QuestionnaireACHandling12Feb08.DOC
DOC document 101 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5685-07-R-0041
About this file
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 07R00410005.doc | DOC document | |
| 07R00410004.doc | DOC document | |
| R0041-amenddate.doc | DOC document | |
| GHRFP.doc | DOC document | |
| PerformanceWorkStatement22FEB08.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information – iaw FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (offeror shall complete this section and forward to the Contracting Officer) Respondent - Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address: __________________________
Telephone Number: ____________________
Fax Number: ____________________
Email Address: ____________________
Point of Contact: ___________________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _________________________________________________
Contract Number: ____________________ Dollar Amount: $____________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance: __________________________
Contractor performed as the _ Prime Contractor _ Sub-Contractor _ Key Personnel.
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be filled in by respondent) Primary
Alternate Name of Respondent: ____________________ Name of Respondent: ____________________
Title: _____________________
Title: _____________________
Address: _____________________
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: _____________________ Telephone Number: _____________________
Fax Number: _____________________ Fax Number: _____________________
Email Address: _____________________ Email Address: _____________________
SECTION 3: GOVERNMENT POINT OF CONTACT
PLEASE EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY TO:
Mr. Fred Moore – fred.moore@incirlik.af.mil or Mr. Joe Reich – joe.reich@incirlik.af.mil SECTION 4: EVALUATION (to be filled in by respondent) Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| # |
| Rating |
| Description |
| 5 |
| Excellent Performance |
| Contractor’s overall performance is recognizably above satisfactory. Innovative management actions have resulted in tangible benefits to the Government. Strives for continuous performance improvement and is committed to meeting Government goals. |
| 4 |
| Very Good Performance |
| Contractor’s overall performance is slightly above satisfactory. Self-initiated actions have resulted in performance identifiable areas, which clearly exceed the standards of performance expected. |
| 3 |
| Satisfactory Performance |
| Contractor’s overall performance meets established performance standards. |
| 2 |
| Marginal Performance |
| Contractor failed to meet many performance standards. |
| 1 |
| Unsatisfactory Performance |
| Contractor failed to meet most or all performance standards. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Quality of Performance
Q1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
Q2 Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
Q3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
Q4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
Q5 Ability to implement current standard practices for aircraft grounds handling
Q6 Ability to implement current standard practices for other services
Q7 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
Program Management P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Transition/Phase-in
T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Management of Personnel E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Contractual Considerations C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you rated “Excellent” or “Unsatisfactory”.
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes
Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?
What are/were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature
Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to the following e-mail addresses:
fred.moore@incirlik.af.mil or Joe.reich@incirlik.af.mil
FA5685-07-R-0041
Attachment 3, 07 January 2008 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104
- 5 -
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .