FA5641-18-R-0002.pdf

PDF 392 KB Posted

Attached to
Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services II Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5641-18-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services II, newest first.
File Type Posted
KTR_QUESTION_UPDATED-GOVT_RESPONSE-26NOV18_2.pdf PDF
KTR_QUESTION_UPDATED-GOVT_RESPONSE-26NOV18.pdf PDF
FA5641-18-R-0002-0001.pdf PDF
PWS_20_Nov_2018_track_changes.pdf PDF
ATCH_1__PWS_20_Nov_2018.pdf PDF
KTR_QUESTIONS-GOVT_RESPONSES-21Nov18.pdf PDF
ATCH_1_TA2_PWS_30_OCT_2018.pdf PDF
ATCH_2_Contractor_Security_Specification_(DD_Form_254).pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

FA564118R0002 30-Oct-2018

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

(49) 6371 405 3209

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

07:00 AM 03 Dec 2018

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

FA56419. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

KACIE L. VARNER

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED ORX

SMALL BUSINESS

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

764 SCONS

JEFFERSON AVENUE

BLDG 413

66877 RAMSTEIN-MIESENBACH

GERMANY

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

FAX:

TEL: (49) 631 536 8519 SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$32,500,000

NAICS:

488119

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF46

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

FA564118R0002

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 2 Months Phase-in Period

FFP

Phase-in period for Transient Alert (TA) aircraft services IAW the PWS to include access to Government installations to implement transition/phase-in for the following locations: Ramstein AB, Spangdahlem AB, Germany and RAF Lakenheath, RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom.

Period of Performance: 1 JUL 2019 - 31 AUG 2019 FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 10 Months Base Period-TA Services Ramstein AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Ramstein AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

Period of Performance: 01 SEP 2019 - 30 JUN 2020

PSC Code: J015

0003 10 Months Base Period-TA Services Spangdahlem AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Spangdahlem, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

Period of Performance: 01 JUL 2019 - 30 JUN 2020

0004 10 Months Base Period-TA Services RAF Lakenheath

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Lakenheath, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

0005 10 Months Base Period-TA Services RAF Mildenhall

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Mildenhall, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

1002 12 Months OPTION Option 1-TA Services Ramstein AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Ramstein AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

Period of Performance: 01 JUL 2020 - 30 JUN 2021

1003 12 Months OPTION Option 1-TA Services Spangdahlem AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Spangdahlem AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

1004 12 Months OPTION Option 1-TA Services RAF Lakenheath

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Lakenheath, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

1005 12 Months OPTION Option 1-TA Services RAF Mildenhall

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Mildenhall, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

2002 12 Months OPTION Option 2-TA Services Ramstein AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Ramstein AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

Period of Performance: 01 JUL 2021 - 30 JUN 2022

2003 12 Months OPTION Option 2-TA Services Spangdahlem AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Spangdahlem AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

2004 12 Months OPTION Option 2-TA Services RAF Lakenheath

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Lakenheath, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

2005 12 Months OPTION Option 2-TA Services RAF Mildenhall

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Mildenhall, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

3002 12 Months OPTION Option 3-TA Services Ramstein AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Ramstein AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

Period of Performance: 01 JUL 2022 - 30 JUN 2023

3003 12 Months OPTION Option 3-TA Services Spangdahlem AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Spangdahlem AB Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

3004 12 Months OPTION Option 3-TA Services RAF Lakenheath

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Lakenheath, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

3005 12 Months OPTION Option 3-TA Services RAF Mildenhall

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Mildenhall, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

4002 12 Months OPTION Option 4-TA Services Ramstein AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Ramstein AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

Period of Performance: 01 JUL 2023 - 30 JUN 2024

4003 12 Months OPTION Option 4-TA Services Spangdahlem AB

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for Spangdahlem AB, Germany IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

4004 12 Months OPTION Option 4-TA Services RAF Lakenheath

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Lakenheath, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

4005 12 Months OPTION Option 4-TA Services RAF Mildenhall

FFP

Transient Alert (TA) Aircraft Services for RAF Mildenhall, UK IAW Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS) and workload estimates as provided in Appendix 6.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government 0003 Destination Government Destination Government 0004 Destination Government Destination Government 0005 Destination Government Destination Government 1002 Destination Government Destination Government 1003 Destination Government Destination Government 1004 Destination Government Destination Government 1005 Destination Government Destination Government 2002 Destination Government Destination Government 2003 Destination Government Destination Government 2004 Destination Government Destination Government 2005 Destination Government Destination Government 3002 Destination Government Destination Government 3003 Destination Government Destination Government 3004 Destination Government Destination Government 3005 Destination Government Destination Government 4002 Destination Government Destination Government 4003 Destination Government Destination Government 4004 Destination Government Destination Government 4005 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 01-JUL-2019 TO

31-AUG-2019

N/A N/A

0002 POP 01-SEP-2019 TO

30-JUN-2020

0003 POP 01-SEP-2019 TO

0004 POP 31-JUL-2019 TO

0005 POP 01-JUL-2019 TO

1002 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

30-JUN-2021

1003 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

1004 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

1005 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

2002 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

30-JUN-2022

2003 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

2004 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

2005 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

3002 POP 01-JUL-2022 TO

30-JUN-2023

3003 POP 01-JUL-2022 TO

3004 POP 01-JUL-2022 TO

3005 POP 01-JUL-2022 TO

4002 POP 01-JUL-2023 TO

30-JUN-2024

4003 POP 01-JUL-2023 TO

4004 POP 01-JUL-2023 TO

4005 POP 01-JUL-2023 TO

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-6 Alt I Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government

(Sep 2006) -- Alternate I

OCT 1995

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

OCT 2010

52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-2 Security Requirements AUG 1996 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2016 52.204-14 Service Contract Reporting Requirements OCT 2016 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.204-23 Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities.

JUL 2018

52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation

NOV 2015

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

OCT 2015

52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding

Responsibility Matters

JUL 2013

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items

NOV 2017

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items JAN 2017 52.216-1 Type Of Contract APR 1984 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

52.228-3 Worker's Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act) JUL 2014 52.228-4 Workers' Compensation and War-Hazard Insurance Overseas APR 1984 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.229-6 Taxes--Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts FEB 2013 52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award

Management

JUL 2013

52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014 52.233-2 Service Of Protest SEP 2006 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

52.237-3 Continuity Of Services JAN 1991 52.237-8 Restriction on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals AUG 2003 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-17 Government Delay Of Work APR 1984 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7003 Agency Office of the Inspector General DEC 2012 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information OCT 2016 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7005 Oral Attestation of Security Responsibilities NOV 2001 252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

OCT 2015

252.209-7999 (Dev) Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law (Deviation)

JAN 2012

252.222-7002 Compliance With Local Labor Laws (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels DEC 1991 252.223-7004 Drug Free Work Force SEP 1988 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or

Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.225-7001 Buy American And Balance Of Payments Program-- Basic DEC 2017 252.225-7005 Identification Of Expenditures In The United States JUN 2005 252.225-7041 Correspondence in English JUN 1997 252.225-7042 Authorization to Perform APR 2003 252.225-7043 Antiterrorism/Force Protection Policy for Defense

Contractors Outside the United States

JUN 2015

252.229-7006 Value Added Tax Exclusion (United Kingdom) DEC 2011 252.229-7008 Relief From Import Duty (United Kingdom) DEC 2011 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7007 Limitation Of Government's Obligation APR 2014 252.232-7008 Assignment of Claims (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.233-7001 Choice of Law (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2015)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.;

and

(D) Have , have not , within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,500 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;

head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.

(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.

(End of provision)

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2017)

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

Notice to Offerors: Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

1.1 To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if necessary. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation; alternate proposals will not be accepted. The response shall consist of three (3) separate volumes: Volume I- Technical Proposal, Volume II- Past Performance, and Volume III- Price and Contract. The offer acceptance period shall be a minimum of 180 calendar days.

1.2 Receipt of Proposals: Proposals submitted electronically via e-mail are preferred. Hard copy proposal submissions are not required but shall take precedence over e-mail submissions. Faxed proposal will NOT be accepted. Send proposals to: matthew.mclean.10@us.af.mil, thomas.collins.16.de@us.af.mil, and kacie.varner@us.af.mil. The CO and Contract Specialist’s inboxes are the only point of receipt. No other US Government point of receipt is acceptable, including e-mail servers. Each offeror should allow sufficient time for their proposal to clear the Agency’s e-mail servers and is responsible for timely submission of their proposal. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Word 2013, MS Excel 2013, or MS Power Point 2013, as applicable. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression utility must be included. Please note that e-mail submissions are subject to size and type restrictions, typically limited to less than 2 megabyte in size per e-mail. If multiple e-mails are sent, they must be marked in a manner that allows the Government to verify the number of e-mails that are sent by a single offeror (e.g. 1 of 2, 2 of 2). It is the offeror’s responsibility to verify that the e-mail was received; the offer is complete and can be viewed. The Government neither will be responsible for any offer not received nor any failure of the offeror to verify the receipt of the e-mailed offer.

1.2.1 All volumes that are submitted via mail or handcarried, shall be mailed/handcarried to 764 SCONS:

Geographical Address: APO Address:

764 SCONS 764 SCONS

Attn: Thomas Collins/ Kacie Varner Attn: Thomas Collins/Kacie Varner Ramstein AB, Geb 413, Room 128 Unit 3187, Room 128 66877 Ramstein-Misenbach, Germany APO AE 09094-3187 (When mailing outside of US) (When mailing from the US)

All proposals must be received NLT 03 December 2018, 07:00 hours Central European Time (CET).

1.3 Access to Base Facilities: 764 SCONS is located on an U.S. Air Force installation (Ramstein AB, Germany) and all access to the installation is controlled by the Government. An escort may be required, as access will not be granted solely based on the need to submit a proposal. If necessary, as pre-coordinated with the point of contact listed in paragraph 1.8, the Government may provide a representative to meet the offeror at the gate to the installation to accept the proposal submission. Furthermore, the U.S. Military conducts random exercises which may require total closure of entrance gate and/or utilization of an alternate base entry. Any delay based on access will not be accepted as a reason for late receipt of the proposal by the Government.

1.4 Evaluation Factors and Standards: The addendum to FAR Clause 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (JULY 2013) provides information on the format and content of the proposal package and what items need to be submitted for each volume. The FAR Clause 52.212-2, EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999), provides a complete description regarding the evaluation factor for award.

1.5 High Probability of Adequate Price Competition: The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offerors, the PCO will review this determination and if, in the PCO’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional price information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the PCO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit additional information to the CO for determination of fair and reasonable pricing.

1.6 In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8, Government Contract files, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals.

1.7 The offeror shall apply all appropriate markings to the proposal including those prescribed in FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.

1.8 Point of Contact (POC): The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) and the Contract Specialists are the sole POCs for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns to the PCO and Contract Specialists. The PCO is Matthew McLean at matthew.mclean.10@us.af.mil. Written requests for clarification shall be sent to the PCO, Thomas Collins at thomas.collins.16.de@us.af.mil, and Ms. Kacie Varner at kacie.varner@us.af.mil.

Submit all requests for clarification NLT 19 November 2018, 07:00 hours Central European Time (CET).

2.0 SPECIFIC PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table 1, below. The titles and contents of the parts shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limitation and with the number of copies as specified. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Section will be removed from the proposal and will not be read or evaluated.

Table 1 – Proposal Organization

ELEMENT TITLE FORMAT # OF COPIES MAXIMUM # PAGES

VOLUME I Technical Written/Electronic Original and 2 copies/1 CD 35 as listed below:

Transition /Management Plan

Written/Electronic Original and 2

No more than 15 pages

Past Experience Written/Electronic Original and 2

No more than 5 pages

Quality Control Plan Written/Electronic Original and 2

No more than 15 pages

VOLUME II Past Performance Written/Electronic Original and 2 copies/1 CD

Up to 10 pages (2 pages per contract/reference)

VOLUME III Price/contract to include fill-ins, required information, documents, and records

Written/Electronic Original and 2

No limit

2.2 The page limitation for all volumes is inclusive of all material except: the front and back cover, title page, transmittal letters, tabs and table of contents. When both sides on a page display printing, it shall be counted as two

(2) pages. No material may be incorporated by reference. Any pages in excess of the maximum number specified will be removed from the proposal without being evaluated. Each volume shall contain a table of contents. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. One copy of each part shall be marked “ORIGINAL”.

2.3 All volumes shall contain pages size 8 ½ x 11 inches and text using no smaller than 10 pitch, Times New Roman Font (font size as small as 6 may be used for graphics and organization charts). Pages must have a minimum 1 inch margin for all four margins. Offerors may include 11 x 17 inch foldouts only to display graphics, flow charts, organizational charts, and drawings. Foldouts shall not be used for incorporating more text information per given page. Foldouts will be counted as one page. Larger page size and smaller font size are not applicable to tables.

Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume.

2.4 Each part shall be written on a stand-alone basis, so that its contents may be evaluated with no cross-referencing to other parts of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation that is not found in its designated part will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal part is permitted where its use will conserve space without impairing clarity and the logical flow of the subject matter is maintained.

2.5 Electronic Reference Documents. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web site at www.fbo.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

2.6 Discrepancies/Ambiguities. Should any portion of this solicitation contain a perceived error, omission or otherwise be unclear, the offeror shall immediately email the CO, clearly describing the portion of the solicitation in question and the impact the discrepancy has on the offeror’s ability to prepare their proposal.

3.0 VOLUME I- TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (EVALUATION FACTOR 1)

3.1 GENERAL: Information the offeror deems appropriate to address the technical criteria should be included in the proposal in an orderly format and be consistent with the evaluation criteria for award set forth in the Addendum to FAR Clause 52.212-2 of this solicitation. Proposal paragraphs shall correspond to the below evaluation factor and pertinent Performance Work Statement (PWS). To facilitate evaluation, the information contained in Volume I shall be specific, detailed, and clearly demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirement for the accomplishment of this effort.

3.1.1. SUBFACTOR 1 – Transition/Management Plan - Offerors are required to submit a Transition/Management Plan reflecting the offeror’s approach to phase-in IAW the PWS. The plan shall address the following:

a. The offeror’s process for a 2-month phase-in period that assumes full responsibility for performance at the start of the basic contract period to include the phase-in team organization with position titles, roles, responsibilities and authorities and the methodology for preparing the phase-in team.

b. An approach for personnel recruitment and retention of personnel that will satisfy the requirements of the

PWS.

c. An approach to satisfying security requirements IAW PWS paragraph 6.

d. An approach to compliance with host nation labor and tax laws, and how the offeror will stay abreast of changes to laws during the duration of the contracts period of performance.

3.1.2. SUBFACTOR 2 – PAST EXPERIENCE - The offeror shall provide proof of Transient Aircraft (TA) services relevant to the PWS with a minimum value of $500,000 per year and performed for at least one (1) year within the last five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. The contractor’s experience can be commercial and/or governmental. If a contractor has key personnel who have experience managing transient alert aircraft services relevant to the PWS in accordance with the minimum value and years stated above, documentation and explanation of experience of key personnel must be submitted to be considered. Include the following information for each contract, subcontract:

a. Contracting Agency/Customer

b. Contract Number (for subcontracts, provide the prime contract number and subcontract number)

c. Contract Type

d. Total Contract Dollar Value per Year and Total Amount

e. Date of Award

f. Period of Performance

g. Description of Requirement and its relevance to the Transient Alert Aircraft Services PWS

h. Contracting Officer’s Name or Commercial Customer Point of Contact, Telephone Number and e-mail address

3.1.3. SUBFACTOR 3- QUALITY CONTROL PLAN - The offeror shall provide a quality control plan that addresses the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS), paragraph 11.1.

4.0 VOLUME II- PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (EVALUATION FACTOR 2)

4.1 Volume II shall provide up to five (5) of the most recent and relevant contract citations performed for Government agencies and commercial customers. Each offeror shall provide recent and relevant past performance citations according to the format identified below. A citation is considered to be one contract. An offeror may not provide multiple citations under one contract unless each citation is a separate task order under an indefinite-delivery type contract.

4.1.1 To be recent, the contract citation must have been completed or ongoing within the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation for a minimum of a one (1) year period. Past Performance for contracts exceeding the timeframe for this definition of recency will be excluded from evaluation.

4.1.2 Relevant contract citations include performance of transient alert services for government or commercial customers that are equal to or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity of the requirement described in the attached PWS. Scope and complexity are defined as they relate to the similarities between a given past performance effort and the PWS and appendices located as Attachment 1 of the RFP. Magnitude is defined as contracts for TA services with a minimum value of $500,000, annually.

Offerors shall provide information for each current or previously performed contract which details at a minimum the following items:

a. Company/Division name

b. Product/Service

c. Contracting Agency/Customer

d. Contract Number

e. Contract Dollar Value

f. Period of Performance

g. Verified, up-to-date name, address, email & telephone number of the contracting officer

h. Narrative addressing why performance of the subject contract is relevant to the requirements defined in his solicitation

i. Narrative addressing compliance with contract terms and conditions

j. Narrative addressing customer satisfaction in terms of quality

k. Narrative addressing any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions and any corrective actions taken

4.2 Offerors will be evaluated on their past performance under recent and relevant contracts/subcontracts for support similar to this solicitation. The Government may review the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIPRS) and any other source deemed necessary to obtain additional information that will be used in the evaluation of the offeror’s past performance.

4.3 The Government may contact references other than those identified by the offeror and use information received to evaluate the offeror’s past performance.

4.4 If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangement with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

4.5 Subcontractor/Joint Venture Teaming Partner Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor or partner cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s/partner’s consent.

Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors/partners that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

5.0 VOLUME III- PRICE AND CONTRACT (EVALUATION FACTOR 3)

5.1 No page limit. Complete blocks 12, 17a, 30a, b and-c of the Standard Form (SF) 1449. Enter applicable CAGE code in block 17a, CODE. The “original” copy shall be clearly marked under separate cover. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.

5.2 Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Pricing Schedule for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to include all Option CLINs. All proposed extended CLIN amounts must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. If the offeror fails to provide an extended amount or if the unit price and extended amount do not calculate correctly, the offered unit price will take precedence. The price offered shall be the offeror’s best price for performance of the work as set forth herein.

5.3 Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provisions FAR 52.212-3 shall be completed in www.sam.gov and be current during the 180 calendar day offer acceptance period.

5.4 All proposed unit and extended prices shall be submitted in U.S. DOLLARS currency and the amount proposed shall be rounded to the nearest U.S. DOLLAR. Offers not submitted in the U.S. DOLLAR currency will not be considered for award.

5.5 Acknowledged Solicitation Amendments. Provide all executed SF 30s, or other appropriate amendment acknowledgments (if applicable).

5.6 Six Month Extension of Services. The solicitation contains the clause at FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services. The exercising of this option is not guaranteed and is at the sole discretion of the Government. If it is deemed in the best interest of the Government to exercise this option, the option year pricing of the last exercised option shall apply for the duration of the extension of services.

5.7 Continuation of Essential Services. In accordance with DFARS 252.237-7024, Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services contained in the solicitation, the contractor shall provide with its offer a written plan describing how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services. This plan will not be evaluated as part of the award decision.

5.8 Provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact who can make decisions concerning your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify the individual(s) authorized to negotiate with the Government. Ensure compliance with FAR 4.102, Contractors Signature. The offeror must provide the company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE code and DUNS code.

52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

1. SOURCE SELECTION

a. Basis for Contract Award This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection (FAR 15.101-2) conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12 Acquisition of Commercial Items, FAR Part 15 Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, 01 April 2016, and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3, 25 May 2018. The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by the addendum to FAR 52.212-1 “Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items” of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and subfactors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

Step 1 – The Government will first evaluate all proposals for Total Evaluated Price (TEP) then rank the offerors from lowest to highest TEP. A price fair and reasonable determination will be made on the apparent successful offer prior to award. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement, including the six-month extension available under FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. For evaluation purposes of the six month Option to Extend Services clause, the extended total will be calculated by multiplying the proposed unit price for CLIN 4002 by 50%. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Step 2 – The apparent lowest price proposal will then be evaluated for Technical Acceptability. Proposals must be rated “Acceptable” for all technical subfactors in order to be determined technically “Acceptable”. If the lowest priced offeror’s technical proposal is “Unacceptable,” the next low offeror’s technical proposal will be evaluated, continuing until an “Acceptable” technical rating with acceptable performance is identified.

Step 3 – The lowest priced, technically “Acceptable” offeror’s past performance will be evaluated. If the lowest prices, technically “Acceptable” offeror’s past performance is determined to be “Unacceptable,” the Government will evaluate past performance of the next lowest priced, technically acceptable offer. This process will continue, as needed, until an offer is rated “Acceptable” for past performance.

Step 4 – Once the lowest priced technically acceptable offer with acceptable past performance is identified, an evaluation will be conducted of the next lowest priced offer in order to determine technical acceptability. This evaluation is done to establish a basis that the lowest priced offer is fair and reasonable through competition. The Government reserves the right that if the lowest priced, technically “Acceptable” offeror’s past performance is determined to be “Acceptable,” the evaluation process will stop and the award will be made to the offeror, pending the aforementioned price fair and reasonable determination.

b. Discussions If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

c. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or subfactors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

2. EVALUATION FACTORS

a. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors or subfactors.

Factor 1: Technical Subfactor 1: Transition/Management Plan Subfactor 2: Past Experience Subfactor 3: Quality Control Plan

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Price

b. Technical Factor The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Simply restating the technical criteria within a proposal may result in an unacceptable rating and preclude the vendor from award. Any subfactor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

TABLE 1 – TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical subfactors:

Subfactor 1: Transition/Management Plan – The offeror’s proposed transition/management plan shall fully address each of the areas identified in the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 “Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items, paragraphs 3.1.1, Subfactor 1 and shall describe the offeror’s capability to implement a successful phase-in that timely assumes full responsibility for performance at the start of the basic contract period. Failure to fully address the required information may render the proposal unacceptable.

Standard: The standard is met when the offeror’s proposal clearly documents a thorough understanding of the tasks required for a successful phase-in and documents acceptable processes that lead to the successful and timely start of performance. Acceptable processes are defined as those tasks and procedures that will ensure a successful phase-in.

Subfactor 2: Past Experience: The offeror’s proposed relevant past experience shall fully address each of the areas identified in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 “Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items, Subfactor 2, paragraph

3.1.2 (a) through (h). It shall describe the offeror’s proven relevant experience as a contractor, subcontractor or that of key personnel in managing transient alert aircraft services with a minimum value of $500,000 with performance for at least one (1) year within the last five (5) years. Failure to fully address the required information may render the proposal unacceptable.

Standard: The standard is met when the offeror documents proof of transient alert aircraft services relevant to the PWS with a minimum value of $500,000 per year performed for at least one (1) year within the last five (5) years as described in the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 “Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items, paragraphs 3.1.2. (a) through (h).

Subfactor 3: Quality Control Plan (QCP) – The offeror’s Quality Control Plan (QCP) shall clearly and completely address the areas listed in PWS, paragraph 11.1. Failure to fully address the required information may render the proposal unacceptable.

Standard: The standard is met when the offeror provides a thorough QCP that clearly addresses how the offeror intends to perform the requirements of PWS paragraph 11.1.

c. Past Performance Factor The Past Performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. Offerors must receive a past performance rating of “Acceptable” to be eligible for award.

(1) Ratings. The Past Performance factor will receive one of the ratings described below.

TABLE 2- PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

(2) Evaluation Process. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance to include quality in supplying products and services that meet the solicitation requirements. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to: Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS); Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS); Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; and interviews/questionnaires with Program Managers, Contracting Officers and Fee Determining Officials, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), and commercial sources.

(i) Recency Assessment An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the contract citation must have been completed or ongoing within the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation for a minimum of a one (1) year period. Past Performance for contracts exceeding the timeframe for this definition of recency will be excluded from evaluation.

(ii) Relevancy Assessment As assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is relevant. Relevant contract citations include performance of transient alert services for government or commercial customers that…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it.