Amendment_2_Solicitation_FA568218R0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the solicitation closing date to November 17 2017 at 1200 PM and to make changes in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and in Addendum to FAR 52.212-2. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 31-Oct-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA568218R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Oct-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

31-Oct-2017

CODE

31 CONS LGC - FA5682

VIA PORDENONE 89/B, AREA "E" EDIF. 600

BASE AEREA DI AVIANO

AVIANO (PN) 33081

FA5682 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA568218R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 08-Nov-2017 04:00 PM to 17-Nov-2017 12:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 –INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet ALL solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. In order to be determined responsive an offeror must submit all documentation to demonstrate the following:

1. Acknowledgement of compliance with all solicitation terms and conditions.

2. Acknowledgement of all solicitation amendments

3. Documentation proving good standing and license to operate in the same business sector of this project work scope.

4. Current Documento Unico di Regolarita’ Contributiva (DURC) certifying the payment of host social security benefits. This document must not be older than 120 days from date of proposal.

5. Temporary Office Facility Product Data, Layout, Location Map

6. Quality Control Plan (QCP)

B. In addition to the requirements outlined above required to determine responsiveness of prospective offerors, the proposal shall consist of two additional separate parts;

Factor I - Price Factor II - Technical

C. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists then no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

D. Specific Instructions:

FACTOR 1 – PRICE

1. Proposed Price: Insert proposed unit prices and extended amounts in the “Schedule of Supplies/Services” for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) in the SF1449. The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number of units. Proposed amounts shall be limited to 2 digits after the decimal. All prices shall be submitted in EURO currency. Offers not submitted in EURO currency will not be considered for award. Offers shall be complete, accurate, and sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirement, and be consistent with the offeror’s proposal. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed pricing rests with the offeror.

1.1. Contract Documents. In addition, the offeror’s proposal shall include the following sections from the solicitation in the Price Factor:

a. Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the 1449 for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).The extended amount must equal the whole Euro unit price multiplied by the number of units.

c. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications.

d. The entire solicitation shall be returned in their entirety.

1.2. Offerors shall provide a document listing the name(s), title(s), telephone number(s), and e-mail address(s) of those individuals authorized to make decisions on behalf of the offeror with respect to the proposal and those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government for this solicitation. The offeror shall also provide the official company/division street address, CAGE code, and DUNS number as reflected in the current SAM registration.

FACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL

The purpose of the technical proposal is to provide the Government the ability to evaluate the technical capability of the offeror to perform the requirements of this solicitation. To facilitate evaluation, the information contained in Factor 1 should be specific, detailed, and clearly demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirement for the accomplishment of this effort. All requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By submitting a proposal, offerors are representing that their firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation.

1. Initial Installation Proposed Duration and Summary Schedule (Limited to no more than 20 pages).

a. The Offeror shall include a narrative showing a plan that adequately justifies the capability to complete full installation no later than 01 February 2018.

b. The Offerors shall provide a narrative explanation to include the following:

(1) Installation schedule showing key milestones.

(2) Crew assembly and work schedules during installation period.

2. Initial Installation Management Approach (Limited to no more than 5 pages). The Management Approach shall include the following:

a. An organization chart that shows the lines of authority and communication for the execution of the contract and clearly shows the lines of authority of the Offeror’s Project Manager, Quality Control, and Safety Organization, key positions, (including all Joint Venture (JV) Partners and Key Subcontractors, when applicable). All positions shall be identified on the organization chart by title and organization. The Project Manager (PM), or the on-site person that communicates with the U.S. Government if the PM is not on-site, and any other personnel authorized to communicate directly with the U.S.

Government shall be clearly identified.

3. Experience. Offerors shall submit two (2) attachments: Experience Overview Sheet, Attachment 6 and Experience Information Sheet, Attachment 7, detailing previous work experience (projects) meeting the requirements of this solicitation. Information for completing Attachment 6 and 7 are is as follows:

a. Offerors shall complete an Experience Overview Sheet, Attachment 8, with a total listing of at least two (2), but not-to-exceed three (3) projects performed within the last five (5) years or currently being performed and at least 50% complete, that best represent the Offeror’s work experience required on this solicitation. If more than three (3) projects are submitted, only the first two (2) projects will be evaluated.

b. Offerors shall provide an Experience Information Sheet, Attachment 9, for each project listed on Experience Overview Sheet, Attachment 8. All Experience Overview and Information Sheets must be filled out completely. The information provided in the Experience Information Sheets will be used to evaluate each Offeror’s experience to this requirement. Offerors are responsible for providing project descriptions in sufficient detail to demonstrate performance of efforts involving requirements that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity as the effort described in this solicitation.

1.1. Projects provided for experience must demonstrate experience in performance in Italy or the EU. Each project submitted shall have a value equal to or greater than $100,000 and be of similar complexity/scope of the project in this solicitation. Offerors may submit larger scope contracts if there is a scope of work within the larger project that is similar to this procurement with a separately measurable performance period and measureable monetary value. Offerors shall clearly describe the project and how it related to the overall contract.

4. Lease Management Approach (Limited to no more than 5 pages).

a. The offeror shall include a narrative showing the plan to meet requirements of routine and as-need maintenance and repairs of all leased facilities. This narrative shall include proposed schedules of routine maintenance as well as the plan to meet routine and emergency call-in repairs in accordance with the PWS.

E. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the RFP (CLINs & PWS) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 of this RFP.

3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

4. Format for proposal submissions shall be as follows:

a. The proposals will be no bigger than A4 size paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed A3 size paper.

b. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

c. Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

d. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

e. Submissions of proposals must follow the guidance in the table below:

Submission Method Instructions CD/DVD - Submit the proposal to Building 600, Area E, Via Pordenone 89, 33081 Aviano, Italy in a sealed envelope or package showing the time and date specified for receipt, solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror.

- one (1) original paper copy;

- one (1) redacted paper copy of the Technical Proposal indicated in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, paragraph D, Factor II. A redacted copy removes all direct references that can identify an offeror by name or other easily recognizable characteristic. The redacted copy will be used during source selection procedures as detailed in Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 of the solicitation.

- Electronic copies:

- one (1) original copy; and

- one (1) redacted copy of the Technical Proposal indicated in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, paragraph D, Factor II.

- Electronic copies must be submitted on CD or DVD. Electronic copies may be submitted on the same disk if sufficient capacity is available.

- Flash drives will not be accepted.

Email - Submit to melissa.maurhart.it@us.af.mil; derrick.foote@us.af.mil;

francesco.saponaro.it@us.af.mil;

-5MB size limit per email.

-If sending multiple emails, label each email as “1 of X” “2 of X” etc. so that receipt of all parts can be verified -It is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure the proposal is sent to the correct Government email address.

-one electronic (1) redacted copy of the Technical Proposal indicated in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, paragraph D, Factor II. A redacted copy removes all direct references that can identify an offeror by name or other easily recognizable characteristic. The redacted copy will be used during source selection procedures as detailed in Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 of the solicitation.

- Electronic copies:

- one (1) original copy; and

- one (1) redacted copy of the Technical Proposal indicated in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, paragraph D, Factor II.

Note: Offerors are cautioned that Aviano AB has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED IF HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the contracting office PRIOR to the time specified for receipt.

CURRENCY

A. All prices in response to this solicitation will be in Euro currency.

B. The Contracting Officer has determined that submission of offers in U.S. currency is not required for this solicitation to be entered into and performed outside of the United States. Therefore the requirement for U.S.

currency at provision 52.215-1(c)(5) is not applicable to this solicitation.

PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION

All proposal documentation in response to this solicitation must be submitted in the English language to include summary translations of all documents (DURC, etc.).

OFFER SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Offers in response to this solicitation shall be submitted to reach the issuing office indicated at page 1 of the solicitation, Standard Form 1449 block 9, by the date and time specified in block 8 of the Standard Form 1449.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION- COMMERCIAL ITEMS

SOURCE SELECTION

A. This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix C, 31 March 2016 and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 27 January 2017. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. The Government will select the proposal with the lowest evaluated price from among those meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. Contract(s) may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and sub-factors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

B. The Government intends to award one (1) contract for the performance of this requirement.

C. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, the procedures outlined in FAR 15.306 will be used.

D. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or sub-factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable. In order to be determined responsive an offeror must submit all documentation to demonstrate the following:

1. Acknowledgement of compliance with all solicitation terms and conditions.

2. Acknowledgement of all solicitation amendments

3. Documentation proving good standing and license to operate in the same business sector of this project work scope .

4. Current Documento Unico di Regolarita’ Contributiva (DURC) certifying the payment of host social security benefits. This document must not be older than 120 days from date of proposal.

5.Temporary Office Facility Product Data, Layout, Location Map

6. Quality Control Plan (QCP)

EVALUATION FACTORS

A. The following evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used to evaluate each proposal: Award will be made to the offeror proposing the combination most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and sub-factors described below.

Factor 1: Price Factor 2: Technical

B. Specific Evaluation Criteria:

FACTOR 1 – PRICE

For the purpose of conducting evaluations, the Government will first evaluate all proposals by Total Evaluated Price (TEP). TEP is the sum total of all FFP Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) CLIN 0001 plus CLIN 0002, as well as the 6 month option to extend services which will be calculated at the same monthly contract price of CLIN 0002.

Price evaluation IAW FAR 15.404-1(a) and Technical evaluation will then be conducted on the two lowest priced responsible proposals. If the lower priced responsible proposal of the two is evaluated as technically acceptable, that proposal represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point.

If the lowest priced offer is rated unacceptable, unreasonable or unbalanced the Government will then evaluate the proposals of the next two lower responsible proposals using the same process as outlined in the paragraph. This process will repeat until a proposal is evaluated as technically acceptable and has both reasonable and balanced pricing and then proceed with the evaluation the Technical Proposal. The two lowest priced proposals will be technically evaluated. In the case of technical acceptability the evaluation process will stop and selection for award will be made to the lowest priced of the two acceptable proposals.

FACTOR 2 - TECHNICAL

The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each sub-factor. Any sub-factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, ineligible for award. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

TABLE 2 – TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following criteria:

1. Initial Installation Proposed Duration and Summary Schedule. The Government will evaluate the proposed installation schedule to meet the completion date of 01 February 2018.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when:

a. The proposed installation schedule and installation crew assembly adequately justifies the capability to complete installation no later than 01 February 2018 and logically addresses an understanding of the project scope, including restrictions which must be considered in the schedule (e.g. permitting, long lead times, phasing, etc.) and an understanding of events associated with coordinating submittals.

2. Initial Installation Management Approach. Proposals will be evaluated for logical flow and the extent to which the proposal illustrates a clear understanding of managing the contract and accomplishing all work elements of the project in accordance with the Performance Work Statement. To facilitate evaluation, the information provided should be specific, detailed, and clearly demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirement for the accomplishment of this effort.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when:

a. The proposal contains an organizational chart that clearly delineates lines of authority and communication with the Government, is organized in a precise and logical manner, and includes all offices involved with the management of the contract to include a comprehensive description of duties, roles, major responsibilities, and authorities for all key personnel.

3. Experience. The Offeror will be evaluated on experience with similar work and complexity of this requirement as submitted in the proposal.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when:

a. The contractor submits at least two (2), but not-to-exceed three (3) projects performed within the last five (5) years or currently being performed and at least 50% complete.

b. The projects submitted demonstrate successful performance and completion of projects in Italy or the EU, are equal to or greater than $100,000 in value, and are of similar complexity/scope as the project in this solicitation.

4. Lease Management Approach. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s plan to manage routine and as-needed maintenance and repairs of the leased facilities.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when:

a. The proposed plan shall explain a logical schedule for routine facility and equipment maintenance as well as the plan to meet routine and emergency call-in repairs IAW the PWS

(End of Summary of Changes)