PPI Survey.doc
DOC document 55 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA5209-08-R-0043
About this file
PPI Survey
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA5209-08-R-0043.pdf | ||
| Performance Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| PPI List.doc | DOC document | |
| Attach 1 -EXHIBIT.doc | DOC document | |
| NOTICE TO OFFERORS.doc.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA5209-08-R-0043
Attachment 4
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
履行実態調書 Date日付:
FROM: 374 CONS/LGCB
Unit 5228, Bldg 620 Yokota Air Base
Fussa-shi Tokyo 197-0001
The contractor listed below has provided the following project as a reference for past performance. Please provide frank, concise comments regarding your assessment of the contractor’s performance regarding this project. In accordance with FAR 15.306(e)(4), the names of individuals providing reference information about an offeror’s past performance shall not be disclosed. 横田基地契約中隊では在日米軍の業務委託契約において、応札業者の受注実績とその履行内容を落札の選定基準に加えております。つきましては貴殿の率直で簡潔なご意見を頂きたく添付の調書をお送りした次第です。尚、米国連邦調達規則に則り回答者のお名前は公表致されません。
1. CONTRACT INFORMATION: The below listed contractor has identified they provided or are currently providing services for your company/agency. 下記業者より貴殿との業務委託の申告がありました。
a. Contractor (Company/Agency) 契約者:
b. Contractor Address/Phone契約者の住所・電話番号:
c. Prime contractor or subcontract主契約者 または 再委託契約者 (元請/下請)
d. Title of Program/Contract 契約件名:
1) Contract Number 契約番号:
2) Period of Performance 契約期間:
3) Services Provided (explain in detail the type of services provided by the contractor) 業務の内容:
e. Total Contract Amount 契約金額:
2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION: (This information will be kept confidential in accordance with FAR 15.306(e)(4). You may be contacted for additional information pertaining to past or present performance of the contractor identified in section 1 above. ご回答の内容は公表いたしません。審査の手続き上、再度連絡を取らせていただく場合がありますので、ご理解、ご協力お願いします。
a. Compay’s Name会社名:
b. Name and Title お名前と役職:
c. Phone Number 電話番号: _______________ FAX ファックス: ______________
E-mail Address 電子メールアドレス: ___________
d. Address 住所: _________________________________________
e. Relationship to Project 契約案件における地位: ________________________________________________
f. Length of Involvement in Project 契約案件の担当年数: ______________
g. Date Questionnaire Completed 回答日: ___________
3. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: When responding to the descriptive statements, choose the rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. If the statement is not applicable, circle “NEUTRAL”. The ratings correspond with the following descriptive values. 下記の説明に最も近いと思われる評価を項目別にご回答願います。履行内容に含まれない場合“NEUTRAL”をお選び下さい。
RATING SCALE 評価の目安
(E)xceptional (超優良): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. 契約内容を満たした上でさらに多くの利益を顧客に与えた。対象の業務は業者の有効な是正措置で問題なく完了した。
(V)ery (G)ood (大変満足): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. 契約内容を満たした上でさらに、高い満足が得られた。 対象の業務に軽微な問題が生じても、業者は有効な是正処置を取って完了した。
(S)atisfactory (満足): Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. 契約要件は満たしている。履行中に軽微な問題が生じたが、業者の是正処置は満足であった。
(N)eutral (どちらでもない): Did not observe performance in this area. 履行内容に該当なし。
(M)arginal (不満): Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. 履行は一部不完全であった。対象の業務に、業者の是正手段の不備による重大な欠陥がある。業者の改善策は有効でないか十分に実行されていないと思われる。
(U)nsatisfactory (大変不満): Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-elements being assessed reflects a serious problem for which corrective actions were not accomplished. The contractor did not take any corrective actions. 契約内容を満たしておらず、期間内に改善の見込みなし。契約した業務は完了せず、業者は是正処置を怠った。
(Circle One) いずれかに「(」を付けてください
a. How efficient was the contractor in providing all required contract
E VG S N M U
correspondence? (e.g., quality plan, reports)
契約者の対応、書類等の提出。
b. How did the contractor retain experienced managers and
E VG S N M U
supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements? 責任者の経験、技能及び現場管理能力。
c. To what extent was the required contract correspondence
E VG S N M U
accurate and complete? 契約者の連絡内容の確実性。
d. How effective were the contractor’s quality control and/or
E VG S N M U
inspection procedures. 契約者の品質管理能力。
e. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance
E VG S N M U
problems without extensive guidance from procurement or technical personnel? 契約者独力での問題解決能力。
f. How well did the contractor substantiate pricing data for change
E VG S N M U
orders/modifications. 別注文や契約変更時における契約者の価格の透明性。
g. If a warranty issue arose, to what extent did the contractor provide
E VG S N M U
timely assistance. 契約者の保証期間中の対応。
h. Was the contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
YES
NO
If yes, explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
契約者の過失により契約を解除したことがある。
i. Were any complaints from employees or subcontractors received concerning
YES
NO
non-payment by the prime contractor? If yes, explain.
契約者の再委託業者-下請け業者-への未払い問題があった。
j. Would you hire this contractor again? If no, why?
YES
NO
契約者と再度契約を結びたいと思いう。
k. Overall Rating 総合評価:
E VG S N M U
l. Additional Comments/Remarks その他:
Please fax or e-mail completed questionnaires to the address shown below:
下記のファックス番号もしくは、電子メールアドレスにご回答の返送お願いします。
374 CONS/LGCB
Unit 5228, Bldg 620 Yokota Air Base
Fussa-shi Tokyo 197-0001
Atten: kumie.aoki
Fax: 042-552-9846
Tel: 042-552-3010
DSN 225-7545
E-mail address:
kumie.aoki.jp@yokota.af.mil
197-0001
東京都 福生市 在日米軍 横田基地内
建物番号620 374契約中隊
青木久美江 ファックス: 042-552-9846
電話: 042-552-3010
電子メールアドレス:
kumie.aoki.jp@yokota.af.mil
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .