unlimited 1 1 1 Financial Statement Unlimited 1 1 1 Pricing Data: Complete RFP, properly executed SF 33, properly executed SF 30(s) as applicable, completed Attachment 4 Pricing Matrix

Unlimited 1 1 1

2. Proposal Format:

(a) Guidance.

(i) All requirements specified in this solicitation are mandatory.

(ii) Simply restating that the offeror understands and intends to comply with this effort or paraphrasing statements in the solicitation is inadequate.

(b) Sufficient Detail.

(i) The proposal must be clear, concise, and legible; contain sufficient detail for accomplishing effective evaluation and substantiating validity of claims.

(ii) Offerors must assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their capabilities and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

(c) Elaborate Presentations Not Desired. Elaborate documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

(d) Pricing Information: All cost and pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Price Proposal Volume.

(e) No Cross-Referencing.

(i) Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

(ii) In Volume II, do not cross reference between the individual plans (Quality Control and Resource/Personnel

Management). Each plan shall stand alone, identify and address all Functional Tabs.

(iii) Information required for proposal evaluation, which is not found in its designated volume, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

(iv) Each response to each factor shall be self-contained. No cross-referencing between factor responses is permitted.

(f) Table of Contents.

(i) Each volume shall contain detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume.

(ii) Master Tables of Contents: Volume I, Contract/Administrative, shall contain a consolidation of the individual Table of Contents from all Volumes (I through III).

(iii)The Tables of Contents will not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

(g) Proposal Copies

(i) All Prime Offeror and Teaming partner information must be incorporated into one comprehensive submittal.

(ii) Staples shall not be used.

(iii) Be sure to identify appropriate markings such as the legend at FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data.

(h) Electronic Copies (E-Copies)

(i) The Offeror shall submit one CD-ROM or DVD with all three proposal volumes containing all of the required information in Section L, paragraph I1(E), Table 1. Proposal Organization Table. These electronic copies shall not be linked to any other document. The CD-ROM or DVD and protective sleeve shall be clearly marked as to Offerors’ name, solicitation title, and solicitation number. The format shall be Microsoft Office compatible.

(ii) The CD-ROM or DVD and “Original” paper proposals will be used for proposal evaluation. The

Government will not perform a word-by-word check of the “Original” proposal versus the CD-ROM or DVD.

However, if discrepancies are identified between the electronic proposal and the “Original” paper proposal, the paper proposal shall prevail. Offerors shall ensure electronic copies on CD-ROM or DVD are virus-free.

(iii)Sound or video (e.g. MPEG) files shall not be embedded into the proposal files.

(i) Page Format Restrictions and Limitations

(i) All pages shall be printed double-sided on recycled paper as much as practical. For example, original letters are exempted from the double-sided requirement.

(ii) Pages shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts.

(iii) Text pages shall be portrait-oriented. Graphics and tables may be landscape-oriented if required to properly present the information.

(iv) Pages shall be typed with at least single line spacing.

(v) Times New Roman, Arial, or similar font preferred. The font size shall be no less than 12 point except table cell, chart, graph or figure labels or text in tables, charts, graphs or figures shall be no smaller than 8 point.

(vi) Margins on all four edges of each sheet will be at least one inch.

(vii) Proprietary statements, security markings, and page numbers may fall within the defined margin area.

(viii) Each volume shall be numbered consecutively with volume and page number, e.g. I-1, I-2, II-1, II-2, etc., except the Technical Capabilities volume.

(ix) The Technical Capabilities volume shall be alpha-numerically numbered by PWS Tab, e.g., A-1, A-2, B-1, and B-2, etc.

(x) Any proposal revisions shall be accomplished with replacement pages, which have changes, clearly indicated by a vertical line in the right margin. Replacement pages shall also be individually dated.

(xi)These page format restrictions shall apply to responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs).

(j) Foldouts

(i) Foldout pages may only be used for large tables (Including Pricing Matrix Spreadsheets), charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics.

(ii) Foldout pages may not be used for pages of text.

(iii) Legible tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, schematics and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, etc.

(iv) Each printed side of a foldout will count as two pages.

(v) For tables, charts, graphs, and figures, the font shall be no smaller than 8 point.

(vi) Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume.

II. VOLUME I – ADMINISTRATIVE/CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION

1. Volume Organization

(a) Contact Information

1. Provide address, phone number, fax number, proposal POC and email address for the proposing prime and each of the teaming members.

(b) Teaming Arrangements and/or Letters of Intent

1. Provide all teaming arrangements and letters of intent for the first level subcontractors to receive credit for performing as a teaming member.

III. VOLUME II – TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES (QUALITY CONTROL RESOURCE/PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT)

1. Volume Organization: Evaluation Factor 1 – Technical Capabilities

(a) General

1. The Technical Capabilities Volume shall be no more than 80 pages.

2. The Technical Capabilities Volume must be specific and complete without references to price.

3. Legibility, clarity and coherence are important.

4. Responses will be evaluated against the Technical Capabilities Factor defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award, for each Sub-Factor.

5. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.

2. Specific Instructions: At a minimum the Technical Capabilities Volume shall address the following Sub-factors:

Sub-factor 1.1: Quality Control Plan: The Offeror shall provide a Quality Control Plan (QCP) that addresses how the offeror will establish and monitor performance metrics. The QCP shall clearly articulate how the offeror will populate the data required by the components that comprise the metrics. The QCP shall contain a metric for each performance threshold identified in the service summaries and may use additional indicators for managing the offeror’s processes and operations. Descriptions shall include specifics as to the areas to be inspected on both a scheduled and unscheduled basis, frequency of inspections, the title and organization’s placement of the inspectors, a description of the methods to be used for identifying and preventing defects in the quality of service performed and a description of the records to be kept to document inspections and corrective actions taken. The QCP will be incorporated in the resultant contract.

Sub-factor 1.2: Resource/Personnel Management: The Offeror shall provide a resource/personnel management approach. At a minimum, the proposed approach shall provide the following essential components:

a. Manning: Process for recruiting, hiring, training and retaining a qualified/certified and capable workforce that can accomplish the entire scope of the PWS and handle surges/variables in workload requirements.

b. Organizational Structure: Organization approach and management structure, including an organizational chart reflecting a management and technical understanding of the complexity of the requirement for the overall structure and each of the Tabs. This element shall include the following: number of the offeror’s proposed management team, rationale and methodology to staff the proposed structure, separately identify the Full time Equivalent (FTEs) associated with the fixed price for recurring Real property Maintenance (RPM) and recurring Real property Services (RPS) The plan shall include any cross-utilization and all sub-contractor participation.

c. Inventory Management: An approach to address inventory controls and accountability of material (contract acquired parts), furnishings and Government furnished property (GFP). The approach must demonstrate how the offeror plans to account for, track and update inventory.

3. Functional Tabs:

3.1: Tab A - General

3.2: Tab B - Supply

3.3: Tab C - Vehicle Operations & Maintenance

3.4: Tab D - Traffic Management

3.5: Tab E – Transient Alert

3.6: Tab F - Real Property Management

3.7: Tab G – Fuels Management

3.8: Tab H – Airfield Management

3.9: Tab I – Reserved

IV. VOLUME III – PRICE/FINANCIAL

1. Volume Organization

(a) General Instructions

1. All information relating to the proposed price must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the price/financial volume.

2. An unreasonably high or low total evaluated price may be grounds for elimination of a proposal from the competition.

(b) Exceptions: List any exceptions taken to the pricing requirements stated in this solicitation and state assumption(s) made by the offeror. Provide complete rationale.

(c) Accounting System

1. The contract will include Labor Hour and Cost Reimbursable line items.

2. The Prime contractor must have an accounting system for accumulating and reporting incurred costs under cost type contracts in order to receive an award.

(d) Financial Statement from the offeror’s financial institution certifying that the offeror either has the financial capability to perform the resulting contract or has the means to acquire them.

(e) Pricing Data shall include, as a minimum, the information set forth below:

1. Properly executed (by an official authorized to bind the company) Request for Proposal (SF33), excluding attachments, but including all amendments (SF30) with Section B, and all clause fill-ins completed. The required pricing fill-ins for section B are only for the FFP CLINS, the Labor Hour and Cost Reimbursable CLINs will be funded at the discretion of the Government and do not require a submission by the offeror.

2. A fully completed Pricing Matrix, Attachment 4, both printed and electronic which shall include all prices and rates as follows:

a. The Pricing Matrix workbook has been formatted to allow the offeror to only enter data in the green cells on each sheet of the workbook.

b. On the Summary Page enter the Company’s Name and Cage Code in the upper right hand of the sheet.

c. On the Year 1 – Year 5 sheets enter the monthly price in whole dollars for all of the Firm Fixed Price CLINS under the column entitled “Unit Price/Rate”. Ensure that your price includes all labor and materials necessary to perform the services as described in Section B of this RFP. Additionally, enter the Material Handling Rate that is contained in PWS in the cell under column “Unit Price/Rate.”

d. On the SCA & DBA Labor Rate Sheet for each labor category you are required to submit a Normal Duty Hour (NDH) and Overtime (O/T) rate. Ensure that your proposed rates comply with the Department of Labor Wage Determinations: Attachments 6 thru 10 of this RFP. Failure to propose a NDH and O/T rate for each category may result in elimination from further consideration.

e. On the O&A Labor Rate Sheet for each labor category you are required to submit a Normal Duty Hour (NDH) and Overtime (O/T) rate. Failure to propose a NDH and O/T rate for each category may result in elimination from further consideration.

f. The Pricing Matrix has been designed to print on 8 ½ x 14 pages. The Summary, SCA Labor Rates, DBA Labor Rates, O&A Labor Rates and Year 1 – Year 5 sheets shall be printed on one page in “landscape” orientation.

g. Your electronic copy shall be submitted per ITO paragraph I.E.2.h. The saved document’s file name shall be as follows: “Your Company’s Name” FA6703-16-R-0008, Attachment 4, Pricing Matrix.

NOTE: ALL PRICE INFORMATION SHALL ADDRESS EACH YEAR OF PERFORMANCE.

L-2 TEAMS/JOINT VENTURE

The Government recognizes that the offeror may subcontract or team with other contractors to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The Government will verify the Offeror and its first-tier subcontractors or Joint Venture as a whole when a signed Teaming Agreement, Letter of Intent or Joint Venture Agreement committing all parties to performance under this contract is submitted.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M-1 EVALUATION FACTORS

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. INTRODUCTION. This section outlines the basis for evaluation of the offeror’s capabilities and proposals submitted in response to the solicitation, after evaluation of offeror’s minimum requirements is completed. The evaluation criteria describe the scope of the evaluation to be performed on each proposal. Section L of the RFP describes the proposal content and format requirements.

2. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD:

a. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or sub factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

b. This acquisition is a best value source selection conducted in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (FAR) 15.101-2, Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process.

The Government will select the offeror based on an integrated assessment of the offerors technical proposal and proposed price information. The first step of the evaluation process will be to accomplish a price analysis and all offerors that will be ranked from lowest to highest evaluated price. The second step is determine if their technical proposal is acceptable or unacceptable in accordance with the evaluation criteria. If during this phase the lowest price offeror is determined to be 1) technically acceptable, and 2) price is determined reasonable and balanced; award will be made to that offeror without further consideration of any of the other offerors. If the lowest priced offeror is not found to be acceptable, then the next lowest bidder will be evaluated by the same criteria. This process will continue until a lowest price offer is identified that is technically acceptable.

c. While the Government Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. Proposals will be evaluated based solely on the factors contained in this solicitation.

d. The Government reserves the right to:

(1) Award a contract or make no award depending upon the quality and/or affordability of proposals received in response to the solicitation;

(2) Reject proposals which, upon initial review, are deemed substantially noncompliant with the proposal requirements of the RFP;

(3) Conduct discussions – if the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation, and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.; and/or

(4) Award without conducting discussions.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS

Evaluation Factors and Sub factors: The following evaluation factors and sub factors will be used to evaluate proposals. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors or sub factors.

Factor 1: Technical

Sub factor 1: Quality Control Plan Sub factor 2: Resource/Personnel Management

Factor 2: Price

4. TECHNICAL EVALUATION:

The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each sub factor. Any sub factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical sub factors for each of the PWS functional tabs (A- I) listed in paragraph c. below:

Sub factor 1: Quality Control Plan

Description: The Government will assess the offeror’s proposed Quality Control Plan (QCP). Offeror’s are required to present all the information as stated in Section L – Instruction to Offerors (ITO).

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the QCP contains a metric for each performance threshold identified in the services summaries and includes any additional indicators for managing the offeror's processes and operations, including specifics as to the areas to be inspected on both scheduled and unscheduled basis, frequency of inspections, placement of inspectors, and methods of inspection/prevention/corrections.

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Sub factor 2: Resource/Personnel Management

Description: The Government will assess the offeror’s proposed resource/personnel management approach.

Offerors are required to present all the information as stated in Section L – Instruction to Offerors (ITO).

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal clearly explains the following:

i. A manning process which ensures the offeror will successfully maintain a capable workforce to accomplish the entire scope of effort and successfully handle surges/variables in workload requirements IAW PWS.

ii. An organization approach and management structure which ensure an appropriately qualified, sufficiently staffed workforce to perform all PWS requirements and skill sets. In addition, the offeror’s approach must ensure successful management of all subcontractor performance.

iii. An inventory management approach which ensures all inventory requirements will be met to include the joint inventory at start up. In addition the plan includes how inventory of materials will be tracked and charged to the workorders in Tab C and Tab F.

Functional Tabs:

Tab A – General

Tab B – Supply Tab C – Motor Vehicle Management Tab D – Traffic Management Tab E – Transient Alert Tab F – Real Property Management Tab G – Fuels Management Tab H – Airfield Management Tab I – Reserved

5. PRICE EVALUATION:

The offeror’s Price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness and balance. See paragraphs (a) and (b) below.

Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated in accordance with paragraph (c) below.

(a) Reasonableness: The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of reasonableness. Price analysis techniques may be used to further validate price reasonableness. If adequate price competition is not obtained or if price reasonableness cannot be determined using price analysis of Government obtained information, additional information in accordance with FAR 15.4 may be required to support the proposed price.

(b) Balance: Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of proposal analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether there are unbalanced separately priced line items or sub-line items. Prices submitted will be compared and evaluated to assure that a logical progression exists as related to price and quantity changes within each offeror’s response to the pricing structure in Section B. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(c) Total Evaluated Price: A Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be used for evaluation purposes only and will be calculated as follows:

(1) The extended prices (unit price x quantity) for all of the firm, fixed price CLINs *001 - *013 and the corresponding option CLINs will be totaled.

(2) The “Service Contract Act Labor”, “Davis Bacon Act Labor” and “Over and Above Labor” applicable to CLINs *014 - *019 and *025 - *030, will be calculated as follows: The proposed fully-loaded labor rates set forth in the “SCA Labor Rates”, “Davis Bacon Act Labor” and “Over and Above Labor” worksheets in Attachment 4 shall be multiplied by a predetermined amount of estimated hours for both NDH and O/T hours for each labor category listed in all years. The number of hours used are based on realistic estimates. The extended amounts (fully-loaded labor rate times predetermined amount of hours) will be given a total for each contract period. The same estimated hours apply to all contract periods and are for evaluation purposes only. The quantities used for evaluation purposes are not provided to offerors. The fully-loaded rates proposed by the offerors need to be balanced as defined in paragraph 6(b). Labor categories by NDH or O/T that are considered unbalanced as defined in paragraph 6(b) may be determined unacceptable.

(3) For evaluation purposes only, an estimated lump sum dollar amount of $750,000 per year for reimbursable parts and materials will be used to determine the material-handling fee portion of the total evaluated price. The figure is based on realistic estimates. Evaluation of the material-handling cost is based on the offerors proposed rate times the lump sum dollar amount of $750,000.

(4) The sums derived from Paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) above will be added together to develop each offeror’s “total evaluated price”.

(End of Summary of Changes)